Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5426 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I just had a question for those of you who lost weight and saw a drop in distance.  While losing the weight, did you just do cardio?  Or did you lift weights as well.  I lost 30 pounds in college and saw a drop in distance but it all came back when I started to lift.


Posted

It depends on the golfer and how much weight they lost.  There are a number of variables that go into the swing that can affect distance.

If you swing properly and use your body you could lose some distance as there's less mass behind the swing.  The counter to that is less mass could result in higher swing speeds which would potentially add distance.

If you're not lifting specifically for golf, I doubt the effects of lifting will have much effect unless you replace the mass lost in fat with muscle.  On there own, bench presses and arm curls won't do much for your golf swing.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I actually started hitting it further. I think the weight loss helped me turn more and as a result the ball goes further now. I was 14 stone I'm now 12.

  • Upvote 1

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Really depends... muscle being more dense I would think would have a bigger effect... Point being muscle loss not weight loss would effect distance. I say this because although basic Physics dictates that less weight=less inertia = less force F=M*A a believe a 30 pound fat loss would aid in mobility  positively and a 30 pound muscle loss would be pretty devastating.

Sorry to geek out on you here but 30 pound fat loss cant hurt your distance...  that's my two cents.

Cheers

Frank

fmk123ster


Posted

Oh and Congrats on the weight loss !

Originally Posted by fmk123ster

Really depends... muscle being more dense I would think would have a bigger effect... Point being muscle loss not weight loss would effect distance. I say this because although basic Physics dictates that less weight=less inertia = less force F=M*A a believe a 30 pound fat loss would aid in mobility  positively and a 30 pound muscle loss would be pretty devastating.

Sorry to geek out on you here but 30 pound fat loss cant hurt your distance...  that's my two cents.

Cheers

Frank

fmk123ster




Posted

I also gained distance with my weight loss, especially with the Driver.   I think I have a much more consistent turn which helps me generate more power off the tee,

Stephen T.


Posted

For me it depended on the swing, my old swing matched my body. I was about 280, 6'1" tall, but i wasn't fat around the belly really. I had some muscle on my as well, so i was a lean looking 280 to say the least. But i had a good lateral shift right and then left. I have really good timing, i got away with alot in that swing, got down to near a single handicap. But i could just demolish the golf ball.

I have lost near 65lbs in over 3 years, and during that time i did see some distance lose. Mostly because my swing fell apart for a bit, i had a nasty pull cut that took me about a year to get rid of. I lost about 15-20 yards. Now i gained nearly all that distance back, my accuracy is way up. I don't swing as hard to get the distance anymore. I am totally in balance 95% of my shots, which is a huge improvement. I use to not hold a finish because i really couldn't, now i can pose for the camera so to say.

So take the weight loss as a good thing, you might loose some distance. But work on gaining some muscle, work alot on the core, and balance. You will gain more back and have a better swing for it, and a healthier life.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5426 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Oh man. As you can see above, Manavian mocked me for not realizing they were getting the 130° from BOTH shoulders. Apparently, though, Manavian is also wrong, as Andy said I was lying when I cited what Manavian had written: The next thing Andy says that's both accurate and clearly stated will be the first. I replied to that post with something like: Tell Manavian who said "only counting the abduction/adduction of one shoulder rather than 2." One of the issues with “bad” information is that y’all can’t even get on the same page. You've not shown that Bryson has 130° range of motion in either shoulder separately P1 to P7. I’ve shown the numbers. You’ve name-called and just said “nuh uh” repeatedly. Did you see the AMG IG video? Of course you have. Wrapping your head around the distance the shoulder travels yet, Andy? Andy later commented to explain how he got his range of motion number (apologies to whoever @iacac and @icaca are on Instagram, who are going to be wondering just what in the hell they've gotten themselves into). Oh boy. Adding the numbers in one direction and then adding them again going back is not a "range" of motion. If I can bend my knees 140°, I don't claim to have 280° range of motion because I have two knees nor because I can also extend my knees 140° after bending them. Bryson (with a driver, again — I used his iron swing) abducts about 65° (and bends his elbow a ton) with the driver. Then he adducts 50… and then another 15°… to end up right back where he started. This is exactly the equivalent of saying that I bend my knees 140° and then straighten them, creating a range of 280°. It's so silly I don't even have much of a response. It falls down completely on its own. It doesn't need even a nudge.
    • Can't remember who but some wise guy said "Arms up, body around"..😉. Anywho, been working on pinning my lead arm less and less to my chest in the BS. Decent progress with the arms, need a lot of work and trust for the 'body around' part. 
    • Wordle 1,823 6/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟩 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 🟩⬜🟩⬜🟩 🟩⬜🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,823 5/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,823 4/6* ⬛🟨⬛⬛🟩 ⬛⬛🟩⬛🟩 ⬛⬛🟩⬛🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.