Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4773 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just ordered custom-fitted Mizuno MP-53s, 4-PW. The fitter suggested I replace the 3 with a hybrid 2 or 3 due to my low ball flight. Any suggestions on a good hybrid club? I've never played a hybrid before, and currently I don't play a 5 wood. I'm looking for a good filler between my 4 iron and 3 wood, so I'm leaning towards a 2 hybrid as a compromise between 3 iron and 5 wood so that I can leave my 60 degree wedge in the bag (actually I need a new one of those, but that's another thread). Thoughts?

I'm not going left or right of those trees, ok? I'm going over those trees...with a little draw.


Posted

I think I was the last person in golf to put a hybrid in my bag, I was not a fan until I tried the Taylormade Raylor.  I tried Mizuno, Cobra, Callaway (2) before I gave and just stuck with my 3 iron.  But once I tried the raylor I knew it was a better fit for me than my 3 iron.  My point is, try all of them if you can, you might find one suits you better than another one.

  • Upvote 1

Craig 

Yeah, wanna make 14 dollars the hard way?


Posted

Good advice here, hybrids seem to be very personal choices, almost to the level of putters.  I've tried most of the popular ones out there and didn't like any of them except Adams Pro A12 and Titleist 910's.  Others swear the R11 and RZB hybrids are great but I didn't like how they looked at address and hit them poorly.

  lumpuckeroo said:
Originally Posted by lumpuckeroo

I think I was the last person in golf to put a hybrid in my bag, I was not a fan until I tried the Taylormade Raylor.  I tried Mizuno, Cobra, Callaway (2) before I gave and just stuck with my 3 iron.  But once I tried the raylor I knew it was a better fit for me than my 3 iron.  My point is, try all of them if you can, you might find one suits you better than another one.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

That's what I like about my fitting place; they just hand you a bunch of clubs to hit and they analyze the results to find the best match. I definitely plan on test-driving the whole rack.

I'm not going left or right of those trees, ok? I'm going over those trees...with a little draw.


Posted
  newtogolf said:
Originally Posted by newtogolf

Good advice here, hybrids seem to be very personal choices, almost to the level of putters.  I've tried most of the popular ones out there and didn't like any of them except Adams Pro A12 and Titleist 910's.  Others swear the R11 and RZB hybrids are great but I didn't like how they looked at address and hit them poorly.

I love how when I say I don't like the look of a club, people (who aren't golfers) think I'm just being picky. But if you don't like the look of something, it isn't going to inspire confidence.

I'm not going left or right of those trees, ok? I'm going over those trees...with a little draw.


Posted

Test out the 2H to see if you can hit it OK. Some players have trouble getting the 2H up in the air because they don't generate enough clubhead speed. Because of this, most companies only make the 2H in the pro or tour models.

When you try hybrids, figure out if you have trouble hooking the ball with them. If so, an H with a Pro or Tour head - less offset - might keep the ball straighter.

As LP suggested, you might try a Raylor (TaylorMade trouble club, now out of production). Raylors came in 19* and 22* lofts, and had a boathull sole on them useful for getting out of the rough. If you use a Raylor, make sure you set up with the sole level - if you rock the head toward the toe or heel, you can push or pull a shot.

I used a 19* R instead of a 5W - really liked it. Only problem was I didn't get much distance out of it. If you want a Raylor, try GolfSmith. A couple of their outlets evidently plucked a bloc of remaining Raylors out of the supply chain, many with cellophane still on the heads.

Note: Raylors are also useful for greenside chips out of really beat-up turf patches.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I've heard that too, and as a relatively new golfer people tell me I'm not good enough to be picky.

I like hybrids that have a deep face like the Adams Pro A12.  The RBZ and R11 appear very shallow (maybe it's the white) and usually cause me to hit them fat because of 1) my less than perfect golf swing, 2) fear that I'll hit them thin.  The Titleist and especially the Pro A12 are deeper so I swing them like my irons and have had good results with them.

