Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5414 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a set of B.H. BH5 irons and thinking of upgrading to the Razr X irons.  Been told the Hogans are a beginner club.  Shooting in the high 80s I like to think im past that stage.  Anyone one know much about the Hogans?  Should I get the Razr Xs?


Posted
Hogan irons are solid. How do you strike them? Most imporant factor is getting fit for the correct lie angle, if they fit you well beat em into the dirt, then get fit for your next set.

Founder/President, AroGolf Premium Milled Putters
Titleist 983K 9.5 / Adams Insight 3W / Rotation of hybrids/long irons
Ping i3 Blades White Dot 5-PW / Ping Tour Wedges Green Dot 52, 58
AroGolf iON1 FB BLACK mil-spec putter


Posted

I do think I hit them well.  i know nothing about being fit for clubs.  I bought them off the shelf at Golf town and just realized there stiff shaft when I know I need a regular shaft.  As for beating them into the ground there about 8 years old and some of the ferrals have broke off or have slide of the iron.


Posted
Well, hogans are premium and because they are not made anymore carry some cache. They made some good irons. as you get better, you may find stiff flex offers some control. How far do you hit the 7 iron? You can always take some super glue or two part epoxy and re glue the ferrules in place. Its easy.

Founder/President, AroGolf Premium Milled Putters
Titleist 983K 9.5 / Adams Insight 3W / Rotation of hybrids/long irons
Ping i3 Blades White Dot 5-PW / Ping Tour Wedges Green Dot 52, 58
AroGolf iON1 FB BLACK mil-spec putter


Posted

With my Ben Hogan BH5 it hit my 7 about 130.  My 5 is around 150.  I was trying the Razr X (callaway) and i was up around 155 with a 6 iron.


Posted

The BH5, if I'm not mistaken, is one of the worst irons ever to bear the Hogan sunburst. I might be thinking about another set, but based on the shape yours are in after only 8 years, I'd say go the upgrade.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted


Originally Posted by welling10

With my Ben Hogan BH5 it hit my 7 about 130.  My 5 is around 150.  I was trying the Razr X (callaway) and i was up around 155 with a 6 iron.



Lofts are definitely a lot stronger these days.. New irons will serve you well distance wise..


Posted

BH-5's were released by Callaway in 2005 and one of the last sets with the Hogan name on it.  They are fully cast stainless steel irons which are very different from the famous Hogan forged irons.  They are considered very forgiving but came in two different offsets.  The steel used was considered soft and as a result they show more wear than other irons typically do.  The RAZR X are nice, but given their price I'd suggest you look at some others like Mizuno JPX-800, Titleist AP1, and Ping G15.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

the pings, razr x and the mizunos are within 50 bucks of each other.  The AP1s are 200 more.  Would you say the Hogans are a "beginner club"


Posted


I never hit them, but Ralph Maltby rates them a 821 MPF (Maltby Playability Factor) which falls into his SGI (Super Game Improvement) category.  The RAZR X is a 605 which is considered a GI (Game Improvement) iron as is the JPX 800 with a 604 MPF.  The Ping G15 (844 MPF), and Titleist API (838 MPF) are rated as SGI.

I wouldn't consider the BH-5's beginner clubs any more than I would the G15's or AP1's which are used by Pro's.  I consider beginner clubs to be what Maltby calls Ultra Game Improvement like the Diablo Edges I use with a 968 MPF.

Quote:

the pings, razr x and the mizunos are within 50 bucks of each other.  The AP1s are 200 more.  Would you say the Hogans are a "beginner club"



Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I was looking at the Razr x #6 which is rated a "ultra game improving" rating 970.  what does it mean?


Posted


You're right, I was looking at the Razr X Forged.  Maltby describes MPF as "A method to determine the playability category an iron club fits into by measuring and quantifying certain mass and dimensional properties of the head itself. The clubheads center of gravity location is very important in the calculation. The clubheads moment of inertia is also used."

The higher the number the more forgiving and easier it should be to play, so UGI would be considered beginners level clubs.  Better players prefer SGI, GI, Conventional or Classic for more control and playability.  Given your handicap I'd think you'd want something from GI to SGI.  The Ping i15's are GI and should be around the same price as the G15's.   Ultimately you should go get fitted and try out a number of irons in your price range to make sure you get the best set for you.

Originally Posted by welling10

I was looking at the Razr x #6 which is rated a "ultra game improving" rating 970.  what does it mean?



Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Demo the Mizuno JPX-800 Pro's. Forged. Not as forgiving as some Super Game Improvement clubs but more forgiving than many other Mizuno irons I tried. Check out threads and reviews on the Sandtrap.

Be careful of distance increases because of added shaft length and stronger lofts. As said before, today's 7-iron is yesterday's 6-iron. More distance with your 6-iron on one set vs. another does not make it better.

Get fitted for whatever you buy. Good fit with bad clubs is better than good clubs with a bad fit. Lie angle and length really matter. Shafts matter too.

Russ - Student of the Moe Norman swing as taught by the pros at - http://moenormangolf.com

Titleist 910 D3 8.5* w/ Project X shaft/ Titleist 910F 15* w/ Project X shaft

Cobra Baffler 20* & 23* hybrids with Accra hybrid shafts

Mizuno MP-53 irons 5Iron-PW AeroTech i95 shafts stiff and soft stepped once/Mizuno MP T-11 50.6/56.10/MP T10 60*

Seemore PCB putter with SuperStroke 3.0

Srixon 2012 Z-Star yellow balls/ Iomic Sticky 2.3, X-Evolution grips/Titleist Lightweight Cart Bag---

extra/alternate clubs: Mizunos JPX-800 Pro 5-GW with Project X 5.0 soft-stepped shafts


Note: This thread is 5414 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
    • We had a member of our senior club who developed a mental block on pulling the trigger. I played with him to see what the membership was talking about. I timed him a few times when he would get over the ball. 45 seconds. He knew he had a mental block and would chide himself, “Just hit it!” Once on the green he was okay and chipping was a bit better. It was painful to watch him struggle. Our “bandaid” was to put him in the last tournament  tee time with two understanding players. We should have suggested to him to take a break from our tournaments. I agree with the idea that when a player realizes they have a problem, the answer is to go fix it and not return until they are able to play at an acceptable pace.
    • Day 56 (4 May 26) - Worked on some ball-then-ground drills - going from P3 thru impact - with a slowed tempo, working to keep all parts in sync.   
    • Wordle 1,780 3/6 🟩⬜🟨🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,780 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟨🟩🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.