Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4993 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am from Germany and therefore I am following a pretty young German golf club company.

They make publicity and were interviewed in Germany's top golf magazines and so on...

The reason for that is because they offer lot's of strange stuff with a "less is more" philosophy

under the company name "Bagger Vance".

However their most outstanding and most discussed product are these grooveless blades here:

http://www.marken-golf.de/golfshop/shop/Grooveless-Eisen-Oldschool---ohne-Rillen_27-444.html

They even offer real leather grips and say they last longer and behave better in rain.

Or they produce bi-matrix shafts of hickory with steel top and remake persimmon woods like these:

http://www.marken-golf.de/golfshop/shop/Bagger-Vance-Persimmon-H%C3%B6lzer_28-1790.html

It's all made in Germany stuff.

However their website is coded like a terrible bunch of debris and the company leader looks like a total freak...

http://www.marken-golf.de/Impressum___AGB/impressum___agb.html

I am not sure if they are cheating with their products or if they are geniusses

and don't know if anybody mentioned their golf clubs here before.

So I wanted to ask what you all think of that stuff...

Is this the true future of golf clubs?

Or is this bullshit?


Posted
It looks like they fill the nitch of outdated technology

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

That's possible...

However they offer everything as 4 week buy and try.

So you can get it and then resend it.

That's not typical for people who sell outdated technology.

It seem's that they are very convinced about what they're doing and have interesing explanations...

They proclaim that with grooveless you get less spin on the long irons and more spin on the short irons.

According to them the reason for this is that during impact the ball gets pressed for a moment to about 20% of it's normal width.

In that moment the ball generates a small counter movement in the opposite direction, practically a small moment of forward spin.

The grooves limit the backspin effect during maximum impact in a way like two gear wheels that go into opposite directions which results in a small loss of backspin.

On the short irons this effect is higher than on longer irons.

On an iron 6 and 7 there is no real difference between grooves and grooveless...

On longer irons you get less spin with grooveless which results into more roll...

Can that be?


Posted
Hi Woltaire, My friend from Mainz had a set of grooveless clubs which he played quite well. I did not. Believe the technology was valid, but he showed thisnto be untrue with nice ball flight and the ability to stop balls on the greens.

Posted
Originally Posted by woltaire

According to them the reason for this is that during impact the ball gets pressed for a moment to about 20% of it's normal width.

Someone is misunderstanding something here!

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted

I always thought that grooves were mainly extra space for grass to go upon impact.  I bet these clubs suck out of the rough, but are probably just fine from a clean lie.


Posted

I'm all for innovation and creativity, but can someone tell me what the advantage is for grooveless irons?  Being different for the sake of being different might be creative but isn't necessarily innovative or functionally advantageous.  I assumed that maybe they used an abrasive or milled surface but the pictures show the irons being pretty smooth.

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane iMix 11.5*
Fairway: Cobra Baffler Rail F 3W & 7W
Irons:  Wilson Ci
Wedges:  Acer XB (52* & 56*)
Putter:  Cleveland Classic #10 with Winn Jumbo Pistol Grip


  • Administrator
Posted

I remember reading that up until about a 5-iron or maybe a 6-iron, grooves don't matter from a clean lie. Above that, though, and the edges of the grooves start to have a *little* impact that increases as you get to higher lofts.

And from the rough, obviously, these would probably suck.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Their "workshop" looks smaller and more cluttered than my 11 year old son's room!

Somewhere in my barrel of odd clubs there is a pretty cool looking grooveless wedge.  It does have milling lines on the face, but no grooves.  i keep saying I'm going oto take it to the practice area one of these days, but keep forgetting I have it.


Posted
Quote:

However their website is coded like a terrible bunch of debris and the company leader looks like a total freak...

Um, all of them look like they just ate a bunch of LSD and are ready to join Charlie Manson's gang..

dak4n6


Posted

Grooveless offers a huge advantage for those who looking good is better then being good - those irons would polish up nicely.

"Quick Dorthy....the oil can!"


Note: This thread is 4993 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • For someone with a very consistent swing speed and ball strike, upgrades may improve performance. For everyday golfers, probably not. I'm a rather odd player. I usually get best performance from basic pro or tour heads, but with lighter stock shaft from the model's standard driver set up. (Yes, current EXS is an exception.) When I get a full driver fitting, I usually try a couple of modest upgrade  (not super magic) shafts. Most of the time upgrade gives a couple of extra yards, or 10 yards less. Remember this about stock shafts: They are matched to a particular driver model to fit the type of player likely to adopt that model. Also, most OEMs offer a variety of stock shafts in their drivers. Test for which one works best. And, the final decider...  
    • Uh, seeing you're having trouble with hit-and-miss performance from inherited clubs... Get Fitted! IF the 910H pair don't work, swap them out. Also, only two degrees separation in loft is not much. You might consider a 4W (much more reliable than a 3W) plus hybrid. This would give more distance separation than two Hs. For hybrid, get one you can hit... Maybe a more benevolent 4H. Quite often I try to brand match my bridge clubs (FWs and Hs), and my irons and wedges... but not always. Whatever works!
    • Like others have said, get fitted. Since 2011, I have played some combination of 4W + 7W. I had a Cobra 3H and 4H a couple of years back, and would swap out the 7W for a 3H in cold months (keep out of cold wind, and rough thinner for wayward drives.) The 7W matched up with yardage often with 3H; the current 4H goes almost as long as 7W, but has a lower trajectory. 4H also bumped out 4i in last bag redo; I learned to hit stinger with 4H so that's my driving iron on tight holes with shallow landing area. Again, a side-by-side test will tell you which way to go. If 5W or 3H is meh, keep the 7W. Also, are you looking to replace the 7W with a 5W or 3H, or add a second bridge club (5W or 3H) to your bag?
    • Makes sense and aligns with other literature. Static stretching, especially for longer durations, can impede performance in strength and power activities. I would not want to do like hamstring, quad, and calf stretches then go immediately sprint. To me that sounds like a terrible Idea. I would rather start off walking, then jogging, then running, then ramp up to sprinting.  To me, static stretching isn't even a warmup activity. I like the term warmup; you want to get some exertion going before the activity.      a { text-decoration: none; color: #464feb; } tr th, tr td { border: 1px solid #e6e6e6; } tr th { background-color: #f5f5f5; }
    • Going to Florida for the usual February golf trip, and with our current weather, that date won't get here soon enough. Heading to Augusta GA for the Tuesday Master's practice round, will definitely get some golf in while I'm in the area for a few days. Hope to be able to catch up with @coachjimsc if he's around. Then it's back to Scotland first of July.  Playing 7 new courses, can't wait for that.  Then somewhere after that is the Rhode Island CC Member-Guest and then my normal October golf trip to Myrtle Beach.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.