Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

2011 College Football Discussion


Note: This thread is 5107 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Who wins the BSC this year?

I'm such a homer so I'm picking the Badgers but OU looks pretty good.

Alan Olson

Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!
Check out our Facebook page!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Huskers could be awsome on defense, maybe best in the nation. Unfortunately OL is only fair and not very explosive on offense. First year schedule in big 10 is brutal. If they find a WR and backup RB and OL improves could win division and be a darkhorse top 5 team. I believfe Oklahoma, Alabama and Oregon are the top 3 with Wisconsin and Nebraska coming next. Badgers lucked out getting quaterback transfer

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


Posted
It looks an awful lot like another strong SEC season. LSU looked great against Oregon. Alabama is going to be tough this year in all phases, and there are some surprises in store for us somewhere in the South Carolina/Florida camps I'd reckon. Auburn is a mere shadow of last year without Newton and Fairley. Georgia looked worse than they should be, and I think we're all in a wait and see on Ole Miss, Tennessee and Arkansas. Looking forward to seeing Oklahoma play. Wouldn't that be a kick to see a Big XII team go big after their conference got kicked around this offseason? Texas needs a QB to compete seriously. Nebraska might surprise a few folks, as might Missouri. I see little to get excited about in the ACC, Big East or BigTen (12) this year. Yes, Ohio State beat Akron, but I'm not sure they can recover to be contenders. Iowa keeps getting close, but they can't seem to keep the talent pipeline full. Wisconsin looks pretty good, I think. Need to watch more tape. PAC 12 looks to be all Ducks. Even in their loss to a very good LSU, they appear strong. USC was unimpressive against Minnesota. Not much else out there at the moment. Boise might be the team out west to make noise aside from the PAC, but they should have beaten UGA a little more handily, I think.

Posted

Coach Saban has finally gotten Alabama to a depth that rivals the old Coach Bryant teams.  Other teams may equal our first team skill, but very few - if any - can match the depth we possess.  This team reminds me of the 2009 team that was still smarting from the losses to Florida and Utah that spoiled the year.  Last year's disappointments, coupled with the tragedies of the past few months have brought this team closer together, and I can't see them letting anything distract them from their goals.  The offensive line is taking "the blame" for only beating Kent State 48 - 7.

Oh yeah... and Auburn sucks.  If they play like they like they did against Utah State the rest of the year, they may not win a single SEC game and that 36 - 0 beating we gave them in 2008 may seem like a close game.  In the West, they may beat Ole Miss... that's it.  Mississippi State's offense is going to run through them like spoiled Mexican food and warm beer.

:ping:

  • G400 - 9° /Alta CB 55 Stiff / G410-SFT - 16° /Project X 6.0S 85G / G410 - 20.5° /Tensei Orange 75S
  • G710 - 4 iron/SteelFiber i110cw Stiff • / i210 - 5 iron - UW / AWT 2.0 Stiff
  • Glide SS - 54° / CFS Wedge / Glide 2.0 SS - 58°/10 / KBS 120S / Hoofer - Black

:scotty_cameron: - Select Squareback / 35"  -  :titleist: - Pro V1 / White  -  :clicgear: - 3.5+ / White

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Shoelace!

In my UnderArmour Links stand bag...

Driver: '07 Burner 9.5° (stiff graphite shaft)
Woods: SasQuatch 17° 4-Wood (stiff graphite shaft)
Hybrid: 4DX Ironwood 20° (stiff graphite shaft)Irons/Wedges: Apex Edge 3-PW, GW, SW (stiff shaft); Carnoustie 60° LWPutter: Rossa AGSI+ Corzina...


Posted

I'm not normally spiteful when it comes to competition, etc.  But I have to say I take MUCH delight in Notre Dame continually being overrated and losing to sub-par teams.

Michigan State's D is looking solid, Wisconsin is going to be a powerhouse, Nebraska looks shaky...probably not a real top ten team yet.  Iowa had no business losing to ISU.  Here's looking forward to week 3.


Posted

As an SC fan, I completely agree with you. Right now, SC is inconsistent and with Monte Kiffin as DC, I would expect more from our defense. Offense looks good despite some miscues against Utah, but the team is still young.

The Pac12 is basically Stanford or Oregon. Both have good offenses, but Oregon has a slew of good players on offense while Stanford is just Andrew Luck. For the first Pac12 conference championship game, I'd pick Oregon vs Utah (because Utah doesn't have to play either Oregon or Stanford in their schedule).

As for the rest, if Bama and LSU are still undefeated, then their game on Nov. 5 should be a good one to watch. Personally, I'd take LSU over Bama but because they're equally as good, it's a coin flip. Whoever wins this game goes to the BCS title game.

Originally Posted by bobleeswagger

I'm not normally spiteful when it comes to competition, etc.  But I have to say I take MUCH delight in Notre Dame continually being overrated and losing to sub-par teams.

Michigan State's D is looking solid, Wisconsin is going to be a powerhouse, Nebraska looks shaky...probably not a real top ten team yet.  Iowa had no business losing to ISU.  Here's looking forward to week 3.



Best Regards,
Ryan

In the :ogio: bag:
:nike: VR-S Covert Tour Driver 10.5 :nike: VR-S Covert Tour 3W :titleist: 712U 21*
:nike: VR Pro Blades 4-PW :vokey: Vokeys 52*, 56* & 60* :scotty_cameron: Studio Select Newport 2
:leupold:
:true_linkswear: 


Posted

I'm not normally spiteful when it comes to competition, etc.  But I have to say I take MUCH delight in Notre Dame continually being overrated and losing to sub-par teams.

Michigan State's D is looking solid, Wisconsin is going to be a powerhouse, Nebraska looks shaky...probably not a real top ten team yet.  Iowa had no business losing to ISU.  Here's looking forward to week 3.

There really seems to be a lack of teams ready to challenge for a spot in the top 5... With scholarship limits, early graduation, better non bcs teams, and current dependence on quarterback play, the landscape has changed. By the middle of October some of the freshmen and sophmores will develop and the challengers will emerge. Right now Okies, LSU, ALA, Boise, Wisc., with Ore., and Ark., maybe in the mix later would be my guess. I root for Neb., but o line is too young and quarterback is reaaly a RB. Tust me defense will be very good by WISC. game. Every Pellini defense has early hiccups.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


Posted

We'll know a lot more about OU after this weekend's game against Florida State.

Haven't seen OU do well on the road in a while. Beating Baylor last season doesn't count (since they *should* beat Baylor), and they really just barely snuck by OSU (giving up way too many points -- entertaining as all heck, but...).  OU will be good this season for sure, but I'm not sure that they'll get to "great".  Again, I may have a slightly different take after the weekend.


Posted

Well, Auburn finally got exposed.  Once Clemson settled down, they did exactly what I thought Mississippi State would do last Saturday.

Alabama's kicking situation makes me nervous.  So does the quarterback situation, but I don't think we'll see any more of Phillip Sims except in mop up duty.  I guess that means, in some twisted way, that I hope to see a lot of Sims this season.  One thing I am looking forward to is a heavy dose of Trent Richardson and Eddie Lacy.  I don't think there is a better running back tandem in the country right now.  Both have showed the ability to run over a defense, as well as out-run a defense.

:ping:

  • G400 - 9° /Alta CB 55 Stiff / G410-SFT - 16° /Project X 6.0S 85G / G410 - 20.5° /Tensei Orange 75S
  • G710 - 4 iron/SteelFiber i110cw Stiff • / i210 - 5 iron - UW / AWT 2.0 Stiff
  • Glide SS - 54° / CFS Wedge / Glide 2.0 SS - 58°/10 / KBS 120S / Hoofer - Black

:scotty_cameron: - Select Squareback / 35"  -  :titleist: - Pro V1 / White  -  :clicgear: - 3.5+ / White

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

With Oklahoma St, Oklahoma, Texas and Texas Tech putting in requests to move to the Pac12, does anyone else think smaller conference teams should move to higher profile conferences to make "Super" conferences?

Best Regards,
Ryan

In the :ogio: bag:
:nike: VR-S Covert Tour Driver 10.5 :nike: VR-S Covert Tour 3W :titleist: 712U 21*
:nike: VR Pro Blades 4-PW :vokey: Vokeys 52*, 56* & 60* :scotty_cameron: Studio Select Newport 2
:leupold:
:true_linkswear: 


Posted

GO BADGERS!!!

The first Big-10 game on the schedule might decide it all. Nebraska vs Wisconsin at Madtown! Should be awesome

Golf is deceptively simple and endlessly complicated


Posted

With Oklahoma St, Oklahoma, Texas and Texas Tech putting in requests to move to the Pac12, does anyone else think smaller conference teams should move to higher profile conferences to make "Super" conferences?

In my opinion this is all about conferences positioning themselves to maximize the value of the new conference TV networks. There is no real is advantage to expanding beyond 12 teams since that makes championship games possible except TV marketing. If small TV marekt schools like Iowa State etc. have an opprotunity to join a BCS conference they will take it, but the may not get the opprotunity.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


Posted

GO BADGERS!!!

The first Big-10 game on the schedule might decide it all. Nebraska vs Wisconsin at Madtown! Should be awesome

At this point it seems likely they will play twice. Right now Wisconsin would have to be favored by 7-10 points. I am hoping Nebraskas young team will improve enough to win a rematch.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


Note: This thread is 5107 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 430 - 2025-12-04 Slow motion backswings (with chippy shots) with AlmostGolf balls.
    • Day 24 (4 Dec 25) - Spent about an hour working with the new 55° wedge in the backyard.  Kept all shots to under 20yds.  Big focus - not decelerating thru downswing and keeping speed up with abbreviated backswing.  Nothing like hitting a low flighted chip with plenty of check spin and then purpose to float a pitch of similar distance.  
    • Day 114 12-4 Put some work in on backswing, moving the hips correctly, then feeling over to lead side. Didn't hit any balls was just focused on keeping flowy and moving better. I'll probably do another session tonight and add in some foam balls.
    • Didn't say anything about your understanding in my post.  Well, if you are not insisting on alignment with logic of the WHS, then no.  Try me/us. What do you want from us then?? You are not making sense. You come here and post in an open forum, question a system that is constructed with logic, without using any of your own and then give us a small window of your personal experience to support your narrative which at first sight does not makes sense.  I mean, if you are a point of swearing then I would suggest you cut your losses and humor a more gullible audience elsewhere. Good heavens.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.