Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4643 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Originally Posted by Mark Lewis

I have a ball balancer and even though I hit a lot more "not so good" shots than good  ones, I feel that the advantage of a balanced ball is definitely in the  putting.  It does roll more consistantly when plaed on the axis!!

One question for you, when you use the balancer and mark the line.  Have you taken the ball out, spun it around randomly and then rebalanced it.  If so, did it come back to exactly the same line you marked before?  I ask not because I am not a believer, I am not in either corner, yet.  But it seems like a simple test to do with multiple balls multiple times to see if there is something to it or not.  If the balancer doesn't return the ball to that same line every time then to me, it's a falacy.

If it does come back then I am going to have to think about this some more...


  • Replies 133
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Originally Posted by Gridiron

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Lewis

I have a ball balancer and even though I hit a lot more "not so good" shots than good  ones, I feel that the advantage of a balanced ball is definitely in the  putting.  It does roll more consistantly when plaed on the axis!!

One question for you, when you use the balancer and mark the line.  Have you taken the ball out, spun it around randomly and then rebalanced it.  If so, did it come back to exactly the same line you marked before?  I ask not because I am not a believer, I am not in either corner, yet.  But it seems like a simple test to do with multiple balls multiple times to see if there is something to it or not.  If the balancer doesn't return the ball to that same line every time then to me, it's a falacy.

If it does come back then I am going to have to think about this some more...


When I did do the balancing, I don't anymore because I generally use tour quality golf balls, it did return to the same location on the cheaper balls. I had previously posted this before, that cheaper balls tended to be off more so than more expensive ones. Expensive ones were a little less consistent. I may do some spin balancing just because I am antsy about playing again....but not because I think it is the answer. On a side note, my daughter's Barbie ball is horribly off and wobbles all over. I wonder where they get those cast offs...

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

This is a very interesting topic. I'm going to add my little thoughts, if you all don't mind.

You guys are talking about marking the centre of mass in a certain place, so you can repeatedly set the ball and  hit the ball along this mark.

But the centre of mass in the golf ball is in 3 dimensions, so if you mark it and it is balancing it side to side on that mark, the ball may not be balanced up and down (the centre of mass in on the line from a side to side aspect, but on the height of the ball aspect the COM could be above or below the centre of the ball). So the ball may roll straighter, but the COM will be going up and down, causing the ball to hop?

I have no doubts, the only ways to truly balance a ball so the COM is in the middle is to:

-Use such a balancer and then add or remove material until the ball is balanced in 3 dimensions - the COM and centre of ball would be balanced, but causes aerodymanic, roll and impact problems because you are mucking with the cover trying to make up for a misbalanced core; or

-As I suspect pros have someone do for them at their supplier, or at least they should have, measure the balance of the ball and get the ones produced that have an acceptable COM=Centre of Ball component. The balancers mentioned here would struggle to find a line, because in theory the ball is balanced, so there is no 'line of balance' it can find, since it is trying to find the unbalanced line. I think that's right, but I also think I just confused myself...

I suspect when you make millions of balls, finding a few hundred almost perfectly balanced to put aside for your sponsored players wouldn't be so difficult?

But I am interested that finding the side to side balance helps you guys when you play, it certainly seems the side to side plays more part than the up and down, particularly when putting.


Posted

I've never heard of balancing your ball, ok, i did, but when i did see that commercial i couldnt stop laughing. if that actually helped, wouldn't every pro be doing it. wouldn't Taylor Made be making some sort of a device that makes it fast and easy, don't you think titleist would be offering "balanced" pro v1s.

Come on fellas, give your head a shake!


Posted

Hey Shooter, you have a very valid perspective and opinion on this.

You are right, no one sells their product 'balanced'. I do wonder if they did, that would then be notice to the world that their other offerings were 'unbalanced' and therefore inferior?

There are links in this thread providing research and positive results from finding a side to side balance point.

I'm not in either camp, I just like to think on interesting topics. But I do find it funny how in golf many people tend to tell others how what they do is better, or putting others ideas or questions down, such as many pages prior in this thread, not necessarily your post.

I don't understand, if someone thinks finding a side to side balance is pointless, great, that is good for them that they are comfortable with their choice. But others, pages back, don't need to tell others they are crazy or stupid for just discussing something that they do.

Comparing the idea of balancing a golf ball, there are threads here on how to stack a golf bag, what golf towel to use, golf fashion that have no place in the act of actually hitting the golf ball. You hit the golf ball every shot. And the process of manufacture of the ball can't guarantee the blobs of material are all placed in exactly the right place. So why can't people at least discuss it?

I mean, people figure out the balance of their putter head, and whether that fits their stroke right? There are threads on what golf tees to use, or the many types available? This topic, IMHO, is no less valid than those, given that people want to eliminate issues with all of their other equipment, why not their ball?

I don't get it, people wouldn't hit a wedge with massive gouges out of it or the head or shaft bent, and I can see people that balance their golf balls just want to know what is going on with their equipment and eliminate any equipment errors they can, because they see it as interesting and/or important. Power to them I reckon.


Posted

Eating popcorn...Great thread.

I'm not a very good golfer, just enjoying the game.  My brother before his accident was a scratch golfer back in the early 80 and back then swore that it made a huge difference when putting if the ball was balanced.  He used the salt water option.     That was a long time before Titleist invented the Pro V1.   The ball technology wasn't as advanced as today.

I get the impression from reading the replies here that the better balls, like the Pro V1 and other high end ones probably don't require balancing unless the golfer wanted to spend time away from the wife.   With the lower end balls, I am also led to believe that it may be a viable option to find the balance.    The difference may be evident when putting.

Did I miss anything?

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I cant believe people waste their time debating this topic. Golf is a time bandit as it is, so why would one waste time balancing golf balls instead of practicing?

I watched the video. How do you know this guy hasn't spent his lifetime collecting and balancing balls? Chances are that's what he wrote his paper on in school, and the dozen or so balls he has could just be a manufacturing defect. You know, in manufacturing you cant check every ball. The quality control personall pick one or two balls from a batch of hundreds and tests' them...So there is a possibility that there could be a "bad" ball in the box....but you ll loose it just as quick as the "balanced" one anyways.

Also, wheels on cars are checked for balance, and once a miss-balance is located on the rim they add a weight to offset the weight in that spot, thus finding a "balance" to the wheel assembly. A ball isn't fixed to a spindle like a wheel on a car...so finding that a ball is miss balanced is irrelevant cause you cant do anything about it.....Therefore; this whole balancing debate is flawed like a 15 cap playing blades...

Hope that got everyone worked up! :)


Posted

But wait, you're debating it as well There are articles in this very thread of people that have marked the line, and even though, as you correctly surmise, the ball isn't actually balanced by adding or removing weight, they got more accurate putts by putting along that line as the centre of mass rolled along that line on a side to side 'balance', although the centre of mass was going up and down.

It is obviouly a use of time you're not happy to give up, and that is totally up to you

I don't balance, but I find it interesting...


Note: This thread is 4643 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.