Jump to content
IGNORED

sandtrap under repair, where to drop without penalty?


Jo Mari
Note: This thread is 4020 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

my approach shot landed in the bunker side green, which the bunker is under repair. where should be my drop without penalty lateral where the point of entry of my ball (not closer to the green) or behind the bunker which is 20 feet back from my ball point of entry?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


If the bunker is out of action for a length of time there should be a drop zone located very close to the

bunker.

If the bunker is out of action for weather ect a local rule should be in effect, usually stating to drop with a clear line beetween the ball and flag so you will not chip back into the bunker. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Jo Mari

my approach shot landed in the bunker side green, which the bunker is under repair. where should be my drop without penalty lateral where the point of entry of my ball (not closer to the green) or behind the bunker which is 20 feet back from my ball point of entry?

If a bunker is under repair and declared GUR the it is automically 'Through the Green' and no longer a Hazard.

Relief should be taken as for any other GUR. ie within 1cl of npr.

See Decision 25/13.

http://www.usga.org/Rule-Books/Rules-of-Golf/Decision-25/#25/13

In certyain circumstances this could apply to a specific bunker completely filled with water.

Decision 33-8/27

http://www.usga.org/Rule-Books/Rules-of-Golf/Decision-33/#33-8/27

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Rulesman

If a bunker is under repair and declared GUR then it is automically 'Through the Green' and no longer a Hazard.

Relief should be taken as for any other GUR. ie within 1cl of npr.

Too many people try to over-complicate the rules.  This is a perfect example of how simple most rules are.  Certainly there are extremely unusual circumstances that require a little thought and research, but 98.3% (exactly ) of the time, if you understand the very basic rules, you can figure out the correct ruling without too much effort.

BTW.....that's not meant to be a shot at the OP for the question, just a general observation.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The general lesson to learn from this thread is that GUR is GUR. Regardless of where the GUR is, the normal GUR rules apply?

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Zeph

The general lesson to learn from this thread is that GUR is GUR. Regardless of where the GUR is, the normal GUR rules apply?

Yes, what makes this a little "complicated" with bunkers is that bunkers are hazards so you must apply the GUR rules for hazards.  If the committee does not specifically deem a bunker as through the green, or specifically give you the right to drop out of a water filled bunker without penalty, (see Rulesman's links)  you are required to drop in the bunker in order to avoid a penalty.  That's what the GUR rule says.

A player can not deem a player as through the green, so if the committee does not do their job, a player could be stuck with having to take a penalty stroke to play out of an unplayable bunker, either under Abnormal Ground Conditions, or Unplayable Lie rules.

Regards,

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Dormie1360

Yes, what makes this a little "complicated" with bunkers is that bunkers are hazards so you must apply the GUR rules for hazards.  If the committee does not specifically deem a bunker as through the green, or specifically give you the right to drop out of a water filled bunker without penalty, (see Rulesman's links)  you are required to drop in the bunker in order to avoid a penalty.  That's what the GUR rule says.

How do you mark the bunker as GUR without giving a possibility to drop outside bunker?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


If the bunker is being renovated, then you may drop outside without penalty.  Unless the committee says otherwise, it is considered GUR and loses it's status as a hazard.  Sorry if I did not make that clear.  If the bunker is entirely full of water, it does not lose it's status as a hazard, however the committee may make a local rule allowing relief outside the bunker without penalty.

David is right, I should have kept quiet.

Regards,

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Dormie1360

If the bunker is being renovated, then you may drop outside without penalty.  Unless the committee says otherwise, it is considered GUR and loses it's status as a hazard.  Sorry if I did not make that clear.  If the bunker is entirely full of water, it does not lose it's status as a hazard, however the committee may make a local rule allowing relief outside the bunker without penalty.

David is right, I should have kept quiet.

If the bunker is completely under repair, it must be designated as through the green, then clearly marked or identified as ground under repair.  Nothing is automatically GUR just because it looks like it should be.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Fourputt

If the bunker is completely under repair, it must be designated as through the green, then clearly marked or identified as ground under repair.  Nothing is automatically GUR just because it looks like it should be.

It does not have to be designated as through the green.

Dec 25/13 is intended to apply in this situation also. ie if a complete bunker is declared GUR, for whatever reason. then it loses its status as a hazard and is automatically through the green.

It certainly has to be marked or identified as GUR though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Rulesman

It does not have to be designated as through the green.

Dec 25/13 is intended to apply in this situation also. ie if a complete bunker is declared GUR, for whatever reason. then it loses its status as a hazard and is automatically through the green.

It certainly has to be marked or identified as GUR though.

Isn't this decison fairly new?  At one time wasn't a renovated bunker, when designated as GUR by the committee,  not automatically TTG?

Originally Posted by Fourputt

If the bunker is completely under repair, it must be designated as through the green, then clearly marked or identified as ground under repair.  Nothing is automatically GUR just because it looks like it should be.

This is correct.  I wrote that 3 times and it still  did not come out right.

Regards,

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by luu5

How do you mark the bunker as GUR without giving a possibility to drop outside bunker?

You mean without penalty? You would need a Local Rule for that, just as described in Dec 25/13.

However, from the top of my head I cannot immediately think of such need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Fourputt

If the bunker is completely under repair, it must be designated as through the green, then clearly marked or identified as ground under repair.  Nothing is automatically GUR just because it looks like it should be.

Originally Posted by Dormie1360

This is correct.  I wrote that 3 times and it still  did not come out right.

No, that is not correct. Rulesman has described it correctly.

Dec 25/13 one more time:

25/13
Bunker Totally Under Repair


If a bunker is being renovated and the Committee defines the entire
bunker as ground under repair, the bunker loses its status as a hazard
and is automatically classified as “through the green” . Therefore, unless a
Committee specifically states otherwise, Rule 25-1b(i) applies, not Rule
25-1b(ii).

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Dormie1360

Isn't this decison fairly new?  At one time wasn't a renovated bunker, when designated as GUR by the committee,  not automatically TTG?

This is correct.  I wrote that 3 times and it still  did not come out right.

The Decision was revised in 2010. Prior to that the bunker was not automatically deemed Through the Green, the Committee had to declare it so.

Now, any bunker declared to be entirely GUR (for whatever reason) is automatically designated Through the Green and is therefore not a hazard.

Which what I said before of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by luu5

How do you mark the bunker as GUR without giving a possibility to drop outside bunker?

As it would automatically become Through the Green (25/13) and no longer a hazard then the player would be dropping in an area which must be outside the GUR (ie the original sandy bunker).

If the Committee required that the drop must be in the area of the 'bunker', they must include in the Local Rule a statement declaring that the area is not Through the Green This is covered in decision 25/13. The bunker wouls still be a Hazard and all relevant rules would apply (eg 13-4)

If ............. the Committee defines the entire bunker as ground under repair, the bunker loses its status as a hazard and is automatically classified as "through the green." Therefore , unless a Committee specifically states otherwise , Rule 25-1b(i) applies, not Rule 25-1b(ii) .

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Ignorant

No, that is not correct. Rulesman has described it correctly.

Dec 25/13 one more time:

25/13

Bunker Totally Under Repair

If a bunker is being renovated and the Committee defines the entire

bunker as ground under repair, the bunker loses its status as a hazard

and is automatically classified as “through the green”. Therefore, unless a

Committee specifically states otherwise, Rule 25-1b(i) applies, not Rule

25-1b(ii).

I'm with you.  I took "must", in Fourputts response, as automatically....however I do understand the GUR designation does have to come first.

Regards,

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Dormie1360

..however I do understand the GUR designation does have to come first.

Call me a pedant but the committee cannot designate a bunker TTG first because that would be overriding a Definition - no can do

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4020 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,013 3/6* ⬛🟨⬛🟨🟨 🟩⬛🟩🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Meanwhile, another old Tour Edge guy switches to Callaway for this season. I have a different problem, course dependent set-ups. What I’m wondering is if @dragonsmhas the 8 iron set 5-PW, AW, GW or just 5-PW, GW. Because the PW is 42°, AW 47°, and GW 52°. Because that could potentially be a gap there. The 5-iron to 6-iron length jump is 5/8” instead of 1/2” so you should be careful of that.    @WUTiger the problem most people have with 3-woods is they don’t play them far enough back into their stance. And they usually don’t have enough loft and the shaft is too long. So 3HL, 4 or 5-wood is probably better for most golfers. I do the “Frankenwood” approach. I have both the 3+ and 5 woods. I typically will either add two degrees to the 3+ on 6600 yards or longer courses, or take a degree off the 5-wood on shorter courses than 6300 or so, and use the 5-wood shaft for both. I don’t usually find a situation where I need both the 3 and 5 wood on a course. I don’t play from 7000 yards it’s no fun. Edit: I mostly agree with @WUTiger on the gapping, although a lot of the newer even fixed hosel fairway woods are made better than what we had when we were playing the old Exotics XRails.
    • Wordle 1,013 4/6* ⬛🟦🟦⬛⬛ ⬛🟦⬛🟦🟦 🟧⬛🟧🟧🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧 par is good after a double bogey yesterday.
    • I did read the fine print tonight. It said replace with “similar features & function”.  8 yeas ago my purchase had features that today are available on the lower end models and the current version of my model has more “bells & whistles” than what I got 8 years ago.  So I am thinking they honored the agreement and I can’t argue the offer. since getting a credit for the full purchase price all I am really out over the past 8 years was the cost of the extended warranty, which was less than a low end  treadmill would have cost me. now the question is which model to replace with.  I’ll stay with Nordic Track or I forfeit the $1,463 credit so I will get Nordic Track.  And they honored the warranty and were not hard to work with which is a plus.
    • Generally speaking, extended warranties are a terrible deal and should almost always be avoided. They are a huge profit center for the companies that offer them, which should tell you almost everything you need to know about how much value most consumers get when purchasing them.  This is correct, and the old adage applies - only buy insurance when you can't afford the loss. This usually doesn't apply to most consumer goods.  To your second question, no I don't believe the offer is fair. They are replacing it, but it is not being replaced at "no cost to you". Since the amount being disputed (over $500) is non-trivial, I would probably push the issue. Don't waste your time on the phone with a customer service agent or a supervisor. They have probably given you all they have the authority to do. Rather, I would look at the terms of your agreement and specifically legal disputes. The odds are you probably agreed to binding arbitration in the event of a dispute. The agreement will outline what steps need to be followed, but it will probably look something like this.  1. Mail the Nordic Track legal department outlining your dispute and indicate you are not satisfied with the resolution offered.  2. Open up a case with the AAA (American Arbitration Association), along with the required documentation. 3. Wait about 4-5 weeks for a case to be opened - at which point someone from Nordic Track's legal department will offer to give you the new model at no cost to you.  They certainly don't want to spend the time and energy to fight you over $500. 4. Enjoy your new Nordic Track at no cost to you. I recently entered binding arbitration against a fairly large and well known company that screwed me over and refused to make it right. In my demand letter, I made a pretty sizeable request that included compensation for my time and frustration. Once it hit their legal department, they cut me a check - no questions asked. It was far cheaper to settle with me than to send their legal team to defend them in the arbitration.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...