Jump to content
IGNORED

Jack vs. Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?


Greatest Golfer (GOAT)  

222 members have voted

  1. 1. Tiger or Jack: Who's the greatest golfer?

    • Tiger Woods is the man
      1628
    • Jack Nicklaus is my favorite
      820


Recommended Posts

I think there are too many variables to consider that people overlook. Forgive me if they have already been mentioned a million times, but I'm new here :D

-Equipment Yes Tiger uses forged blades, but there is still a lot of innovation in those irons over what Jack played in his prime. I'd also like to see Tiger use a persimmon driver like Jacks with a balata ball!

-Course Layout More and more courses, including Augusta National are turning into "grip it and rip it" style venues instead of good old "shot makers" tracts. Not saying Tiger can't make shots, but he doesn't have to work the ball as much as the older guys used to.

-Competition A lot of people say Jack didn't have much competition. But I don't think you can put Phil, Padraig, Ernie and others in the same category of Watson, Palmer, and Trevino. Hell, those guys haven't really pushed Tiger that much... his biggest battles were from virtually unknowns like Bob May and YE Yang. But Jack had Watson, Trevino and sometimes Palmer on his ass every week!


Last but not least.... why is Ben Hogan never mentioned in these debates? Im not wishing any bad things here, but I'd like to see what Tiger would do or what Jack would have done if they almost died in a car accident. I'll bet a lot of money that they wouldn't come back and win 6 more majors and be called the best ball striker to ever live!

Driver: taylormade.gif Tour Burner 9.5*
4 Wood: taylormade.gif200 Steel 16*
Irons: taylormade.gif Burner '09
Wedges: taylormade.gif RAC TP Satin 54*, 58*
Putter: odyssey.gif White Hot Tour #9  Ball: bridgestone.gif B330


Old enough to have enjoyed Jack - his win at Augusta in 86' is will be talked about for generations to come. However, Tiger creates a sense of wonderment with blow-out wins and nail-biters. And some of his shots?!? Even non-sports fans followed Tiger.

909D3 Driver 10.5*
909F3 Fairway Metal 15*
909H Hybrid 19*
AP1 3-4 Irons
AP2 5-8 Irons ZB 9 Iron & PW Oilcan Spin Mill 54* & 58* Studio Select Newport 2 SG5


I think there are too many variables to consider that people overlook. Forgive me if they have already been mentioned a million times, but I'm new here :D

This equipment thing is ridiculous. Why didn't you say you want to see Jack play with equipment that Tom Morris Sr was using?

When a player's peers use same equipment as that player, it really is a moot point, it doesn't matter because Tiger isn't playing against Jack and his equipment, and Jack isn't playing against Tom Morris and his equipment.

This equipment thing is ridiculous. Why didn't you say you want to see Jack play with equipment that Tom Morris Sr was using?

I may have missed your point. What was it exactly?


I may have missed your point. What was it exactly?

That people say Tiger has an advantage because of better equipment, but everyone he's playing with has the same equipment, so their is no advantage.

A quote from Kris
...is that college bball really isn't "lower tier". The better teams have their rosters filled with guys who could play in the NBA. hell, guys used to come straight from high school to the NBA. I really don't think there's much of a difference skill-wise between the two.


I can't agree that Nicklaus had tougher competition. That argument just doesn't add up. The feilds today are deeper and just plain better. Jack had big names to deal with because back then there were only about 12 great players today i think that number has tripled. However I will give some back in saying that for too long much of todays's talented field would just fall down and die when Tiger was in the hunt. I see that changing a bit but for the first 6 years of Tiger's career that what happened too often.

i think that tiger is a bigger asset to the game never has there been more people who watched golf just beacuse of him and ratings would go down if he stopped playing. even though jack is still the man with 18 majors.

Omega V cart bag

Driver- i15 9.5 degree UST AXIVCORE 69 S

Woods- big berthaIrons- MP-32 s300 shaftsWedges54* Vokey56* Spin Milled Vokey60* Mp SeriesPutter-Pro PlatinumBalls- ProV1


Thats really a tough call to make, thats like saying who's better Michael Jordan or Kobe Bryant.... Tiger Woods is still playing and will have to see how his career finishes out.

I haven't played golf, consistently, in the last 15 years. But I've always followed golf and remember watching and following it since the mid-80's.

I'm kind of a stats geek (background is baseball) and, at least right now, Tiger is the clear winner. He might falter, he might get injured, his play might drop off...but by any quantifiable measurement, he's way above Nicklaus at the same age.

I haven't read through this whole thread, but I'm sure at least a minority contingent claims Tiger doesn't have the same competition as Jack. To me, that's a fallacy based on results. In other words, because Jack frequently had Arnie or Watson or whomever in the hunt, you're assuming there were more golfers of elite skill level back then. Whereas I think it's more that the competition level is the same or better, but Tiger is an order of magnitude better than that.

Bottom line: Jack might steal a major or two from Tiger, all things being equal. But head to head in the last round of a major? Tiger wins two out of three.

Although, if you ask me who is the most purely talented golfer of all time--sans equipment, training, etc.--Nicklaus might be the one. It's like Deep Blue vs. Kasparov.

In my Grom:

Launcher 9.0 and 3W. Fujikura Hit-on-M Red X-Stiff
'09 Burners 3-AW. KBS +1" Stiff. 1x hard-stepped
A7 2H. UST ProForce Axiv Stiff 56.08 SW Stainless. G5i Putter. TP Burner LDP or Bridgestone e6+.


