Jump to content
IGNORED

Johnny Miller Master Thread


wengerlaw
Note: This thread is 3289 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Thoughts on Johnny Miller (as an announcer)

    • Johnny's one of the best announcers in the game
      43
    • Ehh... he's OK
      37
    • I hope Johnny and his nasally voice go away... forever
      41


Recommended Posts

Most commentators annoy me, so yeah.

I think Faxon and Pepper add some credibility and composure to today's telecast.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Your right brad and dottie are the business, some of the stuff miller says makes you wonder if it's actually an ex pro talking or have they actually hired phillip Seymour hofman. They both sound and look very similar.

Driver - Callaway FTI
3 Wood - Callaway Big Bertha
Irons - Mizuno MX100
Putter - TaylorMade Itsy Bitsy Spider
Ball - White round ones

Link to comment
Share on other sites


hes a good commentator. he says it how it is and i respect that. foo foo commentators annoy me a lot

Putter first 
:titleist: newport 2 oil can
:titleist: 58* SM4
:titleist: 54* SM4
:titleist: 50* SM4
:titleist: 4-pw AP2 project X 6.0
:ping: i20 9.5 TFC Stiff

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I thought it was quite funny when Paul Casey was standing around waiting for the goups behind to finish and said (paraphrasing) I bet Johnny is analyzing how come I'm not on the range.

Oh yeah I forgot to add "trap draw" blah blah blah "trap draw".... I mean damn he must say this 30 times in a 4 hour telecast!
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I thought it was quite funny when Paul Casey was standing around waiting for the goups behind to finish and said (paraphrasing) I bet Johnny is analyzing how come I'm not on the range.

Ironically, I didn't catch "trap draw" today (I wasn't really listening that closely), Johnny said Paul was fine where he was, and he also suggested that some players listen to his critiques too much.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Ironically, I didn't catch "trap draw" today (I wasn't really listening that closely), Johnny said Paul was fine where he was, and he also suggested that some players listen to his critiques too much.

I only watched for about 10 minutes, but on the 18th hole when Moore was in the rough beside the bunker, Moore put the ball way back in his stance and Johnny said something like "I'll bet he's trying to trap draw this one." Moore hit a good shot too, a nice high draw from that tough stance and lie, he must have caught a bit of a flier.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I only watched for about 10 minutes, but on the 18th hole when Moore was in the rough beside the bunker, Moore put the ball way back in his stance and Johnny said something like "I'll bet he's trying to trap draw this one." Moore hit a good shot too, a nice high draw from that tough stance and lie, he must have caught a bit of a flier.

I'm almost embarassed to say that's when I went out to cut the lawn - I didn't want to watch DJ find a new way to lose a tournament. Whew!

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Ironically, I didn't catch "trap draw" today (I wasn't really listening that closely), Johnny said Paul was fine where he was, and

I think that one was aimed at Poulter who tweeted something in response to one of Johnny's critiques of his ball striking. Basically Poulter said Johnny is full of "bullocks" which I believe is English speak for bullsh!t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I liked when Johnny and Dottie Pepper got into Poulter's fashion sense. Dottie said something like Poulter's shoes matched his pants, but not his belt. Is that a fashion no-no? I better check my wardrobe next time I play, but I'm pretty sure I don't have the red and white shoes like Poulter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Johnny's ok, but he isn't very original. He repeats himself not only hour to hour but also day to day, week to week. He doesn't offer any special insight, and he's kinda annoying. "Eh Rog?"

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Johnny's ok, but he isn't very original. He repeats himself not only hour to hour but also day to day, week to week. He doesn't offer any special insight, and he's kinda annoying. "Eh Rog?"

but.... the trap draw. That's insightful....

In my bag

Driver: J33r 10.5º - Grafalloy ProLaunch Blue
Fairway: 600T 5w, 7w
Irons: Golfsmith Tour Cavity 4-PW/AW/SW/LWPutter: Victoria IIBall: B330-RXGlove: WetherSofShoes: DryJoys

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 5 months later...

I know some like him and some don't, but I have to give Johnny Miller his due for comments I just heard on Saturday afternoon's Honda Classic telecast.

