Jump to content
IGNORED

Advise before a stipulated round


MacDutch
Note: This thread is 3904 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Originally Posted by Dormie1360

In our discussion the OP didn't make it clear if he was trying to purposely mislead the opponent.  Also, it wasn't about a specific club selection.

I'll get to the bottom of this and report back.

No intent to mislead, but it was about a specific clubselection (I7 to not get the bunker in play). But would it be different if there was intent to mislead? Still before a stipulated round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Originally Posted by Dormie1360

There is a decision where intent does come into play, however.  In our discussion the OP didn't make it clear if he was trying to purposely mislead the opponent.  Also, it wasn't about a specific club selection.  Clearly, in my opinion at least, R8-1 is not applicable.  I think it comes down to whether or not R1-4 is.

Yes, but as you know, that rule applies during the stipulated round.

So I don't care if there was intent to mislead, as it was still outside the round.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by iacas

Yes, but as you know, that rule applies during the stipulated round.

So I don't care if there was intent to mislead, as it was still outside the round.


This is correct, you cannot call him on rule 8 because it occurred before the stipulated round began. I also think its a huge stretch to call him under rule 1-4 as Fourputt had said earlier.

The only way a player would be penalized would be if it was believed the statement was a serious breach of etiquette. If this is the case the committee can only disqualify him, not give him a loss of hole penalty. They would proceed under Rule 33-7.

33-7. Disqualification Penalty; Committee Discretion
A penalty of disqualification may in exceptional individual cases be waived, modified or imposed if the Committee considers such action warranted.

Any penalty less than disqualification must not be waived or modified.

If a Committee considers that a player is guilty of a serious breach of etiquette, it may impose a penalty of disqualification under this Rule.

Danny    In my :ping: Hoofer Tour golf bag on my :clicgear: 8.0 Cart

Driver:   :pxg: 0311 Gen 5  X-Stiff.                        Irons:  :callaway: 4-PW APEX TCB Irons 
3 Wood: :callaway: Mavrik SZ Rogue X-Stiff                            Nippon Pro Modus 130 X-Stiff
3 Hybrid: :callaway: Mavrik Pro KBS Tour Proto X   Wedges: :vokey:  50°, 54°, 60° 
Putter: :odyssey:  2-Ball Ten Arm Lock        Ball: :titleist: ProV 1

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Got this from a knowledgeable source.

1-4 quite clearly tells us how to make a ruling if any point in dispute is not covered by the Rules .

Since the question of giving or asking for advice is covered by a Rule, a ruling under 1-4 is not needed or appropriate.

R 8-1 is quite explicit that it only applies during a stipulated round so anything can be said on the tee before the round starts. If a little bit of gamesmanship is tried, it's up to the other guy not to be put off by it.

And if I may go off topic a little on the subject of gamesmanship, I've always liked the story of one of the greats - it may have been Ben Hogan so let's say it was. His opponent had the honour at a hole with a driveable green. Hogan casually asked his caddie for a 4 iron whereupon his opponent put back the wood he had chosen and played a 4 iron instead. While his opponent's ball was in the air and on its way to being woefully short, Hogan returned the 4 iron to his caddie and took out his driver, ready to put his ball greenside.

  • Upvote 1

Regards,

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Dormie1360

And if I may go off topic a little on the subject of gamesmanship, I've always liked the story of one of the greats - it may have been Ben Hogan so let's say it was. His opponent had the honour at a hole with a driveable green. Hogan casually asked his caddie for a 4 iron whereupon his opponent put back the wood he had chosen and played a 4 iron instead. While his opponent's ball was in the air and on its way to being woefully short, Hogan returned the 4 iron to his caddie and took out his driver, ready to put his ball greenside.

To me this is not too far off topic. Might cost him the hole..

8-1/9

Misleading Statement About Club Selection

Q. A made a statement regarding his club selection which was purposely misleading and was obviously intended to be overheard by B, who had a similar shot. What is the ruling?

A. A was in breach of Rule 8-1 and lost the hole in match play or incurred a two-stroke penalty in stroke play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Originally Posted by MacDutch

To me this is not too far off topic. Might cost him the hole..

8-1/9

Misleading Statement About Club Selection

Q.A made a statement regarding his club selection which was purposely misleading and was obviously intended to be overheard by B, who had a similar shot. What is the ruling?

A.A was in breach of Rule 8-1 and lost the hole in match play or incurred a two-stroke penalty in stroke play.

Hogan didn't play a shot with the 4-iron. It wasn't his club selection. He could have said "let me see the 4-iron" because he wanted to clean it.

And it is off topic. The thread title says "before a stipulated round" so let's keep it to that please.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by MacDutch

Before I tee-off on the first hole of a matchplay, I tell my opponent I will hit my 7 iron to keep the sandtrap on the right side of the fairway out of play.  I do this on purpose.

Do I loose the hole giving this advise? My stipulated round did not yet start......

As your stipulated round had not started there is no penalty.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Playing golf in Anglesey

Gotta be able to mutitask! :-D

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 4 weeks later...

Lets take it one step further.

Still on the first tee, my matchplay opponent hits his first ball. After his hit and before mine, he says 'beware of the bunker on the right, better to use your I7 like I did,  to keep it out of play'.

