Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1252 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted
8 hours ago, Ty_Webb said:

One thing I would add to this by the way. A few driving ranges have mirrors behind the hitting bays that I've seen. I quite like them, but it's worth noting that because your eyes are not at hand height at address (one would hope at any rate), you're effectively looking at yourself from the high right angle, so if you're trying to have the club work up along the shaft line on your backswing, you'll be exaggerating it if you follow that line in the mirror (exaggerating assuming you're too far inside to start with)

That is what great about MirrorVision. I just look at the iPad at the different positions and I can see how it looks from the proper camera angle.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
18 hours ago, iacas said:

What do you think of this video?

Not blowing smoke.
That's a great video.

 

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
12 hours ago, iacas said:

No excuses, V! 😄

Nah, no excuses for sure... just wiser today than yesterday. 

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Hey, I just noticed AMG did a similar video on Gears with the viewing angles.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
2 hours ago, nevets88 said:

Hey, I just noticed AMG did a similar video on Gears with the viewing angles.

Yeah it’s a few years old I think.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 12/15/2021 at 9:42 PM, GolfLug said:

Hmm.. no idea. But motion is still a series of static images. Higher the frequency, smaller the incremental unit of motion measured. All similar systems verification works the same way in principle - known size, rate of motion and mapping. I could be wrong there can't be any serious IP in that.

The 'money' is in the program that stiches the images together from all cameras to produce the resulting output. The data output is staggering especially rates of individual motion and relative movements IMO.

I remember something about  'phantom cameras' being used to check their computer generated images.

Hobby is studying golf biomechanics (especially the kinetics) . No official handicap and play only 7-8  times a year for fun scoring between 81-85 . Don't practice and just use external focus cues to swing with a general appreciation of the physics involved. My favourite golf scientists are Dave Tutelman and Dr Sasho Mackenzie.


  • 4 weeks later...
  • Administrator
Posted

A few topics:

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Informative 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 months later...
  • Moderator
Posted

So AMM just posted this and it basically says what's mentioned in the camera angle video above and recommends similar optimal camera placement.

 

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)

I wonder if GEARS has the capability to check the below:

1. How the tour pros PA2 angle is released in the downswing. Basically, a graph showing rate of change of the angle between shaft and lead forearm. 

For example, when looking at these kinematic sequence graphs, Rory's lead arm seems to have a greater angular velocity than the club (ie. the blue graph moves temporarily above the brown line). Same happens for Ricky Fowler, Ernie Els, Grant Waite and JB Holmes. 

Does this mean that the angle between the lead arm and club shaft is actually decreasing in the early downswing for the golfers I've just mentioned?

 

image.thumb.png.42c62840bb814748b3c32867f316e08c.png

 

 2. For tour pros, does an extension of their club shaft trace a 'swing plane line' as demonstrated by Martin Hall's old you-tube video?

 

 

For example, Dr Kwon mentions that tour pros shafts swing on a functional swing plane (FSP) between MD (mid-downswing) and ZC (zero wrist-cock) in the image below which also traces the FSP plane base line.  He shows how the shaft deviates off that FSP in the downswing but there isn't any indication whether an extension of the shaft still continues to trace that FSP plane base line.

TGM proponents would define that tracing of the swing plane line throughout the downswing as swinging 'On Plane'. 

 

image.thumb.png.6bda46f4bfda8452ed3fed39b61a2425.png

 

image.thumb.png.befada03af62ffb2c07950d91f24233e.png

Edited by Warlock

Hobby is studying golf biomechanics (especially the kinetics) . No official handicap and play only 7-8  times a year for fun scoring between 81-85 . Don't practice and just use external focus cues to swing with a general appreciation of the physics involved. My favourite golf scientists are Dave Tutelman and Dr Sasho Mackenzie.


  • Administrator
Posted
8 hours ago, Warlock said:

1. How the tour pros PA2 angle is released in the downswing. Basically, a graph showing rate of change of the angle between shaft and lead forearm.

Yes.

8 hours ago, Warlock said:

Does this mean that the angle between the lead arm and club shaft is actually decreasing in the early downswing for the golfers I've just mentioned?

That's pretty common. Trail elbow and lead arm adduction also change a little bit then.

8 hours ago, Warlock said:

2. For tour pros, does an extension of their club shaft trace a 'swing plane line' as demonstrated by Martin Hall's old you-tube video?

Depends on a few things, including how strictly you're defining the "plane line" and when in the swing you're talking about.

On the downswing, Tour players tend to shift this line a lot less than most amateurs.

8 hours ago, Warlock said:

For example, Dr Kwon mentions that tour pros shafts swing on a functional swing plane (FSP) between MD (mid-downswing) and ZC (zero wrist-cock) in the image below which also traces the FSP plane base line.  He shows how the shaft deviates off that FSP in the downswing but there isn't any indication whether an extension of the shaft still continues to trace that FSP plane base line.

But as you can see, it doesn't deviate much. There are ams that are too shallow then too steep, then still try to find a way to hit the ball.

But then there are also pros like Matt Wolff, too.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

I was looking at HackMotion graphs of DJ on their website and wondering whether GEARS matches (approximately) the figures as per below?

Radial deviation of only 4  degrees at the top of the backswing seems  a bit on the low side even though its more difficult to do this when your wrist is bowed.

The increased bowing of the wrist just before impact also looks a bit strange and wondering how he is able to physically do that?

all-data-1024x507.png

Edited by Warlock

Hobby is studying golf biomechanics (especially the kinetics) . No official handicap and play only 7-8  times a year for fun scoring between 81-85 . Don't practice and just use external focus cues to swing with a general appreciation of the physics involved. My favourite golf scientists are Dave Tutelman and Dr Sasho Mackenzie.


  • Administrator
Posted
3 minutes ago, Warlock said:

I was looking at HackMotion graphs of DJ on their website and wondering whether GEARS matches (approximately) the figures as per below?

Which specifically? And why…? HackMotion specifically and only measures the wrist.

3 minutes ago, Warlock said:

The increased bowing of the wrist just before impact also looks a bit strange and wondering how he is able to physically do that?

Specifically what? The green line? It could be extending because the handle goes while the clubhead slows as it hits the ball. Or it's just the last little roll that adds a little flexion.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, iacas said:

Which specifically? And why…? HackMotion specifically and only measures the wrist.

Specifically what? The green line? It could be extending because the handle goes while the clubhead slows as it hits the ball. Or it's just the last little roll that adds a little flexion.

His radial deviation at P4 seems to look greater than 5 degrees in this sky sports video (or is this due to parallax)? Does GEARS also measure the same figure?

 

 
"Specifically what? The green line? It could be extending because the handle goes while the clubhead slows as it hits the ball. Or it's just the last little roll that adds a little flexion."
 
Not sure I understand what you meant above. What confused me is the flexion-extension graph showing increased flexion happening just before impact. Look at graph below where it shows increased flexion from -10 to  -21  degrees.  How can his lead wrist flex more when the pull force on his hands can be very high approaching impact?
 
I just wanted to know whether GEARS superior working frequency (is it 450 Hz?) corroborates similar wrist measurements as shown in HackMotion (which I think only operates at 100 Hz).
 
extension-graph--1024x998.png
 
Edited by Warlock

Hobby is studying golf biomechanics (especially the kinetics) . No official handicap and play only 7-8  times a year for fun scoring between 81-85 . Don't practice and just use external focus cues to swing with a general appreciation of the physics involved. My favourite golf scientists are Dave Tutelman and Dr Sasho Mackenzie.


Posted
2 hours ago, Warlock said:

His radial deviation at P4 seems to look greater than 5 degrees in this sky sports video (or is this due to parallax)? Does GEARS also measure the same figure?

 

 
"Specifically what? The green line? It could be extending because the handle goes while the clubhead slows as it hits the ball. Or it's just the last little roll that adds a little flexion."
 
Not sure I understand what you meant above. What confused me is the flexion-extension graph showing increased flexion happening just before impact. Look at graph below where it shows increased flexion from -10 to  -21  degrees.  How can his lead wrist flex more when the pull force on his hands can be very high approaching impact?
 
I just wanted to know whether GEARS superior working frequency (is it 450 Hz?) corroborates similar wrist measurements as shown in HackMotion (which I think only operates at 100 Hz).
 
extension-graph--1024x998.png
 

I've just found another HackMotion graph for DJ driver swing on one of Scott Cowx more recent you tube videos and it looks slightly different.

I think the top one must be out of phase because that increased flexion happens before impact whereas in the one below it happens after impact.

image.thumb.png.f2e2f4031bc6ea146507967e7c87afcc.png

 

 

 

Hobby is studying golf biomechanics (especially the kinetics) . No official handicap and play only 7-8  times a year for fun scoring between 81-85 . Don't practice and just use external focus cues to swing with a general appreciation of the physics involved. My favourite golf scientists are Dave Tutelman and Dr Sasho Mackenzie.


  • Administrator
Posted
9 hours ago, Warlock said:

His radial deviation at P4 seems to look greater than 5 degrees in this sky sports video (or is this due to parallax)? Does GEARS also measure the same figure?

5° from when?

That video has him about 138.19° to 145.4°, so… a little over 7°.

9 hours ago, Warlock said:

Not sure I understand what you meant above. What confused me is the flexion-extension graph showing increased flexion happening just before impact.

I don't think that actually happens.

9 hours ago, Warlock said:

extension-graph--1024x998.png

 

I think there's very little chance his wrist is extending fast from 1.8 to 1.95, flexes from 1.95 to 2.05, and then immediately changes direction again to extend from there on out.

I'd wager a lot of money it's a lack of precision or some other sort of mechanical issue with the HackMotion, not what DJ is actually doing. Not because HM is poor or anything, but just because of how it measures, the precision possible for a $700 device, etc.

Almost no chance that it goes from -10 to -21 like that. Not starting before impact. Move the impact line 0.05 seconds to the left and maybe it'd work. And even then, I'm still not sure the wrist actually does that, but I could see the "jolt" causing the HackMotion to read it that way.

Stuff is happening fast at that point in the swing.

7 hours ago, jshots said:

 

Would it be possible with gears to compare feet angle at address to face to path at impact of some better ball strikers?

Yes.

7 hours ago, jshots said:

I've had a theory that in the quest to be a more optimal ball striker, you should play with a slightly open stance.

Why?

7 hours ago, jshots said:

If you set up with feet on train tracks, a square face, and hit down on the ball, that would require that your rotate your club face more closed at impact relative to where it started otherwise you would have an open face and hit everything to the right.

Why?

7 hours ago, Warlock said:

I think the top one must be out of phase because that increased flexion happens before impact whereas in the one below it happens after impact.

Yup.

  • Like 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1252 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.