First, he says of Tommy Gainey--"just an amazing swing. He could tour the country as a 12 handicap and nobody would doubt it."

Gainey hits into the water.

Next shot is Spencer Levin, hitting into the water.

Next shot is Appleby moving it only four feet in a bunker.

Miller: "That might have been the three worst shots in a row in televised history."

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Quote:
Originally Posted by wolverine_man View Post
None

Miller is alright. He usually knows his stuff, though occasionally is completely wrong. I do like Feherty. McCord is a complete jack ass!

I like colorful, interesting, and humorous coverage when possible, even if they say some dumb things.

But, Miller comes off like a know-it-all.

I'm glad he is finally done repeating his insight about the grain always going toward the morning sun...."That was a poor putt. Look at the shadow....he should've known..."

Sigh.

Titleist 910D2 10.5* Stiff / Taylormade 3 Wood - Superfast 2.0 15*  3 Superfast 2.0 Rescue 18* Stiff Shafts

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by Texian

I know some like him and some don't, but I have to give Johnny Miller his due for comments I just heard on Saturday afternoon's Honda Classic telecast.

First, he says of Tommy Gainey--"just an amazing swing. He could tour the country as a 12 handicap and nobody would doubt it."

Gainey hits into the water.

Next shot is Spencer Levin, hitting into the water.

Next shot is Appleby moving it only four feet in a bunker.

Miller: "That might have been the three worst shots in a row in televised history."


Classic Johnny Miller.  I'll watch NBC golf broadcasts just because I like his commentary.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dad-2-3 View Post
None

I think that one was aimed at Poulter who tweeted something in response to one of Johnny's critiques of his ball striking. Basically Poulter said Johnny is full of "bullocks" which I believe is English speak for bullsh!t.

A minor correction but you're close - the word is "bollocks". It's a word I haven't spoken since school in England in the 60s, good to hear it's alive and well. 'The meaning is exactly as you stated.

Miller doesn't mind taking some risks with his commentary, I'm sure he knows that not everyone always appreciates everything he says.  But I can put up with the odd gaff if on the whole he's providing valuable insight or interesting anecdotes, which I think he generally does.  I like the way he talks about the psychological aspects of what's happening out there as well as the technical aspects.   Golf is such a psych game and imo this is an important part of good commentary.  But to do it right you need to have been-there-done-that, which is true of Miller and Faldo both.

Driver: Cobra 460SZ 9.0, med.
3 Wood: Taylor stiff
3-hybrid: Nike 18 deg stiff
4-hybrid:
Taylor RBZ 22 deg regular
Irons:5-9, Mizuno MP30, steel
Wedges: PW, 52, 56, 60 Mizuno MP30
Putter: Odyssey 2-ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I met Johnny on the tee box at #17 at the Honda Classic last Friday.  He was incognito and walked up for a quick look.  I talked to him for a minute or two and he couldn't have been nicer.  I mentioned that I appreciated his style (by not pandering to the pros) and he told me that he is just trying to be honest.  He shook my hand and sped away in his NBC golf cart.

Cobra LTDx 10.5* | Rad Tour 16* | Tour Edge 19* | Titleist U500 4-23* | T100 5-P | Vokey SM7 50/8* F, 54/10* S, SM8 58/10* S | Odyssey 2 Ball Blade | Vice Pro Plus  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I think it would be much more valuable for the listeners to hear what the best players in the world are doing that make them so good.  not some ex-pro who thinks he knows more than all of these players and their coaches who has to point out every little thing he thinks is wrong.  have you heard some of the things he has said involving the golf swing and golf mechanics...he is wrong a lot, he says a lot of dumb stuff, and he is just plain negative most of the time.

and sure its good to point out why a bad shot happended or what a player is doing wrong from time to time...but the way he almost gets excited to point out that he knows why this or that happens.  when rory sabbatini flubbed the chip the other day and jack nicklaus was in the booth, johnny kept talking over nicklaus to point out that rory had "deceled" on it and that every tour pro has a problem with hitting balls from the rough on the top of the clubface because they put the sole down too far at address.  i think i have heard him say that a couple other times before as well.  so he just has to cut off nicklaus to give his negative opinion because he caught a tour pro hitting a bad shot?

