Jump to content
IGNORED

Moe Norman


iacas
Note: This thread is 3303 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Okay, so now the question - if engineers build Iron-Byron on a one plane swing, if its easier to learn and more consistent for the avg. golfer - whats the reason that a swing like Moe Normans isnt taught way more frequently, or do i overlook here something?

The elephant in the room. And honestly I can't even begin to answer it. All I can guess is that tradition dies hard, and that the swing is perhaps just too unappealing aesthetically, if that's the right way of putting it. People are stubborn and prideful, and oftentimes would more willingly play at a lesser level the traditional way than a higher level, if it means looking different and funky. I can say that I am happy for this thread and getting to know Moe better over the last couple of days. I couldn't be more enthralled with the man and his casual, confident and totally original approach to the game. I highly recommend that those who read this thread spend a half an hour checking him out on youtube, moenorman.org and moenormangolafacademy.org (register for the best stuff). While watching him hit is truly a jaw dropping experience, watching his interviews is almost better. Moe's philosophy goes beyond the game for which many of us already see parallels to life. Though not for everyone, for lovers of the game, Moe Norman is a must know personality in my book. Would that I could shake this man's hand.

Launcher 2009 10.5º, S
Rescue Dual 16º
Rescue Dual 19º
Maltby MTF 4-pw, Rifle 5.5
Maltby M-Series 52.6, 58.8 2008 AnserOut of the bag: Big Bertha Fusion 15º, YS6+ R (for sale or trade)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


The elephant in the room. And honestly I can't even begin to answer it.

Pretty much. Aesthetically it isn't too appealing. And honestly, it probably isn't any easier, or harder, to master than the typical 8-piece swing Hogan published. And Hogan's technique became the standard with 100's of teachers, etc.

As well, the classic swing has done pretty well so there isn't motivation to change.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
Pretty much. Aesthetically it isn't too appealing. And honestly, it probably isn't any easier, or harder, to master than the typical 8-piece swing Hogan published. And Hogan's technique became the standard with 100's of teachers, etc.

And Moe was never a long hitter, and while accuracy is more important than distance, it's not that easy. There are tradeoffs.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

He certainly was an enigma in golf. I've read a lot of statistics on him, number of hole in ones double eagles, etc. Are there any truth to this all that people have verified or was it something he told?
Has anyone ever been able to replicate his swing somewhat accurately and experience the same results? Not in terms of hole in ones, but accuracy and distance control.

He had the timing and swing path in order. Not many shots left and right from him.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

He certainly was an enigma in golf. I've read a lot of statistics on him, number of hole in ones double eagles, etc. Are there any truth to this all that people have verified or was it something he told?

When i first started reading this thread about Moe - it felt like reading one of those "Chuck Norris Awesomeness Joke" threads. But if you dig a bit deeper you can find enough scources that confirm lots of the stuff told here.

Emulating a swing, and "owning" it are quite different things. If i recall correctly, he claimed to hit over 5 million balls in his life time (if he would hit 500/day that would be 27 years every day!!). If you go ahead and hit that many balls you will be called one of the greatest ball strikers too. If you can achieve that goal is a completly different thing. I think Moe was lucky that he stumbled across a swing that actually puts less stress on the body so he could practice more, compared to a more traditional swing, and keep working and developing his swing without having to bother much about physical stress to the body. (I´m not a doctor, but i actually read doctors papers recommending a style of swing with less rotation to reduce stress esp. on the back.) So today i went to the range in the morning and hit a couple buckets trying to include some elements of a one plane swing into my swing - and it actually felt okay and i hit some really pure shots - then i went to play 18, where ball striking wasnt really the problem and after that i saw my pro, and we talked about it a bit. He actually was familiar with Norman style of swing and he knew that even Tiger recognised his swing. Then came the argument i always love when i go to my pro with some new idea - if this swing would be so great, why dont we see it more on tour? Well, why dont we actually see it on tour?

Burner 9°
FW Burner 15°
Burner Rescue 19°
MP67 4-PW
CG10 50° CG12 DSG 54° & 60°

Link to comment
Share on other sites


And Moe was never a long hitter, and while accuracy is more important than distance, it's not that easy. There are tradeoffs.

I suppose the greatest pro ever will figure a way to master both of these techniques.

Personally, I'm fine with the Hogan technique. It isn't too complex and relies on a few fundamentals to be executed correctly. I really think a lot of people over-complicate the golf swing. Plus, the Hogan technique draws a lot of power without much effort and if you wanted to lay off on the power for more accuracy, it isn't a thing at all. Half swings go pretty far still and almost never have straightness issues.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Great read!!! What an orginial man he was.

