Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Official Tiger Car Crash/Infidelity Thread


Note: This thread is 5636 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I have to agree with Erik, Tiger doesn't need or have to talk to the police. It's really not anyones buisness, the accident was with a tree so maybe the tree deserves an explanation or the owner of the tree. Other than that nobody needs to hear from him. I feel bad for Tiger having to deal with such a private matter in public it's probably very embarrassing.

im guessing it wasnt a dymo driver... they dont look like they could possibly break a window....

it had to be a mizuno or miura iron with a nike stamp on it seriously though.. i dont care what happened. tiger's ok. he will keep playing golf and keep winning tournaments.

RBZ stage 2 driver & 3 wood

Original AP1 4-GW

Vokey 54.10 & 58.04

Scotty Newport 2


  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
This was a stressfull situation and someone who isn't trained to deal with these types of incidents, often times will struggle with what to do, based on the amount of thoughts streaming through their heads. Elin, if she indeed did do the whole "golf club through the window", did something awesome. I'm guessing if any of us saw our spouses in a situation like their's has been depicted, then I'm sure you'd do the same thing. Cheers to her, I'm just hoping Nike gets him a replacement.
Whats In My Hoofer Bag

R9 460 9.5 degrees
909 F2 15.5 degrees
909H 19 degrees AP2 4-PW (Rifle Project X 5.5) Spin Milled 52, 56 & 60 Degrees Studio Select Squareback 2 Pro V-1 Favorite golfer: Zach Johnson

Posted
im guessing it wasnt a dymo driver... they dont look like they could possibly break a window....

Tiger does have to speak to the police, especially if damage occurred to a fire hydrant (city property) or a tree (neighbor's property). If the damage was only done to his property (i.e. Escalade), then yes you're are correct, he doesn't need to give any statement whatsoever.

Then again, he might not get all of the information in the report that the FHP will complete for the accident. If he wants to get the repairs on his vehicle paid by insurance, they'll go off of the FHP's report for details, etc. Not that he'd have a problem paying for the damages....He should just listen to the Troopers, talk to them, and move on.
Whats In My Hoofer Bag

R9 460 9.5 degrees
909 F2 15.5 degrees
909H 19 degrees AP2 4-PW (Rifle Project X 5.5) Spin Milled 52, 56 & 60 Degrees Studio Select Squareback 2 Pro V-1 Favorite golfer: Zach Johnson

Posted
Bottom line is Tiger is under no obligation to say anything to the police. IMO they have delayed with police until today at the request of either their lawyer or agent so as to responsibly represent themselves from a PR perspective, along with satisfying the authorities. But I agree with the poster above, this is a PR issue for the most part. If this were John and Sally down the street, they wouldn't even need to see one officer due to their rights.

Not sure what Florida law is, but most states require a person to report an accident within 72 hours of the accident occurring (if the person wants/needs a report for insurance purposes). Obviously with the 911 call, law enforcement was called to the scene. Like I previously stated in another post, because his accident involved property damage to city and another person's property, a report must be completed for insurance purposes.

How is an accident involving someone being injured, no matter who they are, and city/public property being damaged not a police matter?
Whats In My Hoofer Bag

R9 460 9.5 degrees
909 F2 15.5 degrees
909H 19 degrees AP2 4-PW (Rifle Project X 5.5) Spin Milled 52, 56 & 60 Degrees Studio Select Squareback 2 Pro V-1 Favorite golfer: Zach Johnson

  • Administrator
Posted
Not sure what Florida law is, but most states require a person to report an accident within 72 hours of the accident occurring (if the person wants/needs a report for insurance purposes). Obviously with the 911 call, law enforcement was called to the scene. Like I previously stated in another post, because his accident involved property damage to city and another person's property, a report must be completed for insurance purposes.

Nobody said it wasn't a police matter. FHP are police... they're investigating.

None of that changes the fact that neither Tiger nor Elin can be compelled to speak to police. Chatting with them isn't a requirement to close the case. Stop saying otherwise - it's untrue. Tiger could be charged - since he damaged public property - with something, but even that's not guaranteed. But that's hardly an issue that's "in question" right now - he admits to running over the hydrant. They know to what address to send the bill.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Yeah, it's not a law that you have to have an interview with police due to a traffic accident, whether its with another car, a fire hydrant, or a lightpole... the police can finish their investigation without it, its his CHOICE to speak with them or not, and thats only if he had something to say that can help his case any (i.e. deer ran in front of his car and he swerved to avoid or something of that nature, which obviously didnt happen).

