Jump to content
IGNORED

What is your take on slazenger


Note: This thread is 5529 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Hey guys I went too golf galaxy the other day and tried out a few clubs. I picked up a couple clubs like the callaway X22 and titlest and 2 diferint types of slazenger clubs.

Of course notheing beats the feel of the titlest when you hit it right but when I hit them It seems like I hit them as good and sometimes better than the other clubs and they are 2 to3 hundred dollars while titles or x22s would set you back 700 easy. I am starting to belive they are just selling brand names.

Go to golf galaxy try them and see what you think.

The weird thing is that the slazenger clubs I cant find anywhere on the net.

They were called slazenger distance and slazenger distance stainless. Not the raw distance hybrid irons.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


For a beginner buying expensive clubs is a waste of money. It's been said hundreds of times: buy a decent starter set of clubs and spend the rest of what you would have spent on expensive name brand clubs on lessons. You'll be a better golfer and once you've gotten your swing and your game locked in you'll have a much better idea about what to spend you equipment dollars on to suit your game.

Nike Vapor Speed driver 12* stock regular shaft
Nike Machspeed 4W 17*, 7W 21* stock stiff shafts
Ping i10 irons 4-9, PW, UW, SW, LW AWT stiff flex
Titleist SC Kombi 35"; Srixon Z Star XV tour yellow

Clicgear 3.0; Sun Mountain Four 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites


not bad beginners sets especially for the price...
i bought my girl a slazenger stand bag and lazy slazenger balls... very inexpensive...
the bag is starting to get a hole where the back pack straps connect to the bag... kinda disappointing... but for 40 bucks i didnt expect much... she likes the balls cuz they come in a variety of different colors... hahaha
RUSS's avg drive - 230yrds and climbing
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Slazenger products are exclusive to Golf Galaxy / Dicks Sporting Goods only..

Didn't Dick's buy Slazenger?

IMHO, when a brand is purchased by a chain store, it is usually the first step in it going down hill. Not that it means it is a BAD brand, but my guess is they will never be top-tier again.

Instight XTD A30S Driver 10.5° ($69 new ebay)
Instight XTD A3OS Fairway Wood 15° ($45 new ebay)
Fybrid 19.5° ($35 new ebay)
Ci7 4-GW ($175 new Rock Bottom Golf via ebay)
53° & 58° 8620 DD wedges ($75 each new PGA Superstore) C2-DF ($35 new Rock Bottom Golf) Riley TT stand bag ($7 n...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The brands owned by Dick's Sporting Goods (and also sold at Golf Galaxy, which is also owned by Dick's parent company) are not a bad quality, but are also not a high end club. As a high handicapper they would probably suit you fine. However, used clubs may be an even better bargain. You may be able to get a higher quality set for less money if you search local retailers that carry used clubs and/or search eBay and other online stores. You could also buy new clubs that are a year or 2 old for a great deal.

For the most part the lesser known names are of a lesser quality. This is not always the case, but usually is. You might also want to look at HirekoGolf.com. They sell a couple brands that are not very well known, but they are cheap and have recieved really good reviews (including being mentioned in 2009 Golf Digest Hot List - http://www.hirekogolf.com/xk/xk.html ). I know Acer is one of the brands I have read good things about. They will also custom build clubs for you.
Driver: SQ DYMO STR8-Fit
4 Wood: SQ DYMO
2H (17*), 4H (23*) & 5H (26*): Fli-Hi CLK
Irons (5-6): MX-900; (7-PW): MP-60
Wedges (51/6*): MP-T Chrome; (56/13): MP-R ChromePutter: White Hot XG 2-Ball CSPreferred Ball: e5+/e7+/B330-RXGPS Unit: NEOPush Cart: 2.0
Link to comment
Share on other sites


My golfing buddy started out with a set of Slazenger clubs back in July, I think he paid $300 for the whole box set. He bent the 5 iron three times ( and Dick's replaced the 5 iron three times), then the bottom of the bag busted. They seemed to be good starter clubs, now he games Cleveland irons.

In my Cart Bag:
Driver: R7 Draw 9*
3W: Ovation 15*
Hybrid Halo 19* 2H, Halo 22* 3H
Irons: i/3 O-Size 4-PWSW: Vokey SM 56*Putter: Anser

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Didn't Dick's buy Slazenger?

I talked to a Dick's Sporting goods manager and apparently what is going on is that yes dicks now owns the names on the clubs but still contracts with the companies that make them. It was basically a way of cutting costs for the companies.

Maxfli- made by taylormade still as far as i know Walter Hagen-was told Adams golf made these. Slazenger not sure who is making those right now.