i have said it before and ill say it again, frank nobilo deserves a position as a lead analyst on some channel because he is the only guy i hear give accurate constructive critisism when nessecary and has on over all positive point of view.  He also does a good job giving value to the listeners at home from what the best players in the world are doing.

and i prefer michael breed's more positive approach when he is on a telecast...he is the exact oposite tho...he points out the good in everybodys swings.  he said on his show that luke donald had one of his favorite swings on tour and was showing his driver swing... isnt LD pretty weak with his driver?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



I'm somewhere in between. No instruction at all would be preferable (I don't need it or care for it). I like Johnny, but he really does need to get over himself. When he started another "I'm so awesome" anecdote while Rory was lining up his winning putt, I was disappointed.

Originally Posted by westcyderydin

I think it would be much more valuable for the listeners to hear what the best players in the world are doing that make them so good.  not some ex-pro who thinks he knows more than all of these players and their coaches who has to point out every little thing he thinks is wrong.  have you heard some of the things he has said involving the golf swing and golf mechanics...he is wrong a lot, he says a lot of dumb stuff, and he is just plain negative most of the time.

and sure its good to point out why a bad shot happended or what a player is doing wrong from time to time...but the way he almost gets excited to point out that he knows why this or that happens.  when rory sabbatini flubbed the chip the other day and jack nicklaus was in the booth, johnny kept talking over nicklaus to point out that rory had "deceled" on it and that every tour pro has a problem with hitting balls from the rough on the top of the clubface because they put the sole down too far at address.  i think i have heard him say that a couple other times before as well.  so he just has to cut off nicklaus to give his negative opinion because he caught a tour pro hitting a bad shot?

i have said it before and ill say it again, frank nobilo deserves a position as a lead analyst on some channel because he is the only guy i hear give accurate constructive critisism when nessecary and has on over all positive point of view.  He also does a good job giving value to the listeners at home from what the best players in the world are doing.

and i prefer michael breed's more positive approach when he is on a telecast...he is the exact oposite tho...he points out the good in everybodys swings.  he said on his show that luke donald had one of his favorite swings on tour and was showing his driver swing... isnt LD pretty weak with his driver?



Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3289 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Who freaking cares about Tom Watson here? Why do you keep talking about ONE other dude, who overlapped Jack less than you seem to realize? We've been over this: Tiger's 82 PGA Tour wins were against significantly stronger fields than any of Jack's major (or regular) PGA Tour victories. That's what I call "accomplishing more." I don't care if Tiger (or Jack) finished T9 at something. What I wrote is not absurd, because I value Tiger's victories as more difficult than Jack's. Just as I would if, say, Scottie Scheffler gets to 11 or 12 majors in his career. You've now earned your timeout. I'm not a fan of repeating myself or discussing things with the intellectually dishonest.
    • Tom Watson's peak ability possibilty surpasses Jack. He won 6 PGA Tour    No he did not. That is factually false. Just on the face, what you just wrote should immediately seem absurd to you. You are golf pro. Have you not followed golf the last 15 years at all?  
    • Dude, for the umpteenth time now… Someone achieving less in more time is not a good argument. When he wasn't playing golf? Yeah, wow, what a statement! FFS, man. No, it isn't. Tiger won more PGA Tour events, each of which had stronger and deeper fields than any of the major victories Jack had. Jack played against (slightly exaggerating) ten year olds. Cool for him, easy way to rack up top tens, top threes, and wins. I don't care about that. Tiger set more strokes gained and scoring average records than Jack ever did, even over a LONGER period of time (if you want to keep pushing that, which is dumb). Ha, bull.
    • Wordle 1,057 4/6 🟨⬜🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩🟨🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Jack's total output is way ahead.  Jack third and 1st in strokes gained at age 43 and 44.  If this were debated like baseball no one would think Tiger is the GOAT.  When I looked up Jack's 83 and 84 strokes gained,  he had 14 top 10s in 28 events in just those two years he was "non-existent". (And he had 15 the two years before that and won two majors three years before)  I was curious to see how many top 10s Tiger has had since 2014.  He has had 13 top 10s in a decade.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...