Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2335 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I recently bought a set of Apex cf16 off callaway preowned. I bought them at the suggestion of my instructor and he told me to get them +1/2 inch. When I was playing this week and at the range today, the AW seemed really short so I measured the clubs and they seem to be either standard length or in some cases a half inch shorter than spec. I measured the club basically in the position it would be in at address from the floor to the end of the grip. Is that the correct way to measure?

I have a lesson next week and my instructor is also a club fitter so I will ask him, but I was just wondering in the meantime. 


Thanks!


Posted

The catch here is what is standard length.  Ideally, you need club length that fits your body and swing.  If you are hitting the clubs with good gapping and accuracy, don't worry about the clubs being too long or too short

  • Like 1

What's in the bag

  • Taylor Made r5 dual Draw 9.5* (stiff)
  • Cobra Baffler 4H (stiff)
  • Taylor Made RAC OS 6-9,P,S (regular)
  • Golden Bear LD5.0 60* (regular)
  • Aidia Z-009 Putter
  • Inesis Tour 900 golf ball
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
48 minutes ago, Mesa4234 said:

I recently bought a set of Apex cf16 off callaway preowned. I bought them at the suggestion of my instructor and he told me to get them +1/2 inch. When I was playing this week and at the range today, the AW seemed really short so I measured the clubs and they seem to be either standard length or in some cases a half inch shorter than spec. I measured the club basically in the position it would be in at address from the floor to the end of the grip. Is that the correct way to measure?

I have a lesson next week and my instructor is also a club fitter so I will ask him, but I was just wondering in the meantime. 


Thanks!

Here, I go over how to properly measure a golf club. It's at the 3:50 mark.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Upvote 1

  • Moderator
Posted
29 minutes ago, pganapathy said:

The catch here is what is standard length.

When people say standard length, it means the stock length from the manufacturer's specifications.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
49 minutes ago, billchao said:

When people say standard length, it means the stock length from the manufacturer's specifications.

Yes, which is not always the same. A 5 iron is typically 38" but Mizuno, for example, can be 37.75". 


  • Moderator
Posted
Just now, leftybutnotPM said:

Yes, which is not always the same. A 5 iron is typically 38" but Mizuno, for example, can be 37.75". 

Right, there's no industry standard. Hell, there's no manufacturer's standard. Different models made by the same company can have different stock lengths.

I always assume, perhaps incorrectly, when someone mentions standard length, they're checking back to the spec sheet of the particular set of clubs to which they are referring.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, billchao said:

Right, there's no industry standard. Hell, there's no manufacturer's standard. Different models made by the same company can have different stock lengths.

I always assume, perhaps incorrectly, when someone mentions standard length, they're checking back to the spec sheet of the particular set of clubs to which they are referring.

I was a bike mechanic during college and still build bikes now, there is no standard length there either, they all do what they want. 

I looked at the standard length of the cf16s and the AW for example measures 35.5" but I measured around 35" to the end of the grip. The clubs were supposed to be +1/2 so even with measurement error, the club is short. The 5 iron is supposed to be 38" at standard length and I measured it to b 37.5 or so. The only club that doesn't fit the pattern is the 4 iron. Standard is 38.5" and it measured 38".

Its not really noticeable on the longer clubs, but the shorter irons feel short. 


  • Moderator
Posted
3 minutes ago, Mesa4234 said:

The only club that doesn't fit the pattern is the 4 iron. Standard is 38.5" and it measured 38".

I'm not quite understanding. It's 1/2" shorter than standard like the other clubs you mentioned. That fits the pattern.

Maybe they listed the set in error as +1/2" instead of -1/2", or accidentally sent you the wrong set or something.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I meant to say it measured between 38 and 38.5, but still short. I have a feeling you are right, they were a -1/2 instead of +1/2. I am away on vacation for the next couple of days but I will give them a call next week. Thanks for the insight!


  • Moderator
Posted
14 hours ago, billchao said:

Right, there's no industry standard. Hell, there's no manufacturer's standard. Different models made by the same company can have different stock lengths.

I always assume, perhaps incorrectly, when someone mentions standard length, they're checking back to the spec sheet of the particular set of clubs to which they are referring.

Even grip butt ends can be different thicknesses. So there is a lot of variation.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2335 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.