Jump to content
IGNORED

Fake Callaway FT9?


Note: This thread is 1266 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

It appears legit to my aging eyes but I'm not sure how one would really be able to tell the difference from a few photos online. If you haven't bought it I'd recommend ensuring it comes from a reputable seller. If you have bought it maybe take it a Callaway demo day and have the rep take a look at it.

And, if you've bought it and like the way it hits, who cares if it's legit - at least until you go to sell it, anyway?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Looks real. Looks are easy to fake but sound and weight can be a better indicator. Did that ‘hyperbolic’ sticker come on the new ones?

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

What makes you think it might be fake? That is the question.

There is absolutely nothing about it that would make someone think it was.

And....in case you didn't know, these date back to about 2010.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • iacas changed the title to Fake Callaway Ft9?
8 hours ago, Shorty said:

What makes you think it might be fake? That is the question.

There is absolutely nothing about it that would make someone think it was.

And....in case you didn't know, these date back to about 2010.

Seller only asking $50.00 for what appears to be new condition.

Serial number starts with "3" instead of the usual "6" that is on all the other FT-9's for sale.

I do know it dates back to 2010. I have a growing collection of everything Cally made dating back to the GGB from the late 90's.  Back then is when I started playing the game and was one of those that would pay full retail for the new Cally drivers, woods....etc. Of course the price paid for them held my swing back for some reason as I was always worried about dinging the new club. Since getting back into this I have been buying clubs for a fraction of what they sold for. Been building the collection since 2015 and having fun cleaning and touching them up. Now when I go to the range I swing without that Nagging thought going thru my head about dinging the thing up.....LOL

Call it weird I guess, but having learned how to do all my own work has taken my game to new levels. Reshafting, gripping, and modifying is just making it more fun. I like these I-mix heads as I can prepare and try different shafts while practicing.

I went ahead and bought the FT-9 in question, and since Ebay offers buyer protection I really have nothing to lose right.

Along the way though I did get jilted on a FT iZ 3&5 wood that looked great in the photos, but turned out to be knockoffs. Magnet sticking to the crown, fake fill hole and all, but the seller quickly refunded.

Just thought I'd ask about the new driver here as maybe some of you have actually had one of these back when they came out.

thx

Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • iacas changed the title to Fake Callaway FT9?

Pretty sure it's fake. Has that cheaper fake look that some Callaway's have. Might be wrong as it's so old and my memory of that club isn't great, but the lettering looks clunky, the face looks overly shiny, and the textured section on the sole doesn't look quite right.

Even if real, I don't know that I would pay $50 for it. You can spend a little more (still under $100) and get something better in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


39 minutes ago, Adam C said:

Even if real, I don't know that I would pay $50 for it. You can spend a little more (still under $100) and get something better in my opinion.

@Mikem65d, I agree with this. You can get newer and better drivers for a little bit more money. Why bother with this club?

1 hour ago, Mikem65d said:

Of course the price paid for them held my swing back for some reason as I was always worried about dinging the new club.

This is silly, no offense. Clubs are for hitting. If you have some "collector's clubs," then hang em on the wall. Otherwise, swing and hit the ball...hard!

1 hour ago, Mikem65d said:

having learned how to do all my own work has taken my game to new levels. Reshafting, gripping, and modifying is just making it more fun.

I doubt this has made your game better because such things do not enhance your golf skills, but I agree that it may be more fun.

By the way, I like Callaway woods as well. I have an Epic Flash Sub Zero driver, Epic Flash Sub Zero 3w and 5w, and an Epic Flash heavenwood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

7 hours ago, Mikem65d said:

Seller only asking $50.00 for what appears to be new condition.

 

Asking market value for something doesn't imply it's fake. 

 

Screen Shot 2021-04-04 at 5.42.20 am.png

  • Like 2

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 1266 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • 78 today at Minnesott (36 front / 42 back) - a new first with an even par on the front.  A big day of up and downs for par.  Only 26 putts against 4 GIR and 5 nGIR.  Was a CPO (cart path only) day due to recent rains.  Overall game was on - until 18 where I was looking at having a first “no-sixes” and made a triple 7 (tee shot in the lake, 2nd tee in fairway, shot 4 approach to right of green pin high, shot 5 bogie on the green, long two putts for triple 7.  Still a solid round and new personal best. 
    • I believe that 76 bpms is the tour average (or somewhere around that). I think that's from taking it back to impact. I'm not 100% sure of exactly how it works since a typical pendulum is already moving when it starts going back. The putter on the throughswing ideally would work pretty much exactly like a pendulum though. To get the exact same time period from starting the putter back to impact, you'll have to accelerate it a lot faster on a longer putt right at the beginning until it gets to the speed it needs to be to make the putter move the right distance. Probably all way too much to think about while actually hitting a putt, but bottom line is I agree entirely that a metronome is a good thing to use if you're working on your putting tempo. As to the split between backstroke and downstroke, the tour tempo lot said 2:1 is the ideal. 3:1 for full swing. 2:1 for short game and putting. Whenever I go on a SAM I am about 1.7:1 I think and I can't for the life of me get my backstroke to be slow enough to get it to 2:1. Ho hum. Last comment - if you do have a perfect pendulum putting stroke and you have the ball slightly forward of the center of your stance, then the putter should be just starting to rise again at impact and with the way that pendulum motion works, it should be very slightly decelerating at impact, which I believe someone may have suggested once 😛 
    • Was going to chime in on Erik’s videos - they were and are solid teaching on better putting.  
    • I'm a big fan of the metronome. I forget what my actual numbers were, but something like 0.59 seconds: my backswings, regardless of the length of the putt, is 0.59 seconds (or 0.72 or whatever the actual number was). The period of a pendulum is determined by the length of the pendulum. So, to hit a putt harder, you take it back farther… in the same amount of time. So you have to swing it faster, and thus, it comes through faster. The putter head has to travel faster to travel farther in the same amount of time. Everyone tends to have a "beat" that they like. For some it's slower, and they have to make bigger backswings to make a putt go the same distance as someone like Brandt Snedeker. It also has a metronome IIRC. 😄 
    • Day 141 (20 Sep 24) -  Late getting to the weekly men’s scramble, plus the course was under a delay (rains yesterday saturated the course) so it was a solo round day. The course was 100% CPO (cart path only) so shot placement was key.  Opted to play the Diablo Edge Irons as “in my mind” the chunky, wide soles play better in wet turf coupled with Eye2 wedges (50.5 & 57.5).  Had best front nine ever - an even 36 (one bogie, one birdie and seven pars), back was typical at 6-over (could have been easily 3-over if not for the triple on 18 - can we say 1st drive into the lake, approach to the right of the green a s a long two putt) .  Long story short - as new personal best of 5 over for a 78.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...