The question is, is this considered advise? My stipulated round did still not yet start, so is it under the rules possible to give advise to someone who's stipulated round did not yet start?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Lets take it one step further. Still on the first tee, my matchplay opponent hits his first ball. After his hit and before mine, he says 'beware of the bunker on the right, better to use your I7 like I did,  to keep it out of play'. The question is, is this considered advise? My stipulated round did still not yet start, so is it under the rules possible to give advise to someone who's stipulated round did not yet start?

His stipulated round had started. He gave specific advice. He should be penalized.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I am not sure. The reason is that if I had asked him the question, I could not be penalized (my round did not start). So I could trap him into answering and he would loose the hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I am not sure. The reason is that if I had asked him the question, I could not be penalized (my round did not start). So I could trap him into answering and he would loose the hole.

In your example, he offered unsolicited advice after his round had started. He is in breach. If you're intentionally trying to trick him into a rules violation, it seems to me that then rule 33.7 could come into play for your serious breach? Tough to prove.....

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Exactly when a player has started his stipulated round is specific.  Decision 2/2 covers matchplay.  Also, Rule 8-1 (Advice) is very specific on when a player is liable for a breach of the rule.

If the player gave or asked for advice after his first stroke he is in breach.  If a player, who had not played his first stroke, asked for or gave advice, there would be no breach. As far as the application of Rule 33-7 I think that would be a serious stretch.  A player should know he can not give or ask for advice.  On the first tee if someone asked me for advice, even if I did not know the intricacies of when a stipulated round starts, I should be hesitant in answering.  As far as penalizing the player under R33-7 for asking,  this would be hard to prove.  I think a player who is ignorant of the Advice rule could easily ask for advice in MacDutch's example, without having any ulterior motives.

Regards,

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by David in FL

In your example, he offered unsolicited advice after his round had started. He is in breach.

2/2

Stipulated Round in Match Play

In all forms of match play other than threesomes and foursomes, a player has begun his stipulated round when he makes his first stroke in that round. In threesomes and foursomes match play, the side has begun its stipulated round when it makes its first stroke in that round.

The stipulated round has ended in match play when all of the players in the match have completed the final hole of the match (although a player may lodge a subsequent claim under Rule 2-5 or correct wrong information under Rule 9-2b(iii) ). With the first round of a 36-hole match, the stipulated round has ended when all the players in the match have completed the final hole of that stipulated round.

3/3

Stipulated Round in Stroke Play

In all forms of stroke play other than foursomes, a competitor has begun his stipulated round when he makes his first stroke in that round . In foursomes stroke play, the side has begun its stipulated round when it makes its first stroke in that round.

In individual stroke play, the competitor's stipulated round has ended when he has completed play of the final hole of that round (including correction of an error under a Rule, e.g., Rule 15-3b or Rule 20-7c ). In foursomes or four-ball stroke play, the stipulated round has ended when the side has completed play of the final hole of that round (including correction of an error under a Rule).

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 5 months later...

First what kind of player uses a 7i off a teebox but is afraid of a little fairway bunker?

Second can we agree that our conclusion is that the stipulated round has not yet started until a player puts hit ball into play?

I.e. a little gamesmanship "you might want to kiss your woods it's a pretty tight front 9" or " I'd better be careful with my putter I heard these greens run notoriously faster than the practice green" is allowable on the practice range or on the teebox before the stipulated round starts (assume match play).

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3904 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Day 542, April 26, 2024 A lesson no-show, no-called (he had the wrong time even though the last text was confirming the time… 😛), so I used 45 minutes or so of that time to get some good work in.
    • Yeah, that. It stands out… because it's so rare. And interest in Caitlin Clark will likely result in a very small bump to the WNBA or something… and then it will go back down to very low viewership numbers. Like it's always had. A small portion, yep. It doesn't help that she lost, either. Girls often don't even want to watch women playing sports. My daughter golfs… I watch more LPGA Tour golf than she does, and it's not even close. I watch more LPGA Tour golf than PGA Tour golf, even. She watches very little of either. It's just the way it is. Yes, it's a bit of a vicious cycle, but… how do you break it? If you invest a ton of money into broadcasting an LPGA Tour event, the same coverage you'd spend on a men's event… you'll lose a ton of money. It'd take decades to build up the interest. Even with interest in the PGA Tour declining.
    • Oh yea, now I remember reading about you on TMZ!
    • Of course there's not a simple or knowable answer here. But the whole Caitlin Clark phenomenon is a nice example IMO. Suddenly there was wall to wall media coverage and national attention and... the women's tournament got similar ratings to the men's and much higher ratings than the men in the final four. With every indication that there will be some portion of the uptick that remains going forward. And there's the whole element that Sue Bird brought up. That basketball needed a pretty enough white superstar guard. One who looks like the "cute little white girls" that describes most of the soccer USWNT that's been able to achieve much higher popularity than any version of women's basketball, which is dominated by black players and none of any race who could be described as little... I do think women's sports are in a good place to start taking off more though. It's really only in the coming 5-10 years that the majority of girls will start to come of age with post Title IX grandmothers (as in their grandmothers were allowed to be serious athletes). I don't follow men's or women's basketball much, but in golf for sure the women's tour has gotten much deeper over the past 20 years and only looks to keep going in that direction. I've heard the same about women's basketball. And the patriarchal attitudes that socialized girls out of sports and everyone out of women's sports fandom aren't gone but have def diminished.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...