Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5768 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted
He shouted at Rocco "The ball is in play!" Just before Rocco picked up the ball after it was dropped in a drop area. He thought that because the ball dropped out of the area that it was not in play. If Rocco grabs that ball, it's all over. We don't get to see the rest of that great match. But the RO actually shouted at him just before he touched the ball.

"The rest of that great match" was about two more shots. Rocco was pretty much toast when he was taking the drop. It was on the 19th and final hole of the day.

And yes, the RO was there for that match. They were the only players on the course and Rocco had an obvious ruling issue. Dustin Johnson's guy thought it was obvious Dustin was in a bunker, asked him if he needed any help, and then went forward to help push the crowd back, which aided Dustin. The situations are not analogous. If the RO had seen Dustin staring at the sand quizzically I'd wager he'd have provided pre-emptive assistance.
I'm just saying that everyone that is thinks they can't be proactive is very wrong.

Nobody's saying they "think" it. It's not an opinion. ROs go by a fairly simple code and it wasn't broken here. It wouldn't have been broken if the RO thought the player needed help and gave it to him, but given how obvious he thought it was that Dustin was in a bunker, he saw no need and simply tried to stay out of the way of the player, which is his first real obligation.

David Price knows a heck of a lot more about being an RO than you or I do, so I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt, particularly since it meshes well with what I've seen ROs do first-hand. And remember, in most events there aren't any walking ROs. They have to be called over. Their job isn't to observe every shot - it's simply to be more readily available if a player needs them. They primarily try to stay out of the way, not shoe-horn themselves into the action.
I don't recall the Mediate drop, but sounds like the rules official was right there and was overseeing Mediate's drop. If so, the procedure is for the official to announce to the player that the ball is in play. This verifies to the player that the drop was done within the rules.

Yep. If DJ had asked Price for a ruling he'd have stuck around as long as necessary. After he said "it's a bunker, don't ground your club" that might be all that was required and he'd go forward to again help with the crowd. DJ didn't aks for a ruling, and Price was under no obligation to provide one pre-emptively.

Would have been nice, and he wishes he had, but not because he screwed up - to prevent Dustin from screwing up. The PGA doesn't want to see someone lose a tournament because they have a brain fart and violate a rule.
If you're setting up for a shot out of the bunker, you typically hover your club inches from where you'd ground it. The odds that anyone would see what DJ was about to do before he touched down were pretty slim... Obviously it'd be nice if something had prevented things from ending as they did.

Well the point albatross is trying to make is that Price could have said "that's a bunker, Dustin, don't ground your club" as Dustin was arriving at his ball, not to do it moments before the infraction actually occurs.

And again, Price says he wishes he had, but not because he failed in his duties, just because it would have avoided all of this mess.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 186
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
So, should the ROs follow the players all over the course to point out the rules that the players already know?

"You are on the green, it is not allowed to have the caddy stand behind your line when putting"
"Hi there, you are in a water hazard, make sure you don't remove any loose impediments"
"Your ball is sitting on a severe slope, make sure you don't touch the grass so the ball starts rolling"
"On the tee; Dustin Johnson! Make sure you tee the ball up behind the tee markers"

It's like having the Microsoft Office paper clip following you around all the time, telling you how to use bold or italic letters.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
It's like having the Microsoft Office paper clip following you around all the time, telling you how to use

That's hilarious.

And gives me a chance to post this old joke:

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The club-grounding penalty has nothing to do with improving your lie. Putting your club in the sand may give you information about the texture and condition of the bunker. It may not, but then in basketball you get your free throws even if you're fouled on a shot that you were never going to make. The rule is as it is to make it enforceable and avoid bickering over how much you can touch the sand before you're probing it: the answer is none at all.

EXACTLY! The rules are cut and dry for a reason, to avoid strange situations and interpretation.

Not only do I disagree that no advantage was gained, I'll point out that the rules are and must eliminate any and all grey areas which include things like "did he gain an advantage?" and "did he intend to do something?"

iacas - +1 - we are in agreement on this point.

You have got to be kidding.

I agree! I played once with a guy that chose to announce to all the other players in the group his current stroke and what he was trying to do, every time. "I'm hitting my 3rd shot now, I'm going to try to hit it to the left portion of the green." It was VERY ANNOYING and DISTRACTING. I never played with him again.

I agree he should have asked the rules official. Has anyone mentioned yet that a rules official pro actively warned Rocco Mediate in the U.S. Open playoff against Tiger? He shouted at Rocco "The ball is in play!" Just before Rocco picked up the ball after it was dropped in a drop area. He thought that because the ball dropped out of the area that it was not in play. If Rocco grabs that ball, it's all over. We don't get to see the rest of that great match. But the RO actually shouted at him just before he touched the ball.

It's A LOT easier to warn someone then they are bending over to pick up a ball, 1) there is a fair amount of time as they reach down to warn them and 2) they are not setting up or in the middle of a shot, so warning them is appropriate. In DJ's situation, the amount of time to 'warn them' is a fraction of a second, "wait, don't ground your club", how is the official supposed to know that he 'might ground his club'? He's also interrupting the shot, which could have caused a different rules infraction, when the player actually wasn't going to ground his club. Sure...he could 'warn him' as he approached his ball, but that's not his job. Enough said!

In my :nike:  bag on my :clicgear: cart ...

Driver: :ping: G10 9*    3-Wood: :cleveland: Launcher
Hybrid: :adams: 20* Hybrid      Irons: :ping: i5 4-GW - silver dot, +1/2"
Wedges: :cleveland: 56* (bent to 54*) and 60* CG10     Putter: :ping: Craz-e (original blue)


Posted
So, should the ROs follow the players all over the course to point out the rules that the players already know?

LOL. That is awesome.


  • Moderator
Posted
"Go away Mr. Paper Clip guy, NOBODY LIKES YOU!" - Stewie Griffin

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5768 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • So, Brendan Sorsby, Texas Tech transfer QB, was found guilty of sports betting by the NCAA. He admitted to it. He placed thousands of bets over multiple years while at Indiana and Cincinnati. This included betting on his own teams.  The NCAA rules ban athletes from betting on any sport (college or pro).  A retired visiting judge from Tarrant County, Texas has put an injunction on the NCAA ruling. He is a visiting judge because the first judge was a graduate and big fan of Texas Tech, and he recused himself. The judged ruled the following... "Under Curry's order, Sorsby is permitted to play for Texas Tech's 2026 season on the condition that he continues his treatment for a gambling and anxiety disorder and serves a two-game suspension (missing games against Abilene Christian and Oregon State)."  Don't get me wrong, I don't particularly care for the NCAA. That still doesn't mean that a college can choose when or where to say, "Yea we agree to these rules for all our sports, well except in this case." Here is a breakdown from S&W. The Hidden Weapon in Sorsby’s Injunction: How a Lubbock County Court Order Quietly Neutralized the NCAA’s Most Powerful Enforcement Tool - Law Offices of Snell & Wilmer By Ryan J. Regula On June 8, 2026, Lubbock County District Court Judge Ken Curry issued a temporary injunction in Brendan Sorsby v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, Cause No. DC-2026-CV-0791 (99th Judicial District... The main judgement made sense. Sorsby, I am going to have all this harm done to me if I don't get to play. The Judge, I agree. The penalty for gambling is too harsh, so here are all these things you must do, and I will grant this injunction against the NCAA. Basically, an analogy would be when a person goes into court for a DUI and they agree to all these other things to not end up in jail.  What sucks for the NCAA is the NCAA has appealed to Texas’ Seventh Court of Appeals, based in Amarillo. All four justices that preside over the court are graduates of Texas Tech University School of Law. It would be hilarious if all four of them had to recuse themselves 🤣. For those who like to read legal rulings...  
    • The chatter in my brain is when the distance is between clubs since I am pretty weak at shortened backswings, etc. I try to simply decide if being long or short is the better outcome and choose my club based on that and simply not even try for the “real” distance.  For me a full normal swing is what I strive for.
    • I saw this comment made in a golf article... "Most golfers stand over a 4- or 5-iron still negotiating with themselves. They think about how hard to swing, whether they have the right club, if they have the aim correct and more. It’s a lot to deal with and long irons punish the “half-in” golf swing." I am not sure the "most golfers" is correct regarding the bolded part. I can understand if there is a bunker, water, and/or OB that a lot of golfers would be fixated on that. I am not sure that leads to ending up more times there. Pending your level in golf, the variance is so large in outcomes, it could be just with in the expected outcomes. I can understand if have a big lake on the right side of the hole being one of the most terrifying shots for right-handed amateur golfers.  I am not sure many golfers are standing over the ball talking to themselves, "Ok, maybe I should step back and pull the 4-iron. Am I lined up right? Oh, the wind came up, should I swing harder? What am I going to have for dinner tonight, maybe steak. (Joking, somewhat 😛)" A question is that how much chatter do you get while standing over the ball. Are you questioning the everything about your golf shot?   
    • Wordle 1,816 5/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,816 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.