Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Warfish

Best Ping and/or Titleist Irons for Very High Handicap Player

Recommended Posts

With apologies in advance, I am quite confused on which model in these two companies lines are best suited for the new, inexperienced or plain old bad golfer.

The two brands catalogues both go into great detail regarding technology and features, with is great for the experienced knowledgeable player. I am neither as yet.

So, if one is in the market for a nice new set of Ping or Titleist Irons, which model would be most appropriate for such a low-abillity player?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

With apologies in advance, I am quite confused on which model in these two companies lines are best suited for the new, inexperienced or plain old bad golfer.

if you are inexperienced i woudl stay away from any titleist irons and go with the ping raptures or the g5's. the raptures are a very easy iron to hit but the cheaper alternative is the g5.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With apologies in advance, I am quite confused on which model in these two companies lines are best suited for the new, inexperienced or plain old bad golfer.

I would also look at the other major names: Callaway X-20's, Taylor Made R7's, Adam's Idea's and Mizuno MX25's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For the very high handicapper, my advice would be to check out the Callaway ERC Fusion or Cleveland HiBore irons. Both are targeted for the high handicapper, and the HiBore specifically should cost significantly less than the Ping Rapture irons.

If you want to spend even less money, Adams golf, and TourEdge offer similar clubs for a fair amount less than the big guys.

Other responders are correct, Titleist doesn't really have anything specifically designed for the high handicap player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With apologies in advance, I am quite confused on which model in these two companies lines are best suited for the new, inexperienced or plain old bad golfer.

The words you're looking for are "super game improvement," or "game improvement" at the very least. And get fit for the proper shafts. Talk with a pro about clubs before you go and buy 'em. Why are you so brand-specific on your first purchase?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Would the 755 be considered Titleist's closest answer to irons for a mid-high handicapper?

"A high performance mid-size cavity back iron with enhanced heel-toe weighting and a vibration dampening feature for outstanding looks, feel and forgiveness."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are you so brand-specific on your first purchase?

PING is what my Father player before he died (Suicide, when I was 19, about 12 years ago now). I am a rather ideosyncratic man, and playing what my father played holds meaning for me.

As for Titleist.....I don't know, when I was younger (and played) I always liked the idea of playing Titleist golf balls. And now that I am older and coming back to the game after ten+ years out, I still like the old loyalty. That, and I find their clubs to be some of the most aetheticly appealing out there (and as I said, odd bird that I am, appearance means alot to me).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PING is what my Father player before he died (Suicide, when I was 19, about 12 years ago now). I am a rather ideosyncratic man, and playing what my father played holds meaning for me.

Actually, that's a very good reason for going for a brand name.

The answer I should've given the first time is that Golf Digest's Hot List in Feb 2007 listed Ping Rapture in their "Super Game-Improvement irons" section; it got top marks in Buzz, Performace, and Technology, near-top in Preference, but not very high in value. They also listed Ping G5s in their Game-Improvement section, with top-marks in everything except value, which received near-top mark.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Call me crazy, but I'm a High Capper (24 -26) and I love my Titleist 775's. I was hitting Ping G2's, but just never felt like I was making good ball contact. The Titleist just feel great on the ball, kind of soft but crisp - I still have a G2 6 iron and swing it every now and then, it it still has a mushy/muted feeling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey everyone,

My initial question is: Is there a big difference between the Titleist 804s vs 775s?

I know that the 775s are an upgrade to the 804s... I was wondering if anyone knew if the 775s have become geared towards a slightly lower handicapper, or are harder to play than the 804s? I was thinking of getting the 804s because I've read and heard so many good thigns about the 775s but cant seem to afford the price tag at the moment. Is there a big difference? I know that 804s are definitely cheaper right now... ($450 brand new on tgw & dirt cheap on ebay).

I'm also a highcapper (~25) who feels on the brink of a breakthrough (lowering HC to ~15). I know that I'll require practicing more, which I'm willing to start doing, yet I feel that I haven't been able to shoot lower because of my current set of clubs (hand me down Mizuno T-zoid Pro Forged). I like the feel of my Mizunos but I know I'm in need of an upgrade to newer clubs at least (the grooves are all worn out) and I think those are a bit above my skill level. Like I said, I'm willing to put in the practice to get better and I want clubs that have good feedback. Currently looking into Mizunos or Titleist but open to other club suggestions...

Any feedback or comments are greatly appreciated. Thanks~

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cleveland Launchers are inexpensive and great irons for a beginner.

i absolutely agree. I have them and they are awesome. And for $300 they're a steal

Make sure they are the Launcher LP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a Callaway demo day at my local golfschool this weekend. I tried several clubs and I liked the Fusion Wide Soles the best (I'm also a high handicapper). However, there was not much difference between them and my BenRoss VX Combo OS irons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any ping would be easier to play and grow with than almost any current Titleist product. However you will not "grow" out of the pings as you get better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My dad just got a set of ping raptures, and they are very nice. I've been playing for about a year, and I recently picked up a pre-owned (but almost like new) set of Callaway X-16's for $300. The technology is not too different from the later X-18 and X-20 models, and for $300 bucks, it's provided pretty good value.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • As a disclaimer I wont bother with techinal terms for this.    Exessive stretching puts the muscle in an elongated or "full rom" state. Basically its as long as the muscle can get without tearing. More rom sounds pretty good eh? What could go wrong? The problem is that when the muscle is stretched to this point it doesnt have the same ability to stretch anymore. So that tightness people are so keen to get rid of is actually the muscles inherent stretch reflex that protects the muscle, tendons and ligaments from tearing. The muscle is designed to stretch first to protect everything else. If you live a sedentery lifestyle and that stretch reflex isnt used it can tighten up too much but even then youre best off doing dynamic stretching because thats how the muscle is supposed to work in the first place. This principle is why it isnt recommended to do static stretching before a workout. So really you shouldnt attempt to increase the static rom as much as the dynamic rom.  
    • It is and it isnt. For the most part Id say it isnt. At the end of the day it really is as simple as calories in and calories out BUT because that piece of cake is not particularly nutritious nor does it take very long to digest you tend to need to eat more cake to say full which tends to promote overeating. You pretty much have to decide to stay hungry for a while to compensate.  
    • When did I ever say I was talking about them using to RUN FASTER. Never. If the ball flies further guess what. The club was moving faster. THEY GOT FASTER. Yes steroids have a multitude of benefits for an athlete but for the sake of this discussion I didint think it was relevant to list every one of them. For sure they benefitted from the faster recovery aswell as the increased performance.   Dont tell me about my logic when its obvious you havent even read what Ive said. To quote myself: "Also keep in mind were not talking about going from Bubba to Arnold here. Theres a healthy middle point for optimal performance. Tour players just do not look like athletes(on average)." "Youre always going to find exceptions" You are uninformed to put it nicely. 450*10 does not happen all the time outside of powerlifting gyms. Especially not for a guy weighing 165. His estimated max is around 600-640 lb. Please dont get started on the way estimations work. The american record is like 700 for the 165. Either way he is very strong both in relative and absolute terms and its a very impressive lift. Ofcourse there comes a point where if he bulks up too much it wont help thats exactly what Ive said. At no point have is said tour players should look like bodybuilders. Infact to quote myself again: "Strength = speed potential. Speed athletes are not inherently going for size its just a byproduct of getting stronger and faster. If it was we would have meat balls like IFBB pros breaking records at everything speed related. The whole bulking up too much is pretty much a myth for natural athletes anyways."
    • Yes Daniel Im is a CP-ish player with kind of an inline downswing, he likes the way "swinging left" with his body feels. He does hit up a little with the driver. CP is not optimal for clubs over a 6 iron....typically. It's just a much easier pattern, easier way to swing and hit all the trajectories, especially with today's equipment. Hogan didn't have the left arm as far out as Mac wants it and Snead hit pull draws. Like I just said CP isn't good for the longer clubs, Mac never played a tournament going CP, he went with CF fades.  It's also a complicated pattern, lots of sequencing and movements have to be in order and most importantly you need a lot of speed to do it functionally. I could make the case Hogan had more CF pieces than CP pieces. Anyway, I agree with what @iacas has been posting. Mac's info isn't the answer to the golf swing, it's an attempt in the right direction but there is better and more functional information out there.
    • Oh, gosh, on the range tonight, I discovered that my address position was too far away from ball, and I had lowered my hands at address. I was setup for failure. Made  a few minor changes, and was hitting fairways high again. Now I can determine whether the shafts fit on some new Tour Edge woods - I fear the regular is too soft. Another winter project - shafts. I want to be done with clubs.
  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. hockeyref18
      hockeyref18
      (18 years old)
    2. Mike86
      Mike86
      (31 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon

×

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.