Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Jack vs. Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?


Greatest Golfer (GOAT)  

222 members have voted

  1. 1. Tiger or Jack: Who's the greatest golfer?

    • Tiger Woods is the man
      1627
    • Jack Nicklaus is my favorite
      820


Recommended Posts

Posted

Someone has likely made this point already (I didn't read all 255 pages ), but this argument should take into account more than major championships.

Fact is, Nicklaus won 73 total tour events, majors included, during his career. Tiger has already won 71 times, majors included, and will obliterate Jack's mark as well as Sam Snead's all-time (men's) record of 82.

And it's not like Tiger is picking off wins against weak fields. Like Jack, he's been highly selective when scheduling and plays only those tourneys with the best fields, on the best courses.

Here's my question: If Tiger finishes with 17 majors and, say, 100 total victories, who's the greatest?

Cheers,
DoctorK

Competitive golf is played mainly on a five-and-a-half-inch course... the space between your ears.
~~Bobby Jones~~


Posted
I know this is blasphemy, but a lot of folks inside golf find Nicklaus to be insufferably arrogant.

Not a crime, nor anywhere near Tiger's sins, I know. But let's not make Nicklaus out to be all class, all the time either. (Granted, his on-course demeanor was immeasurably better than TW's.)

As for competition, if everyone agrees the depth of quality golfers now is superior to Jack's era, doesn't it stand to reason that fewer players would have won more majors back then? (Nicklaus 18, Player 9, Watson 8, Palmer 7). Believe that's just basic logic & math, and the reason Nicklaus' competition appears to have been stacked with more historically great players.

BTW I grew up idolizing Nicklaus, lest anyone think I'm a young turk dissing the older generation.

Sean

Posted
Jack had tougher competition and won 18 majors but even more unbelievable he finished second something like 15 times!!

While first place may be the overriding factor, golf is an individual sport the overall record is relevant. To me the greatest player in golf must be measured by the totality of the record. I would be quite surprised if Tiger ever comes close to that.

The question shouldn't come down to just Jack or Tiger. It does because we have become fixated on winning the four modern majors. That leaves out dominant golfers who played before that test became the standard, and before some of those tournaments even existed.

I don't think anyone would argue that the standard of class in the world of golf was set by Bobby Jones. It's too bad his memory is not more vivid.

I prefer Jack. He is a class act.

His on course demeanor is head and shoulders above Tiger. Just ask Tony Jacklin. Nicklaus plays in his first Ryder Cup and concedes a two-foot putt to Tony Jacklin — results in the first tie in the Ryder Cup history. As he handed Jacklin the marker, he said, ''I don't think you would have missed that putt, but under these circumstances I would never give you the opportunity.'' The match was halved, the tournament ended in a tie for the first time in its 42-year history and the two players walked off the green, arm in arm.

I do think Tiger is a great golfer but have never been on his "band wagon" Wish Jack was back!

If Nicklaus were playing today, in his prime, with today's equipment and especially with the golf balls available today, this thread would be non existent.

My vote is for Jack!

IN MY BAG:

DRIVER: TaylorMade Stealth 2 Plus 9* Fujikura Ventus 65G S shaft
3 WOOD: TaylorMade SIM2 Titanium 3-wood 15* Mitsubishi TENSEI AV Blue 75 S shaft
UTILITY: TaylorMade Stealth 19* 3 Hybrid Aerotech Steelfiber i95 S shaft
IRONS: TaylorMade P760 3-PW;/TTDyn Gold 120 S-300
WEDGES: Clay Long Personal Edition SW 54* TTDyn Gold Tour Issue S400 shaft
WEDGES: Clay Long Personal Edition SW 58* TTDyn Gold X100 8i shaft
PUTTER: PING BeNi Scottsdale Anser or Ping BeNi Anser 4 34.5"
BALL: Bridgestone Tour B RXS


Posted
If there's one area in which one is clearly superior to the other, it's the short game. Tiger's one of the best ever around the greens; Nicklaus was average, at best. And that's one part of golf where equipment has had little if any effect.

Spare me the argument that Nicklaus never missed greens and thus didn't need a good short game. Tiger's GIR stats are always at or near the top.

Cheers,
DoctorK

Competitive golf is played mainly on a five-and-a-half-inch course... the space between your ears.
~~Bobby Jones~~


Posted
I think this argument will be moot soon enough. Still say Tiger will go over 20 majors. Only a matter of time before a 50-something wins a major, and Tiger's health regimen should keep him competitive with the young-uns until age 55 or so. That's 20 more years!

Sean

Posted
Its a good toss up here. I really like Jack although I likr Tiger too. I am going to say Tiger because he is such an athelete.

Posted
All the talent in the world wont make you the most respected golfer in the game. You also need to have class and humility. Tiger doesn't quite have it yet.

:Acer: XF Leggera Driver 10.5* True Ace Death Stick 56g Shaft

 Quick Strike Q4M 21* Hybrid and Q4U 24* Hybrid with  Platinum 60 Shafts

 685 OS Milled Irons 5-PW with  Platinum 60 Shafts

:Killer Bee: NCW Wedges 52* 56* 60*

:TearDrop: Putter

 


Posted
Tough question. It is hard to compare players from any professional sport to players from decades ago. Technology has changed and the game has changed. Hard to say if Jack would have been even better with today's training and technology.

