Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Distance study in this month of Golf Digest


Note: This thread is 5627 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Found this article about a distance study Taylormade did with over 13,000 men with different handicaps.

They found that the avg clubhead speed of a scratch golfer was 104 mph with an average distance of 252. But, what was interesting was the optimal distance for a swing of that speed should be 265, meaning the sweet spot even for scratch golfers is not being hit that much.

Also, some other stats in this study are:

HANDICAP SPEED DIS OPTIMAL

scratch-5 : 104 - 252 - 265
6-15 : 96 - 234 - 246
16-25 : 90 - 218 - 226
25+ : 84 - 202 - 212


As you can see you need a really fast swing and hit the ball in the sweet spot to hit a ball far, but what I expected was the difference in optimal with a scratch and a 25+ handicap wasn't that much of a difference.

OHIO

In my Revolver Bag
R9 460, RIP
R9 TP 3 Wood, Diamana 'ilima 70*Idea Pro Black 20*Titleist AP1 712 4-AW Spin Milled Black Nickel 56.08 & 60.10


  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Let me guess, TaylorMade then claimed that we all need to be using 46.5" drivers to compensate for the lack of optimal distance as a result of not hitting the sweet-spot?

Posted
Let me guess, TaylorMade then claimed that we all need to be using 46.5" drivers to compensate for the lack of optimal distance as a result of not hitting the sweet-spot?

LOL, Taylormade is pretty counter-productive. I think they realize not many hit the sweet spot, and since you only lose 10 yards lets make it up with length.

Also, I think, as it doesnt say, the optimal is also different because they are not swinging at an optimal angle of attack.

OHIO

In my Revolver Bag
R9 460, RIP
R9 TP 3 Wood, Diamana 'ilima 70*Idea Pro Black 20*Titleist AP1 712 4-AW Spin Milled Black Nickel 56.08 & 60.10


Posted
Let me guess, TaylorMade then claimed that we all need to be using 46.5" drivers to compensate for the lack of optimal distance as a result of not hitting the sweet-spot?

lol, how did you guess?


Posted
i thought the SS´s would be higher.

I had 88mph with my 20* hybrid (the only club i´ve had fit for me), so i´d be at around 100mph with my driver. I´m no scratch golfer though!

My Clubs
Driver - LV4 10* R flex
Wood - sam snead persimmon 2 wood (for windy days)
Hybrid burner tour launch 20* stiff flex.
Irons - Tour Mode 3i,4i stiffIrons - FP's 5-PW R-flexWedge - spin milled 54.14Wedge - spin milled 60.07Putter - Victoria Lowest round 2010: 79 (par 70)Latest rounds at...


Posted
I don't think your swing speed is getting slower when your handicap is getting higher..... I played with buddies who can hit 270 yards but they are 20+ handicap. Funny statistics though...
Whats in my Golf Bag:
Driver: Nike Sumo 5000
5 Wood: Mizuno MP-001
Iron: Mizuno MX-950 5-PW
Wedge: Cobra FP 60 degrePutter: Odyssey 2-BallBall: Yellow balls

Posted
I don't think your swing speed is getting slower when your handicap is getting higher..... I played with buddies who

can hit and average are two very different stats

i GUARANTEE they don't average 270 and probably hit 1/10 of the "270's" actually in the fwy too just sayin....distance is often over rated and under achieved
"My swing is homemade - but I have perfect flaws!" - Me

Posted
I swing anywhere from 96mph to 100mph with an average smash factor of 1.41 with the driver. My average carry is around 260.

In my bag:
Driver: R5 TP Diamana 83s Shaft
Fairway: Burner 15 degree Fujikura REAX
Hybrid: Custom 19 degree
Irons: DCI 990 S300 4-PW

Wedges: NF 52.04*, Spin Milled 56.10* and 60.08*

Putter: Red X3

Ball: ProV1

Shoe: Tour 360 LTD


Posted
I hit my driver around 260ish and unless I'm playing in a tourney with a lot of low cappers I rarely see anyone hit it consistently past me. Now I am sure there is a lot of people that can hit it past me but people hit one long drive which becomes their average distance. I find it sad too because too many people worry about how far they hit it instead of chipping and putting which would make them much better golfers.
Driver: i15, 3 wood: G10, Hybrid: Nickent 4dx, Irons: Ping s57, Wedges: Mizuno MPT 52, 56, 60, Putter: XG #9 

Posted
I cannot reach the grapes , therefore the grapes must be sour

cleveland Hibore xls 8.5* driver
Cleveland Hiborexls 13* 3 wood
Ping S 56
Nike oz putter


Posted
I swing anywhere from 96mph to 100mph with an average smash factor of 1.41 with the driver. My average carry is around 260.

High five Colorado dude - us Albertans have the same altitude advantage. Now if I can just reduce my distance on 3 foot putts to approximately 3 feet : (

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
Let me guess, TaylorMade then claimed that we all need to be using 46.5" drivers to compensate for the lack of optimal distance as a result of not hitting the sweet-spot?

He's not kidding folks. I went to a demo day two weeks ago and the newer TaylorMades were all atleast 2" longer than my r7 Superquad.

Driver: r7 Superquad 9.5°
5W: Speed LD
Hybrid: Rescue TP 19°
Irons: MP-57 3i-PW
Wedges: SM Oil Can 52° and 58°Putter: Rossa Daytona

Posted
The numbers here are nothing unexpected. I find most of them to be spot on. The real difference, is how far each group thinks they hit it. Clubhead speed is a function of technique, not strength. PGA tour driving distance is 286 with a 112 mph clubhead speed. That study pretty much confirms that to be fairly accurate.

Of course, you have the fantasy lala land people out there still who believe they can hit it farther, and come up with an astounding array of rationales, from "PGA tour players don't go at it full speed" (but yet their clubhead speed is higher... Wonder how the ball knows not to fly as far?) to "I measure my drives!" (with a GPS, every single one, and average them out? Wow, that's impressive.)

Posted
It's a shame there are no studies regarding accuracy. The obsession with distance does get tiresome at times, and it would be refreshing to see discussions about how close to the target people are hitting the ball.

Posted
Distance is overrated. I am not long by an stretch - 230-250 depending on the conditions. The way I have gotten my handicap down is by learning to hit different shots, but especially by practicing my short game like crazy. It didn't take me long to realize I was not going to be overwhelming any golf courses with my distance or impressing anyone with my long bombs. The way I will beat you is by out playing you from the fairway and on the greens. I'm not too worried if you hit it 50 yards past me...

What's in my bag:
Driver: taylormade.gifBurner 09 Stiff 9.5*
Fairway Woods: adams.gifRPM Low Profile 3 & 5
Irons: mizuno.gifMP 57 - 3-PW Project X 5.5
Wedges: wilson.gifREG. 588 54* &cleveland.gif 60*Putter: ping.gifAnserBall: titleist.gifProV1x Home Course: Forest Ridge Golf Club


Posted
It's a shame there are no studies regarding accuracy. The obsession with distance does get tiresome at times, and it would be refreshing to see discussions about how

Ironically, that's where people should really be calling bulls+++. Apparently 20 handicappers can hit their ball < 10 feet (on average!!!) from 100 yards. HAHAHA!!!

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
Ironically, that's where people should really be calling bulls+++. Apparently 20 handicappers can hit their ball < 10 feet (on average!!!) from 100 yards. HAHAHA!!!

And then three putt from there to keep the handicap at 20+


Note: This thread is 5627 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.