Advertisement
Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
mvmac

TaylorMade RockerBallz Irons and RocketBallz Max Irons!

8 posts in this topic

This Wednesday I was able to attend a TaylorMade media day event yesterday at the La Costa Resort.  Want to thank all the great TMAG staffers (Christa, Michael, Dave and Mike) for having me and sharing this exciting line of prodcuts.  I was even able to play a round with Tom Kroll, the global product lines manager for woods.

For more on all of TaylorMade's New line of products, check out these links:

R11S Thread

RocketBallz Driver, Fairway and Rescue

Penta TP5 Golf Balls

RocketBallz Irons


Like I said, I was lucky enough to play with Tom Kroll from TMAG who is the manager of the metal wood division.  He's a former Nationwide tour player and shot an easy -1 at the La Costa North Course.  He was playing the new RockerBallz irons with DG x-100's.  Even though that's a little too stiff for me, it gave me a better idea of how the irons performed than if I were to hit the lighter weight shaft designed for slower swing speeds.  As promised they are long, straight but at the same time don't look like "shovels".  The 8- AW don't look all that different than my Anser irons.

There is also another great story that goes along with the creation of what TMAG calls the INSANE 11.  At the presentation Wednesday they showed us a funny mockumentary of how they improved on the top selling Burner 2.0 irons.  On a side note, you may not know that Taylormade is now the #1 iron in golf. kicking Callaway off the pesdistal, in large part due to the success of the Burner line of irons.

The video showed the irons team working away to find something that goes even farther and straighter.  What TMAG did is that they "stole", in the video they kidnapped a metal wood engineer and tortured him by clanging a Callaway Diablo driver in his ear, in order to find out the secrets that the metal woods guys have.  It's torture because the Diablo is known to sound really funky, and the engineer screams, "It sounds so horrible!".  Obviously also having fun at the "rivalry" between the 2 companies (which they should now call the mercy rule)  The engineer gave in and took their top performing metal wood technology and implemented it in an iron.

RBZ 6Iron_3_4.jpg

Speed

Every RBZ iron head, from the 3- to the lob wedge(Insane 11), is uniquely constructed and features a progressive length and spec package, which has been carefully coordinated to ensure proper trajectory and distance gaps throughout the set.  The 3-5 irons have a metal wood construction because the new, hollow clubhead construction akin to that of the company’s industry leading line of metalwoods. This hollow head construction allows the company’s engineers to create the clubface (455 carpenter’s steel in the 3- through 5), and allows for a lower and centered CG location which ensures solid contact on the face when hitting off turf, promoting maximum energy transfer at impact.

Lowering the CG also allowed TaylorMade engineers to strengthen the loft to promote a more penetrating flight. This improved CG location is made possible in the 3- to 6-irons by thinning areas of the sole, top-line and back wall, then repositioning the saved weight into the rear wall and heel to shift the CG lower and more toward the center.

RBZ 6Iron_Toe.jpg

Quote:

Without a doubt, the new RocketBallz iron will be an improvement over any other iron in a golfer’s bag,” said Sean Toulon, executive vice president of TaylorMade Golf. “From a technology standpoint, we have done the unthinkable. We brought in metalwood engineers to help create irons with faces that behave like drivers, sending the ball easily high and far almost as if it was bounced off a trampoline. These technological advancements will be visible to the golfer upon first contact with a ball.”

Accuracy

Key to the improved accuracy of RocketBallz irons is the new “Toe-Bar” feature, positioned in the upper toe, and the new design of the Inverted Cone.  Fast-faced irons suffer in terms of accuracy because the asymmetrical shape of an iron face naturally causes the flex-point of the face to direct the ball off-line.  The Toe-Bar and redesigned Inverted Cone together stiffen the toe-area of the clubface so that when the face flexes it directs the ball straight forward.

RBZ 6Iron_Face.jpg

“We’ve worked extensively to advance fast-faced iron performance, and feel like we’re well ahead of our competitors in this category,” said Bret Wahl, TaylorMade senior director of iron, wedge and putter research and development.  “We’ve learned that high COR is most useful when on top of high speed you can also control the face-flexion to send the ball on an accurate flight-line.  With that in mind, we’re very pleased with what we’ve achieved with the RocketBallz iron.”

