Jump to content
  • entries
    5
  • comments
    109
  • views
    3,370

Retirement golf - 6 months result

Sign in to follow this  
rkim291968

1,624 views

It has been exactly 6 months after I retired.   Here's what happened to my golf after I have retired. 

  • I have been playing 5 - 6 times a week.  However, a simple majority of the rounds have been less than 18 holes.   I simply quit when I get too tired, get hungry, etc..    Being able to play everyday, I don't feel I need to finish around.
  • With more time, I thought I'd get warm up before a round but I don't.   I feel I can learn more by playing.  Instead, I go to range practice whenever I can't play a round - raining, course bought out, etc..   
  • I avoid playing during busy hours, like Saturday.  That means I am playing a lot by myself or with my wife.  This gives me time to focus more on each shot.   When I play in 4-some, sometimes, I get distracted.
  • My HI improved immediately after my retirement.   Playing 5 - 6 times a week helped me improve on my short game, and course management.   HI improved by about 4 - 5 strokes over the 6 months, not all at once though.  However, I don't think it will continue to improve unless I do something different.  
Sign in to follow this  


5 Comments


Recommended Comments

When I first retired I was playing 4 or 5 times a week, while practicing too. Even braved the weekend crowds.  Did that for quite a while. Now it's 2 or 3 times a week, and never on weekends, and holidays. 

Then one day I thought about something else I wanted to do. That cut into my golf time. As more months passed I found other things I wanted to do. In the long run, having other things to do has helped my golf game. No complacency, or burn out has creeped in. 

In the past year or so I have settled into, what I call a daily "non routine". By that I mean I no longer make a daily schedule for the most part , I still average 45 holes a week. Some weeks I might play 4, or 5 times. Other weeks I don't play at all. I still practice weekly, which is mostly short game stuff. 

The idea of waking up most mornings with nothing planned, but staying busy,  to me, is what retirement is all about. Sure there are maintenance things around the homestead that need to be done, but there is no rush to do them. 

Today is "homemade pancake day" with our youngest Grand Daughters. No golf. Later on it's the "bikini barrel racing" competition up in town. Perhaps this evening a visit to a new sports bar that just opened up near by. Monday through Thursday, at some point, will see me back, grinding it out on the golf course again. 

Share this comment


Link to comment
On 6/25/2016 at 4:46 AM, dennyjones said:

Please continue to keep us updated.    I'm in the similar situation having retired in May.   

Congrats!   Enjoy the retirement.  

 

I thought I'd get serious and start my own "Dan's plan" but I found that I have other things to do - like learning a new language, gardening, ....   Life is good.

 

 

 

Share this comment


Link to comment

I am "semi-retired".  I took a part time job at my old job but at a higher pay rate.I work nights (always have). But now I get a few hours sleep before a morning round. It certainly helps.  I do not play Saturdays.  I may play Sunday. I now run the Senior Men's league at my club and it is growing and it certainly occupies time. It also put me on the Club Executive so for comedy relief I attend the meetings. My golf is not improving but :I don't practice. I just play and have a good time.  My golf is not deteriorating. I find I can concentrate on the shot at the moment.  I would like to putt better when the speed is up on greens around the province but that is unlikely without practice.  I am less inclined to engage in equipment searches.  I am convinced nothing I have ever bought really changed my game. I hit wooden woods when they were in vogue. I hit small headed metal ones. And now I have a large headed one.  ( I secretly believe one I bought from Wal-Mart for Xmas from my wife was the best driver I ever owned but I succumbed to the hype).  All in all I am content. And that is what retirement has done for me.  Hope you all find similar contentment in your retirement pursuits.

Edited by gatsby47

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Blog Entries

  • Posts

    • I think I am grasping the premise of what this video is demonstrating but I don't think that it was demonstrated properly.  If you were only trying to isolate the arms then you should be sitting in a chair ,keeping your shoulders parallel to the target line the whole time, and not setting your wrists which you showed provided 45 mph.  I doubt that you would then generate 95 mph of swing speed and would probably make about half of that. I say this because when you demonstrated the upper body swing you had the benefit of hitting against a stable base and torso because the point was to try to use no lower body at all. However you did set your wrists and that contributed with 45 mph of extra speed that you didn't have when you did the lower body only swing.  Your arms only swing has the benefit of using the wrists as a lever where as the  lower body only swing did not.  The speed of your arms was transferred to a lever point, the wrists, and speed was added, where as if you didn't set your wrists then that would have been more accurate because the speed of the arms would have been transferred directly to the club, and the speed delivered would have been much less. This is exactly what happened in the lower body swing but you had to drag the club through impact because the intent was to only use the lower body.  The lower body only swing had no kinematic transfer of speed, where the arms only swing did, and this where I see your experiment was flawed.  I am in the camp of feeling like my upper body is passive and that I don't set my wrists but I know that it is happening at some point in the swing because I swing 118 mph.  I know that I have fast hips and I try to feel like my upper body, lower, body, and the club, are coming through impact all at one time but I know that is not what is happening in reality because feel is not real of course.  I hope my explanation was clear and that my point was made. 
    • Are you kidding? They pretty much only use rules officials to confirm rules that you learn in your first week of playing the game.
    • I think they are accustomed to playing courses set up in a certain way most every time, and have come to expect a certain base level of ‘playability’ (rough height, green speed, pin placements). They certainly complain when thier normal shots don’t have ‘expected’ results.  They generally execute ‘superb, excellent, or very good’ shots and get upset with any poor results.   I think this expectation, along with the pressure they play under accounts for their frustration. It shows the most  clearly only occasionally (during majors) where they are having thier worst shots, and some normally ‘acceptable’ shots heavily, instead of moderately penalized.  Amatuers complain just as much, if not more when our results are not good.  But we have our lack of talent and execution to blame more readily than PGA Tour players. We amateurs execute ‘very good, pretty good, poor, or very poor’ shots and can more easily understand when things don’t work out.  It’s also interesting to me how the pros play very difficult courses that are set up to play more easily, with perfectly manicured fairways, greens and rough, plus tamped down rough from spectators, and tons of help from spectators and volunteers/staff to locate balls. Not to mention rules officials at thier beck and call to answer any questions and help the take the best advantage of the rules possible.  While we all generally play the opposite, which are easy (short) courses that are not set up much at all, and have bumpy greens, long rough, and no help finding lost balls, not to mention other inconsistencies through and on the greens. It certainly seems from our perspective that they have little to complain about. But if I hit 10 or 14 approach shots in a round that literally struck the greens (LOL for me, not in this decade!), and more than half of those rolled off said greens.... I’d be beside myself with frustration, no matter the stage or the stakes, but ESPECIALLY in a major championship.  Having said all that, I voted yes because, at the end of the day, big picture.. they are playing the greatest game in the world for a living. And a good living, too for most (all?) of them.  “Course was unfair this week! Only made 55k for the week due to my poor finish!” But I get it. They are human, and it is golf. Whining shall happen.    
    • There is a chance that piece was not designed to be removed.  The adapter sleeve is a black plastic component, so this is a different part.  Does the adapter sleeve fit inside of this piece when it's installed in the hosel?
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. DWB
      DWB
      (65 years old)
    2. Goldy49
      Goldy49
      (69 years old)
    3. joezep23
      joezep23
      (58 years old)
    4. Lukeklaas
      Lukeklaas
      (18 years old)
×

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...