Jump to content
IGNORED

Wilson Staff Fluid Feel Tour Model Blades


Recommended Posts

I was browsing one of the local golf shops yesterday, my eye was initially caught by a set of TM MB TP Smoke irons. Gorgeous, more blade-like than many pure blades, despite the small cavity. In pretty good shape, hit well, and a good price at $450, but I didn't need another set of irons, especially for any significant amount of money. I moved over to the lower priced used clubs, and amongst the sea of PINGs and Callaways I found a set of Wilson Staff Fluid Feels 3-PW (appears to be the 1984-1986 model according to the internet). They were filthy (unrelated question-what golf shop doesn't bother to clean any of its used clubs?), and in desperate need of new grips, but appeared to be in good shape otherwise. I hit the 3 iron, 5 iron, 8 iron, and PW in the hitting bay, and they felt about 98-99% as good as the TM MBs. The price? $39! I brought them up to the front and said I wanted them re-gripped with red 2G Tour Wraps. The salesman said "$39? The grips will cost nearly as much." I said I couldn't pass them up at that price and the grand total with new grips, installation, and tax was $72. The salesman said "these are really hard to hit," and I couldn't help but respond "unless you're swinging them right!" We agreed that a "new" set of blades with brand new grips for less than the cost of 1 used club was a more than decent deal. They certainly don't look forgiving, but I figure if I can handle 1982 Titleist Tour Models I'll make due with these (if anything they look slightly more forgiving than the Titleists). I cleaned 'em when I got home and they look like forged irons that have been used for about 5 seasons, so a screaming deal in my opinion for clubs that are a real piece of history. I'm not jingoistic about my golf clubs, but the complete lack of new American forged (or cast) irons makes these extra special. I have zero need but now want a vintage set of MacGregors and Hogans to fill out my collection. I guess there are worse and more expensive hobbies...
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I actually played these in the old days, it is a great set and they are not as hard as they look like.

Enjoy !

  • Like 1

Cal Razr Hawk 10.5 | TM Superfast 3W | Adams Idea Pro Black 20 | MP-68 3-PW | TW9 50/06 + 58/12 | Ram Zebra Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Thanks-I'm taking them to the range this afternoon so we'll see how it goes.  My absolute lowest rounds have been with cavity backs, but my average round is about the same cavity back versus blade.  But the range usually tells the story.  When I first got my Titleist Tour Models I went to the range immediately and hit more than my share (much more) of hosel rockets.  I'm an advocate of blades and GI clubs, but I will agree that blades certainly mandate a ball first strike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



You are absolutely correct, took 'em to the range and they weren't very hard to hit, certainly more forgiving than the Titliest Tour Models.  Really, really soft-I got no "blade vibration" even on slightly thin shots.  Shaft labels are mostly rubbed off, so I can tell that they're Dynamic Golds, but not whether they're regular or stiff.  No matter, my shots went straight, they felt great, and they're in the bag now.

Originally Posted by Gerald

I actually played these in the old days, it is a great set and they are not as hard as they look like.

Enjoy !



Link to comment
Share on other sites


Wilson Staff Forged!  Welcome to the club!!

(My forged cavity back RM's suddenly make me feel like I'm cheating)

  • Like 1

 :macgregor: V Foil 8.5*    :tmade: Mid Rescue 16*  -- :wilsonstaff: RM  2 thru Wedge -- :vokey: 56/10  -- :scotty_cameron: Studio Design 2  & a  :srixon: Z Star 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I hit 'em at the range again today, just incredibly soft feeling irons.  For some reason my swing was grooved for long irons-I hit the 1 iron and 3 iron better than the PW (couldn't stop chunking).

Link to comment
Share on other sites


see my sig-gotta love em.

Don

In the bag:

Driver: PING 410 Plus 9 degrees, Alta CB55 S  Fairway: Callaway Rogue 3W PX Even Flow Blue 6.0; Hybrid: Titleist 818H1 21* PX Even Flow Blue 6.0;  Irons: Titleist 718 AP1 5-W2(53*) Shafts- TT AMT Red S300 ; Wedges Vokey SM8 56-10D Putter: Scotty Cameron 2016 Newport 2.5  Ball: Titleist AVX or 2021 ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Mine have been in the garage for about 20 yrs now together with a buch of the old persimmon woods ...... maybe I should refurbish them, I played really solid with these in the old days.

Originally Posted by max power

You are absolutely correct, took 'em to the range and they weren't very hard to hit, certainly more forgiving than the Titliest Tour Models.  Really, really soft-I got no "blade vibration" even on slightly thin shots.  Shaft labels are mostly rubbed off, so I can tell that they're Dynamic Golds, but not whether they're regular or stiff.  No matter, my shots went straight, they felt great, and they're in the bag now.



Cal Razr Hawk 10.5 | TM Superfast 3W | Adams Idea Pro Black 20 | MP-68 3-PW | TW9 50/06 + 58/12 | Ram Zebra Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Played my first round today with the Wilson Staffs, 18 hole executive course.  Honestly, they were very, very easy to hit.  Easily the softest-feeling irons I own, and alignment was a snap.  Nearly had my first hole in one twice today, both holes were about 145 yds, 8 iron, tap in birdies.  My two bad holes (double bogey) were directly due to flubbed shots with the lob wedge.

I feel kind of stupid bagging a $39 set of irons while my Mizunos and MacGregors sit in the closet, but I see myself sticking with these for at least a month or two (which is a long time for me to go between an iron rotation).

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I was in a little golf shop a couple of years ago and a set Wilson Staff blades (2-PW) caught my eye.  The price tag was $100 and I talked him down to $60.  I think I went straight to the driving range right after I bought them and was shocked at how well I hit them - I even hit the 2 and 3 irons well.

I came home and started doing research on what exactly I had bought..  It turned out to be a set of 1969 Wilson Staff Dynapower Bulletback irons.  I played them for a few months but then the shhhhh$%#*'s started happening so I went to the Ping i10's..

Here is a set I found on ebay..

Link to comment
Share on other sites


That makes no sound to me .....

Originally Posted by max power

I feel kind of stupid bagging a $39 set of irons while my Mizunos and MacGregors sit in the closet, but I see myself sticking with these for at least a month or two (which is a long time for me to go between an iron rotation).


It takes about a few months before you really dial in on a set and just when you feel very confident with a set, you are changing for the next set to get used to.

It would be better to with one set for at least half a season and then decide if you are going to stick with them or else...... if you have a set you play well with, stay with it ........

Cal Razr Hawk 10.5 | TM Superfast 3W | Adams Idea Pro Black 20 | MP-68 3-PW | TW9 50/06 + 58/12 | Ram Zebra Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Honestly, it doesn't take me 3 months to dial in a set of irons-maybe 1 round and a couple range sessions.  If the maximum lowest possible score/handicap was my only goal it would probably make sense to stick to only one set.  But I'm no pro and never will be, and my love of golf extends to many, many facets of the game.  One of which is playing different irons, or a different driver every once in a while-even a different putter now and then.  I keep track of my distances with every club I use, saved in a Word document (which I also weirdly enjoy) so switching 1 or 14 clubs doesn't really affect my shot/decision making out on the course.

I've been playing with persimmon and blades lately, cause it's harder, it feels great, and it's fun.

Originally Posted by Gerald

That makes no sound to me .....

It takes about a few months before you really dial in on a set and just when you feel very confident with a set, you are changing for the next set to get used to.

It would be better to with one set for at least half a season and then decide if you are going to stick with them or else...... if you have a set you play well with, stay with it ........



Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 1 year later...

Hi, I have a set of fluid feels from circa 1987. 2 iron threw to pw. Might even find ther 1 iron had that as well. I have owned them since new and used them on and off till about 7 years ago when I purchased a set of Pi7s.....also great clubs. If anyone is interested in making me an offer I'd be happy to sell. They are in really condition given their age. Happy to attach pix. Be sad to see them go but would like an enthusiast to enjoy them rather than have them in the closet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have a set of staff fluid feel blades--I don't know how old they are, but I got them used in like 1989.  I've gone through 5 or 6 sets of irons since then, but these are the ones that I have never gotten rid of.  I recently cleaned out my garage of all excess golf gear; I sold 3 sets of irons and a dozen assorted wedges and hybrids, but I couldn't let go of these.

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 4 years later...

I just picked up a set (2-PW) of the '85-'86 Staff Fluid Feel Tour Blades (missing the 7 iron) for $1.99 each at a local Goodwill. They look like they're in good to very good condition, except for all the dirt and grass that was never scrubbed off the faces. They have stiff shafts and 6 of them have nice Chamois grips. I'll post before/after cleaning pics soon.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 5 years later...
On 9/18/2017 at 8:01 AM, HoganApexBlades said:

I just picked up a set (2-PW) of the '85-'86 Staff Fluid Feel Tour Blades (missing the 7 iron) for $1.99 each at a local Goodwill. They look like they're in good to very good condition, except for all the dirt and grass that was never scrubbed off the faces. They have stiff shafts and 6 of them have nice Chamois grips. I'll post before/after cleaning pics soon.

I now have two sets of them. One in stiff and the other in regular shafts. I don't even know which is best for me now, but my newest favorite is another set of recent acquisitions (worked beautifully today) Palmer Standard 85's with stiff (TTDG) shafts. I've finally gotten my swing established and settled down enough tho appreciate the differences in shaft characteristics. Next to get the Apex line sorted. And I'm sure I'll slow down into regular shafts eventually.  But I have loved the Wilson's for a long time. They just work and feel great!

This ain't no Party, this ain't no Disco...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 4 weeks later...
On 2/28/2011 at 8:32 PM, max power said:

I was browsing one of the local golf shops yesterday, my eye was initially caught by a set of TM MB TP Smoke irons. Gorgeous, more blade-like than many pure blades, despite the small cavity. In pretty good shape, hit well, and a good price at $450, but I didn't need another set of irons, especially for any significant amount of money. I moved over to the lower priced used clubs, and amongst the sea of PINGs and Callaways I found a set of Wilson Staff Fluid Feels 3-PW (appears to be the 1984-1986 model according to the internet). They were filthy (unrelated question-what golf shop doesn't bother to clean any of its used clubs?), and in desperate need of new grips, but appeared to be in good shape otherwise. I hit the 3 iron, 5 iron, 8 iron, and PW in the hitting bay, and they felt about 98-99% as good as the TM MBs. The price? $39! I brought them up to the front and said I wanted them re-gripped with red 2G Tour Wraps. The salesman said "$39? The grips will cost nearly as much." I said I couldn't pass them up at that price and the grand total with new grips, installation, and tax was $72. The salesman said "these are really hard to hit," and I couldn't help but respond "unless you're swinging them right!" We agreed that a "new" set of blades with brand new grips for less than the cost of 1 used club was a more than decent deal. They certainly don't look forgiving, but I figure if I can handle 1982 Titleist Tour Models I'll make due with these (if anything they look slightly more forgiving than the Titleists). I cleaned 'em when I got home and they look like forged irons that have been used for about 5 seasons, so a screaming deal in my opinion for clubs that are a real piece of history. I'm not jingoistic about my golf clubs, but the complete lack of new American forged (or cast) irons makes these extra special. I have zero need but now want a vintage set of MacGregors and Hogans to fill out my collection. I guess there are worse and more expensive hobbies...

Many Wilson blades have high to very high MOI scores. Anyone who thinks they are hard to hit hasn’t hit them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • https://static1.squarespace.com/static/603d222df4a6a57df7ef3e29/t/663cdba5d89e3a1848dab8d1/1715264422455/US_DIS_ILND_1_24cv3749_d34676497e293_COMPLAINT_filed_by_SuperSpeed_Golf_LLC_Jury_Demand.pdf The full complaint is there, but  basically, SuperSpeed (SS*) is claiming the Stack System (SS*) Stack System’s [sic] produces inflated metrics later used to, [sic] mislead and deceive consumers. Stack System’s marketing materials inflate apparent swing speed and distance gains through selective presentment of data without qualification that purported gains are not the result, in whole or part, of its training protocol and products. * Yes, I'm joking about abbreviating both "SS." SuperSpeed wants: A judgment that the Stack System has disseminated false and/or misleading information in violation of federal and Illinois law. The deletion of all false advertising distributed and recall of all packaging containing false advertising and a requirement that Stack System issue notices (written or otherwise) to that effect to all current distributors and retailers of its products and all distributors with whom Stack System has done business in the past eighteen months. Written confirmation within 30 days of an injunction detailing the manner and form in which Stack System has complied. An order that Stack System disseminate corrective advertising informing consumers, the trade, and the public of Stack System’s unlawful conduct. 3X all profits received by Stack System as a result of its unlawful actions. 3X all damages sustained by SuperSpeed (as a result of Stack System’s actions) The cost of the action All reasonable attorney fees All other relief to which SuperSpeed are entitled and such other or additional relief as just and proper. Oy.
    • I'm not doing this for the hundred and twentieth time. Sorry in advance, but you get the massively abridged version. Those guys also benefited from the weaker/shallower fields. Also, Watson's career doesn't overlap with Jack's like many think it did. Tom is nearly a decade younger. Jack won only like four majors only after Tom won his first. And Tom won more British Opens than he did all three of the other majors combined, as it was his specialty (not Jack's). Arnie's career similarly doesn't overlap Jack's as much as many think.   Jack would also tell you Tiger was the better golfer.
    • Weaker depth of fields for sure. Some of the top level guys with Jack were pretty awesome. Tom Watson had the lead on the 72nd hole of the 2009 British Open, an event where Tiger missed the cut. Old Tom was almost 60 years old. Jack himself at age 58 finished Top 10 at The 1998 Masters and scored better than Tiger, who won The Masters by 12 shots just a year before that.   The success of both Tom & Jack in older age gives some hope that maybe Tiger can find the magic again at some point. He’s still trying to figure out how to build the stamina for 72 holes after the leg injury. I would love to see him jump on the leaderboard in the coming years. I know a lot of people have given up on him at this point, but that was also true from 2014 to 2017 with the back injuries. He had a hell of a resurgence in 2018 & 2019. Would be fun to see it again. 
    • Perceptive rules question by caddie unlocks Tour pro’s ‘dead zone’ relief A perceptive rules question by Xander Schauffele’s caddie, Austin Kaiser, unlocked “dead zone” relief during the Wells Fargo Championship.
    • I ran across an interesting new clip, Johnson Wagner went into that spot with the Referee who allowed the relief.  Apparently there was a perfectly reasonable shot to be made, as Johnson clearly demonstrated, so relief from the TIO was perfectly appropriate.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...