Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

"Chapman" Competition Rules Question


Note: This thread is 2502 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I do not believe the USGA has a set of Rules for "Chapman" competitions.  By "Chapman", I refer to a team game where a 2-man team each tee off, then switch and hit each other's ball on the second shot and then finally, select one of the balls and alternate shots until holed.  There are other names for this game but many of us use "Chapman."

The questions deals with penalty strokes taken and the right to choose which ball to play after two shots.  In the scenario, Player A hit a long tee shot and player B hits a very short drive.  Player A lays up short of a cross hazard for his second, using Player B's tee shot.  They move forward and discover player A's tee shot went too far and is in the hazard.  They drop out and player B prepares to hit.

The opposing team states that if Player B hits, the team must pick-up the other ball.  Because they dropped and took a penalty, player B is hitting the team's 3rd shot.  They have no option to use the "lay up" ball once a 3rd shot is made.

It sort of makes sense to me.  Player B is going to hit the 3rd shot, whether they play either ball.  It would not be reasonable to allow player B to hit both balls and then choose one of those.

Anyone know for sure how it should work?

Brian Kuehn

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

You won't find an answer in the rules of golf, so it really comes down to how the committee who organizes the tournament wants to handle that situation. My suggestion would be to phrase the rule such that each team gets two strokes at each ball (a "stroke" being defined as a swing/chip/putt but not a penalty) and then a decision must be made. 

So in the case you describe above, Player B would hit from the drop area. Then the team would get to choose whether to play that shot (lying 3) or the layup (lying 2). 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Also known as Pinehurst or American Foursome

Conventionally, each player's second shot is with the others' ball (or substituted) ball in play

Edited by Rulesman

  • 2 months later...
Posted
On 10/23/2018 at 5:12 PM, Big C said:

You won't find an answer in the rules of golf, so it really comes down to how the committee who organizes the tournament wants to handle that situation. My suggestion would be to phrase the rule such that each team gets two strokes at each ball (a "stroke" being defined as a swing/chip/putt but not a penalty) and then a decision must be made. 

It is probably a good idea to mention that the "Chapman" format seems to have different versions if you search the internet. Sometimes called Chapman, and other times called Modified Chapman, Pinehurst, or Modified Pinehurst, it all really comes down to what is documented in the rules sheet prior to the tournament starting and how well a job the committee did in documenting it because it is not governed by the rules of golf. So is yours really Chapman? Who knows, but if your specific condition was not documented very specifically in the rules sheet prior to the tournament then it is up to the committee on how to rule.

At our club we play this format a few times a year. Both players hit their drives, they switch to their partners ball to hit the second shot, and then they choose which ball to finish the hole with. The third shot is chosen "officially" when either the un-chosen ball is picked up, or the chosen ball is put into play by one of the team members. On our rules sheet it says that if a shot or stroke is lost or unplayable, and a drop is taken, the drop is not only counted as a stroke and recorded as part of the total strokes for the hole, but the drop is an act of putting the ball in play. Thus at our club, the choice is made if the ball is dropped and a team member is now hitting greater than 2.

These types of formats, although a lot of fun, can get difficult when there is a rules issue. Unfortunately, it is the nature of the beast. 


Posted

Oh the things you learn here...I didn't have a clue something like this existed.  

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 1/12/2019 at 6:07 PM, Rulesman said:

The Pinehurst System is a fun golf format, especially for two partners of differing abilities. Here's how to play it, plus its several alternate names.

The USGA recognise it in the USGA Handicap Manual 

Although it may be true that it is recognized as a format, the USGA does not provide rules for this format other than those provided for Stroke Play and Match Play. Thus the OP's question is not answered by the link provided or the Chapman link that the link refers you to. I believe from playing this format in the past that the OP's opposing team is correct and the fair thing to do would be that a 3rd shot would nullify the other ball from being a choice, but again a good committee would define what happens in this situation so there is no confusion and in the event they did not, they are required to make a ruling once brought to their attention.

I can't imagine how thick the book would become if the USGA addressed the unique rules for each and every format that exists at the club level. This is one of the reasons the committee exists.


Note: This thread is 2502 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The term I hear most often is "double teeing" which means the course/club has starting times from both the #1 and #10 tee.  I have encountered this many times and we know if we are the first group off #10, we may well get to #1 and have to wait because there are groups still with tee times yet to tee of #1.  In most instances, where the course/club has a starter, he normally explains this situation.  In this case, the pro advised what you would could/would encounter making the turn to #1.  And, that is exactly what happened.  Probably would have been wise to talk to the pro after playing back 9 and ask when you could go off #1 since apparently that club does not double tee.   Regardless, the outburst towards the other group was uncalled for.  And, I don't blame the member for being upset.  As a member of a private club, you are responsible for the actions of your guest.  I have played many times as a guest in the UK and I am pretty damn sure my host was responsible for my actions while at the club.  I know at the clubs I have belonged to here in the US, that is the way it is.  As a matter of fact, the member may find himself being brought before management and facing possible suspension.  So, I don't blame him for being upset.  However, as the host, he really should have stepped up and put a stop to the OP's actions.  OP makes this statement "I now understand that standards are different on the "private course." But I'll take those lessons to the muni, too."  No, the standards are not different.  You, sir, seem to be just a bit hard headed and belligerent, even if you are college professor...which possibly explains a lot.   JMHO
    • Day 32: worked for about 10 minutes on my drill. Filmed it as well for a check in. I think it’s slightly better but still seeing some issues. 
    • Day 44 (26 Dec 25)  -  played in the Friday men’s shootout with a twist - used the Toney Penna persimmons and MacGregor blades - had a blast playing these clubs.  They really help in zoning in on making solid ball contact.  Scoring was solid - had several looks at birdie and had a few par saves.  Overall a day of focused course management. 
    • Day 2: 2025.12.27 Eighteen holes at Kauri Cliffs. Focusing on trying to keep flex in right leg during backswing.
    • Day 136 12-26 Had a different practice planned today but life happened. Worked on "wide to wide" and still working on remaining flowy. Starting the club head in front of the ball as a drill, is helping with the flow of the swing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.