Driver-Callaway FT-5 Draw 9.5"

3WD-Callaway Hawkeye 15*

Hybrid-Callaway FT 21*

Irons-Callaway Steelhead X-16 4-P

Wedges-Callaway Big Bertha Tour 52* 56* 60*

Putter-Odyssey White Hot #1

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hey guys I went too golf galaxy the other day and tried out a few clubs. I picked up a couple clubs like the callaway X22 and titlest and 2 diferint types of slazenger clubs.

what kind of babbling, incoherent post is that?

my god.....

TM R11/Titleist 910F 15*/ Nike SQ2 20* & 23*/ Nike CCi 5-PW/ Nike SV 52* & 56*/ SC Newport 2 Studio Style 32.5"
Nike 20XIx/Pro V1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Slazenger is a sad story.

I played tennis before golf. The racket I still use is of the last line Slazenger put out before being bought by Dicks. They've released rackets since then. But if you compare the make quality of the rackets. It's no contest. Tennis-wise is all I can vouch for, and in this case, Slazenger used to be a Premium quality product. If I had to rate quality now, I think it's best described as a Premium Generic.

I started out with a complete set of Slazenger clubs with all graphite shafts. They were made well... but still with shortcuts (that you see on generics.) The 'weights' on the driver and one of the hybrids just fell off -- apparently it was just stuck on with some glue. The driver dented a little in two different places, but that's more likely due to some really shoddy ball striking between my and some friends than anything else. The only item in the set I felt was not up to par, was the golf bag. It was amazingly light, but impossible to set up to walk with, and very top heavy balanced.

I still don't regret buying those clubs one bit. When I found out what I wanted and caught on some really lucky deals I jumped on the boat to my new gear.

Driver: Tour Burner 9.5° Stock Stiff
Wood: Tour Burner TS 13° Stock Stiff
Hybrid: Tour Burner T2 18° Stock Stiff
Irons: Tour Preferred 3-PW Rifle Project X 6.0
Wedges: 54.10|58.08 Z TP Rifle Spinner 5.5 Putter: VP Mills VP2 Ball: TP/Red.LDP Bag: Warbird Hot Stand Bag 2.0Started playing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


what kind of babbling, incoherent post is that?

?

What kind of comment is that? Really not even close to adding something productive to the discussion. To the OP, I would lean toward buying a used set of better quality for around the same price. I'm sure Slazenger is not terrible, but I would think something like Ping, Callaway, Adams, Cleveland, Cobra would be more durable. The lack of Slazenger clubs on Ebay and such haws to be an indication that their poorer quality affects resale. You might also consider having clubs built from components, like those from Golf Works, affiliated with Golf Galaxy. Some are likely to cost you around the same as a set of Slazengers off the shelf, but will be of better quality.

Launcher 2009 10.5º, S
Rescue Dual 16º
Rescue Dual 19º
Maltby MTF 4-pw, Rifle 5.5
Maltby M-Series 52.6, 58.8 2008 AnserOut of the bag: Big Bertha Fusion 15º, YS6+ R (for sale or trade)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


?

I see this a lot and agree to an extent, but always stick with the other side of the argument in the end. This is where I get caught up:

I spent $280 and got a bag, driver, 3wood, 3h, 4h, 5-pw irons and a putter. It was brand new with a one year warranty (that is doubled to two thanks to my credit card benefits). Given that budget, what can you get me for my money?

Driver: Tour Burner 9.5° Stock Stiff
Wood: Tour Burner TS 13° Stock Stiff
Hybrid: Tour Burner T2 18° Stock Stiff
Irons: Tour Preferred 3-PW Rifle Project X 6.0
Wedges: 54.10|58.08 Z TP Rifle Spinner 5.5 Putter: VP Mills VP2 Ball: TP/Red.LDP Bag: Warbird Hot Stand Bag 2.0Started playing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


what kind of babbling, incoherent post is that?

?

What kind of comment is that? Really not even close to adding something productive to the discussion. To the OP, I would lean toward buying a used set of better quality for around the same price. I'm sure Slazenger is not terrible, but I would think something like Ping, Callaway, Adams, Cleveland, Cobra would be more durable. The lack of Slazenger clubs on Ebay and such haws to be an indication that their poorer quality affects resale. You might also consider having clubs built from components, like those from Golf Works, affiliated with Golf Galaxy. Some are likely to cost you around the same as a set of Slazengers off the shelf, but will be of better quality.