My favorite thing about the irons is the progression of the head shapes throughout the set.   The 9-L are smaller, compact short-irons, 6-8 are deep undercut-cavity middle- irons and large, and the super easy to hit 3-5 hollow long-irons.  But even though the long irons are still game improvement they look pleasing to the eye at set-up.  TaylorMade’s Multi-functional Sole  while the sand wedge, attack wedge and lob wedge all incorporate our new ATV sole, talking about that more soon.

RBZ 6Iron_Address.jpg

Fitting

For all the "feel" talk we have on the thread, TMAG confirmed that FEEL IS SOUND.  They measure the feel by measuring the  sound (in hertz).  To create a pleasing "feel", TMAG engineers found an acoustic Japanese polymer that's exceptionally soft and pliable; it works in conjunction with the badge system to absorb unwanted vibration and sound without slowing the face.

Also, every RocketBallz iron is engineered with an added cavity chamber in the heel at the point of the hosel-to- face transition that makes the heads easier to bend, allowing us to offer RocketBallz in 4 degrees upright, 4 degrees flat, and plus-or-minus 2 degrees in loft.  The necessity for this was discovered during prototyping as the hard 455 steel used for the clubheads makes bending difficult.

My Take

It was great to play with Tom and see what these irons can really do.  If you hit it anywhere on the face, it's going to be a decent shot.  The ball does "rocket" off the face.  I'm not a long hitter but I hit a 5 iron with an x-100, 200 yards in the air over water.  Not something I normally do.  The shorter irons weren't ballooning either, which is something you can credit to the CG being repositioned, also makes it important to get the right shafts for yourself.  Kind of makes the TP line of irons almost "silly" to play.  Tom, a former Nationwide tour player can hit all the shots he needs, have maximum forgiveness in the long irons, trajectory control in the short irons, really versatile sole designs.

The irons have a darkish grey finish, really durable a sleek.  Maybe too dark for my liking, I prefer a satin finish, but I like the RBZ finish or a shinny chrome.

While the RoketBallz irons look great at address the longer irons will displease those that care about how rear or cavity design looks.    I think it's something you'll get over once you hit the 4 iron.

Club Specs, Pricing and Availability

RocketBallz irons are available in 3-iron through LW, right-handed and left-handed (no left-handed LW).  Sets of eight clubs are being sold at a manufacturer’s suggested retail price of $699 with steel shafts, $899 with graphite shafts.  Steel shafts weigh 85 grams, steel wedge shafts are heavier at 105 grams to promote increased rhythm and feel.  Graphite shafts weight 65 grams.  Ladies’ RocketBallz irons are available in 5-iron through SW, equipped with

MORE

If you're not happy with hitting it further with the RBZ irons you may want to take a look at the RocketBallz Max irons.  The idea behind this irons was to put all the technology they possibly could for an iron, regardless of cost.  So, instead of having the metal wood construction in just the 3-5, the Max irons employs metalwood construction in every irons.  The face created separately from the hollow body allows the face to be unsupported (lacking braces or crosspieces behind it that could inhibit flex) and exceptionally thin, making it very fast in how it flexes and reflexes at impact.  The face of every RocketBallz Ma x iron is so fast that the COR measures up to the maximum limit allowed by the Rules of Golf.  For those that loved the CGB Max irons a few years ago, these are latest and greatest for that type of performance.

RBZ MAX 4Iron_3_4.jpg

Quote:

“RocketBallz Max irons are like a beautiful sports car that you would see in a showroom,” said Bret Wahl, TaylorMade senior director of iron, wedge and putter research and development. “We applied a „maximum technology‟ approach in the engineering process and left no stone unturned in the engineering process. The design, the progressive set-make-up and the incredible performance puts RocketBallz Max into a unique class. This is certainly the best performing super game-improvement iron we‟ve ever created.”

