• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Big_M

ProV1's - Enough Already

161 posts in this topic

OK... this is a little bit of a rant...

Why the hell does every two bit hack of a golfer with a little money need to play these balls. 90% of golfers out there won't see any significant difference between a ProV1 and say an NXT Tour, HX Bite, or Top-Flite Gamer for that matter. So why pay double the price? I know some people have money to piss away, but it just doesn't make any sense to me. Especially if you're a 14 handicap slicer... go play a frigging low spin ball that'll reduce that slice and cost less than half the price. Maybe I'm overreacting, but it just drives me nuts seeing so many people extol the greatness of a ball that probably isn't all that suited to thier game or one that they can't tell the difference between it and any other ball in the first place.

just had to get that off my chest... sorry
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Marketing, marketing, marketing. I saw a thread somewhere that talked about which brands are bad about "brainwashing" golfers. Titleist has to be number one with the ProV line of balls.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

my thoughts exactly. thats why i like to play with Precept Laddie X's. $19.99 for 24 balls. i think its ridiculous when i see all these amateur golfers who will only buy brand new ProV's to play with. give me a break. i cant tell the difference between the Precept Laddie X and a ProV at all.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love that hackers play them. I can go in the bush and get them free.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a 14 handicap (not a slicer) who plays Pro V1's. Perhaps a less expensive ball will perform just as well for me but why should you care? Golf is my hobbie and I'll buy the balls and equipment I damn well please.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK... this is a little bit of a rant...

I can sort of see your point but, I tend to prefer softer balls because otherwise during putting it feels like a rock. I can certainly tell between different types of ball but not brands, or models per se. A bit like champagne, I know when I'm tasting swill or when it is good stuff but I couldn't tell you much of a difference between a '88 Krug and a '95 Krug

I tend to only use Pro V1s on shorter par 3s, anything less than a 6 iron and/or if it is playing off an elevated tee box down onto a green. An ex-girlfriend of mine lived beside a golf course and her garden ran down the length of a par 5. Her garage was full of golf balls and she'd let me take sacks of them home with me when I'd go over to see her. She was even kind enough to arrange them by brand. This was 6yrs ago and I've not bought a golf ball since. It was a good chance for me to try out lots of different types of golf balls.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK... this is a little bit of a rant...

I agree with the statement about the ProV vs the NXT Tour.

I don't agree that all 14 handicappers are slicers. You really should pick your ball based on your spin needs as the driving distance on each ball is not that varried accross the entire industry. I know that the more greens I miss the more control I need around the green. I also know that the ProV is not the only ball that can give me the spin I need to get up and down on a hard green. Plus there is the entire issue, for us low ball hitters, of actually NEEDING spin off the driver (assuming we don't hit the bananna ball). So good rant.....but I only half agree...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have ProV1s that I practice my wedges/putting with. I like the feel. They seem to stop on the green for me, versus the rocks from the range or the balls I actually play.

However, I use TM Burners when I play which have medium spin. When they hit the ground, I get craters on the green or just off of the fringe with wedges. I cannot imagine how the ProV1s will react.

I am not brave enough to hit a $4 ball into the trees for someone to take.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use TM Burners when I play which have medium spin. When they hit the ground, I get craters on the green or just off of the fringe with wedges.I cannot imagine how the ProV1s will react.

I usually find singe marks in the grass where mine have landed

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK... this is a little bit of a rant...

Ego

And like Klaymon says, killer marketing.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a 14 handicap (not a slicer)

I agree with the statement about the ProV vs the NXT Tour.

Easy fellas... I never meant to imply that all 14 cappers were slicers... all I was saying is that someone who is a 8, 12, 16, etc. probably doesn't see all benefits a ProV has to offer. I was also noting that someone who has trouble with side spin (hookers and slicers) might be better off with lower spinning balls like NXT Extremes, HX Hots, and Bridgestone e6s. Certainly many 14+ cappers are straight hitters... and ProV's might be right for some 18 cappers who maybe lack distance, but have a great short game or wedge game, or need the extra feel or spin... but, I KNOW for a FACT that many of the people who play ProV's do so not because it makes them better, but for other reasons (ego, money no issue, advertising, player X plays them, image, etc.). Like I said, my post was a rant, but I stand by the premise that Prov's are over used by MANY (not all) people who don't need them and maybe aren't even suited for them.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was also noting that someone who has trouble with side spin (hookers and slicers) might be better off with lower spinning balls like NXT Extremes, HX Hots, and Bridgestone e6s.

Points taken and agreed with!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see plenty of ugly golfers with nice shirts. What can you do?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought 12 dozen mint pro-v1 for $150. Hacks like me can play tour balls and not worry about draining a $5 ball in the drink or slicing one deep in the woods.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK... this is a little bit of a rant...

Why did you have to get that off your chest?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont play pro Vs unless I find them, but I play tour balls pretty exclusivley. I do definetely notice a difference off the clubface I dont care what anyone says. Honestly I notice the different feel of a distance ball probbaly off the putter face more than anything.

But why do you care, I mean i sort of agree with the sentiment that its great bad players play good balls and leave them there for me to find.

If your gonna rant about something rant about people getting down on the ground and lining up their third putt for triple bogey like it was a birdie putt for the masters.......and then missing making me wait all the while
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

. someone who has trouble with side spin (hookers and slicers) might be better off with lower spinning balls like NXT Extremes, HX Hots, and Bridgestone e6s. .

I agree with your point here. In fact, I disliked Pro V1's a couple of years ago when I was learning to play and didn't hit straight. Higher spinning balls exaggerated my slice/hook and a distance ball better suited my game.

