Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

My observations from watching the Pros.


Note: This thread is 5394 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

A friend and I drove down from Calgary and watched the Saturday and Sunday rounds of the RBC Canadian Open  tournament and there were a few things I was very surprised by.

Ball striking - these guys really hit down on the ball. I have been making a concious effort to hit down on the ball more this year but this was an eye opening experience. These guys fly 9 irons at the ball flight of my 6 iron. Thats my goal going forward is a more penetrating ball flight with more spin. It really let me know where my swing is and where I want it to be. I have never seen anyone at any course I have played hit a ball like that.

Driving Distance and Accuracy - The fairways were thin and these guys pound the ball 300 yards carry and hit the fairway 80% of the time (may not have been 80% but felt like it). Also how far there hands were forward with the driver was surprising. They definetly do not catch it on the upswing.

The size of the guys - I was surprised that the average size of the guys was probably only 5 ft 8 and maybe 160lbs. Maybe only half a dozen guys over 6 ft tall.

Swing tempo - they definetly do not try to kill the ball. I was surprised at how light they swing and all there power and distance comes from solid contact.

The money spent on the weekend was the best money I have spent on Golf. To see how the game is supposed to be played was great. You can watch it on TV and watch swing visions on YouTube until your eyes bleed but you will never get the full effect. If you ever have the chance to see a pro hit the ball you owe it to yourself to see it. It will change how you play golf.

Driver- Titleist 910 D3 9.5

3 Wood- Burner 15 degree
Irons- Slingshot 4I-AW
Hybrid- CPR 3 22 degree
Putter- White Hot XG 8


Posted

80% in the fairway?  You sure it was the Canadian Open you went to?


Posted


Originally Posted by slabm7

A friend and I drove down from Calgary and watched the Saturday and Sunday rounds of the RBC Canadian Open  tournament and there were a few things I was very surprised by.

Ball striking- these guys really hit down on the ball. I have been making a concious effort to hit down on the ball more this year but this was an eye opening experience. These guys fly 9 irons at the ball flight of my 6 iron. Thats my goal going forward is a more penetrating ball flight with more spin. It really let me know where my swing is and where I want it to be. I have never seen anyone at any course I have played hit a ball like that.

Driving Distance and Accuracy- The fairways were thin and these guys pound the ball 300 yards carry and hit the fairway 80% of the time. Also how far there hands were forward with the driver was surprising. They definetly do not catch it on the upswing.

The size of the guys- I was surprised that the average size of the guys was probably only 5 ft 8 and maybe 160lbs. Maybe only half a dozen guys over 6 ft tall.

Swing tempo- they definetly do not try to kill the ball. I was surprised at how light they swing and all there power and distance comes from solid contact.

The money spent on the weekend was the best money I have spent on Golf. To see how the game is supposed to be played was great. You can watch it on TV and watch swing visions on YouTube until your eyes bleed but you will never get the full effect. If you ever have the chance to see a pro hit the ball you owe it to yourself to see it. It will change how you play golf.


Hey,

I also went to this event and it was my first time too. Best money spent on golf to date.

Regards to

1)I thought the opposite.  On some players, I found that their contact didn't sound really solid.  But the ball still flew! Geoff Ogilvy especially.  There were a couple players on the driving range (no names) and the sound they made gave me nerd chills. Just sooooo good.

2)Agreed. The course was so narrow and these guys were hitting it down the middle.

3)I'm 5'5 so I was surprised how big these guys were

4)Agreed. Its all about tempo tempo tempo

Tour Burner 9.5 Aldila NV65R
MP-57 3-PW R300
588 SW 54
588 LW 60


Posted


Your accuracy figure is off. The best was Joe Durant with 78.57%.  The average for the field was 55.93%.

Originally Posted by slabm7

Driving Distance and Accuracy- The fairways were thin and these guys pound the ball 300 yards carry and hit the fairway 80% of the time. Also how far there hands were forward with the driver was surprising. They definetly do not catch it on the upswing.


Posted


Originally Posted by shades9323

Your accuracy figure is off. The best was Joe Durant with 78.57%.  The average for the field was 55.93%.


I didn't look at the numbers but standing on the side of the 18th fairway it sure felt like 3/4 of the guys were hitting it and it was a very thin fairway. I was very surprised at how many hit it.

Driver- Titleist 910 D3 9.5

3 Wood- Burner 15 degree
Irons- Slingshot 4I-AW
Hybrid- CPR 3 22 degree
Putter- White Hot XG 8


Posted
In person the pros can appear more accurate off the tee because the fairways can be tighter than we expect and a lot of their misses are only by a few feet. It looks way more accurate than the drives we're used to hitting.

"Golf is an entire game built around making something that is naturally easy - putting a ball into a hole - as difficult as possible." - Scott Adams

Mid-priced ball reviews: Top Flight Gamer v2 | Bridgestone e5 ('10) | Titleist NXT Tour ('10) | Taylormade Burner TP LDP | Taylormade TP Black | Taylormade Burner Tour | Srixon Q-Star ('12)


Posted

I get everything you are saying man... I'm able to attend 6 or so PGA events a year and it really is an eye opener. Kinda makes it easy to see why these guys are called pro's. I guess at 6'3 and 220lbs I'm gonna have an uphill battle...


Posted


Originally Posted by shades9323

Your accuracy figure is off. The best was Joe Durant with 78.57%.  The average for the field was 55.93%.


He could have been observing from one hole in which the accuracy was 80%.  Even so, he said it might not be.  Regardless, pro's are extremely accurate and that is what he is conveying here I don't see why you had to be so particular about a minor detail

Driver: adams.gif Speedline 9032LS RIP Shaft (Stiff)

3 Wood: adams.gif Oviation 3Wood

Hybrids: taylormade.gif Rescue 18* 3H - 22* 4H

Irons: callaway.gif X-24 Hot Irons 5-PW

Wedges: cleveland.gif CG15 52, 56

 

Putter: odyssey.gif PT 82

Ball:  e6


Posted


He very well could have been observing on one hole, but how many people really only observe one hole?  He said it might not be after I provided the actual stats from the tournament, i.e. he edited his op.  The pros were not extremely accurate off the tee for this tournament as seen by the 56% average. They usually do better.  I am so particular because I am an accountant and that is how I am wired. I like statistics to be factual. It was a main point in his post, so I don't see how it is a minor detail.

Originally Posted by bkoguy07

He could have been observing from one hole in which the accuracy was 80%.  Even so, he said it might not be.  Regardless, pro's are extremely accurate and that is what he is conveying here I don't see why you had to be so particular about a minor detail




Posted


Originally Posted by shades9323

He very well could have been observing on one hole, but how many people really only observe one hole?  He said it might not be after I provided the actual stats from the tournament, i.e. he edited his op.  The pros were not extremely accurate off the tee for this tournament as seen by the 56% average. They usually do better.  I am so particular because I am an accountant and that is how I am wired. I like statistics to be factual. It was a main point in his post, so I don't see how it is a minor detail.



You missed the whole point of his post. He was thrilled to see pro's playing the game, and he noticed how good they are. What a real shot looks like when it it hit correctly. He doesn't care what the exact percentage of fairways hit was. What he ment was the pro's were able to hit a narrow fairway. You are like this on just about every thread you post on. Very annoying.

  • Upvote 2

Posted

If he didn't care about the exact percentages, he wouldn't have tried to quantify it.  Sorry I care about things being factual.

Feel free to block me then. If you are not sure how, click the blue arrow near my SN and then click block member.

Originally Posted by Callawaykid

You missed the whole point of his post. He was thrilled to see pro's playing the game, and he noticed how good they are. What a real shot looks like when it it hit correctly. He doesn't care what the exact percentage of fairways hit was. What he ment was the pro's were able to hit a narrow fairway. You are like this on just about every thread you post on. Very annoying.




Posted


Originally Posted by shades9323

He very well could have been observing on one hole, but how many people really only observe one hole?  He said it might not be after I provided the actual stats from the tournament, i.e. he edited his op.  The pros were not extremely accurate off the tee for this tournament as seen by the 56% average. They usually do better.  I am so particular because I am an accountant and that is how I am wired. I like statistics to be factual. It was a main point in his post, so I don't see how it is a minor detail.

Then you should call him out on the 300 yards of carry because I don't believe that to be "factual" either.  It's not a big detail, he was/is obviously exaggerating.  I also observe one hole usually if I go to a tournament, I'll just pull up a chair and watch one area.  Once again, that is just me so people are all different.  He also could have just followed one specific pro around and that pro hit 8/10 fairways that he saw(obviously not since it was plural when he stated it but what ever).  Either way not a big deal, point being, they hit the ball far and in the fairway a lot.

Driver: adams.gif Speedline 9032LS RIP Shaft (Stiff)

3 Wood: adams.gif Oviation 3Wood

Hybrids: taylormade.gif Rescue 18* 3H - 22* 4H

Irons: callaway.gif X-24 Hot Irons 5-PW

Wedges: cleveland.gif CG15 52, 56

 

Putter: odyssey.gif PT 82

Ball:  e6


Posted

It's really cool to see them play.

I couldn't believe how high some of them were hitting their long irons and woods/drivers.

And an other observation I made is how focused the pros are, you can really feel the concentration.


Posted



Originally Posted by shades9323

I am so particular because I am an accountant and that is how I am wired. I like statistics to be factual. It was a main point in his post, so I don't see how it is a minor detail.



Oh, I thought you were just being a stickler, as usual.

  • Upvote 1

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted


Originally Posted by Spyder

Now I remember why I cannot stand accountants.



Believe it or not, some of us accountants are actually pretty laid back.  Don't let one ruin it for the whole bunch!

SQ Dymo 10.5°

 Idea Pro A12 3H 20°

 710 AP2 5-GW SM4 56/11 60/07

 White Hot Sabertooth


Posted


Originally Posted by Spyder

Now I remember why I cannot stand accountants.



I am married to one and she doesn't bother me at all.  She must not be wired liked that.


Posted

I get where the OP was coming from and I also get when the factual guys were coming from... I have some friends who happen to run sports books and I have learned that I can't tell a story quoting numbers unless google and Mike and Mike can back up my data...


Note: This thread is 5394 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I would think of it in terms of time. The time it takes to get the arm angle into a good position to deliver the club with proper shaft lean. Another component is rotation, but that is also a matter of timing. It relates to how the body stalls to give the golfer time to hit the ball. If you have to get 80+ degrees out of that right elbow in one third of a second versus 50 degrees in the same time then you have to steal time from somewhere. It is usually body rotation. That does not help with shaft lean.  I agree in that amateurs tend to make the swing more complicated than pro golfers. 
    • I haven't been able to practice like I wanted and won't for the next week.  1. The weather sucks in Ohio this year. I have been mostly inside hitting foam balls. Just kind of my basic stuff.  2. I woke up last Saturday with a left side rib muscle on fire. If I turned or leaned a certain way it would spasm that almost buckled my knees. I have been taking a break to let that settle. I don't want to get a long term injury. I think I pinched a nerve or just aggravated a muscles.   3. I am going on a mini-vacation to Florida (screw you Ohio weather) with a friend, and rolling that into a work conference I have next week. I will be with out my clubs for a week.  I will be back next in two Fridays to hit the ground running with some warmer temps and better weather in Ohio, hopefully. I would really like to get more out on the course and the range.     
    • Day 580 - 2026-05-04 Played eight holes. Sometimes golf kicks you in the nuts. 😉 
    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
    • We had a member of our senior club who developed a mental block on pulling the trigger. I played with him to see what the membership was talking about. I timed him a few times when he would get over the ball. 45 seconds. He knew he had a mental block and would chide himself, “Just hit it!” Once on the green he was okay and chipping was a bit better. It was painful to watch him struggle. Our “bandaid” was to put him in the last tournament  tee time with two understanding players. We should have suggested to him to take a break from our tournaments. I agree with the idea that when a player realizes they have a problem, the answer is to go fix it and not return until they are able to play at an acceptable pace.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.