Jump to content
IGNORED

Jack vs. Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?


Greatest Golfer (GOAT)  

221 members have voted

  1. 1. Tiger or Jack: Who's the greatest golfer?

    • Tiger Woods is the man
      1628
    • Jack Nicklaus is my favorite
      819


Recommended Posts

Still Jack for me. Tiger is likely to pass 18 professional majors, but Jack had some attributes which I think Tiger has not yet developed. The fist pump and spit were not in Jacks game.

----------------------------------
909D3 10.5 Matrix Code 6
909F2 15.5 and 18.5 Whiteboard
585H Ozik Altus
MP68 4-P, KBS ZTP 52. 56, 60 KBS DASS Luke DonaldHome club: http://www.bearwoodlakes.co.uk/hm/hm.aspx


whats wrong with a fist pump?

Nothing, just a style thing. Tiger has a different crowd-pleasing style than Jack.

----------------------------------
909D3 10.5 Matrix Code 6
909F2 15.5 and 18.5 Whiteboard
585H Ozik Altus
MP68 4-P, KBS ZTP 52. 56, 60 KBS DASS Luke DonaldHome club: http://www.bearwoodlakes.co.uk/hm/hm.aspx


  • Administrator
Still Jack for me. Tiger is likely to pass 18 professional majors, but Jack had some attributes which I think Tiger has not yet developed. The fist pump and spit were not in Jacks game.

Just as smoking isn't in Tiger's game (but was in Jack's until, coincidentally enough, the U.S. Open at Oakmont). Different eras. Jack didn't really have the Tiger Twirl or the Tiger Leg Kick, either.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Tiger this tiger that. Bunch of nonsence is what goes on. Untile Tiger has better numbers the point is mute. Consequently Jack did great thing with a family life. Tiger nothing so far, lets see results after kids to test his "great" consentration. One track man in my opinion so far. Regarding people who say tiger is longer than jack please, who hit it 300yds with wooden drivers. Not tiger! Better ball striker. Again who has hit 1 irons in competition with results. Not tiger. Yes tiger has better short game but stop saying he is better at everything versus jack.

At this point jack is still the best.

WITB
r7 SQ TP 8.5* Diamana White 83 X
GS Tour 14* Aero 85 X
Md 21* Aero 95 S
MP-67 MP-R Black Ni Wedges Red Circa62 No.2


Since I am part of the younger generation i am going to say Tiger. He has the greatest impact on and OFF the course. I think that you have to have both to be the greatest.
Ace Adair


904R 10*
I3 4 Wood 17* G5 Hybrid 22* CG-4's 4-PW Vokey Design 200 Series-- 50*, 54*, 58* G2 Anser Putter 35" ProV1 Hoofer 3 Bag "Putts get real difficult the day they hand out the money." -Lee Trevino "You are one evil, cunning woman. It's a massive turn on."--House...

1 irons to my understanding are modern 2 irons due to every club being made 1 club stronger in say the past 10-15 years, a modern PW was a 9 iron back in jacks day. Anyway, Id say Tiger so far has been much more dominant, but its too early to compare careers and tiger is/was a great 2 iron player, maybe the best ever, so that whole long iron arguement should be mute

Until Tiger wins 18 majors, Jack is the greatest, but when that happens (and it will...) it will be Tiger. Jack was a better driver, they are about even on iron play, Tiger has the much better short game, and they are both incredible clutch putters. Jack does lose points for being a Buckeye though :)

My bag:

Driver: Cobra AMP 9.5 degree w/ GD6 stiff flex shaft

3 Wood: Ping Anser 14.5 degree THC-800 stiff flex shaft

Hybrid: Titleist 910H 19 degree Mitsubishi Kiani Blue stiff flex shaft

Irons: Nike Pro Combo Tour 4-PW Dynamic Gold S300 shafts

Wedges: Titleist Bob Vokey 52-8, 56-11 and 60-4

Putter: 2-Ball White Steel, 34" bent 1 degree flat


  • Administrator
Until Tiger wins 18 majors, Jack is the greatest, but when that happens (and it will...) it will be Tiger. Jack was a better driver, they are about even on iron play, Tiger has the much better short game, and they are both incredible clutch putters. Jack does lose points for being a Buckeye though :)

I disagree with this way of thinking (but hey, to each his own... I'm only commenting here on my opinion - keep yours, it's just as valid). Bobby Jones didn't win 18 majors (13, IIRC, and only 7 "pro" ones) but he in fact may be the best golfer of all time.

Tiger has won his faster. If a freak accident ended Tiger's career tomorrow, I'm simply suggesting the total number may not matter 100% - there's got to be some consideration for the RATE at which the majors were won, right?

I think Tiger's the best largely because of the rate. If his rate slows and he somehow doesn't get to 18, then both things (rate and total) will be in favor of Jack, but right now his rate's higher and it's almost a foregone conclusion his total will be higher, so I give a slight edge to Tiger.

And yeah, I'd put Bobby Jones ahead of Jack Nicklaus, though I could probably be convinced to change my mind because Jack may have had slightly tougher competition.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I have to vote for Jack because I am tired of hearing about Tiger this, Tiger that. I am waiting for him to walk on the water to get to the 17th green at sawgrass.

Driver-Callaway FT-5 Draw 9.5"

3WD-Callaway Hawkeye 15*

Hybrid-Callaway FT 21*

Irons-Callaway Steelhead X-16 4-P

Wedges-Callaway Big Bertha Tour 52* 56* 60*

Putter-Odyssey White Hot #1


I disagree with this way of thinking (but hey, to each his own... I'm only commenting here on my opinion - keep yours, it's just as valid). Bobby Jones didn't win 18 majors (13, IIRC, and only 7 "pro" ones) but he in fact may be the best golfer of all time.

