• Announcements

    • iacas

      Introducing TST "Clubs!"   08/28/2017

      No, we're not getting into the equipment business, but we do have "clubs" here on TST now. Groups. Check them out here:
Sign in to follow this  
wengerlaw

Johnny Miller Master Thread

0  

  1. 1. Thoughts on Johnny Miller (as an announcer)

    • Johnny's one of the best announcers in the game
      43
    • Ehh... he's OK
      37
    • I hope Johnny and his nasally voice go away... forever
      41


Recommended Posts

wengerlaw    1
I'm taking a break from watching the U.S. Open to vent about how awful Johnny Miller's commentary is. I'm tempted to watch the rest of the final round on mute. Miller has no personality and compensates by being hyper-critical and grouchy. He makes watching golf nearly unbearable. From the way he talks, you'd think he never made a mistake on the golf course for his entire career.

Miller's overbearing, blowhard attitude makes me long for Feherty, McCord and Kostis.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Chilidipper    0
I was thinking the exact same thing. He should stick to his column.

He is lightening up a bit. I like his insight and he really does know whats going on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

gogolfing    19
I agree; there were a handful of times today where I shook my head at what Miller said. He caught himself a few times and tried to back track a bit, but he talks like he was the greatest player ever. Ironic for a guy who retired relatively early due to a bad case of the yipps. I saw him interviewed by Rich Learner on Live From yesterday and they discussed his 63 final round to win, and Miller was weepy the entire time. Hard to figure out how his on camera personality changes from that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

tomas216    0
i completely agree. i cant believe how far off nbc is. today i heard roger maltbie commenting on cabrera after the first errant tee shot all day. it was something to the effect that, "this is why he only has 3 european tour victories". i was thinking, "easy there buddy". found it funny when he went on to win.
as for captain obvious (johnny miller), just like every other commentator, tiger's exciting play makes his job much easier, with more to talk about. i also hate bob costas.

id prefer to have the cbs crew, but we have no choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lamebums    1
I'm taking a break from watching the U.S. Open to vent about how awful Johnny Miller's commentary is. I'm tempted to watch the rest of the final round on mute. Miller has no personality and compensates by being hyper-critical and grouchy. He makes watching golf nearly unbearable. From the way he talks, you'd think he never made a mistake on the golf course for his entire career.

How about no commentator at all? Seriously, these guys are annoying. Just tell me who it is, how far the guy is away, and what club he's hitting. No background stuff, no riffraff, unless it's absolutely vital.

The same goes for baseball and usually football. I want to watch the damn game!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

bnez    0
I agree. I'd take the CBS crew anyday over the NBC bunch. The ESPN crew did a good job on the early round coverage too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Parker0065    31
The whole NBC crew of Miller, Maltbie, and Costas are just down right pathectic in my view. They were kissing Tiger's arse so bad on Saturday that I did have to mute them,,,lol.


I can't remember what hole but Miller was basically calling Cabrera a choking dog, and Cabrera stakes it and makes a birdie, leaving Miller to swallow his rhetoric!!! I just can't stand how they cling to Tiger like he's the only one out there, I was celebrating mighty loud when Cabrera pulled off the win!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shindig    250
How about no commentator at all? Seriously, these guys are annoying. Just tell me who it is, how far the guy is away, and what club he's hitting. No background stuff, no riffraff, unless it's absolutely vital.

Hopefully, one of these days, we'll have TVs with the DVD-type options; one track for commentary, one track for just the game's audio.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

CG031    2
Miller isnt terrible during the actually announcing, the thing that pisses me off is that they never stop talking about his 63 or w/e to win the U.S. open...It's like, WE HEARD WE DONT CARE NOW!!!

Roger Maltbie is an ididot as well. Damn guy looks like a chipmunk thats why they took him off camera.

NBC isnt terrible but it's not great either. CBS has better announcers, but ESPN was the worst. Chris Berman for golf makes me wanna puke.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ogg    0
Berman was awful. Johnny Miller was awful. I still don't understand why golf writers praise him for speaking his mind. We are watching golf, not world current events. Johnny sometimes just has to hear himself talk (like yesterday, Australians are better at the chip and run shot than Americans).

Like a previous poster said, we are here to watch the golf (or the game), keep your mouth shut.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

elivate    0
What's worse than the commentary is the idiots who always yell "Get in the hole!" as loud as they can every time Tiger hits a shot... That is just foolish...

I also really get tired of seeing only Tiger and Phil's shots all day, there are other golfers playing the event you know...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

niblick    0
I found Miller's commentary to be like a bad piece of furniture in the room. You know it's there, and you hate it, but after a while you're able to ignore it enough to not hate the room it's in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

iacas    4,164
Berman was awful. Johnny Miller was awful. I still don't understand why golf writers praise him for speaking his mind. We are watching golf, not world current events. Johnny sometimes just has to hear himself talk (like yesterday, Australians are better at the chip and run shot than Americans).

I'll agree or let a lot of stuff about Johnny Miller slide. Personally, I think with the right cast, he'd be a fine announcer.