Tech

Improved CG and Grooves

Each RocketBallz Max clubhead is individually engineered to position the CG exceptionally low and deep-back in the head, and in precise alignment with the center of the face.  Tungsten weighting is placed in strategic areas of the sole, mainly at the toe and heel ends, to lower the CG and increase forgiveness.  TMAG's newest and highest performing groove is machined into every clubface to promote maximum spin.

RBZ MAX 4Iron_Face.jpg

RBX Max Engineered for Higher Handicap Players

RocketBallz Max short-irons are designed with the needs of higher handicap players in mind. TMAG studied thousands of swings using high-tech custom-fitting and research tool, MATT (Motion Analysis Technology) and discovered that, among the numerous fundamental differences between highly skilled players and high handicappers, one is that skilled players make a consistently descending blow with their short-irons usually at an angle of four to eight degrees.  High handicappers, in contrast, swing every club, including the short-irons on a shallower approach path of about one degree.  This presents the club head to the ball with a higher loft promoting a too-high trajectory, too little spin, and a significant loss of ball speed.  To counter the problem, engineers strengthened RocketBallz Max short-iron lofts.  That, combined with mass properties made possible by the hollow head, promotes a more aggressive flight when launched with a shallow downswing angle.

Quote:

“We‟ve learned that the way a fast-face flexes can direct the shot off-line,” added Wahl. “To solve the problem, we strategically stiffened the area of the clubface near the toe to make the asymmetric shape of the face behave symmetrically. Although this is a new technology, we‟ve already become extremely precise with it, enough to create a draw bias to the left with RocketBallz Max irons, which will help the multitude of players who regularly lose the ball to the right of their target.”

RBZ MAX 6Iron_3_4.jpg

Shaft Specs

Stock shafts include steel KBS 90 Satin shafts with a beautiful new brush finish and Matrix‟s new graphite Ozik Program HD model (55-gram men‟s, 45-gram ladies‟) that‟s the first lightweight iron shaft to feature Matrix‟s patented HD (16-sided internal structure) technology. The 16-sided design features a higher MOI than any traditional “round” shaft, promoting more forgiveness and enhanced feel.

Price and Availability

RocketBallz Max irons are available in 4-iron through LW, right-handed and left-handed (no left-handed LW). Sets of eight clubs are being sold at a manufacturer‟s suggested retail price of $1,299 with graphite-shafted long-irons, steel-shafted mid- and short-irons, $1,399 with graphite shafts throughout the set. Ladies‟ RocketBallz Max irons are available in 5-iron through SW, at an MSRP of $1,399. Availability at retail starts on February 3, 2012.

RBZ MAX 6Iron_Address.jpg

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Hard to believe those rbz max irons could be with that kind of money. I recall Callaway had a $1,500(?) or so set a few years ago - can't recall exactly what they were called. Wonder how many they sold at that price. Seems absurd.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love looking at the beauty of irons. These do not fall into that category and is that price point correct? wow unattractive and expensive. Bad combo, but I am biased not a fan of TM.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I made the mistake of hitting a rzb max 6 iron in a golf store this week  and it is an amazing club, unlike anything I have ever hit.  Though pricey, they will

be my next set of irons.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So Mike, are you going all TM on us? Nice write-up. They should have you on staff!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by TourSpoon

So Mike, are you going all TM on us? Nice write-up. They should have you on staff!

It was just a PR-type post from his trip to TaylorMade... last December...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It was just a PR-type post from his trip to TaylorMade... last December... ;-)

Just saw the date...nothing wrong with PRing with the big boys. We are all jealous!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by gstew

I made the mistake of hitting a rzb max 6 iron in a golf store this week  and it is an amazing club, unlike anything I have ever hit.  Though pricey, they will

be my next set of irons.


its only money right?!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • He started off playing the first hole exactly how he should: fairway, 20-footer for birdie to the fat side of the green, tap-in par.
    • @iacas-Tho it is nice to be able to take your time and type out what you mean to say this is one of the downsides to a forum too-You have to respond to a whole bunch of crap and a person can get all of their thoughts out uninterrupted. If you were been sitting in a room with @natureboy and he started drawing that entirely stupid picture with the lines you could have cut him off and spared all of us the pain of having to watch him so badly miss the point. I bet @natureboy is still going to look at the response-And I bet he is still not going to see where he went wrong. But that is because he is just that way and he is unable to see how stupid his own posts are and how little they actually deal with golf swings. His stick drawing is exactly why you asked for a video-Even though he posted it after you asked. His errors and flaws and stupid thoughts would have been even more evident if he had actually tried to make a vid.
    • Or… golf is hard, and he got hot for awhile. Wouldn't be the first flash in the pan. We'll have to wait to see what the true version is. He could be quiet for ten years and then win a few majors.
    • That makes a great third bullet point. Or a first bullet point, bumping my two down.
    • This photo and the text above illustrate pretty well exactly why I and the entire moderation team is now done with you. The image fails on two levels: The center image is not representative of an actual good golf swing. The right hip is closer to the right foot in the center image, yet you maintain that it's farther away. Whether the second thing is done intentionally or accidentally I don't know. I don't care to know. But it's very representative of how you argue, and why you're now going to be prevented from arguing. You pervert arguments to the point where we're no longer discussing the golf swing. You get basic facts or concepts wrong (like when arguing about course rating, misunderstanding the radius vs. diameter in faulting the rating process for higher handicappers). You focus on some small thing - which often isn't even something anyone else has said - and lose sight of the forest or the big picture. You're not here to help golfers. You're here to "win" an argument, a goal that as yet is unmet, and you have to post absolute crap like the above to try to do it. I had a bit of free time this morning. So I responded to your last post in some detail. It, as one would expect, contains a number of typical @natureboy traits: cherry picking a photo while ignoring the concept, failure to understand basic points, perversion of the statements of others, putting words in the mouths of others, use of vague words like "a lot" (often in combination with the "putting words in the mouths of others), and hyper-focus on some small largely negligible point. Nobody else should waste their time to read the below, or open the spoiler and read that. It will not shed light on anything, it will not help you with your golf swing, and you will not glean any useful information. It exists simply as my last effort at illustrating to @natureboy a small part of the reason why we're tired of him… even though as I post it I know with certainty it too will fail. I gave you twenty warning points last night. It was made clear to you what you had to do, and you failed to do so, flaunting the requirement in several posts. The entire moderation team - @mvmac, @RandallT, @boogielicious, @jamo, @billchao, @nevets88, @mchepp, others - and myself have simply gotten sick and tired of your entire persona here. You're constantly and never-endingly arguing stuff to the point where you bastardize things so much you're no longer even talking about the golf swing, and you fail to comprehend or respond to what's written to you in response. You have two real choices once your current suspension is over: You can ignore these warnings, continue to be a belligerent arguer, and receive a final 50-point warning that will result in your permanent ban. You can avoid behaving in the manner that infuriates the entire moderation team. That will likely mean limiting the topics in which you post quite a bit, because though you fancy yourself to be capable of discussing the golf swing from a theoretical perspective, you've proven that you are not. Now, I want to be very clear about something. You're not being warned or "handled" because you disagree. You're being handled here because you contribute nothing positive. You're belligerent. You don't help people. You don't demonstrate anything. You pervert and distort topics in order to make a point that often has little or nothing to do with how people actually play golf. You're on a mission to "win" an argument, not to further the understanding. You speak as if you know and fail to ask questions, despite the holes in your logic and posts being constantly exposed as gaping. You quite often fail to read what's written, take a beat, and try to understand it. P.S. This requirement is anything but arbitrary. The list of reasons are long, the surface of which was only scratched in this post. Arbitrary would have been to say something like "to continue posting here you must dress up in a purple outfit and post a photo of yourself diving from a diving board into a pool of jello." Asking you to post a video illustrating your point is the opposite of arbitrary.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Catcher20
      Catcher20
      (27 years old)
    2. JD15
      JD15
      (52 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon