Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5347 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I was thinking of picking up a box of refinished prov1x's for my round this week. My question is are they as bad as everyone says? Not prov's but refinished golf balls, I know they probably won't feel and act like a brand new ball but must be similar right, I've read some bad things and was just looking to get your input, have you ever played with them what's your take? Thanks in advance

I have never played refinished golf balls, but I too have read some less than flattering things about them. On the other hand I rarely ever see anything negative about recycled AAAA or AAAAA balls.

There are tons of threads here to peruse regarding used/cheaper balls.

In the bag
Driver: Tour Burner 10.5*
Fairway: Launcher 2009 17*
Irons: X-18r 4-SW
Gap Wedge: CG15 52*Wedge: X Tour 60*Putter: Crimson 550Ball: E5


I grabbed a 60 pack of used dunlops at walmart this year for like 17-20$ I think. Was worth it ive only not used like 1-2 and still have tons of em.

No complaints. Anyways doesnt ball not even really matter until you get to like a 10hcp?
 Driver:callaway.gifBig Bertha 460cc 10* Hybrids: adams.gif A7 3-4H  Irons: adams.gif A7 5i-PW
Wedges: cleveland.gifCG 12 50*, CG 14 56*, CG12 60* Putt Putt:odyssey.gif White ICE Tour Bronze 1 Putter

Haven't tried refinished myself, but would rather recommend recycled, grade AAA or better.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  BostonSully said:
Anyways doesnt ball not even really matter until you get to like a 10hcp?

That's what I think, too.

I don't think a ball really matters that much for golfers with our skill level. I used to play ProV1 (and V1x) and Dunlop DDH balls just because my father had dozens of boxes of them. Now I play logo overruns and recycled balls. Dan

In my Revolver bag:

| Driver | Burner 460 9.5°
| Wood | Burner Plus 3 wood
| Hybrid | 22° Rescue Dual| Irons | MX-300 / Grads| Wedge | Spin milled 54°, 60°| Putter | Studio Newport 2.5 35"| Balls | NXT, Pro V1x DDH SF Tour, Pinnacle logo overruns :)


I bought a few dozen refinished ProV1's on an auction...really cheap price. I shared a few sleeves with my regular golf group (2 - 5 HCP) - they thought that they played like a new ball (but the stigma of refinished was still there). So, I didn't have any issues with this one purchase. Moving forward, I'd probably stick with Mint used (4A / 5A) because they can usually be had cheaper.

If you have the choice between refurbished and used go with the used ones,because that way they haven't been altered with inferior coating or anything though I have played both and have had no problems besides the ones you always get with softer balls.Besides for $1.50-$2.25 per ball compared to $4.00 plus you'll get more moneys worth.

In my Nexos

Driver R9 10.5*matrix ozik xcon 6
3wood dunlop Reaction 15*
hybrid Rescue 09 19* Aldila Re*ax 65 S Irons 755 3-PW project X flighted 5.5 Wedges MP T-10 52* 07 DG S300 WG 706 56* 12* bounce DG Wedge flex1018...


Ya i'd go with recycled
my buddy bought some refurbished ones, they looked like absolute crap.... its really hit or miss if they were refnished well or not

My Clubs:
Ping I3 + blade 3-pw
9.5 09 Burner with prolaunch red
Nickent 4dx driver
Taylormade Z tp 52, 56, 60
YES Carolyne putter


  nearwater said:
That's what I think, too.

This couldn't be further from the truth.

The type of ball matters greatly within 100 yards. If you have a higher handicap, I guarantee the way to pickup 5 strokes fast, is 100 yards and in. Going to be tough to develop 100 yard and in feel using pinnacles, for example. Not that it can't be done, but, I read somewhere that golf is the most difficult sport on the planet. Why make it harder than it has to be?

  JML22 said:
Ya i'd go with recycled

I'd read that most refinished balls are poor condition or bottom of lake balls that require refinishing for appearance but likely have issues beyond appearance.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Bought a dozen of slightly used Titleist at a Golf Course. I say they are slightly used because that must be the balls which golfers shot into the water hazards and retaken by the Golf course attendant.

I don't see how they differ in performance compared to a new ball.
Whats in my Golf Bag:
Driver: Nike Sumo 5000
5 Wood: Mizuno MP-001
Iron: Mizuno MX-950 5-PW
Wedge: Cobra FP 60 degrePutter: Odyssey 2-BallBall: Yellow balls

when buying those refinished balls, its all about luck i think.
i bought refinished balls 3 times. twice, they were pretty much brand new, but the 3rd batch was absolute crap.

  ddalet said:
This couldn't be further from the truth.

It's a double-edged sword, though. Soft, spinny balls which are great for short game control also accentuate hooks/slices.

Driver: Nike Ignite 10.5 w/ Fujikura Motore F1
2H: King Cobra
4H: Nickent 4DX
5H: Adams A3
6I 7I 8I 9I PW: Mizuno mp-57Wedges: Mizuno MP T-10 50, 54, 58 Ball: random


Go with recycled over refinished. Normally refinished balls are balls that are completely beat up and they have a new coating and paint applied to make them appear new. However, because of this there is no way to actually tell the condition of the ball. Recycled balls on the other hand are just used balls. Check out GolfBallNut.com for a great selection of balls at really good prices. I think you can get 1 dz. Pentas for $21 in mint condition; hard to pass that up. The rest of the premium balls are right around this price point as well.

Personally, I picked up 2 dz. Srixon Soft Feels in near mint condition for $6/dz. for short game practice and they were in great condition. I'd say 18 of the 24 were pretty much brand new and ALL of them were playable.

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
PXG 0211 Driver (Diamana S+ 60; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrids (MMT 80; 22°, 25°, and 28°) · PXG 0311P Gen 2 Irons (SteelFiber i95; 7-PW) · Edel Wedges (KBS Hi-Rev; 50°, 55°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · PXG Xtreme Tour Ball · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · JumboMax Ultralite Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Vessel Player V Pro Bag

On my MacBook Pro:
Analyzr Pro

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Only experience I've had with them is very negative. Whatever finish it is that they put on me quickly started flaking off...definitely not something I want to deal with. Go with "recycled", same price and you don't have the funky finish.

Driver: i15 8* UST Axivcore Red 69S
3w: CB1 15* Grafalloy Prolaunch Platinum 75s
5w: G10 18.5* UST V2 HL
3h: HiFli CLK 20* UST V2 Hybrid
4h: 3DX 23* UST V2 Hybrid5i-pw: MX-23 TT Dynalite Gold S300GW/SW: RAC 52*and 56*Putter: SabertoothBag: KingPin


Note: This thread is 5347 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 297: back to mirror work tonight. Working on slow movement for feels from the wrist stuff. 
    • Day 22: 5/13/25 Putting through gates and weight shift drills with a wedge.
    • I would be happy to hang out with you guys but as of now @DaveP043 and I are planning to stay in Cranberry Township. There’s a bit of travel between the two places, but maybe we can work something out.
    • Personally I have no issues with even the steroid-era figures such as Bonds, McGwire, and Sosa being inducted into the hall. My reasoning there is we already have nearly a half-dozen known steroid users in the hall, including those inducted after their steroid usage was already common knowledge. David Ortiz and Pedro Martinez (as well as Ivan Rodriguez, Adrian Beltre, and Todd Helton) both failed the same wave of anonymous drug tests that saw Sammy Sosa shunned by the nation, and he's in the hall. Piazza admitted to using Andro (the same thing McGwire was juicing with) and amphetamines. Greenies were commonplace in MLB clubhouses and used by countless stars, alongside cocaine, from at least the 60's all the way up until the early 2000's. There are at least a dozen other pros in the hall that have allegations from teammates who claim to have directly witnessed steroid usage. Even Nolan Ryan has stated that he thought steroid usage was a widespread problem in the sport as early as the mid to late 70's. I'm of the opinion that once that genie is out of the bottle, and it most certainly has been for decades now, it's a bit silly to pretend those already inducted are somehow morally superior for being not quite as astronomically and suspiciously good at baseball when using steroids. Hitters were using steroids, pitchers were using steroids (funny how we saw the number of complete games fall off a cliff at the same time that steroid enforcement was being ramped up), it's an even playing field as far as I'm concerned. To quote The Incredibles, "When everyone is super, no one will be".  As for Pete Rose it would appear that by all accounts he never bet as a player and only ever bet on his own team while managing. It's understandable to prohibit any involvement in the sport after it was discovered, but it's not something that gave him any advantage in reaching his level of achievement in the sport.  As for Joe Jackson, I personally don't think he should have been banned in the first place. He actively refused the bribe, tried to report the plot to the owner of the White Sox, and his alleged confession only occurred after the White Sox's team attorney got him roaring drunk immediately prior to the grand jury testimony. Every confessed conspirator also stated that he never attending any of their meetings or discussed plans with them. Not to mention the fact that if he WAS trying to fix the series he did an absolutely terrible job of it considering he was the best performing player on either team by far setting a World Series record that stood until 1964 and went error-free while gunning down at least one runner at home plate. 
    • Day 7: 5/13/2025 Range day today. Had a really good session. I was able to pull a mirror over into my stall and make a slow-mo swing in the mirror and then try to duplicate the swing to hit a ball.  Felt really good today. Tomorrow will be league night. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...