Launcher 2009 10.5º, S
Rescue Dual 16º
Rescue Dual 19º
Maltby MTF 4-pw, Rifle 5.5
Maltby M-Series 52.6, 58.8 2008 AnserOut of the bag: Big Bertha Fusion 15º, YS6+ R (for sale or trade)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Well for what it's worth they still make great cricket bats. I think it's a bit hit and miss with those multi-sport manufacturers, for some sports they make great stuff and others it's not such high quality and it goes up and down. They were never a big name in cricket bats, for instance, until a few years ago and now plenty of international players are using them. I say if you like the clubs and you hit them well then go for it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I had an 18* rescue club that was a Slazenger which was easy to hit a very long. I'd say nearly as easy as my xls which is meant to be one of the easiest hybrids of all to hit. Of course i get a more stable ball flight from my xls and i can hit it further, but i wouldnt mind gettin a 21* version at all.
What I Play:
Wilson Mini Stand Bag | PING G10, 10.5°, Proforce V2 HL S | PING G5, 15°, 18°, Aldila NV 75 S | PING G5, 19°, Aldila VS Proto By You 80 S
Mizuno MX200 4-PW S | Ping Tour W 50/12 X | Ping Tour W 58/TS X | A selection of putters, all 35.5 inches.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Thanks guys This helped allot

I just need to get new clubs My clubs are over 10 years old now. Old callaway X-18s. Want to get AP1s but they are so damn expensive. Especialy when compared to slazenger so I just wanted to hear what you thought.

