Jump to content

Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, Carson Brady said:

Anyone know the year of these MTs?

1968. Pretty sure.

  • Thumbs Up 1

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 minutes ago, Carson Brady said:

Cool. If I clean up do they have any value?

Just make sure you sell them to a pro golfer.  Amateurs are not allowed to use this grip.


6 minutes ago, Carson Brady said:

Cool. If I clean up do they have any value?

Just to be clear.....there is pretty much no such thing as "collectable" golf clubs or valuable old golf clubs unless they have some specific link to a VERY famous golfer.

Old golf clubs are not in short supply.

  • Thumbs Up 1

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


7 hours ago, Shorty said:

Just to be clear.....there is pretty much no such thing as "collectable" golf clubs or valuable old golf clubs unless they have some specific link to a VERY famous golfer.

Old golf clubs are not in short supply.

Person. But yes @Carson Brady, very seldom are old golf clubs of any value. And with golf clubs, rare usually means nothing as well.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

@GAA

I have a set of Armour 234 iron master irons exactly like yours and the 234 woods. 

The shaft bands do not indicate a flex for what I can tell, they just say Macgregor Tru-Flexion. Do you have any info on this shaft, is this similar to an S flex or R? 

Also, any idea what these retailed for in 1964? The clubs are beautiful to me, leather grips and all, but I was curious on retail to determine if these were considered pro level clubs or budget irons for this era. 

I am excited to play these clubs and was encouraged by your post with hopes of learning more about them. Thanks much. 


1970/71/72 MacGregor MT complete set 1-SW.  This is an 11 club set in nearly mint condition with clubs 1-10 iron plus a sand wedge.  Original grips.  Not really of concern whether they are worth anything, I just think they are beautiful clubs with clean and unique ferrules.  

IMG_1205.jpeg

IMG_1206.jpeg


  • 4 weeks later...

I pulled out an old set of irons I received as a gift in the early 60's from and uncle, who had lost the 8 iron. This set, minus the 8, is the MacGregor MT, Tourney Colokrom, REC M75. I was getting ready to donate to Goodwill, but wondered if someone who understands this line has a better idea for what I should do with these clubs. I also have a set, 2 - 9, of the Walter Hagen Haigs I am getting ready to part with as well.

Your thoughts?


  • 1 month later...

I'm  pretty certain that is a 1974 Macgregor Tourney iron. I bought a 2-10 full set that year at the Fort Sam Houston golf course pro shop. Mine had the Propel shaft. I remember hating the irons as to me they had no feel to them. Sorry it is a very late response but just saw the post.


  • 3 weeks later...

Hey all, new guy here. If I wanted to explore purchasing a set of vintage MacGregor irons, 1970 on back. What would you choose and why?


(edited)
13 minutes ago, DaveD28 said:

Hey all, new guy here. If I wanted to explore purchasing a set of vintage MacGregor irons, 1970 on back. What would you choose and why?

Are you buying these to play with, or as a collector's item?

Oh, and welcome to the forums.

Edited by Double Mocha Man
  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

The more you use them the less they are a collector's item.  As mentioned before in this thread, old golf clubs do not carry much value, unless the were used by someone famous, verified.  


I just purchased a set of 1958 MacGregor Tommy Armour SS2 copper plated irons. Hopefully I’ll have them Saturday for the driving range. My reasoning for these vintage irons is to feel what golfers felt many years ago. My Sim Max OS Irons are very forgiving. I want something different to work with. David 

C2193EC5-84EF-4CCF-A3BF-F98A69A40D15.png


2 minutes ago, DaveD28 said:

I just purchased a set of 1958 MacGregor Tommy Armour SS2 copper plated irons. Hopefully I’ll have them Saturday for the driving range. My reasoning for these vintage irons is to feel what golfers felt many years ago. My Sim Max OS Irons are very forgiving. I want something different to work with. David 

C2193EC5-84EF-4CCF-A3BF-F98A69A40D15.png

That will be fun.  Don't forget the metal spikes.  J/K.  Let us know how it goes.  I have a wood-headed McGregor driver passed on by my dad that I take to the range every once in a while.


(edited)
On 3/29/2022 at 7:37 PM, DaveD28 said:

Both

Depending on your height, they will likely need to be lengthened and regripped to play decent for you. Depending on how old you go, the irons were significantly shorter (about 1 inch). I like the shape of the Macgregor Colokrom's. They are reasonably priced. Great look and good solid strike feel. These sets were made in the early 50's and remade in the early 80s.If your looking for something more collector-ish I may recommend a set of Byron Nelson Tourneys or Tommy Armour .

Edited by topoftheline89

WITB:

:ping: G25 8.5 with Hazardous black stiff shaft. Anser 3W 15 degree

 :mizuno: MP-14 3-9. 51* Mizuno, :cleveland:54* Cleveland RAW ,60*  588 :odyssey: #2 Stricker special


(edited)
On 3/30/2022 at 5:26 PM, DaveD28 said:

I just purchased a set of 1958 MacGregor Tommy Armour SS2 copper plated irons. Hopefully I’ll have them Saturday for the driving range. My reasoning for these vintage irons is to feel what golfers felt many years ago. My Sim Max OS Irons are very forgiving. I want something different to work with. David 

C2193EC5-84EF-4CCF-A3BF-F98A69A40D15.png

My 8 iron. 100-120 yards average. Original grips.

Edited by DaveD28
Wrong title description

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 8: 12/17/2024 Okay I took my new PPJ swing thought to the range today. I wasn't sure I was quite ready to do so, but I'm glad I did.  When I got it right it was good... really good. When I got it wrong it was a major fail. I hit lots of really ugly ones. But I didn't let that deter me. I stayed committed and focused on the PPJ and I avoided any temptation to go back to what I was doing before just so that I could "look" better at the range. I'm pretty excited about what I saw when I got it right.  I hit the 6 iron mostly (nearly all block work today). I also hit about 6 balls each with the PW, 8I, 5W and Driver. Those had varying degrees of success. I did crack one drive that let me feel and see what the changes will look like once I get fully trained.  Anyway, I'm going to go back to the mirror work for a couple of more days before bringing it back to the range. I do feel like if I can get this right my swing will improve a lot. So I think its worth the effort. I liked the way it looked on GEARs when I get it right, and I like the results I got at the range when I got it right. Now the goal is to work towards getting it right more often. 
    • So I think it's that they can't just bend the shaft or hosel to get it to a new lie angle. They adjust that and it changes the weighting, so they have to then adjust all the weights to get it balanced again. I get the impression that it's a bit of an iterative process and they do it all in the US, so they're paying US labor costs to build it and make it work how it's supposed to. Whether you believe in the tech or not, I think that's a true statement.
    • Ah, the old EE in the backswing move. Chest going back and staying down doesn't help.
    • Extremely outward path with a very closed club face. Maybe unless you have a stupidly weak grip, like right hand way over top, I don't think the grip is necessary highly correlated to this. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...