Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3963 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
The course certainly looks fabulous in the evening, seeing all the humps and bumps from the setting sun.

Yeah I was about to say the same it looked stunning, just a beautiful place.

Peter is the best in the biz I think, I love listening to butch as well, both have a wonderful passion for the game

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Plox

As has been stated you suggested the course was a field. Having seen the undulating fairways that fact alone makes your hyperbole null and void.

As for your other criticisms such as the large shared greens. I felt that provided a unique and tricky aspect to the course which you don't often see at other venues. You appear to have a dislike of these features and to me that has as much a rationale as my fear of flying- probably none.

Then we have the excitement for the spectators of the 1st and 18th and the spectacle of being able to see both holes from all sides. The 18th is a fantastic yet simple hole as the green is driveable. The 17th has to be one of the best holes in golf.

You made two arguments plox 1/ objectively that the course was featureless- 'a field'. 2/ that you don't like it.

Whether you like it or not point 1 was a dud as the features of the course are clear.

Posted
You see it this evening, with the late sun sliding across the fairways...

you begin to understand how difficult this course is.

It looks flat from the air and bland from most cameras during the day. Then the shadows lengthen...

...and you see. Those wee humps and hollows are craters and mountains. You get the line wrong and you are finished.

You take an eagle-
I'll take two
I'll give it back
With a bogey pretty soon
That Old Grey town
Got me spinning round & round

Good luck Luis, good luck Lee
Whoever wins is the same to me
That Old Grey town
Wins out every time

Come over here referee - I think I'm sick
These old links have caught me slick
The wind is spinning
All around my brain...

(Thanks to Rev Gary Davis and his obsession with cocaine)

Posted
I always have a hard time watching the PGA tour for weeks after the Open Championship. I love links golf. The USA courses seem "boring" and "ho hum" in comparison.

Posted
You appear to have a dislike of these features and to me that has as much a rationale as my fear of flying- probably none.

Possibly the worst analogy I've ever heard, but carry on.

John Deere classic? Bravo. Considering my point about playing those other great links courses, you're not the brightest spark are you? This week has just highlighted how brilliant Loch Lomond was the week before, a course that should easily be hosting this event at some point in the near future.

Posted
Possibly the worst analogy I've ever heard, but carry on.

the only problem is the time.

I don't think the course could be played 2 weeks in a row.

My Clubs
Driver - LV4 10* R flex
Wood - sam snead persimmon 2 wood (for windy days)
Hybrid burner tour launch 20* stiff flex.
Irons - Tour Mode 3i,4i stiffIrons - FP's 5-PW R-flexWedge - spin milled 54.14Wedge - spin milled 60.07Putter - Victoria Lowest round 2010: 79 (par 70)Latest rounds at...


Posted
Possibly the worst analogy I've ever heard, but carry on.

What, I dont think the Open will ever be played at a parkland course.


Posted
Possibly the worst analogy I've ever heard, but carry on.

Im not the brightest spark ahahahhahaahaha the open being played on a parkland course ahahaha what a tool!!!


Posted
What, I dont think the Open will ever be played at a parkland course.

You're right - the Trust Deed or whatever specifies that the Chmpaionship should be played on a links course.


Posted
Possibly the worst analogy I've ever heard, but carry on.

I knew you would have no answer to my points but instead would resort to picking up on something meaningless about my post.

Wind up fail.

Posted
St. Andrews Old Course is the one course in the entire world I want to play before I die. Yes, it seems pretty obvious it is not the most picturesque etc. etc. but there is something about it, the mystique and the fact that so many of the best golfers who ever lived played and/or won on the old course.... Same goes for Prestwick. I will tee it up on both before I say goodbye to this world. Just remember, Bobby Jones hated the old course too when he first played it...later he would go on to say it was one of his favorites...they even named a hole after the great one Bobby Jones..i think its a karma thing too...you cant judge a book by it's cover.

Posted
I'm not gonna get involved with the original post of this horrible thread but....I just wanted to say that this was the only post that I thought Wow great answer! Nice job...

Agreed, well said Deryck.

:tmade: M2 10.5° - Fujikura Pro 60 - Stiff
:tmade: V-Steel 18° - M.A.S Ultralight- Stiff
:ping: G400 4-UW - AWT 2.0 - Stiff
:tmade: Tour Preferred 58° ATV - KBS Tour-V - Wedge
:scotty_cameron: Select SquareBack - 34" - SuperStroke MS 2.0


Posted
People can wax poetic about the history, but the argument that "it's more beautiful in the setting sun" could pretty much be said about any piece of ground. My local muni is glorious as the sun sets.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
People can wax poetic about the history, but the argument that "it's more beautiful in the setting sun" could pretty much be said about any piece of ground. My local muni is glorious as the sun sets.

But the setting sun accentuates the extremity of the hills and hollows, proving that the course is not, by any, means a "field" as someone wrote.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted
But the setting sun accentuates the extremity of the hills and hollows, proving that the course is not, by any, means a "field" as someone wrote.

A "field" implies a crop. It looks more like a meadow.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
Agreed, well said Deryck.

Thank you! I think many forget that in the 1800s, there weren't "any" golf courses?? lol. So to build something at that time from straight imagitaion that can stand up to what exists today speaks to levels beyond comprehension. All of the beautiful courses that many speak of today have had the advantage of taking other examples and either adding or improving upon them in creating a new course masterpiece. St. Andrews grew from nothing really besides imagination.

How can anyone in this post argue against something that spawned this game and after almost 200 years, still ends up in a debate? Like really think about it everyone. We are debating a golf course that was built almost 200 years ago...doesn't that say something ???????????????

Deryck Griffith

Titleist 910 D3: 9.5deg GD Tour AD DI7x | Nike Dymo 3W: 15deg, UST S-flex | Mizuno MP CLK Hybrid: 20deg, Project X Tour Issue 6.5, HC1 Shaft | Mizuno MP-57 4-PW, DG X100 Shaft, 1deg upright | Cleveland CG15 Wedges: 52, 56, 60deg | Scotty Cameron California Del Mar | TaylorMade Penta, TP Black LDP, Nike 20XI-X


  • 4 years later...
Posted
It is my favorite course on earth and I am excited the Open Championship will be held at the Old Course this year.

Note: This thread is 3963 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.