Posted
Jack was before my time so I guess I have always pulled more for Tiger. What Jack did though was amazing considering how far technology has came in the game of golf.

Posted
I believe Tiger is greatest so far because of his short game and accuracy.
And yet he has tremendous atheletic ability to rip the ball apart from the tee.

His escape shots from roughs and trees also contributed to my bias.

Posted
I'm gonna have to go with Nicklaus until proven otherwise.

In the Cleveland bag:
Cleveland Launcher Comp 460 9.5°, Aldila NV 65g S
Cleveland Launcher Steel Fairway 15°, Fujikura Gold 65g R
Cleveland Launcher Hybrid 20.5°, Fujikura Fit-On Gold 65g S
Mizuno MP-60 3-PW, Royal Precision Rifle 6.0 S ...


Posted
I'd have to go with Tiger. With the way the world has globalized and how much more people are exposed to golf, he's definitely up against a better pool of golfers. As time goes on with any sport, you're competing against a greater number of better athletes than ever before.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • They weren't necessarily short - I don't remember the exact specifics of all of it, but some of them were missing a little left or right or both. Day 1 they were landing on the edge and kicking on, where day 2 they were just missing and kicking down into the bunkers and did it a lot. I think all told I actually went into bunkers on 8 holes. Some of them were not good shots. Like a few examples, on 8, the pin was in the back. I hit it solidly, but pulled it and it went long, over the bunker into long grass. I had the ball in sandy earth with long grass around it and about a foot below my feet. That next shot I tried to do what I could but it went into the bunker in front of me. Into a footprint. That one I dug out of the footprint, but still in the bunker. Got that one out of the bunker, but into the fringe grass in front of me. Chipped that one on a bit hard and two putts later made a 7. Another was on 14. The flag was on the little finger of green front left. I tried to play a little past it and a little right. Shoved it maybe 10 yards right of where I wanted to and the carry over the bunker gets longer the further right you go and that one hit the grass between the green and the bunker and came back down into the sand, left it in there and didn't get up and down on the next one. I think carrywise it carried about as far as I was planning on it doing so. Another was on 6, leaked my drive a little right into the fairway bunker. Hit a nearly good shot from there that went a little left and a little short and kicked into the bunker front left. That was a strike thing and just a hard shot. Did similar on 18. Drive in the right bunker, slightly heavy second that hit the bank between green and bunker again and kicked back into the sand. I think the tiredness manifested more as not squaring the face up so well and less as slowing down.
    • Depends on how short you were coming up on these shots. A bit more wind? Also, maybe you were swinging at 2-3 mph slower the next day.  I think the biggest thing is not adjusting. Like making assuming your stock shot is not enough and taking 1 club up. Not sure what type of adjustments you were making in your decision making. 
    • No one should measure a joint mobility away from that joint. If you go to physical therapy, they are not measuring your knee mobility based on your midline. It is based at the joint. Shoulder mobility should be measured in reference to the shoulder joint. 
    • He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4). Oh, I downloaded it and watched it (and commented there) before he blocked me. It's what led to him posting the comment in the "update" above. 😄  Single shoulder range of 75°, and that's going out well into the follow-through. 50° Max range up to impact. Manavian's video is bad. He keeps saying "midline" which is just a horrible way to look at it. He also kept saying that the club was moving that amount — also wrong. Adding left and right together is really freaking dumb. Another golf instructor said "That's like saying the player has 100 degrees of knee bend (adding left knee bend to right knee bend) 🤦‍♂️" (similar to what the biomechanist said about squatting). Also, see my post above about elbow bend. That's why Plummer’s alignment stick demo is so intellectually dishonest. A golfer can't get anywhere near that position on the left with his left hand on the alignment stick (quoted below).  
    • That makes no sense at all.  so, I watched that Instagram. Here is a summary...  Bryson.... Address: Trail Shoulder 0 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 65-deg abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 15-deg abduction. P9: 10 degrees adduction. Rory... Address: Trail Shoulder 16 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 26 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 0 degrees abduction.  P9: 18 degrees of adduction.  DJ... Address: Trail Shoulder 4 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 42 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 2 degrees abduction.  P9: 15 degrees of adduction.  Their point is that arm doesn't stay on the trail side. That the arms have to get across the chest from P4 to P9. I mean they do. What matters is the rate of which it happens relative to the position of the swing. The trail shoulder at P9 is not abducted a lot. The range of that total abduction movement is like 40 to 70 degrees. Bryson might be an outlier. Rory might be an outlier as well.  A couple of points.  1. None of them had any adduction at impact. So, this tells me the trail arms stays on the trail side of the body at impact. Is it moving towards lead shoulder, yes. It doesn't happen till post impact. The right side of the body is moving towards the target, so the arms don't have to as much as people think.  2. Trail shoulder adduction from Impact to P9 is 18 to 25 degrees.  3. P9 adduction of the trail shoulder is only about 2 to 12 degrees more adducted than at address. The arms/hands stay in front of the chest a long-time post impact. If Rory, from his address position just rotated his body towards the target and raised up his arms so he is at P9. He basically didn't have to move his trail arm further across his chest than where he started at address. Visualize that for a bit. I bet for people who tend to stall and drag their arms across their body to hit the ball, that would emphasize how much the arms stay in front of the body and how much you have to turn.             
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.