Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4233 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
My coach has a "Trackman" device". I tried it couple times, seen good but don't know about every shot that is accurated. Sometime the driving range is so windy so my ball goes farther? Or pushed it to the right/left by the wind.

My coach only rely on the "Trackman" report. Should I 100% trust on the report? It also tell me the spin rate, lauched angle, club path, attach angle, face angle,,,,,,ect

Overall is a amazing technology for golf industry.

Posted
How did the ball look and feel to you? Im sure thats more important than what some robot says..
THE WEAPONS CACHE..

Titleist 909 D2 9.5 Degree Driver| Titleist 906f4 13.5 degree 3-Wood | Titleist 909 17 & 21 degree hybrid | Titleist AP2 irons
Titleist Vokey Wedges - 52 & 58 | Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 Putter | ProV1 Ball

Posted

The trackman radar is very accurate, up to 400 yards. It's also accurate to 1 foot at 100 yards for measuring landing points.

The problem with it is that most people don't want to accept the fact that they don't hit it as far as they think.

  • Upvote 1

In my Srixon staff bag:

Driver: Titleist 909D2 8.5 - Grafalloy Epic X
Fairway: Adams RPM LP 13 degree - Grafalloy Epic X
Hybrids: Adams Idea Pro 18 degree - DGSL X100Irons: MacGregor 1025M 3-PW - DG X100SW: Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 54 - DG X100LW: Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 58 - DG X100Putter...


Posted
The problem with it is that most people don't want to accept the fact that they don't hit it as far as they think.

Isn't that the truth. My father-in-law was amazed at how short my drives really were when I showed him the readout on my GPS.


Posted
The problem with it is that most people don't want to accept the fact that they don't hit it as far as they think.

LOL....this is true for the pros as well....how many of those 305 yard drives have about 40 yards of roll from those nice firm fairways....and all seem to claim 290 of "carry"

"Getting paired with you is the equivalent to a two-stroke penalty to your playing competitors"  -- Sean O'Hair to Rory Sabbatini (Zurich Classic, 2011)


  • Moderator
Posted
LOL....this is true for the pros as well....how many of those 305 yard drives have about 40 yards of roll from those nice firm fairways....and all seem to claim 290 of "carry"

Although, I have seen the tracman results from the pro drives that have 290 yards of carry

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The trackman radar is very accurate, up to 400 yards. It's also accurate to 1 foot at 100 yards for measuring landing points.

You are so right!

Trackman mesured my driver distance avg. 273 yard. I always think my driving distance were over 285 yard avg. I guess I was wrong

  • 4 years later...
Posted

I have heard they have different settings on the Tour for Trackman than for amateurs and the public. They measure club speed off the toe for the stars on t.v.  The rest are measured off the heel or mid face. If you think about it this helps to move product and sell new drivers every year because it makes the public feel that much slower. If I watch a guy on t.v. hit something that is in the air for 7-7.5 seconds and they regularly claim a 310- 325 yard carry than I know they are juicing the numbers to create drama and ratings. Anybody hitting at a range or on a course and carrying 8 seconds is hitting bombs but seldom will they read out to farther  than 300-310.


Posted

I have heard they have different settings on the Tour for Trackman than for amateurs and the public. They measure club speed off the toe for the stars on t.v.  The rest are measured off the heel or mid face. If you think about it this helps to move product and sell new drivers every year because it makes the public feel that much slower. If I watch a guy on t.v. hit something that is in the air for 7-7.5 seconds and they regularly claim a 310- 325 yard carry than I know they are juicing the numbers to create drama and ratings. Anybody hitting at a range or on a course and carrying 8 seconds is hitting bombs but seldom will they read out to farther  than 300-310.

Given your handicap, I would guess that you probably are almost as fast as many of the tour players. The issue with using air time, is that balls hit with different initial velocities could have the same hang time. If there is a slight headwind it could hang in the air longer and go less distance.

Do your readings indicate an error from the Trakman? Do you have good correlation between your actual course distances and Trakman numbers for similar conditions?

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The trackman and other Launch monitors computes data and analysis based on phased array Doppler radar & proprietary optical systems, from the moment of impact to about4-5 feet feet from the tee, once the ball is gone from that window it is no longer tracked. Instead highly sophisticated software further calculates what the ball will do based on spin, velocity, smash factor, compression etc

so how does it know the final distance, well it also calculates decent angle and spin RPM degradation. Most pros now are looking for maximum carry with less than 42 degrees of decent angle with the least amount of spin. Somewhere in the 32-38 degree is ideal. Too steep say 50 degress the ball basically plugs or rolls a few yards, too low of angle your carry distance is severely impacted, yeah your roll distance might be 25-30 yards but carry distance is 50 yards less too.

The GUI interface allows for the consumer and pro to SEE the ball flight based on these calculations measured from the tee to a few feet after impact.


  • Administrator
Posted

The trackman and other Launch monitors computes data and analysis based on phased array Doppler radar & proprietary optical systems, from the moment of impact to about4-5 feet feet from the tee, once the ball is gone from that window it is no longer tracked. Instead highly sophisticated software further calculates what the ball will do based on spin, velocity, smash factor, compression etc

I'm almost positive that's not correct. I'll get an answer hopefully within a few hours.

Additionally, they can "track" the clubhead prior to impact as well.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
I'm almost positive that's not correct. I'll get an answer hopefully within a few hours.

@Spitfisher - I was correct - they can track much more than 4-5 feet, up to the entire ball flight. They will extrapolate if the data becomes unavailable (I once saw two balls collide - it extrapolated from there - or a student steps in front of the radar, etc.).

There are two ways to see how long it tracks.

  1. The color of the line changes (if the setting is enabled) when it goes from measuring to extrapolating.
  2. You can look at the raw data (well, as raw as they'll show you), which will show you something like this:

Even the shortest distance on there - 178 yards - is quite a bit farther out than 4-5 feet. :-)

These are true on both FlightScope and TrackMan.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

. . . They will extrapolate if the data becomes unavailable (I once saw two balls collide - it extrapolated from there - or a student steps in front of the radar, etc.). . .

I bet that doesn't happen very often.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

@Spitfisher - I was correct - they can track much more than 4-5 feet, up to the entire ball flight. They will extrapolate if the data becomes unavailable (I once saw two balls collide - it extrapolated from there - or a student steps in front of the radar, etc.).

There are two ways to see how long it tracks.

The color of the line changes (if the setting is enabled) when it goes from measuring to extrapolating.

You can look at the raw data (well, as raw as they'll show you), which will show you something like this:

Even the shortest distance on there - 178 yards - is quite a bit farther out than 4-5 feet.

These are true on both FlightScope and TrackMan.

I never would have guessed this.  Always assumed, probably since it can extrapolate in a studio, that it always does so.  I think this makes it even more impressive.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

I never would have guessed this.  Always assumed, probably since it can extrapolate in a studio, that it always does so.  I think this makes it even more impressive.

After all, FlightScope (EDH) got their start tracking missiles and things. A missile that's a few hundred miles away is smaller than a golf ball that's a few hundred yards away.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

4-5 feet

I am going on what my training was with flight scope, I heard it first hand from the trainer- unless he was wrong. I used both systems most recently flight scopes 100s maybe even 1000s of fitting sessions. In that time I have never seen two balls collide where it impacted the data so far down range. But I have seen golf balls slice, block, hook or fade into a net running parallel to the driving range, never once did I see any indication of a change of ball flight on the gui interface or data. The same goes for trees and yardage bill board signs on the range. I have seen drives at 3 degrees of launch hit the 150 yard bill board dead on, yet the launch monitor still showed it rolled to 200yards.

The numbers you supplied can be hard crunched calculations based on launch, spin velocity etc. Trackman nor flightscope are no simple radar only devices like what the police use, but they use a multitude of sonar, radar and advanced algorithms and mathematical calculations. A vast majority of these flightscopes are used indoors, especially here in the northeast.


Note: This thread is 4233 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The term I hear most often is "double teeing" which means the course/club has starting times from both the #1 and #10 tee.  I have encountered this many times and we know if we are the first group off #10, we may well get to #1 and have to wait because there are groups still with tee times yet to tee of #1.  In most instances, where the course/club has a starter, he normally explains this situation.  In this case, the pro advised what you would could/would encounter making the turn to #1.  And, that is exactly what happened.  Probably would have been wise to talk to the pro after playing back 9 and ask when you could go off #1 since apparently that club does not double tee.   Regardless, the outburst towards the other group was uncalled for.  And, I don't blame the member for being upset.  As a member of a private club, you are responsible for the actions of your guest.  I have played many times as a guest in the UK and I am pretty damn sure my host was responsible for my actions while at the club.  I know at the clubs I have belonged to here in the US, that is the way it is.  As a matter of fact, the member may find himself being brought before management and facing possible suspension.  So, I don't blame him for being upset.  However, as the host, he really should have stepped up and put a stop to the OP's actions.  OP makes this statement "I now understand that standards are different on the "private course." But I'll take those lessons to the muni, too."  No, the standards are not different.  You, sir, seem to be just a bit hard headed and belligerent, even if you are college professor...which possibly explains a lot.   JMHO
    • Day 32: worked for about 10 minutes on my drill. Filmed it as well for a check in. I think it’s slightly better but still seeing some issues. 
    • Day 44 (26 Dec 25)  -  played in the Friday men’s shootout with a twist - used the Toney Penna persimmons and MacGregor blades - had a blast playing these clubs.  They really help in zoning in on making solid ball contact.  Scoring was solid - had several looks at birdie and had a few par saves.  Overall a day of focused course management. 
    • Day 2: 2025.12.27 Eighteen holes at Kauri Cliffs. Focusing on trying to keep flex in right leg during backswing.
    • Day 136 12-26 Had a different practice planned today but life happened. Worked on "wide to wide" and still working on remaining flowy. Starting the club head in front of the ball as a drill, is helping with the flow of the swing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.