Tiger- although everyone says that Jack had more competition because of more multiple major-winners, the opposite is true- players win fewer majors each these days because the field is more talented, meaning that Tiger's 14 (and hopefully eventually 18) are more meaningful.

I wasn't around when Jack is at his prime.. but I haven't seen anyone generated as much buzz as Tiger.. for golf game for sure.. and possiblly for all sports as well..

so... tw for sure

How can you compare them?

Jack was in the era of the wooden drivers and 1-rons
Really tough stuff to hit.

Tiger has all this new technology helping him.

I know tiger trains hard.
But for actual talent and ball striking I'd vouch for jack.

My Clubs
Driver - LV4 10* R flex
Wood - sam snead persimmon 2 wood (for windy days)
Hybrid burner tour launch 20* stiff flex.
Irons - Tour Mode 3i,4i stiffIrons - FP's 5-PW R-flexWedge - spin milled 54.14Wedge - spin milled 60.07Putter - Victoria Lowest round 2010: 79 (par 70)Latest rounds at...


How can you compare them?

I'm astounded at the number of people who make this statement without thinking it through. Everyone in Jack's era used the "really tough stuff to hit," and everyone in Tiger's era uses all the "new technology." Tiger is only playing against a field of players with modern equipment, not Jack with persimmon and balata. If anything, this hurts Tiger, as the better ballstrikers were able to distance themselves from the pack in the era of persimmon. Modern technology closes the gap between the top pros and journeyman golfers, making Tiger's dominance even more impressive.


Really wasn't interested in golf during Jack's time so I'm going to have to go with Tiger.

What does this have to do with the relative greatness of Jack or Tiger?!?


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Having had the opportunity to live and work in a few different countries, I've encountered some golf traditions, whether they are well-established customs or unique experiences at local courses. While not all of these are widely practiced, they highlight the diversity and creativity in the golfing world. 1. Japan - The O-Bon Golf Festival In Japan, during the O-Bon (lantern) Festival, I've seen golf courses hosting night golf events with glowing balls and lantern-lit fairways. It's a serene and beautiful way to combine golf with culture.  2. Scotland - The Guising Golfers In Scotland, around Halloween, I've come across golfers participating in "guising," where they dress up in costumes and play a round of golf. It adds a festive twist and a lot of fun to the game. 3. South Korea - The New Year's Honbae In South Korea, golfers play a round of golf on New Year's Day, followed by a celebratory meal and drinks (9th hole and after the game). It's a time for camaraderie and positive intentions for the year ahead. Besides new year's, on higher end courses, they often break on the 9th hole for some light food and drinks like fancy ramen and makgeolli rice wine (ordered in advance). 4. Australia - The Outback Golf Challenge (I have not experienced this one myself) In Australia, there is apparently an Outback Golf Challenge, where golfers navigate rough terrain and face unconventional obstacles. It's considered a true test of skill and adaptability (but hasn't produced many PGA golfers 😉 ). 5. Finland - The Midnight Sun Golf Tournament (I have not experienced this one myself) In Finland, the Midnight Sun Golf Tournament is where golfers play late into the evening under the perpetual twilight of the summer months. The endless daylight makes it a truly unique event. While these traditions may not be universally established, they represent the variety of golfing experiences around the world. I'm curious if any of you have encountered or participated in unique or local golf traditions, whether internationally or closer to home.
    • It's from "Every Shot Has a Purpose" which was co-written by one of Annika's coaches. Decent read about reducing uncertainty and committing to the golf shot.
    • Ah, I didn't realize this was about standing over the ball versus time to play the shot. Definitely two different things there. Yea I would imagine being static over the ball/taking a long time over the ball does make things worse in the long run, hence all the waggles guys will do before pulling the trigger.
    • I'm not sure who said it first but I've seen it a lot. There's this "think box" vs "play box" theory. I've also seen it with a planning vs doing line on the ground. The idea is basically you stand away from the ball (a couple feet) and do your "think box". This is where you do your planning, your swing cues, your practice swings (if you believe in practice swings.) All of that is done in the "Think Box". Then you step into your "play box" address the ball and hit it. Sometimes it's done with a imaginary line on the ground. You do all of the think box stuff behind the line. Then once you cross the line you step up and hit it.  Here's Annika Sorenstam demonstrating the "Think box" and "Play box": So, Annika's time over the ball is really short. Because she did all of that other stuff not over the ball, but in her "Think box".  There are lots of variations on this theme. But I think you get the idea. 
    • I speak for myself. If I inventory my swing thoughts, swing tempo, optimum muscle tension and rehearse a swing before I take my address, then I pull the trigger reasonably quickly with usually acceptable results. Like a proper program download before deploying it. If I don't bother to by forgetting or just not caring, I am inclined to look for my cues while hovering over the ball after taking the address, while tension builds up and then I fire with a half ass program that is still buffering. I guess that's no better than rolling a dice. In other words, a good pre-shot routine does wonders. I am not advising folks to take 13 practice swings while the flowers wilt waiting for something to happen, but one or maybe two are reasonable and good for you. I am certain hitting half ass shitty shots and making double bogey takes longer than making a par.  My desire this year is to just that as I have not developed a habit taking a practice swing and as a result have tendency to freeze over the ball after address, that is counter productive for both time and result. I think that is what @saevel25 is talking about in the OP.      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...