Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Most Overpaid People in Sports


Note: This thread is 5072 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I feel like the only underpaid players in football are the linemen.  The average lifespan of a NFL player is 55 (and the average NFL player is only in the league for 4 years!).  Why?  Because the lineman bring down the average.  Every game, there is at least one point when the lineman gets up dizzy from a minor concussion.  Even LBs like Junior Seau get brain damage quite easily.  These are the players that deserve even more money then they get.


Posted

Any competition is an absolute joke when the players refuse to play because they are 'not getting paid enough'. What an absolute farce.

Driver: Taylormade R11 set to 8*
3 Wood: R9 15* Motore Stiff
Hybrid: 19° 909 H Voodoo
Irons: 4-PW AP2 Project X 5.5
52*, 60* Vokey SM Chrome

Putter: Odyssey XG #7

Ball: Titleist Pro V1x


Posted
Originally Posted by michaeljames92

Any competition is an absolute joke when the players refuse to play because they are 'not getting paid enough'. What an absolute farce.

Why is that a joke and a farce?  Shouldn't everyone have the right to earn what they are worth and be fairly compensated?  No different than a factory worker going on strike for fair compensation.  If they are willing to refuse to play/work and risk their livelihood all together, how is that a farce?

It doesn't matter if you make $8.00 per hour or $8 million per year.  If the other people in your industry are getting paid X for your level of work and production, you have every right to try to get X.  Just because X varies in value, doesn't make it a farce.  Usually only jealousy does...

  • Upvote 1

Driver:  :callaway: Diablo Octane
Fairway Wood:   :adams: Speedline 3W
Hybrid:   adams.gif A7OS 3 Hybrid 
Irons:   :callaway:  2004 Big Bertha 4-LW


  • 5 weeks later...
Posted
Originally Posted by Gresh24

Why is that a joke and a farce?  Shouldn't everyone have the right to earn what they are worth and be fairly compensated?  No different than a factory worker going on strike for fair compensation.  If they are willing to refuse to play/work and risk their livelihood all together, how is that a farce?

It doesn't matter if you make $8.00 per hour or $8 million per year.  If the other people in your industry are getting paid X for your level of work and production, you have every right to try to get X.  Just because X varies in value, doesn't make it a farce.  Usually only jealousy does...

Rito. We'll just lose half a basketball season because the players are only getting paid 30 million instead of 35. Absolute joke. Seems to be a general trend in american sports though. No longer is playing a sport for the love of it seem to be in any of these players minds anymore, they are just looking to get rich. This is why salary caps are so important, look at the Premier League, wages are just ridiculous.

Driver: Taylormade R11 set to 8*
3 Wood: R9 15* Motore Stiff
Hybrid: 19° 909 H Voodoo
Irons: 4-PW AP2 Project X 5.5
52*, 60* Vokey SM Chrome

Putter: Odyssey XG #7

Ball: Titleist Pro V1x


Posted
Originally Posted by Gresh24

Why is that a joke and a farce?  Shouldn't everyone have the right to earn what they are worth and be fairly compensated?  No different than a factory worker going on strike for fair compensation.  If they are willing to refuse to play/work and risk their livelihood all together, how is that a farce?

It doesn't matter if you make $8.00 per hour or $8 million per year.  If the other people in your industry are getting paid X for your level of work and production, you have every right to try to get X.  Just because X varies in value, doesn't make it a farce.  Usually only jealousy does...

You either aren't understanding the points or aren't willing to.

Either way, your counters have been pretty irrelevant.

Nobody even brought up the point of them having or not having a right to strike.


Posted
Originally Posted by Kapanda

You either aren't understanding the points or aren't willing to.

Either way, your counters have been pretty irrelevant.

Nobody even brought up the point of them having or not having a right to strike.

What?  I responded to a post that talked about players holding out and the distribution of money within an organization (same as strikes).  The post said it is ridiculous because of the amount of money involved.

Driver:  :callaway: Diablo Octane
Fairway Wood:   :adams: Speedline 3W
Hybrid:   adams.gif A7OS 3 Hybrid 
Irons:   :callaway:  2004 Big Bertha 4-LW


Posted
Originally Posted by Gresh24

What?  I responded to a post that talked about players holding out and the distribution of money within an organization (same as strikes).  The post said it is ridiculous because of the amount of money involved.

Did not say they have/have not the right.

And I'm glad you bring up this point, because it shows exactly that it has nothing to do with jealousy, as you make it seem to be (for some it does, granted).

Some years back the London Tube operators (or whatever they are called... the people that drive the trains), went on strike something like twice within one year. They make well above minimum wage, but not exactly six figures though. Still, they had a good wage. They went on strike. The whole city despised them for it, and it all came down to the fact that they went on strike because they could - not that they should and had a reasonable argument.

It becomes even more ridiculous when your check is in the seven figures! (And beyond!!)


Posted
Originally Posted by Kapanda

It becomes even more ridiculous when your check is in the seven figures! (And beyond!!)

No it doesn't.  That's the point.  The amount of money involved is irrelevant.

Driver:  :callaway: Diablo Octane
Fairway Wood:   :adams: Speedline 3W
Hybrid:   adams.gif A7OS 3 Hybrid 
Irons:   :callaway:  2004 Big Bertha 4-LW


Posted
Originally Posted by Gresh24

No it doesn't.  That's the point.  The amount of money involved is irrelevant.

"Most overpaid"

There is overpaid, and there is more overpaid. The difference is literally in the figures.


Posted

From a true business perspective "Overpaid" means the person is paid more by their business or institution that they are worth to that business or institution.  Only the owner of the Miami Heat can decide if a guy like Lebron James is overpaid since they are the ones paying his checks and reaping the benefit of employing him.  The same goes for any other athlete or business owner / employee.

If you want to debate whether athletes provide more value to society than say doctors or teachers, that's a philosophical discussion, not business.

  • Upvote 2

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Kapanda

"Most overpaid"

There is overpaid, and there is more overpaid. The difference is literally in the figures.

Driver:  :callaway: Diablo Octane
Fairway Wood:   :adams: Speedline 3W
Hybrid:   adams.gif A7OS 3 Hybrid 
Irons:   :callaway:  2004 Big Bertha 4-LW


Posted

If you read my posts and the post by newtogolf above you, that's the thinking behind it. It's not a matter of being jealous, it's a matter of critiquing the resource distribution system in place.

With that said, I suspect that the reason why you hold your view is because you have run across so many that are blatantly jealous of top earners and make their case just on the mere fact that they earn a lot.


Posted
Originally Posted by Kapanda

With that said, I suspect that the reason why you hold your view is because you have run across so many that are blatantly jealous of top earners and make their case just on the mere fact that they earn a lot.

That was the clear opinion of several that posted in this thread.  That is why I responded to it.  My views have nothing to do with how other people think.

Driver:  :callaway: Diablo Octane
Fairway Wood:   :adams: Speedline 3W
Hybrid:   adams.gif A7OS 3 Hybrid 
Irons:   :callaway:  2004 Big Bertha 4-LW


Posted

In a captialistic society, resource distribution is based on the persons ability to generate revenue for who they work.  I'm not saying it's fair, but we all know teachers make less money than professional basketball players as we mature and prepare for college.  The difference is not everyone can be a professional basketball player.  If you based income strictly on value to society I'd suggest our military should be the highest paid of all, followed by police, teachers, and at the very bottom of the list on the pay scale, politicians.

Originally Posted by Kapanda

If you read my posts and the post by newtogolf above you, that's the thinking behind it. It's not a matter of being jealous, it's a matter of critiquing the resource distribution system in place.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I make that same point in my posts in this thread (except I don't give an order of profession and pay)


Posted
Originally Posted by newtogolf

In a captialistic society, resource distribution is based on the persons ability to generate revenue for who they work.  I'm not saying it's fair, but we all know teachers make less money than professional basketball players as we mature and prepare for college.  The difference is not everyone can be a professional basketball player.  If you based income strictly on value to society I'd suggest our military should be the highest paid of all, followed by police, teachers, and at the very bottom of the list on the pay scale, politicians.

I think our society values entertainment above all else.  The reason not everyone can be a professional basketball player is because we demand that the athletes we watch be the absolute best in the world.  We don't have that demand for any of the other professions listed--we want the best we can get within (in some cases) a modest dollar figure


Note: This thread is 5072 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Hello Golfing Buddies, It has been awhile since I posted but I am the Retired Old Man that asked for advice because I suffered two "T.I.A.'s about switching from playing right handed to playing left handed.  I purchased a Callaway Edge Left handed golf clubs. I changed the grips to oversize grips.  Well, two weeks ago and still at 79 years old, I shot a 44 and 47 on a small course in my hometown.  I am currently changing my shafts from regular flex to Senior flex.  So, you can see' it can be done! So, you other old timers; get with the program! Blessings to all of you. Retired Old Man (Terry Warner)  
    • Haiduk - Archdevil        
    • Probably since the golfer has to swing the club back and up. The hands have to move back and up. You can feel them go back and up just by turning the shoulders and bending the right arm, because it brings your hands towards your right shoulder.  The difference is if you maintain width or not. Less width means a shorter feeling swing path so the more you need to lift the arms. Being as someone who gets the right arm bend at 110+ degrees, it's 100% a timing issue. I am use to like a 1.5+ second backswing. It probably should be like 1 second at most. Half a second or more will feel like an eternity. I have had swings where I keep my right arm straighter and I am still trying to time the downswing based on the old tempo.  Ideally, for me, it is probably going to be a much quicker and shorter (in duration) backswing, while keeping the right elbow straighter. Which also means more hinging to get swing length without over swinging. 
    • Wordle 1,789 5/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩🟨🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • I'm currently recuperating from surgery, so no golf, but have been thinking about this quite a bit. This and the don't overbend the right arm thing. It's hard for me to even pose the position, so I'm not 100% sure, but I feel like it's impossible to have the right humerus along the shirt seam and not overbend your right arm, unless your hands are down near your hips. If the left arm is up at or above the shoulder plane and your right arm is bent less than 90 degrees, then your right humerus has to raise or your hands will get pulled apart. Your left hand can't reach your right hand unless either the right upper arm is up or the right arm is overbent. Is that right? If it is, then focusing on not overbending the right arm would force you to raise the humerus. And actually thinking further on it, if you do overbend your right arm, then you're basically forcing your upper arm down or forcing your left arm to bend. Since (for me at least) bending the left arm too much is not something I think I need to worry about, it means that the bend in the trail arm is really the driving force behind what happens to the right humerus. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.