  JaxBomber17 said:
Originally Posted by JaxBomber17

I love how when I say I don't like the look of a club, people (who aren't golfers) think I'm just being picky. But if you don't like the look of something, it isn't going to inspire confidence.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  JaxBomber17 said:
Originally Posted by JaxBomber17

Just ordered custom-fitted Mizuno MP-53s, 4-PW. The fitter suggested I replace the 3 with a hybrid 2 or 3 due to my low ball flight. Any suggestions on a good hybrid club? I've never played a hybrid before, and currently I don't play a 5 wood. I'm looking for a good filler between my 4 iron and 3 wood, so I'm leaning towards a 2 hybrid as a compromise between 3 iron and 5 wood so that I can leave my 60 degree wedge in the bag (actually I need a new one of those, but that's another thread). Thoughts?

Personally, I'm not a high speed player, so I've always found low lofted hybrids a bit more difficult than using a fairway wood. Having said that, I've always found the comparable hybrid to go a club longer than the comparable iron - probably due to the longer shaft length and fairway type size that is the typical hybrid.

If you want forgiveness and almost a mini-fairway wood, I'd probably suggest an RBZ hybrid in the 3 Hybrid.

My favorite is the Titleist 910h - although more expensive, Titleist allows you to vary the loft and lie. I found it more forgiving than I thought it would be - even though it is not for zoro type swings (all over the place).  They will provide a free wrench if you request it when you purchase. If your dealer says "no," call Titleist and they will provide you a wrench. Titleist also allows you to select from a menu of decent quality stock shafts - there are at least 4 choices. The Titleist 21 H is 21 deg, but you can vary from 20.25 to 22.5.

You have an Edwin Watts near you - I'd go by and hit a few in their simulator and see what fits you. Of course, I've found a simulator is only good for evaluating your choices between clubs. I try to ignore the yardage it gives.

With hybrids, it's personal. I've found them to be the most difficult club to choose in the bag. While you are at Watts, try the Vokey SM4 if you want a retail wedge. The 60-10 ought to fit for the softer sand, but your mileage may vary.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  newtogolf said:
Originally Posted by newtogolf

I've heard that too, and as a relatively new golfer people tell me I'm not good enough to be picky.

I like hybrids that have a deep face like the Adams Pro A12.  The RBZ and R11 appear very shallow (maybe it's the white) and usually cause me to hit them fat because of 1) my less than perfect golf swing, 2) fear that I'll hit them thin.  The Titleist and especially the Pro A12 are deeper so I swing them like my irons and have had good results with them.

The only way to get better is to be picky about your game. That's been my strategy lol

  WUTiger said:
Originally Posted by WUTiger

Test out the 2H to see if you can hit it OK. Some players have trouble getting the 2H up in the air because they don't generate enough clubhead speed. Because of this, most companies only make the 2H in the pro or tour models.

When you try hybrids, figure out if you have trouble hooking the ball with them. If so, an H with a Pro or Tour head - less offset - might keep the ball straighter.

As LP suggested, you might try a Raylor (TaylorMade trouble club, now out of production). Raylors came in 19* and 22* lofts, and had a boathull sole on them useful for getting out of the rough. If you use a Raylor, make sure you set up with the sole level - if you rock the head toward the toe or heel, you can push or pull a shot.

I used a 19* R instead of a 5W - really liked it. Only problem was I didn't get much distance out of it. If you want a Raylor, try GolfSmith. A couple of their outlets evidently plucked a bloc of remaining Raylors out of the supply chain, many with cellophane still on the heads.

Note: Raylors are also useful for greenside chips out of really beat-up turf patches.