Bobby Jones played against amateurs, well two of his grandslam were against amateurs weren't they??? Hard to compare any golfers of different era's. We're HUGE tiger fans but if Tiger were to retire tomorrow, dont think you could say without a doubt that Tiger was the greatest. Certainly you would say he WOULD have been the greatest, but the record books have gotta count for something

Golf is not a game of perfect unless you're playing with me


Tiger IS the man.

My Bag

Hybrids: nike.gif VR_S 17º, CPR3 18º, 22º, 26º, 30º R Graphite

Irons: nike.gif Slingshot 6I-PW R Steel

Wedges: nike.gif SV 52º/10, 56º/14

Putter: taylormade.gif Rossa Monza Corsa 34"

Ball: nike.gif One RZN-X


1 irons to my understanding are modern 2 irons due to every club being made 1 club stronger in say the past 10-15 years, a modern PW was a 9 iron back in jacks day. Anyway, Id say Tiger so far has been much more dominant, but its too early to compare careers and tiger is/was a great 2 iron player, maybe the best ever, so that whole long iron arguement should be mute

The long iron's go to Jack hands down. Tiger does have a nice 2 iron "tee shot" but I would say even Fred Couples is/was a better long iron player than I've seen from Tiger. Tiger has a better short game than Jack, and I even give Tiger a slight edge in putting over Jack, but overall ball striking goes to Nicklaus! As far as clubs go, you can't compare a forged blade iron from the 60's and 70's with the forged blades of today. There is a lot of technology in today's forged irons. I've played forged blades for over 30 years and when you slightly mishit a set of McGregor Tourney's from the 70's you instantly knew it and the results would be worse than poor. With today's forged blades you can slightly mishit it and still get away with a respectable shot. Then there's the whole golf ball differences. I always thought it would be interesting to see Tiger play a round with clubs and balls from that era. I'm sure he would be amazed at how easily the ball would spin left or right. It really is amazing what they have done in the last +20 years to take the side spin out of the golf ball! Bottom line is Jack didn't have the technological advantages that Tiger has. Golf was a harder game to play back then. The clubs had smaller sweet spots, and the balls flew shorter and with a lot more side spin.

In My Bag:
Driver: :Cobra Amp Cell Pro 9.5*, Stock X-Flex

3 Wood: :Cobra Bio Cell 16*, Stock X-Flex

5 Wood: Cobra Bio Cell 20*, Stock S-Flex
Irons: Bridgestone J40-CB 3-PW, Project-X 6.0

Gap Wedge::Vokey: 52* CNC  

Sand Wedge: :Vokey: 58* CNC  

Putters: Scotty Cameron Newport II 

Ball: Bridgestone 330-S(2014)


  • Administrator
The long iron's go to Jack hands down. Tiger does have a nice 2 iron "tee shot" but I would say even Fred Couples is/was a better long iron player than I've seen from Tiger. Tiger has a better short game than Jack, and I even give Tiger a slight edge in putting over Jack, but overall ball striking goes to Nicklaus!

Did you happen to watch the last two majors of last year? In particular, the one played in July?

Then there's the whole golf ball differences. I always thought it would be interesting to see Tiger play a round with clubs and balls from that era. I'm sure he would be amazed at how easily the ball would spin left or right.

You do realize Tiger played balata balls in winning some of his majors and all of his U.S. Amateurs, right?

Bottom line is Jack didn't have the technological advantages that Tiger has. Golf was a harder game to play back then. The clubs had smaller sweet spots, and the balls flew shorter and with a lot more side spin.

So? Nicklaus' and Tiger's peers have the same relative advantages or disadvantages. Technology is a moot point. Tiger - and Jack - can only compete with the equipment they have, just as Bobby Jones could before them both.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • A 5400 yd course is not that short for gents driving it 160 yards considering the approach shot lengths they are going to be faced with on Par 4s.  Also, for the course you are referring to I estimate the Par 4s have to average longer than 260 yds, because the Par 5s are 800 yds or so, and if there are four Par 3s averaging 130 the total is 1320 yds.  This leaves 4080 yds remaining for 12 Par 4s.  That is an average of 340 per hole. Anyway, if there are super seniors driving it only 160ish and breaking 80 consistently, they must be elite/exceptional in other aspects of their games.  I play a lot of golf with 65-75 yr old seniors on a 5400 yd course.  They all drive it 180-200 or so, but many are slicers and poor iron players.  None can break 80. I am 66 and drive it 200 yds.  My average score is 76.  On that course my average approach shot on Par 4s is 125 yds.  The ten Par 4s average 313 yds.  By that comparison the 160 yd driver of the ball would have 165 left when attempting GIR on those holes.     
    • I don't think you can snag lpga.golf without the actual LPGA having a reasonable claim to it. You can find a ton of articles of things like this, but basically: 5 Domain Name Battles of the Early Web At the dawn of the world wide web, early adopters were scooping up domain names like crazy. Which led to quite a few battles over everything from MTV.com You could buy it, though, and hope the LPGA will give you a thousand bucks for it, or tickets to an event, or something like that. It'd certainly be cheaper than suing you to get it back, even though they'd likely win. As for whether women and golfers can learn that ".golf" is a valid domain, I think that's up to you knowing your audience. My daughter has natalie.golf and I have erik.golf.
    • That's a great spring/summer of trips! I'll be in Pinehurst in March, playing Pinehurst No. 2, No. 10, Tobacco Road, and The Cradle. 
    • April 2025 - Pinehurst, playing Mid Pines and Southern Pines + 3 other courses. Probably Talamore, Mid-South, and one other.  July 2025 - Bandon Dunes, just me and my dad. 
    • Wordle 1,263 5/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩   Once again, three possible words. My 3rd guess works. 🤬
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...