Driver.... Nickent DX Evolver V2 65 stiff /07 Burner YS6+ stiff .
4 wood..... Nickent 4DX
Hybrids.....Tour Edge Geomax 22* 25* 28*
Irons.....TM R7 6-P + AW,SW,LW
Putter.....Odyssey White Hot XG 2 BallBag.......Callaway ORG 14 A.L.I.C.E. Ball........Bridgestone e6 / Srixon Soft Feel...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Then came the argument i always love when i go to my pro with some new idea - if this swing would be so great, why dont we see it more on tour? Well, why dont we actually see it on tour?

Moe was short, which you don't want to be on the tour today. Even with good accuracy you don't want to hit a wood into every par 4. I don't know how far he hit it, but I assume that is a part of the reason. Another is that Moe had perfect timing and movement. You can mimic a swing all you want, but it's the positions and movements from the top of the backswing to the ball that is causing most trouble, and is also what's hardest to mimic.

Most players hit stray shots, Moe seemed to have perfect control of his clubhead, keeping it square all the time. If you do this along with having a consistent swing and good impact, you'll be good at distance control. Moe owned his swing, like Ben Hogan. Many have tried to copy them, but it will never be as good as the original. Feelings and muscle pressure can't be seen and copied.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The foremost authority on Moe's swing is without a doubt Todd and Tim Graves. They have the Grave's Academy and teach Moe's swing. Check out swinglikemoe.com There you can find a wide variety of info. about Moe. Todd learned from Moe and by reviewing and studying a lot of video of Moe. Search Todd Graves on youtube as well as Moe. There is a lot of info out there.

Moe's way of swinging the club is not the only way to deliver the club square to the ball at impact. It requires the least amount of moving parts, thus it is easier to repeat. Why is it not on tour yet? Let's examine this a little bit. The guys getting on tour now have been building their swings at country clubs across America. The pro's at those clubs do not know Moe's swing enough to be able to teach it effectively to kids at an early age. And.. do you think if you are good enough to go to college and play golf you are going to change your swing and make it 100% different than anything else you have ever learned? On top of that, making it on tour is less about ball striking than it is putting now anyway. The guys that win are the ones making the putts... plain and simple.

I see some of the changes Tiger is making in his swing. He is trying to adapt some of what Moe did to his swing to make it more simple. When his game is on, Tiger's stance is a little wider, the arms do more of the work, and the hips are under control because he keeps his right foot on the ground until well after impact. When Tiger sprays the ball, the heal of his right foot is off the ground well before impact.

Tim and Todd Graves teach Moe's swing in only 4 moves. It's pretty easy, but it does go against what most have learned their whole life, so it's hard to change. I have been working on it for over 10 years. While I don't quite "own" it yet, because I still miss a fairway once in a while, and my brain gets in my way, I can go out on any golf course and know I can find my ball a lot easier than most other players.

My swing thoughts:

- Negative thinking hurts more than negative swinging.
- I let my swing balance me.
- Full extension back and through to the target. - I swing under not around my body. - My club must not twist in my swing. - Keep a soft left knee

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Do you happen to have a video of your swing MiniMoe? Would've been interesting to see how it looks like. At +4 your are obviously doing something right on the course.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

One thing that has only been lightly touched on here is the sheer number of balls that Moe hit. I contend that anyone who hits that many balls is going to be a good ball striker, regardless of the swing they employ.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


If I didn't have to pay as much at the range, I'd hit a lot more balls. I hit over 1000 balls over one week once and thought it was pretty much, but it's nothing close to 4-500 a day. It cost over $65 to hit 600 balls, do this 7 days in a row and you're paying $455. That's just not an option.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

My brother has my swing on his vid camera, but has yet to get it to me.. He is a police officer and works really weird hours right now. I'm going to bug him on his next day off to get it.

Back in the day when Moe was learning his swing, he had a shag bag and would hit the balls to one end of the range, then hit them back to the front end of the range. He also did not work much during day to make time to hit all those balls.

My swing thoughts:

- Negative thinking hurts more than negative swinging.
- I let my swing balance me.
- Full extension back and through to the target. - I swing under not around my body. - My club must not twist in my swing. - Keep a soft left knee

Link to comment
Share on other sites


If I didn't have to pay as much at the range, I'd hit a lot more balls. I hit over 1000 balls over one week once and thought it was pretty much, but it's nothing close to 4-500 a day. It cost over $65 to hit 600 balls, do this 7 days in a row and you're paying $455. That's just not an option.

Get a shag bag and 100 balls and find a place to where you can swing for free. You're often limited to using shorter clubs, but a swings a swing so w/e.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Do you happen to have a video of your swing MiniMoe? Would've been interesting to see how it looks like. At +4 your are obviously doing something right on the course.

Yes i wanted to ask the same thing - that would be great.

Moe was short, which you don't want to be on the tour today. Even with good accuracy you don't want to hit a wood into every par 4. I don't know how far he hit it, but I assume that is a part of the reason.

I never found infos on that topic either, but you have to be careful, if you call somebody "short" that played like 40 years ago - just because he didnt bomb it out there 300y back then, doesnt mean its impossible to do nowadays with the new technology available (and despite that - short distances not necessarily have to come from a different swing - they can be body related - i guess Moe wasnt that much into Yoga and stretching

) . I remember reading, that he admitted, that he actually was longer in older age with newer technology than back then. MiniMoe - would you mind giving us your distances on your clubs or comparing it to distances with a more traditional swing? I think,the normal amateur struggeling around 15-20 hcp doesnt need more distance, he needs more consistency and obv. a simplified approach to the game, since he doesnt have the time to practice that much to ingrain the traditional golf swing in a reasonable amount of time to make it consistent for him.

Burner 9°
FW Burner 15°
Burner Rescue 19°
MP67 4-PW
CG10 50° CG12 DSG 54° & 60°

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Get a shag bag and 100 balls and find a place to where you can swing for free. You're often limited to using shorter clubs, but a swings a swing so w/e.

That is an option. I do have access to huge grass fields where I could do something like that. Hitting short irons is better than nothing.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

One thing that has only been lightly touched on here is the sheer number of balls that Moe hit. I contend that anyone who hits that many balls is going to be a good ball striker, regardless of the swing they employ.

Did he really hit that many balls? In one of the video he says " i hit 3 million ball in my life" he looks 60+ in the video and he started play around 10. 3m/50= 60,000. 60K/365= 164 balls a day every day in his life. Granted that allot of balls but not some amazing number that other could come close to. Vijay hit 500+ ball a day 4-5 days a week, I would guess that even at his age heover the 3M mark.

Driver R7 Superquad NV 55 shaft or Bridgestone J33 460 NV 75 shaft
3 and 5 Wood X
Hybrid original Fli Hi 21* or FT 22*
Irons AP2
Wedges Vokey 52* - 8 , 56* 14, 60*-7Putter California CoranodoBall TP RedGPS NeoRange Finder- Bushnell Tour V2 When Chuck Norris puts spin on the ball, the ball does not...
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3303 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Wish I could have spent 5 minutes in the middle of the morning round to hit some balls at the range. Just did much more of right side through with keeping the shoulders feeling level (not dipping), and I was flushing them. Lol. Maybe too much focus on hands stuff while playing.
    • Last year I made an excel that can easily measure with my own SG data the average score for each club of the tee. Even the difference in score if you aim more left or right with the same club. I like it because it can be tweaked to account for different kind of rough, trees, hazards, greens etc.     As an example, On Par 5's that you have fescue on both sides were you can count them as a water hazard (penalty or punch out sideways), unless 3 wood or hybrid lands in a wider area between the fescue you should always hit driver. With a shorter club you are going to hit a couple less balls in the fescue than driver but you are not going to offset the fact that 100% of the shots are going to be played 30 or more yards longer. Here is a 560 par 5. Driver distance 280 yards total, 3 wood 250, hybrid 220. Distance between fescue is 30 yards (pretty tight). Dispersion for Driver is 62 yards. 56 for 3 wood and 49 for hybrid. Aiming of course at the middle of the fairway (20 yards wide) with driver you are going to hit 34% of balls on the fescue (17% left/17% right). 48% to the fairway and the rest to the rough.  The average score is going to be around 5.14. Looking at the result with 3 wood and hybrid you are going to hit less balls in the fescue but because of having longer 2nd shots you are going to score slightly worst. 5.17 and 5.25 respectively.    Things changes when the fescue is taller and you are probably going to loose the ball so changing the penalty of hitting there playing a 3 wood or hybrid gives a better score in the hole.  Off course 30 yards between penalty hazards is way to small. You normally have 60 or more, in that cases the score is going to be more close to 5 and been the Driver the weapon of choice.  The point is to see that no matter how tight the hole is, depending on the hole sometimes Driver is the play and sometimes 6 irons is the play. Is easy to see that on easy holes, but holes like this:  you need to crunch the numbers to find the best strategy.     
    • Very much so. I think the intimidation factor that a lot of people feel playing against someone who's actually very good is significant. I know that Winged Foot pride themselves on the strength of the club. I think they have something like 40-50 players who are plus something. Club championships there are pretty competitive. Can't imagine Oakmont isn't similar. The more I think about this, the more likely it seems that this club is legit. Winning also breeds confidence and I'm sure the other clubs when they play this one are expecting to lose - that can easily become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
    • Ah ok I misunderstood. But you did bring to light an oversight on my part.
    • I was agreeing with you/jumping off from there.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...