Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6035 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
http://www.brianmanzella.com/forum/g...ice-again.html

2 Questions for low handicappers....

1 - what are your thoughts in general on this article/method?

2 - I think I understand most of how this is supposed to work, but from that impact position, my wrists seem to resist rolling over. In other words, getting from the first pic to the second pic is not smooth for me. Any advice here?



Been playing just a few months but I play almost every day.

What's in my bag: Distance Master Driver, Maltby Trouble Out woods/hybrids, Maltby KE4 Irons (all assembled by me so I can never blame my equipment).


Posted
It works. I discovered this some days ago and has since sliced maybe 2 shots on the course. I have however developed a tendency to hook the shots, not preferable, but better than slicing anyways. I'm working on getting it square.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
It works. I discovered this some days ago and has since sliced maybe 2 shots on the course. I have however developed a tendency to hook the shots, not preferable,

I wouldn't say hooking is better. My scores have gotten a lot worse with hooking the ball because once they get to the trees they keep going


Posted
Depends a lot of what course you normally play. On mine I definately want a hook rather than a slice. The hook is also less pronounced. I think it's better because it shows I'm doing something different and finally managed to get rid of the slice I've been hitting for the last...5, 6 years. I also think it's easier to work back to a square clubface from a closed than an open.

I'm not going to settle for a hook, so it won't call it a wanted shot, my goal is square. I've also got a slightly in-to-out swingpath, so a slice goes further off the line than my hook, which comes back over.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Exaggerated positions. Sometimes exaggeration works to get the feel for something. After you get the feel, then you need to tone it back to more natural positions. JMO

In the first photo in your post, I think his hips are not turned enough and his hands are too far forward at that point after impact.

Posted
well, looks fairly straight forward to me. the only thing is, if you don't yet know how to control your clubface with your wrists, which is particularly hard at any level, you might very well start hooking the ball dreadfully.

Posted
Keep a soft left elbow in your follow through. It should stay pretty close to your side and you shouldn't have a problem getting in that position. Your follow through should almost mimic your back swing (straight left, bent right on back swing, and straight right and bent left on follow through.)

Posted
I do think the photo's are exaggerated, but as far as what the wrist and forearm should do at contact and after are correct.

He is also staying on his right side and not shifting his weight. This will create a hook every time and most often a pull hook.

In my bag:
Driver: R5 TP Diamana 83s Shaft
Fairway: Burner 15 degree Fujikura REAX
Hybrid: Custom 19 degree
Irons: DCI 990 S300 4-PW

Wedges: NF 52.04*, Spin Milled 56.10* and 60.08*

Putter: Red X3

Ball: ProV1

Shoe: Tour 360 LTD


Posted
I wouldn't say hooking is better. My scores have gotten a lot worse with hooking the ball because once they get to the trees they keep going

I think Lee Trevino said "you can talk to a slice but a hook won't listen".


Note: This thread is 6035 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 22 - 2026-01-11 More mirror work. Back outdoors tomorrow.
    • Day 11, 1/11/26.  Today was putting, along about 6' of carpet, with coins on the ground to keep me cognizant of what I'm doing.  I think this is the at-home drill from LSW. (Ugh, missed two of the last four days -- 1/10 and 1/8)
    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.