But the comment above is simply stupid. Miller made that comment moments before Baddeley got up and down from nearly the same spot as Tiger, while Tiger bladed his chip over the green and made double. It was as prescient, wise, and timely a quote as I've ever really heard in a golf telecast. It was exactly the kind of opinion that was appropriate at that time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

scotton    0
The Aussie quote was good, and that's what Miller is there for. The problem is they go to him too often and he can't fill the dead air, so he winds up talking out of his ass. He needs to be the third guy in the booth. Slick announcer guy, technical shot by shot guy, then throw it to Johnny occasionally for a color perspective.

I miss Feherty so much. And McChord.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • ... well, it was clarity for me, anyway.  

      I've been going through a slump recently.  After finally achieving a single digit index, it's been all downhill for the last 3 weeks or so.  Off the tee, I developed a quick hook that I couldn't get rid of.  Everywhere else, I've struggled to strike the ball solidly.  

      On the 5th hole this morning, I was in the rough up the left hand side.  I had 193 yards to the hole and the ball was kind of sunken down a bit, but the back of the ball was exposed.  I took a few practice swings, and then it hit me that I needed to play this like a fairway bunker shot.  I needed to make sure the contact to the back of the ball was clean and that I accelerated through the ball.  I hit a low 4 iron that ran up into the green side trap.  Other than the fact that I pulled it a bit (the rough closed the club face just enough), I played it exactly as I'd wanted to.  

      2 holes later, I had 130 to a flag in the back corner of the green.  This specific green is hard and the ball always releases.  Again, I was in the rough... but this one was sitting cleaner.  I had that same swing thought, playing it like it was a fairway bunker shot, and I hit a great shot with a pitching wedge that landed just shy of the pin and released to about 20 feet.  

      For the rest of the round, that was my thought standing over the ball with an iron.  I've been pretty good out of fairway traps for awhile now.  I don't know why it never clicked with me before today.  I hit crisper irons today than I have for the last month.  I scored like crap (a lot of shots were going further and I was left with tough up & down chances), but... striking the ball felt good again.  

      Chances are that I'll forget this again in the near future, or some other 'masterful' swing thought will take over... but, for now... at least I feel like I'm headed in the right direction.

      CY
    • It may. I'm assuming the driver is the biggest issue right now, and not just by a little. If I have a student who is coming for > 1 lesson, I take a slightly different approach. I'll work more often with an iron swing, because many of the same issues are present across the board. But if they're just coming once? I have to show them that I can help them get better with their biggest weakness. And so sometimes that means "yeah, you probably do that with your irons, but since it's magnified even more with the driver, let's work with that." It's not always a pure "golf" decision. Sometimes it's a business decision. If you've got someone coming for eight lessons, you can work up a longer-term plan, and if the driver still isn't fixed you can address it in a later lesson, and the student is more comfortable with that too. If you have one shot, you've got one chance to leave the student feeling happy at the end of the lesson. Your priorities change a little, as does the student's - he's not looking for a long-term ten-shot improvement, he wants to save two or three shots by not hitting a huge slice 14 times a round. Depending on what you mean by "generally." The driver and iron swings can be fairly different. There's less importance on getting your weight forward when the ball is teed up, you can swing faster, many pros play a different shape with the driver than irons, etc. It's a similar but different swing… depending on how picky you want to be about calling something the same or different.
    • Why?   I'll assume you're familiar with logical fallacies and spare explaining why this isn't a legitimate argument.   I don't remember Jack complaining when he was outdriving most of his fellow competitors in the 60s and 70s.    
    • There's no one commonality here Frankie. If letting your head/neck rotate through more will help your chest/torso rotate through more, go for it.
    • Well, some people equate long game with length alone. Straight is a huge factor as well. Length without the ability to find the darn thing is pretty useless. All other aspects of the their games being equal someone who hits the ball farther will win as they should have a better chance of getting the ball in the hole in the fewest number of strokes. That being said in the real world that would never happen as people's games would almost never be equal in all other areas. And I never said that, too many factors exist. I just never did buy into the "practice your short game 80% of the time" theory for the mere fact that even the best players on the planet only get it up and down at an average of about 60% of the time. I mean the best guy on tour only gets it up and down 67% of the time. So even the best amateur can only hope to achieve 50%. (although there are people on this forum who would make you think they get it up and down 90% of the time ) Basically my belief has always been to be successful you have to have as many looks at birdie as possible, so you have to have as many GIRs as possible which means you have to be in the best position possible to hit greens. Which in turn means hit it as long as you can AND hit it where you can find it. Even the best hybrid player on the planet from 225 yards is not as good as I am with sand wedge from 110. Like Lee Trevino said, "There are two things that won't last long in this world, and that's dogs chasing cars and pros putting for pars." You can only get it up and down so often so there is a direct correlation between GIR and scoring well. if you miss 10 greens on average even the best player is looking at a score of +4. 
       
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Bryan Kasper
      Bryan Kasper
      (25 years old)
    2. Greg Pickett Golf
      Greg Pickett Golf
      (62 years old)
    3. hobecorning
      hobecorning
      (75 years old)
    4. Lfm
      Lfm
      (73 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon