Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1935 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just recently picked up a set of the Ping Eye 2 + no + irons, 3-PW, ZZ-Lite shaft, Red Dot for $89 and Play it Again sports and they were in mint condition.  Barely played.  I went out and shot a 71 with them and that's the best round I've had all year.  I can't explain how wonderful these irons feel.  It's a crisp yet soft feel and the ball just explodes off the face.  The ZZ-Lite shaft is perfect in that it's a stiff shaft, lightweight with a soft feeling tip.  The ball just springs off of the club with a penetrating trajectory.  The best thing about the Ping Eye 2s are the long irons.  I have tried ALL of the irons that come out over the years and there are no long irons that compare.  The 3 iron takes off like a rocket with a medium ball flight and penetrating trajetory.  The pitching wedge is deadly from 70 to 110 yards and there is no need for a gap wedge because the PW is 50.5 degrees.  If you have the means I highly recommend procuring a set.  There is nothing like Ping Eye 2 bliss.


Posted

I've had this on my mind lately. A buddy of mine owns a golf shop and he just took in a set of mint condition Eye 2 BeCu black dots. He wants too much for them IMO ($279) or else I would've bought them already.

In the Bag:
Driver: Cleveland Launcher Ultralight XL 270

FW: Taylor Made 300 17 degree 
3-PW: Mizuno MX-23

AW: Mizuno TP-T11 52/07 (Bent to 50)
SW: Mizuno TP-T11 56/10

LW: Mizuno TP-T11 60/05

Putter: Original Ping Zing

Ball: Wilson Staff FG Tour


Posted

You're crazy if you think $287 is too much to spend for a mint set of BeCu Ping Eye 2 irons.  A set in mint condition will easily fetch $400+ on Ebay.  When I graduated from high school my parents bought me set of Ping Eye 2 Copper irons 2-LW and I think it cost them around $900 at the time.  It was great because they also paid for me to go to Hawaii with my class and I played 5 times in a row with my brand new Ping Eye 2 BeCu irons.  They are better feeling than any iron ever produced and that absolutely includes forged clubs.


Posted

i would spend 300 dollars on a new set of ping eye 2's..

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I suspect you're a troll.  I belong to three private clubs, including two of the most exclusive west of the Rockies, and I find that Ping irons are an almost infallible indicator of someone who flat can't play.  I've seen good ballstrikers with Mizunos, Wilsons, Macgregors, Titleists and Powerbilts (In fact, often PB's), but Ping guys hardly ever parachute one close to the pin on one of our slick greens.    I think Ping might appeal to the same type of guy who buys Cadillacs, i.e. someone who never got the memo that BMW's, Audis and Infinitis exist.  Oh well, that's cool, someone has to keep the Chinese economy from imploding.


Posted

Anyone who claims to belong to 3 private clubs could only be a basement dweller living with his mom.  If anyone is trolling it's you my friend.  I posted this thread because I was excited about my Ping Eye 2 + no + with ZZ-Lite shafts purchase.  Red Dot by the way.   You come on here and flame me for no reason.  Gee, thanks for the warm welcome.  Now, why don't you go back to raking leaves for your mommy so she can give you your $5 allowance for the week.  Then you can take the big $5 bill, get some quarters and play Asteroids.

Now, for the rest of you who are serious about golf, your game will surely flourish by playing Ping Eye 2 irons.  Karsten was the allmighty and I am his prophet.

  • Upvote 3

Posted

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

They are great clubs, and I love the old school loft gaps.  Still, I've hit multiple sets in excellent shape (regular and BeCu) and found my MX-200s and 775s superior.  Just a tad too much offset and a slightly harsher feeling out of the PINGs.  I still lust after them though.


Posted

I'm surprised to hear that because I've tried the Titleist 775 and I found them much harsher than the Ping Eye 2 BeCu.  Now, if you're hitting off of mats I can understand why the 775 might feel softer.  However, on the course the Ping Eye 2s feel much better.  As for the MX-200, I tried those and they just ballooned up into the air with those Dynalite Gold shafts.  Plus the PW is much larger than the Eye 2.  Eye 2s feel and play much different on the course than they do on the range.  It's as if they know where they are.  I'm not saying that's a likely scenario but you never know.  There are advances in nano technology and psychic stuff that none of us understand yet.


Posted


Originally Posted by neurodoc

I suspect you're a troll.  I belong to three private clubs, including two of the most exclusive west of the Rockies, and I find that Ping irons are an almost infallible indicator of someone who flat can't play.  I've seen good ballstrikers with Mizunos, Wilsons, Macgregors, Titleists and Powerbilts (In fact, often PB's), but Ping guys hardly ever parachute one close to the pin on one of our slick greens.    I think Ping might appeal to the same type of guy who buys Cadillacs, i.e. someone who never got the memo that BMW's, Audis and Infinitis exist.  Oh well, that's cool, someone has to keep the Chinese economy from imploding.


Mahan, Westwood, and Watson would disagree

  • Upvote 1

:tmade: SLDR X-Stiff 12.5°
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Wood Stiff
:nike:VRS Covert 3 Hybrid Stiff
:nike:VR Pro Combo CB 4 - PW Stiff 2° Flat
:cleveland:588RTX CB 50.10 GW
:cleveland:588RTX CB 54.10 SW
:nike:VR V-Rev 60.8 LW
:nike:Method 002 Putter


Posted

Thanks Kieran123, someone had to put that bully in his place.  I personally think he should get banned for what he said to me. It's one thing to belong to a country club but it's another to call someone poor because of the clubs they play.  I would never stoop so low.  To each his own I guess.


Posted


Originally Posted by neurodoc

I suspect you're a troll.  I belong to three private clubs, including two of the most exclusive west of the Rockies, and I find that Ping irons are an almost infallible indicator of someone who flat can't play.  I've seen good ballstrikers with Mizunos, Wilsons, Macgregors, Titleists and Powerbilts (In fact, often PB's), but Ping guys hardly ever parachute one close to the pin on one of our slick greens.    I think Ping might appeal to the same type of guy who buys Cadillacs, i.e. someone who never got the memo that BMW's, Audis and Infinitis exist.  Oh well, that's cool, someone has to keep the Chinese economy from imploding.


Quote:

Anyone who claims to belong to 3 private clubs could only be a basement dweller living with his mom.  If anyone is trolling it's you my friend.  I posted this thread because I was excited about my Ping Eye 2 + no + with ZZ-Lite shafts purchase.  Red Dot by the way.   You come on here and flame me for no reason.  Gee, thanks for the warm welcome.  Now, why don't you go back to raking leaves for your mommy so she can give you your $5 allowance for the week.  Then you can take the big $5 bill, get some quarters and play Asteroids.

Now, for the rest of you who are serious about golf, your game will surely flourish by playing Ping Eye 2 irons.  Karsten was the allmighty and I am his prophet.


Stretch.

"In the process of trial and error, our failed attempts are meant to destroy arrogance and provoke humility." -- Master Jin Kwon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


What?

They're really good clubs-legendary for a reason, and I do prefer the Eye 2 PW to the MX-200 GW.  I've hit the PINGs, and my irons, and many others on mats and on the course-no comparison in softness (or perceived softness).  There is no iron that "magically" feels better because it's being hit off of grass instead of a mat, or vice versa.  You got a screaming deal-I'd buy 'em 3 times at that price.  But they are just golf clubs-nice, large offset, perimeter weighted cast cavity backs (that hold up forever).

Originally Posted by famousdavis

There are advances in nano technology and psychic stuff that none of us understand yet.




Posted

This might be a bit of a newsflash for some but the golf ball has no idea what iron it's being hit with.   A golf ball doesn't care if it's being struck with vintage Pings or 2011 forged Mizzy's.   A ball can only react to the physics applied to it.

If you think your course are somehow special and only certain brands of irons will work you need to rethink your position.   People buy new clubs because it feeds their ego.   A square faced Eye 2 moving at 100mph will produce a pretty solid ball flight regardless of what the ad agencies have implanted in your head.   Some of the best forged irons of today are not radically different from their counterparts of 50 years ago.

Case in point:

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ6ay1-JLpTz0gX8niAZ48PtJwo0OrGdmm96N7200NbqvnENlKz

Driver: VRS 9.5 degrees

Fairway Wood: 13 degrees
Hybrid: A3 19 degrees

Irons: i20's  Yellow dot

Wedges: Vokey's 52, 56 & 60

Putter: 2 ball

Ball: Penta; ProV


Posted

I played with a set of eye2's for the longest time.  Amazing clubs.

In fact I only recently replaced them with a mint set of used I5's and that was only because I got fitted for clubs and needed something a few degrees upright with regular vs stiff shafts.  The I5's, to me, feel very much like the eye2's - that's why I bought them.  Now that I am used to them I actually like the I5's better.

And I actually own several country clubs and a small airline.  Ever heard of Texas?  I own that, too.  All my friends, like President Obama and George Clinton always want to hit my I5's when we go to one of the many, many country clubs I own or belong to.


Posted

I too have searched in vain for a superior iron to the Ping Eye 2.  It started as a curiousity and over time led to visiting golf stores every week.  Eventually I realized that I couldn't fight these demons on my own.  I needed help.   It all started with the Ping Zings.  I received them as a graduation gift for my post graduate work.  What was I to do....not play them and disappoint the ones I love?  After 6 frustrating months I tried to play with the Zings but it was an exercise in futility.

The Ping i5 irons were the first that gave me the impression that they could replace my Eye 2s.  Less offset, stronger lofts and a slightly lighter and more flexible shaft in the CS-Lite.  They started out great, like a good set of muffins ready to be cooked.  But, like every other iron, they squatted to rise but got cooked in the squat.  To be fair, the CS-Lite shaft is an abomination that doesn't resemble the ZZ-Lite in any way, shape or form.  The Ping Eye 2s are back in my bag now.  It's like looking at old friend.  I put my ego in check and realized that they play every bit as good as any iron I've ever tried and I've tried them all.

To the man who said I need my eyes checked, my eyes are fine.  You need to put your ego in check and go venture into that dark world to see what keeps you from playing the greatest iron ever invented...the Ping Eye 2.


Posted

The OP just discovered the awesome power of PINGs then he had them in high school then . . . he lost me.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Note: This thread is 1935 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.