Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4154 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Aside from the obvious where you can not use the slope feature for competition, does anyone use it and do you think it's worh the extra $100?

Thanks,

Bill


Posted

Bill, my pops has one with the slope feature and although it's great to know how it 'should' play...for an extra $100 you could do a fairly good estimate by your own...and that's free. for as much as he used it without the slope, i used it without. sure it's a great feature but, i don't think it's worth it. it's like getting a bmw and then sayin, 'should i buy the sport seats for $1750 or are the ones that come standard good enough...?"

In my Titleist 2014 9.5" Staff bag:

Cobra Bio+ 9* Matrix White Tie X  - Taylormade SLDR 15* ATTAS 80X - Titleist 910H 19* ATTAS 100X - Taylormade '13 TP MC 4-PW PX 6.5 - Vokey TVD M 50* DG TI X100 - Vokey SM4 55 / Vokey SM5 60* DG TI S400 - Piretti Potenza II 365g


Posted

I didn't get the slope feature because it is not within the rules handicap or tournament scores. The distance is just giving you  information you are entitled to and can get by maps or pacing, but slope is something that you have to estimate on your own.  I also did not see the point of spending the extra money for it as well.

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted

I did not get the slope feature on my Tour V2, and I can't imagine why anyone would want it.  I can't see why it would be worth $100 more to make it unusable for anything but casual play.  I can usually make a pretty good estimate of the elevations I find on most courses, and I play on every kind of terrain from the plains to the Rockies.  It's usually just going "x" clubs over or under your standard for the distance.  It's like learning to judge wind, only easier.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by Fourputt

I did not get the slope feature on my Tour V2, and I can't imagine why anyone would want it.  I can't see why it would be worth $100 more to make it unusable for anything but casual play.  I can usually make a pretty good estimate of the elevations I find on most courses, and I play on every kind of terrain from the plains to the Rockies.  It's usually just going "x" clubs over or under your standard for the distance.  It's like learning to judge wind, only easier.


Rick, your input is valued, but please don't speak for others. It's fine to say that you don't see any benefit, but consider stopping short of saying "nobody else would want it."

Tournament golfers use the slope feature all the time when mapping out a new course. It's may be easier than "learning to judge the wind" but learning to judge wind is difficult (particularly given funny lies and/or gusts and/or being in trees) AND it's better to know a shot is "+7" than to think "I think it's a full club more."

I really like the Leupold GX-4 because you can switch faceplates and measure slope when you want, or use it with just yardage when you want to do that, too.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

And then there are some of us who don't give a rat's backside about 'tournament legal'. ;)

In the Bag

Ping i15 8* Diamana Whiteboard

Titleist 909f3 13.5* Aldila NV

Ping S57 3-PW KBS C-taper

Macgregor 52, 56, and 60 wedges

SC Newport 2.5

 

Light travels faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

 


Posted


Quote:
Originally Posted by iacas View Post


Rick, your input is valued, but please don't speak for others. It's fine to say that you don't see any benefit, but consider stopping short of saying "nobody else would want it."

Tournament golfers use the slope feature all the time when mapping out a new course. It's may be easier than "learning to judge the wind" but learning to judge wind is difficult (particularly given funny lies and/or gusts and/or being in trees) AND it's better to know a shot is "+7" than to think "I think it's a full club more."

I really like the Leupold GX-4 because you can switch faceplates and measure slope when you want, or use it with just yardage when you want to do that, too.


Just a clarification Erik - I said that I can't imagine why anyone would want it, not that "nobody else would want it."  Most golfers say that they aren't even good enough to need to know the distances as accurately as what a laser will give them, so adding yet more accuracy seems to me to be redundant.  The guy asked if it was worth it and I gave my opinion, just like you did.

Quote:
And then there are some of us who don't give a rat's backside about 'tournament legal'.

Then I have to assume that your posted handicap was legally established too without the use of slope measurement?  Just asking since you brought it up....

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I live relatively close to Houston.. Not much elevation change here so there definitely isn't much need for the slope feature.. My Bushnell Tour V2 is great.. And if you're like me and don't have the slope feature, you're still going to be in a much better position than those who are stepping it off from the 150 marker..


Posted

No, it's not a legal handicap per USGA. It's just a number based upon 90 or so rounds downloaded from my skycaddie to their website.

I'm sure it's a vanity handicap (the one under round I shot last Sunday was a fluke, trust me...). But friends I play with don't believe me when I tell them it's bogus, I'm really a 10-15, and we should play $20 a hole straight up. They just laugh and put their hands over their wallets.

I'll remove it so there's no confusion.

In the Bag

Ping i15 8* Diamana Whiteboard

Titleist 909f3 13.5* Aldila NV

Ping S57 3-PW KBS C-taper

Macgregor 52, 56, and 60 wedges

SC Newport 2.5

 

Light travels faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

 


Posted

I totally agree with Fourputt...i'm a high handicapper and I dont need de 1 or 2 yards more or less I need the 10 or 20 when I'm firing from the adjacent fairway cus I just sliced or hooked the ball LMAO!!!


  • 3 years later...
Posted

I have to disagree.  MORE accuracy cannot be a bad thing.  It's the whole reason for buying a rangefinder in the first place.  I'd been a GPS guy for years and it really helped my game.  However, eventually the "I've got Front Middle Back #'s of ___.....but how FAR back is that pin" still introduces a bit of uncertainty (never a good thing in golf).  As does watching your GPS change numbers as you stand still....or your buddies being 3-5 yards different than yours consistently.  My Laser RFer changed all that and my game once again took a step forward .......as I feel even MORE confident that I've got a solid distance TO THE PIN.

After playing a VERY hilly course yesterday......I'm seriously considering a SLOPE RFer for that reason.....and the Leupold 4X for the ability to be Tournament legal (although I generally ONLY play in scrambles and I don't think it would be an issue there).

For those who have them......how accurate do you find the calculated "flat and level distance" using your slope feature?

(LOL....just realized the age of this thread.....oh well, maybe it'll be revived)


Posted
You couldn't give me one. You couldn't give me a nonconforming driver either.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

You couldn't give me one.

You couldn't give me a nonconforming driver either.

On the long shot someone offers you a free one........................ can I have it ?

got a driver thanks :-D

Derrek

Righty in the left trap


Note: This thread is 4154 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.