In my (crossing my fingers for Syracuse Orange Cart) bag:
Tour Burner 10.5* Stiff
Walter Hagen 3 metal
Tour Preferred S300 DGs (3-PW)
Tour Preferred 52.08 GWWalter Hagen 56* SW Studio Stainless Newport 2 point 5 ProV1x's if i got em, but usually TP blacks


Posted
They need to say something soon. He is a public figure, and in the world of PR if you don't fill the void it will be filled for you, and probably stick, even if it's not remotely close to the truth.

Bingo! I don't think Tiger & camp is worried about being charged for any crime. Actually if he can get this over with some traffic violation, he'll be happy. What's at stake his impeccable image of world's greatest athlete. He made only $10mil this year for winning tournaments, but got $100mil from endorsements. Those endorsements do not only rely on how many games he wins but also his image as a great person/father/husband.

"During our weekly Lamaze class, the instructor emphasized the importance of exercise, hinting strongly that husbands need to get out and start walking with their wives. From the back of the room one expectant father inquired, "Would it be okay if she carries a bag of golf clubs while she walks?"


Posted
Gees, some bizarre posts here.

It's been said numerous times already, but let me say it too: under the law of the United States, Woods cannot be compelled to provide a statement to police or to give evidence in a court that might incriminate him. The idea that a judge can "authorise" the violation of a right protected by the US Constitution -- and, indeed, the common law generally -- is absurd. It's wrong for many reasons. The most obvious reason may be that the power of judges is limited in a very important and appropriate way: they are bound by the law. Judges cannot validly depart from a mandatory requirement of a law passed by the Congress or a State legislature, let alone a right granted by the Constitution to all citizens personally.

To the extent that this issue is interesting at all, it's not because of any legal issues that it raises. As another poster wrote above, for Woods, this will primarily be a public relations issue. If John Doe had run over a fire hydrant and into a tree, and had then been "rescued" by his wife with the aide of a golf club at 2:30am, there could be no public interest in the story beyond the outcome of any police investigation into the matter. That's obvious. Here, though, the accident involves a guy that has marketed himself to the public in a particular way -- and he's made an absolute fortune for himself as a result of that marketing. Given that, on one view -- not mine, at the moment -- the accident might appear to raise questions about the truth of some of that marketing, I think the public's interest in the story is understandable. Equally, however, I think it regrettable that the media and other vultures seem determined to take bites from the guy before most of the facts are known.
Current setup:
Titleist 909D2 9.5°, Diamana Blue Stiff | Titleist 909F2 15.5°, Diamana Blue Stiff | Mizuno MP-57 3-P, Nippon NS Pro 1050GH Stiff | Titleist Vokey SM 54.11, 60.07 | Scotty Cameron ACVII / Napa California | Titleist Pro V1X

Posted
"My wife, Elin, acted courageously when she saw I was hurt and in trouble."

He failed to add 'after she beat the crap out of me'.

 Sub 70 849 9* driver

:callaway:  Rogue 3 & 5 woods, Rogue X 4 & 5 hybrids

:tmade: SIM 2 6-gap irons

:cobra:  King snakebite grove wedges 52 & 58*

 :ping: Heppler ZB3 putter

 

 


Posted
They know to what address to send the bill.

Exactly the reason this is a non-issue from police/public policy standpoint.....Tiger has admitted fault and will certainly pay for any damage to public property and/or the property of his neighbor.

I can guarantee that there will be no insurance claim for damage to his ride...... case closed....................

"Getting paired with you is the equivalent to a two-stroke penalty to your playing competitors"  -- Sean O'Hair to Rory Sabbatini (Zurich Classic, 2011)


Posted
As you all know, I had a single-car accident earlier this week, and sustained some injuries. I have some cuts, bruising and right now I'm pretty sore.

His PR people are doing a great job!!


Posted
Tiger has admitted fault and will certainly pay for any damage to public property and/or the property of his neighbor. ... Case closed.

Not necessarily. His admission determines his civil liability to the State (I assume it was State property), but I doubt it determines his criminal liability.

I don't know the details of the criminal law in Florida. In most jurisdictions, though, it is a criminal offence to drive carelessly or negligently. In Australia, a driver that damages public property: (a) will be liable to pay for the costs of restoring the property (for most people, those costs will be paid by the insurer); and (b) depending on the circumstances, will often be charged with (at least) careless driving, a summary offence here.
Current setup:
Titleist 909D2 9.5°, Diamana Blue Stiff | Titleist 909F2 15.5°, Diamana Blue Stiff | Mizuno MP-57 3-P, Nippon NS Pro 1050GH Stiff | Titleist Vokey SM 54.11, 60.07 | Scotty Cameron ACVII / Napa California | Titleist Pro V1X

Posted
So Tiger was under no obligation to talk to the police and completely within his rights to turn them away from his house. That's fine and I am sure there are many a young minority male living in the inner cities that would be very interested to know they have that option as well?

Posted

in TW's official statement he said:

"This situation is my fault, and it's obviously embarrassing to my family and me. I'm human and I'm not perfect. I will certainly make sure this doesn't happen again ."

what does he mean by " I will make sure this doesnt happen again "? what, an accident? how can you be sure you will never have another accident??? or did he mean he will make sure he doesnt cheat again? hehe


Posted
So Tiger was under no obligation to talk to the police and completely within his rights to turn them away from his house. That's fine and I am sure there are many a young minority male living in the inner cities that would be very interested to know they have that option as well?

They actually teach us this in civics class. The Bill of Rights is for everyone, not just non-minorities living in the suburbs - what is your point exactly?

Driver: Nike Ignite 10.5 w/ Fujikura Motore F1
2H: King Cobra
4H: Nickent 4DX
5H: Adams A3
6I 7I 8I 9I PW: Mizuno mp-57Wedges: Mizuno MP T-10 50, 54, 58 Ball: random


Posted

Who will be the first one to yell "Rachel Uchitel!!!!" at a tournament??????

Nike SQ 9.5 w/ ProLaunch Red
Titliest 906F2 15
Miura 202 3-5 Irons
Miura Blade 6-PW Irons
Mizuno MP 51 & 56Yes! Tracy IINike One Black


Note: This thread is 5636 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • In driving a car you have all sorts of random or variable parts, though. Different speeds, corners, conditions, size of turns… even different cars and sizes, different traffic and laws (lights, signs, etc.). I don't think I've seen anyone doing "block practice" to practice the same exact turn 100 times, then trying it in the real world.
    • IMHO, block practice is good. Any new motor pattern or a 'move' has to be committed to muscle memory and be reproducable at command without conscious thought as the final goal. I don't see how this is that much different than learning how to drive a car, or let's say how to handle the steering for example. One must do it enough times and then also do it in different situations to commit to all layers of brain - judgment of demand, decision making, judgment of response and finally execution. Unless each layer is familiar of each of their role in the specific motor move, it is not truly learned and you will simply fall back to the original pattern. I think the random practice is simply committing the learned pattern to different scenarios or intervals of time to replicate in the real world (actual rounds). It breeds further familiarity learned from block practice. Steer the car a hundred times to learn the move (block) and then drive the car all over town to make it real world (random) to a level of maturity. I don't see how block and random have to be in conflict with each other.  
    • Yea, I think the first thing is to define block, variable, and random practice with regards to golf.  The easiest one might be in practicing distance control for putting. Block practice would be just hitting 50 putts from 5 feet, then 50 putts from 10 ft then 50 putts from 15 ft. While random practice would having a different distance putt for every putt.  In terms of learning a new motor pattern, like let's say you want to make sure the clubhead goes outside the hands in the backswing. I am not sure how to structure random practice. Maybe block practice is just making the same 100 movements over and over again. I don't get how a random practice is structured for something like learning a new motor pattern for the golf swing.  Like, if a NFL QB needs to work on their throw. They want to get the ball higher above the shoulder. How would random practice be structured? Would they just need someone there to say, yes or no for feedback? That way the QB can go through an assortment of passing drills and throws trying to get the wright throwing motion?  For me, how do you structure the feedback and be time effective. Let's say you want to work on the club path in the backswing. You go out to the course to get some random practice. Do you need to set up the camera at each spot, check after each shot to make it random?  I know that feedback is also a HUGE part of learning. I could say, I went to the golf course and worked on my swing. If I made 40 golf swings on the course, what if none of them were good reps because I couldn't get any feedback? What if I regressed? 
    • I found it odd that both Drs. (Raymond Prior and Greg Rose) in their separate videos gave the same exact math problem (23 x 12), and both made the point of comparing block practice to solving the same exact math problem (23 x 12) over and over again. But I've made the point that when you are learning your multiplication tables… you do a bunch of similar multiplications over and over again. You do 7 x 8, then 9 x 4, then 3 x 5, then 2 x 6, and so on. So, I think when golf instructors talk about block practice, they're really not understanding what it actually is, and they're assuming that someone trying to kinda do the same thing is block practice, but when Dr. Raymond Prior said on my podcast that what I was describing was variable practice… then… well, that changes things. It changes the results of everything you've heard about how "block" practice is bad (or ineffective).
    • Day 121 12-11 Practice session this morning. Slowing the swing down. 3/4 swings, Getting to lead side better, trying to feel more in sync with swing. Hit foam balls. Good session overall. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.