Your post implied that 14 handicaps are hacks and only expert golfers should play quality balls. I'm tired of that type of BS.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a 14, and I fade the ball. Sometimes I slice it. I play Pro v's. I'm not on the green in regulation very often. I rely on wedges and putter to have a decent round. I love the feel off both. That's why I play them.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Golf Evolution
  • Posts

    • 2016 TST Initiative: Forward Tees Tournament
      In Lowest Score Wins, we recommend that golfers play from the forward tees in order to experience "breaking 80" for the first time, or shooting 65, or having more birdie putts than they've ever had, or whatever. This year, in 2016, we're taking it one step farther: we're encouraging everyone here to work with the head pro at your home course (or, if you play multiple courses, the head pro at each of them!) and to set up a serious "Forward Tees Tournament." A Forward Tees Tournament (FTT) will be: FUN! Enlightening Unique Challenging I'll give anyone who creates and/or participates in a FTT this year the special achievement/award seen to the left. Anyone with this award will be entered to win a TST prize to be determined at the end of the year (and I'll do my best to make it a fairly good prize, but that shouldn't be the main reason why anyone should do this). You can play: With or without handicaps. With or without brackets/divisions/flights. Stroke play or match play. 18, 27, 36, 54+ holes. One day, two days, three days. Etc. I think golfers will love playing in this type of tournament. I think it will challenge them to think about how they play and score. I think it will result in faster play, more fun, more birdies, more chances to hit 7-iron into par fives and feel like a Tour player for once, and… lower scores (or higher scores for the dumb players!). So there you have it. What can you do from here? Pledge here in this thread to talk to your head pro. Recruit your buddies and local golfers to play in your event. Work with your head pro to make the event a success. Play in the event! Post here after your tournament has been played to claim your super-exclusive award/achievement! I'm in. I'll be doing this, hopefully at multiple courses this year. Are you?
    • Posting old scores
      I haven't had an official handicap for about 15 years because in the past several I've only been able to play 6-8 times per year. This year I joined a club so that I could play in tournaments and since I need five scores to get a handicap, I entered some scores in GHIN from my last few rounds in 2015 (since I play so rarely, I can remember them). When I was doing this, I forgot to change the date when posting a score from August so it defaulted to today and is now my most recent reported score. GHIN won't let me change the entry but says to "contact my club" to fix it, which seems like a hassle for everyone involved. It's not my lowest score but it's close, so it will probably be included in my handicap calculation for quite a while unless the date is changed. How big of a deal is this?
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Another thing is sometimes to 'give up' on par. For example, as a bogey golfer, if I hit a bad tee shot and end up say 220yds from the hold on a par 4 rather than the usual 130yds, play the hole as if bogey is the new par. You've made the hole more difficult for yourself and rather than trying to hit the green with a 3 wood (a green designed to be hit with a mid/short iron), take 2 shots to get on the green and 2 shots to get down. 1 220yd par 4 is an easy hole (could even make birdie (which becomes par and a great save) whereas a 220 yd par 3, not off the tee, is asking for trouble. Not always the best way to play golf (read Lowest Score Wins) but the best way to avoid blowing up.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      Find it yourself please. I don't think that would provide much insight. Courses, technology… all very different. Too many differences. People who qualify for the Opens rarely actually compete for them. The winners and top finishers almost always come from those who qualify automatically. I'm not. Very few foreign golfers played on the PGA Tour in the 60s. It's been steadily growing - and travel has made it easier, too - through to now. And even now we're starting to see Asian golfers really take over. The only Asian golfer many could name who competed against Nicklaus was Isao Aoki. Maybe Jumbo Ozaki. I'm just talking about the number of golfers. There are a ton more now. I don't care. I realize perhaps your condition forces you to take everything literally, but I wasn't being literal here. The PGA Tour takes the best 150 players or so out of X. As X grows, the amount of separation between those top 150 players narrows. We're in a very narrow phase right now. When Jack was playing, the gap was significantly wider. No. Tiger was quite a bit more dominant and "above" even MORE highly competitive fields. Both halves of that are true: Tiger won by larger margins and against stronger fields. I agree. And I've said similar things. No…? You don't say? (On page 273 of a thread doing just that…)? You seem to be the only person who regards WGCs as weaker fields that offer a "competitive break." It says a lot about how others should consider your opinions on strength of field. You're assuming or haven't read many of my posts in this thread, because I've said several times that I'd put it within a few points of 50/50. Maybe 55/45. Hardly what I'd call "strong." Of course we're both "estimating." Tiger's record, IMO, against significantly stiffer competition, puts him ahead. Not by a lot. Not really. If only 30 players had a realistic chance to win a tournament, adding players beyond that 30th player does little to affect the strength of the field. The WGCs could add 200 club professionals that would never win and… the strength of field would remain exactly the same. Where have I said this? Because even if I did, it doesn't support whatever you're trying to force it into supporting here. The odds of a club pro beating anyone on the PGA Tour these days are slim to none. They were slightly more likely back when fewer "A" players played the PGA Tour… like in the 60s and 70s. A "C" player's game almost never varies enough - not for four days - to beat even 10 or 15 "A" players. Here's an opinion, but one I could probably back up if I cared enough to take the time (I do not): a modern WGC has a stronger field than many (perhaps all) of the majors Nicklaus won. I've said this before, and will say it again here: In Jack's day, there were maybe 10-15 "A" players, 25 "B" players, and the rest were "C" players. Today there are 100+ A players and the rest B players. I'm also going to request, mostly because of the number of times I've had to repeat myself in this thread, that you not quote or respond to me, @natureboy, in this thread. I'm not keen on repeating myself about something that, ultimately, I don't care that much about. It is what it is, their records are what they are, and they could only beat the guys they played against.
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Never try to hit through trees, always just get back to the fairway.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries