Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1472 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am in the process of re-organizing the man cave.  It’s pretty much always consisted of a fitness area, golf net, music studio, bar.  It will remain similar in function, but I have reduced the footprint of the fitness area after selling a rack and olympic weights.  This gives me the extra space to upgrade the golf set up, including the addition of a simulator.  I’ll use the simulator primarily for practice, as an at-home range makes it much easier to find 30-60 mins for practice.  It’ll also be used to play simulator rounds over the winter months.

I upgraded the net to a Net Return Pro and am also upgrading to a TrueStrike mat.  For now, I’ll just be using my iPad or laptop to display simulator information/graphics (both can ultimately be linked through a TV).  Down the road I may consider a projector and screen, we’ll see.  I have exactly 16ft of length, could maybe push it to 17ft but don’t think that will add any real simulator value at the expense of encroaching on the music studio.

Now the question… which simulator would you choose in this situation, and why?  GC3 or Mevo+?

GC3 seems most logical due to the limited space (photo vs radar), but it is significantly more expensive at $8K.  They had a version for $7K recently (limited courses), but those are not posted anymore.  I’m not willing to go the Bushnell route because I hate the subscription model as a consumer (same goes for SkyTrak).

Mevo+ seems more cost effective, but my worry is it will not be accurate enough with the flight limitations in my set up.  There is a short indoor mode, but I still have concerns whether there will be enough ball flight (for radar to pick up a hook or slice?).

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

8 feet either side of the ball should be enough for the MEVO+ with the short indoor setting. If you use the Titleist RCT balls, then you won’t have to worry about the metal dots too. The bonus is you can use the MEVO+ anywhere. Bring it to the range and gather other data.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
8 hours ago, Denny Bang Bang said:

Mevo+ seems more cost effective, but my worry is it will not be accurate enough with the flight limitations in my set up.  There is a short indoor mode, but I still have concerns whether there will be enough ball flight (for radar to pick up a hook or slice?).

The short indoor setting is enough to pick up the ball flight. Obviously longer flight would make it more accurate, but I use this setting in my practice area in my side yard and it’s fine. I have about 8’ of flight and 8’ behind the ball to set it up as well.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 hours ago, boogielicious said:

The bonus is you can use the MEVO+ anywhere. Bring it to the range and gather other data.

GC3 can be used outdoor as well.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Bryan

:wishon:  919, Aldila Voodoo  :callaway: Razr X Tour 3h  :callaway: Razr Hawk 3w, Aldila NV  :callaway: Razr X Forged 4-PW, KBS Tour  :wishon:  52, 56, 60, KBS Tour
 :odyssey: White Ice 330, 33in  :aimpoint:    :true_linkswear:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
10 hours ago, boogielicious said:

8 feet either side of the ball should be enough for the MEVO+ with the short indoor setting. If you use the Titleist RCT balls, then you won’t have to worry about the metal dots too. The bonus is you can use the MEVO+ anywhere. Bring it to the range and gather other data.

Yes.

I was going to say "get the GC3" but you're one of the few people who have the space for a Mevo+. I'd get some RCT balls and get the Mevo+. It's $1800 to $2k (depending on what deals are available when you buy), and current owners will get a discount on the Pro Package which will be at most $1k (without a discount), so for maybe $2500 to $2700 you can have a pretty great package as opposed to $7 to 8k.

And… I don't know that the GC3 is much more accurate. The Mevo+ is, with my experiences, within 1-2% of an X3 or a Trackman 4, or a GCQuad… so even if the GC3 is only 1%, or 0.5%… is that worth it? It wouldn't be for me, but I'm not going to tell you how to spend your money, as sometimes I buy things that are seemingly minimal to others.

mevo-practice.jpg

The best affordable portable personal launch monitor for golf. FlightScope Mevo includes a ball flight tracker and swing monitor mobile app.
1 hour ago, vasaribm said:

GC3 can be used outdoor as well.

Yep, though it may struggle some in bright sunlight and/or darker conditions.

That's one of the perks of radar vs. camera-based systems.

  • Thumbs Up 2

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thank you for the responses.  I was pretty much resigned to the GC3 route as being the only option under $10K to assure good accuracy with short flight.  Accuracy is high on the list, so reading the Mevo+ is 1-2% off does help make the Mevo+ more appealing.  I do like it comes stock with several “ranges”, plus 5 courses (granted the GC3 comes with quite a bit as well).

It’s a good point as well some of you made on the ProV1 RCT balls, I have read a little about them and helping with spin readings.

I’m generally pretty value minded, so it’s not as much about the money, as it is what I’m getting for the money.  That said, I wouldn’t pay $50 for something that is 20% off on accuracy either.  I’ll have to do a bit more digging on the Mevo+.

@billchao Working within the same 16 ft range, are you happy with the results?  (I.e. you’d buy it again?)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
6 hours ago, Denny Bang Bang said:

@billchao Working within the same 16 ft range, are you happy with the results?  (I.e. you’d buy it again?)

Absolutely. I only found time to do one session with it and I didn’t have my RCT balls yet but my 7i averages came out almost identical to when I got fitted for them on a GC Quad or whatever device it was.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Pulled the trigger on the Mevo+ today, couldn’t resist letting the deal expire tonight while still making up my mind.  I’ll share a pic once everything set up.  Thanks again for all your thoughts.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
3 minutes ago, Denny Bang Bang said:

Pulled the trigger on the Mevo+ today, couldn’t resist letting the deal expire tonight while still making up my mind.  I’ll share a pic once everything set up.  Thanks again for all your thoughts.

Did you click through using the link(s) on the site here?

Congrats! You'll enjoy it.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
21 hours ago, iacas said:

Did you click through using the link(s) on the site here?

Congrats! You'll enjoy it.

I did not purchase it through a link, apologies if the site missed out on any credits or something.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
40 minutes ago, Denny Bang Bang said:

I did not purchase it through a link, apologies if the site missed out on any credits or something.

Yep, that's why we have a carefully curated small set of affiliates.

Enjoy.

For others:

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1472 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.