Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4936 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well I read an article about ball flight theories from a guy by the name of Doug Dahle.

He writes allot of articles that are really good and I was particularly interested in the Theory of Ball flight as well as the corresponding articles. I just thought I would share this with everyone as well as the rest of Doug Dahles articles.

http://oldproblog.com/2010/02/introduction-to-ball-flight/

http://oldproblog.com/

I hope everyone enjoys the info!

Mitch G


Posted


  Rednax1530 said:
Originally Posted by Rednax1530

Well I read an article about ball flight theories from a guy by the name of Doug Dahle.

He writes allot of articles that are really good and I was particularly interested in the Theory of Ball flight as well as the corresponding articles. I just thought I would share this with everyone as well as the rest of Doug Dahles articles.

http://oldproblog.com/2010/02/introduction-to-ball-flight/

http://oldproblog.com/

I hope everyone enjoys the info!

Mitch G


His ball flight theory is wrong.  Nonetheless, I'm glad they found (and removed) his tumor.

:titleist: :scotty_cameron:
915D3 / 712 AP2 / SC Mont 1.5


  • Moderator
Posted

Unfortunately John Jacobs gets the ball flight laws wrong.  This is not my opinion, this is just physics and backed up by leading Dopper Radar analysis systems like Trackman and FlightScope

The article says:

   Face said:

The 4 influences on the fight of the ball are:

1. Face- Where the clubface points the ball will ultimately end up.

2. Swing Path- The path the club travels tells the golf ball where to start. The club face tells it where to finish.

3. Angle- The angle the club takes to approach the ball determines the trajectory of the shot.

4. speed- the clubhead speed determines how far the ball will go

The face angle primarily determines the ball's start line.  The face is a tool of projection and the ball curves away from the path.

Here are a couple good articles to check out

http://thesandtrap.com/b/playing_tips/ball_flight_laws

http://3jack.blogspot.com/2010/07/why-we-got-old-ball-flight-laws-wrong.html

  • Upvote 2

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


  Tomboys said:
Originally Posted by Tomboys

His ball flight theory is wrong.  Nonetheless, I'm glad they found (and removed) his tumor.



I wouldn't go as far to say that his ball flight theory is completely wrong. There are some points that are debatable. and allot of the points that he makes  are very correct. Physics in my understanding does work in his theory, although maybe not quite to the extent as is suggested.  I think mvmacs post is really helpful.

Either way, he has allot of useful information even if you don't agree with each point he has brought up and all of his "theories".

The last thing is, and one of the reasons for this forum is to share information. if you have some, then could you share it with the rest of the forum? After all many of us are here to learn new things which can be done often by understanding.

Thanks for your input Tomboys

Mitch G


Posted
  Rednax1530 said:
I wouldn't go as far to say that his ball flight theory is wrong. There are some points that are debatable but the "theory" can be scientifically backed up with the general physics. The debate is mainly between face and swing path. They both affect similar areas of the ball flight and this has been pushed back and forth before.

I would, because it is wrong. Follow the liks mvmac posted. Those are the real ball flight laws. This is not debatable, it is confirmed by radars, high speed cameras, physics etc.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


  mvmac said:
Originally Posted by mvmac

Unfortunately John Jacobs gets the ball flight laws wrong.  This is not my opinion, this is just physics and backed up by leading Dopper Radar analysis systems like Trackman and FlightScope

The article says:

The face angle primarily determines the ball's start line.  The face is a tool of projection and the ball curves away from the path.

Here are a couple good articles to check out

http://thesandtrap.com/b/playing_tips/ball_flight_laws

http://3jack.blogspot.com/2010/07/why-we-got-old-ball-flight-laws-wrong.html


Thanks for the post Mvmac! That is very helpfull!

I had not realized the old ball theories were incorrect like that and just thought that it was some really good info

Mitch G


Posted

Kudos to you Rednax1530!

If only all threads on the ball flight laws were like this one.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm." – Winston Churchill


  • Moderator
Posted


  Rednax1530 said:
Originally Posted by Rednax1530

Thanks for the post Mvmac! That is very helpfull!

I had not realized the old ball theories were incorrect like that and just thought that it was some really good info

Mitch G



And thanks for wanting to share good info.  I grew up, as most do, with "path controlled start line laws" and eventually learned otherwise.  It's starting to change, slowly, but starting to change.   Thanks for taking a look at the info and open to learning

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4936 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • You know what, I have thought about moving to Arizona a little bit, but I do love the winters here. It really is nice down here from like November thru March. And I totally would do a home setup thing, I really should, but my stupid tennis elbow is really so easily flared up. It's getting better every month with dry needling, but it's so annoying too. I do think I'm finally solving the root causes thru both the dry needle treatments and fixing this steepness/toe strike thing. The former actually does heal it and learning how to plane the club correctly reduces the trauma the elbow takes because of the increase in sweet spot hits. I really should just do a trip to Scottsdale though, I went there once many years ago and it was a beautiful place. Didn't play golf at the time so I really should go. I'd love to get away from the humidity too. And I know there are great mats out there, like at Golf Evolution for example I've been told. In my case, I will hit foam balls off a mat sometimes at home and that has some of the effects of actually hitting a ball while reducing the impact. And this is maybe a topic for another thread, but I've found just making air swings to be more beneficial to me than I originally thought -- that going really fast and not hitting a ball shows my flaws quite a bit too. I'll film myself just making fast air swings inside and trying to fix it. It's almost like speed training except if speed training included trying to make a really technically sound swing on top of it. Hopefully this comment isn't too much of a tangent, but It is the winter depression thread, so maybe tangents about what to do with oneself indoors with golf is okay. Appreciate it though, I really have thought about Arizona a couple times over the last year at least.
    • Day 23: chipped in the garage with foam balls. Focused on crisp contact. Did mostly lower chips but mixed in some higher ones. Slightly more open stance, plus ball more toward middle, plus higher handle led to the best results. Need to keep those 3 things in mind. 
    • Day 2: Worked on distance wedge swing feels. The feel for me is to keep the upper body down more while straightening the lead leg.
    • Day 18 (September 22).  I understand the two club drill better, and was alternating that and hitting a few smooth 6-iron shots;  indoors, off a mat, into the net.  I spent about 20 minutes on this thus far tonight.
    • I don't know your family or work situation, but have you considered relocating to Arizona?  I was out there the past month or so and played quite a few times;  it's hot, but not humid.   Or, if your house is sufficient size, consider setting up an indoor practice area, so at least when the weather or your schedule isn't cooperating, you can still hit a few. ... said Shindig, who has routinely disappeared for months, sometimes a year or more, at a time because of getting busy at work and just quietly sobs to himself as he walks past the room where his mat and net are during that time.  Dang, I need to not allow that to happen again.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.