Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5689 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I know a lot of people frown upon this. Of course, fluffing the ball even when in a fairly good lie is wacky. However, where do we draw the line? What about in a bad patch of fairway where the ball is on the dirt between two clumps of grass? do we play that as it lies or put it on the clump of grass? what do the purists think?
John

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I say always play it where it lies if you are serious about the game and getting better, unless there is a rule you can follow, like ground under repair.

Posted
if im just out there having fun with my dad or somethin, i would put it on that patch of grass. If im really trying to keep score and use scores for hc, then no.

:cobra: Speed ld-f 10.5 Stiff
:snake_eyes: 3 & 5 Woods
:adams:A4 3 hybrid
:bridgestone: J33 Forged Irons 4-pw
:ping: 50th Aniv. Karsten Ansr Putter56*, 60* wedges


Posted
I understand what you guys are saying, but I would counter to say that a pga player would never be hitting off the dirt in between clumps of grass in the fairway, so why should I?

Posted
I understand what you guys are saying, but I would counter to say that a pga player would never be hitting off the dirt in between clumps of grass in the fairway, so why should I?

Why not? If a PGA player happens to land his ball in a divot, he will have to play out of it. There are lots of advantages the PGA players got over us, but we are not playing PGA courses under PGA conditions.

And how often do you find yourself in a spot like that?

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Play it as it's dictated on that course.

If it's lift clean & place in effect, do it. Playing hero on the west coast in december is not worth it sometimes.

Otherwise play it as it lies. You hit it there, so deal with it. I've lost countless strokes from hitting out of divots, rough, from under or behind trees, etc. & i've counted every one.

I see people 'roll' their ball all the time. Their prerogative i suppose. Not sure why they bother keeping score, though. There's cheaper things to do if one is inclined to cheat.

Posted
if the rules say play as it lies.
Play the ball as it lies.

It all depends if your playing in a tournament or with friends.
I'd still play it as it lies with friends but I don't care if they place it.
If it's a tournament, you have to play it.

My Clubs
Driver - LV4 10* R flex
Wood - sam snead persimmon 2 wood (for windy days)
Hybrid burner tour launch 20* stiff flex.
Irons - Tour Mode 3i,4i stiffIrons - FP's 5-PW R-flexWedge - spin milled 54.14Wedge - spin milled 60.07Putter - Victoria Lowest round 2010: 79 (par 70)Latest rounds at...


Posted
If Im playing with friends for a beer or a small nassau..... we play it up. We allow each other to bump the ball within a foot or so in the fairway only. I hate to see them stripe one right down the middle and have to watch them hitting their next shot from a ankle deep divot. We also have a root rule were we can move it just enough to get a clear swing without breaking a shaft or wrist. We keep it fun.

The purists on here might find ours methods within the rules of golf, but keep in mind that a great many courses and clubs use winter rules in thier own tournaments year round.

Posted
I used to fluff nearly every shot I hit. More recently, since I've really decided I want to get better and track my real score I play where it lies. The only time I move a ball now, is if the lie will do damage to my club, and then I take a penalty stroke. I suppose if I made the kind of money the tour pros do, I could play better courses, and not worry as much about damaging clubs. My first trip out with my new x18r irons, I took a pratice swing in the rough, hit a small rock, and put a nice ding in the bounce of my twice used SW.

Matt Schnurbusch

In the Bag:
Driver 9.5* XS Tour Square
Fairway Launcher 17*Irons X18R 4-SWWedge REG. 588 60*Putter Crimson Series 550Ball GamerGlove F3 Glove


Posted
If you hit a good shot, and are fortunate enough to land in the fairway, then you should have a good lie. To me, there should be no luck involved if you have hit the perfect shot in the fairway. You can get a drop from a sprinkler head, why not get relief from some douchebag's divot?

Posted
Here's my take. If you want to improve your game, play as it lies. If you want to have fun, play up. If you are in a tournament, follow the local rule.

I started playing as is and putting out everything. My HI is higher than 5 years ago but I feel better about my game now.

My Clubs
Driver - Nike SUMO 13* R flex
Wood - Cobra 5 wood 18* R flex
3-PW hybrids/irons - Mizuno MX-950 R flex
Wedge - Mizuno MX-950 51* Wedge - Cleveland CG14 56* 14*Putter - RifeBall - Taylormade TP LDP RED


Posted
I'll play the ball down and I do believe that this has done more to improve my game than any amount of practice, etc.. Learning how to hit out of bad lies makes hitting the good ones so much easier!

That said, I will give myself what I call the "Muni course club preservation drop", which dictates that unless I'm in a place where it's normal to expect rocks, etc. to be in your lie, I'll give myself some kind of relief from anything that might severely damage my clubs while keeping roughly the same lie/conditions as the original predicament. BTW - tree roots don't fall into this category since they're a normal part of any course, this really only applies towards the odd rock buried in the groud, etc.

Posted
If the ball lands in ground under repair, I move it BACK to a better lie.

If i am in a bunker full of rocks ( for some reason common in Calgary??? ), I also move my ball to better sand because I don't wanna dent my clubs.

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter


Posted
I know a lot of people frown upon this. Of course, fluffing the ball even when in a fairly good lie is wacky. However, where do we draw the line? What about in a bad patch of fairway where the ball is on the dirt between two clumps of grass? do we play that as it lies or put it on the clump of grass? what do the purists think?

This may be the first "rule" I ever heard about the game of golf, long before I ever played myself.

Play the ball as it lies . Don't touch it, don't move it. Always. Unless a Rule either allows or requires you to do otherwise. It doesn't matter where the ball lies.... in a water hazard, bunker, rough or fairway. I love the way so many players try to justify breaching the rules by saying the play they ball down except when there are rocks or tree roots or they have a bad lie. The last I heard, trees and rocks are natural features of golf courses. As is bare ground in some places. Sometimes the rules give you relief for those places and sometimes they don't. If not then there is always Rule 28 - Ball Unplayable. Otherwise, doesn't it just make sense to learn how to hit the shots? In nearly 40 years of playing golf I've never yet done terminal damage to a golf club when making a stroke, yet I've played from roots, rocks, bare hardpan, concrete and asphalt cart paths, gravel maintenance roads, bridges over hazards.... you name it. If you can find it on a golf course I've probably hit off it. I just determine the best shot I think I can pull off from the lie, then try to play it. That does NOT meaning always taking a full swing, but I can generally advance the ball and still give myself a chance to score, and do so without damaging myself or the golf club. Actually, pulling off those shots is half the fun of playing golf. If you want to demoralize an opponent, make par from the base of a tree, or hit to within chipping range from a gravel road with deep rough on both sides and no place to drop. That is great fun.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Here's my take.

But this only works if you PRACTICE all these bad lies. Do you practice hitting out of divots? Do you practice hitting off bare dirt? Do you practice hitting your ball out of a field of tree roots? If not, I question how anyone would really "improve" at these shots, by only seeing them once or twice per round, and never on the range...

I started playing as is and putting out everything. My HI is higher than 5 years ago but I feel better about my game now.

You said "playing as it lies" would improve your game. So why is your HI higher now than before? Shouldn't you be "better" now than you were before?

I'm not arguing that taking fluff lies is the right thing to do, but the reason not to do it is that it's against the rules. I don't see that hitting those wierd lies will do anything to make you better, unless you also PRACTICE all those wierd lies. Phil M hit a great shot off the cart path last weekend - but I guarantee he had hit thousands of balls off of cart paths and hard pan before attempting it during a round.

HiBore 10.5 driver
GT-500 3- and 5-woods
Bazooka JMax 4 Iron Wood
Big Bertha 2008 irons (4 and 5 i-brids, 6i-9i,PW)
Tom Watson 56 SW Two-Ball putter


Posted
I see people 'roll' their ball all the time. Their prerogative i suppose.

I play regularly with a guy that will roll the ball in the rough. It doesn't bother me, as we're just playing to play, no money on the line or anything. However, we've talked numerous times about playing in two-man tournaments together, but I get concerned because I don't want to deal with the scenario where he rolls the ball and gets called on it.

In the bag:
Ping G5 Driver 9 degree, Ping G10 3-wood, Nike 3 hybrid, TaylorMade R9 Irons 4-AW, Cleveland CG15 56 and 60 degree wedges, Odyssey 2-ball blade putter


Posted
Play the course as you find it. The rules cover such things as Ground Under Repair, Embedded Ball, Cart Paths and Casual Water. If it's not covered in the rules, you play it as it lies. If you are on hardpan, you play off the hardpan. If it's next to a root, you figure out a way to play it from there. In a divot, same thing.

I can't remember exactly, but I believe Tom Kite tells a story about Harvey Penick. It seems there was a junior (Kite and Ben Crenshaw were juniors at that time) tournament at the course in Texas where Penick was the pro. Some kid asked Penick whether they were going to play "winter rules". Penick replied something to the effect that they would be playing under the rules of golf. Anything other than that was playing some other game, not golf. Kite said that stuck with him from that day forward.

To Pittpanther: Why not hit a few practice shots out of divots at the range? You might find that they aren't so difficult as you imagine. Then when you face one on the course, you'll know what to do.

Posted
If you hit a good shot, and are fortunate enough to land in the fairway, then you should have a good lie. To me, there should be no luck involved if you have hit the perfect shot in the fairway. You can get a drop from a sprinkler head, why not get relief from some douchebag's divot?

I agree with your douchebag take, but.... If you hit a bad shot into the trees and get a lucky kick back out onto the fairway, do you put it back into the trees, to reproduce the lie you "should've" had?

Bill


Note: This thread is 5689 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
    • Day 23 - 2026-01-12 Finally outdoors again with 10 minutes of 7 iron work in the net. Also mirror work. Excited to get back on the range tomorrow and maybe do some film.
    • Day 10: 2026.01.12 Hit 25 balls at the range, working on rotating right hip during backswing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.