Thanks Again to everyone but nike_golf
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Slazenger clubs are basically to be avoided. They do however do the best commercials. The famous K1 speed driver, with knife technology, and the FAST irons advert with Tony Jacklin and Kenny Daglish-tremendous stuff. Makes me laugh every time. Particularly when kenny holes a bunker shot with the free handy sandy sand iron-first take as well--haha get in there kenny.Sorry to babble nike_golf
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 5529 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I kind of figured that might be part of the problem. I’m still guilty of it myself at times and you’re a better ballstriker than I am. I imagine the temptation to go for the flag grows as you get more control over your wedges. Might want to think about shot selection, too. I don’t know how you typically play short game shots but I see a lot of people default to hitting high pitch shots from basically everywhere, to every hole location, without regard for how the green is contoured and how the ball might release depending on where it lands. I know my short game has been steadily improving from expanding my shot selection, overall. Though to be honest, part of that is from necessity because I was really struggling with pitch shots so I started hitting more chips from everywhere, but it taught me a lot more about how to play short game shots in general. NP man. We’re all learning and improving together. It is a really good tool.
    • 2 rounds this weekend, one at my home course and another course that I know well.   Played well for 3 of the 4 nines.    Ended up with an 80 and an 88.  Breaking it down by 9, it was 38, 42, 41, and a tough 47 where I somehow ended up with chipping/pitching shanks where I dropped at least 6 strokes on the last 6 holes.
    • Yikes, how time flies. Here we are, almost ten years later. After prioritizing family life and other things for a long time, I'm finally ready to play more golf. Grip: I came across some topics on grip and think my grip has been a bit too palmy, especially the left hand. I'm trying to get it more in the fingers and less diagonal. Setup: After a few weeks of playing, this realization came today after watching one of Erik's Covid videos. I've been standing too far from the ball, and that messes up so much. Moved closer on a short practice session and six holes today, and it felt great. It also felt familiar, so I've been there before. I went from chunking the bejesus out the wedges to much better contact. I love changes that involves no moving parts. Just a small correction on the setup and I'm hitting it better and is better suited for working on changes. I'm a few years late, but the Covid series has been very useful to get small details sorted. I've also had to revise ball position. The goal now is back of ball in the middle of the stance as the farthest back with wedges, and progressively moving forward the longer the clubs get. Haven't hit the driver yet, but inside left foot or at the toe I suppose. Full swing: It's not terrible. I noticed my hands were too low, so got that to work on. Weight forward. More of the same stuff from earlier days. Swing path is now out-in and I want the push-draw back. When I get some videos it'll be easier to tell. I've also had this idea that my tempo or flow/rhythm could improve. It's always felt rushed around the end of the backswing into the transition, where things don't line up as they should. A short pause as things settle before starting the downswing. Some lessons might be in order. Chipping and pitching: A 12-hole round this week demonstrated a severe need to practice, but also to figure out what the heck I’m trying to do. I stood over the ball with no idea of what I wanted to achieve. On a four meter chip! I was trying the locked wrists technique, which did not work at all. As usual when I need information, I look for something Erik has posted. I’ve seen the Quickie Pitching Video before, but if I got it back then, I’ve forgotten. After reviewing that topic, some other topic about chipping and most importantly, the videos on chip/pitch from his Covid series, I felt like I understood the concept. I love the idea of separating those two by what you are trying to achieve, not by distance or ball flight. With one method you use the leading edge to hit the ball first. With the other, you use the sole to slide it under the ball. I was surprised he said that he went for the pitch 90% of the time while playing. I’ve always been scared of that shot and been thinking I have to hit the ball first. Trying to slide the club under usually ended with a chunked or skulled shot. After practicing in the yard the last days I get it, and see why the pitching motion is more forgiving. It’s astounding how easy the concept and motion is. Kudos to Erik, David and anyone else involved for being an excellent students of the game and teachers. With those two videos, my short game improved leaps and bounds, without even practicing. Just getting the setup right and knowing what motions you are trying to do is a big part of improving. Soft hands and floaty swings feels so much better than a rigid “hinge and hold”, trying to fight gravity and momentum by squeezing the life out of the grip. At least how I took to understand the “hold” part. I also think the chipping motion will help in the full swing. Keeping pressure on the trigger finger to ensure the hands are leading the clubhead and not throwing it at the ball. I've also tried looking in front of the ball at times when chipping, which helps. That's something I've been doing on full swings for a long time, and can make a big difference on the ball flight. Question @iacas: You say in the videos that you want the ball somewhere near the middle of your stance, and that for pitching it's the same. On the videos you got a fairly narrow stance, where inside of the left foot is almost middle of the stance, but the ball looks more inside the left foot than middle of the stance. Is that caused by the filming angle or is the ball more towards the inside of the foot? I often hit chips and pitches from uphill and downhill lies, where a narrow stance would have me fall over. What is your thought process and setup for those shots? The lowpoint follows the upper body, around left armpit IIRC, so a ball position relative to the feet may not be in the same spot relative to the upper body with a wider stance. Practice: I've set up my nets at an indoors location where I can practice at home. I did a quick search on launch monitors (LM), but haven't decided on anything yet. We're probably buying a house in this area in the near future, so I may hold off a purchase until I see what I can get going there. At some point I'd love to get a proper setup with a LM that can be used as a simulator. Outdoors golf is not an option 4-6 months a year here, so having an indoors option would be great. That would also be a place to use the longer clubs. My nearest course is a shorter six hole course where I don't use anything longer than a 21º utility iron. To play longer 18 hole courses I have to drive 1-1.5 hours each way, which I will do now and then, but not regularly. The LM market has changed a lot since Trackman arrived, and more people are buying them for personal use, but it's still need to spend a lot of money for a decent one that can fi. track club path. The Mevo at £305 could perhaps be something to consider. Maybe they have lowered the price to get out units before a new model is launched? It is almost six years old, though perhaps modified since then. It's got limited data and obviously isn't an option as a simulator, but could provide some data when hitting into a net. I'd have to read more about it first. It has to be good enough to be useful for indoors practice. As long as I frequently hit balls on the range or course, I'll get feedback on any changes there.
    • I'm pretty good at picking targets with mid/long irons in hand, but yes lately I have been getting more aggressive than I should be, especially from 100-150. The 50-100 deficiency is mainly distance control, working on that mechanically with Evolvr, but the 100-150 is definitely a result of poor targets.  6,7,8 iron in my hand I have no problem aiming away from trouble/the flag, hitting a very committed shot to my target, but give me PW, GW, and some reason I think I need to go right at it (even though I know I shouldn't). Like here from my last round. 175 left on a short par 5 to a back right flag. Water short right and bunker long. Perfectly fine lie in sparse rough, between the jumper and downwind playing for about 10yds of help. I knew to not aim at the flag here, aimed 40 feet left of it, hit my 165 shot exactly where I was looking, easy 2 putt birdie.   But then there's this one. I had 120 left from the fairway to a semi-tucked front left flag. Not a ton of trouble around the green but the left and back rough does fall off steeper than short/right rough. For some reason I aimed right at this flag with my 120yd shot, hit it the exact proper distance but pulled it 5yds left and had a tough short sided chip. Did all I could to chip it to 8 feet and missed the putt for a bad bogey. Had I aimed directly at the middle of the green maybe 5yds right of the flag, a perfectly straight shot leaves me 20 feet tops for birdie and that same pulled shot that I hit would have left me very close to the hole.    So yeah I think the 50-100 is distance control and the 100-150 is absolutely picking better targets. I have good feels and am strong with distance control on those I just need to allow for a bigger dispersion.    This view is helpful. For the Under 25yds my proximity is almost double from the rough vs the fairway which reinforces that biggest weakness right now being inside 25yds from the rough. But then interestingly enough in the 25-50yds I'm almost equal proximity from fairway and rough, so it looks like I need to work on under 25yds from the rough and then 25-50 from the fairway. The bunker categories are only 1 attempt each so not worried about those.   Thanks as always for the insight, it's been helpful. I'm really liking ShotScope so far.
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟨🟨⬜🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...