Clubhead speed isn't an issue for me; I'm in the low 130s with my driver. I tend to drift over my front leg, which is what lowers my shot shape. I'm working on getting rid of that. I prefer my local Golftec for my clubs. Their simulator is fairly accurate and they have heads from eight or ten different brands with all kinds of shafts to plug in; I plan on taking this list you guys are giving me and trying them all out with a few different shafts. Best part about going through them is customization is free. I'm 6'7" with a fairly upright swing and need a lot of tweaks to my sticks.

The Pro/Tour head is a useful thought, my most common flaw is a low hook that occurs when I drift too far forward. I'll definitely remember that.

Thanks!

I'm not going left or right of those trees, ok? I'm going over those trees...with a little draw.


Posted

WIth speed like that, it's up to you - with more speed, look at the Adams clubs. The Titleist 910h may be appealing in a low loft because of its adjustability and relative forgiveness. With your ability, it's really what makes you feel confident. The RBZ Tour or Tour TP may also be a consideration.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Ping i20 has a great feel and look to it.

 913 D2 8.5* with V2 66g stiff shaft

 910F 14.25 with Diamana stiff shaft

 i20 17, 20, and 23 hybrid 

 AP2 712 5-PW with Dynamic Gold S300 shaft

 54 and 60

 D66

 Tournament Edition 1600

 

 


Posted
  Mr. Desmond said:
Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

WIth speed like that, it's up to you - with more speed, look at the Adams clubs. The Titleist 910h may be appealing in a low loft because of its adjustability and relative forgiveness. With your ability, it's really what makes you feel confident. The RBZ Tour or Tour TP may also be a consideration.


Sorry if this is a dumb question, but is RBZ the next generation of the R11s or something Taylormade did separately? I tried the R11 driver (albeit at Dick's, and I was probably swinging scared because I hit the ceiling a few times) and it didn't seem very responsive to me. I didn't like the feel at impact.

I don't know if ability is the right word lol...I have power, that's about it, and my short game bails me out of a lot of really crappy approach shots. I'm hoping these MP-53s will help rectify that. Stiffer shafts, more workable, and the correct lie angles. Can't wait to stop seeing angled divots and my irons bailing right.

I'm not going left or right of those trees, ok? I'm going over those trees...with a little draw.


Posted
  JaxBomber17 said:
Originally Posted by JaxBomber17

Sorry if this is a dumb question, but is RBZ the next generation of the R11s or something Taylormade did separately? I tried the R11 driver (albeit at Dick's, and I was probably swinging scared because I hit the ceiling a few times) and it didn't seem very responsive to me. I didn't like the feel at impact.

I don't know if ability is the right word lol...I have power, that's about it, and my short game bails me out of a lot of really crappy approach shots. I'm hoping these MP-53s will help rectify that. Stiffer shafts, more workable, and the correct lie angles. Can't wait to stop seeing angled divots and my irons bailing right.

The RBZ is a new line that took the place of the Burner line. TM calls it RBZ or Rocketballz - and what they've done is designed a deeper slot on the sole of the club to make the face "spring" more to get closer to the maximum spring-like effect. It does not surprise me that the R11S did not feel great. The R11 had  similar feedback last year.

If you have power but still don't make contact consistently in the center, then you might want a more forgiving Adams hybrid, and the Titleist 910h and RBZ, along with others, are still in your wheelhouse. Lots of hybrids out there - it's tough to choose without a demo. WIth power, you may want something forgiving but with a deeper face, which typically keeps launch down. But it's all a balance between head and shaft that fits you. I like the adjustables and a decent shaft.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  JaxBomber17 said:
Originally Posted by JaxBomber17

Sorry if this is a dumb question, but is RBZ the next generation of the R11s or something Taylormade did separately? I tried the R11 driver (albeit at Dick's, and I was probably swinging scared because I hit the ceiling a few times) and it didn't seem very responsive to me. I didn't like the feel at impact.

I don't know if ability is the right word lol...I have power, that's about it, and my short game bails me out of a lot of really crappy approach shots. I'm hoping these MP-53s will help rectify that. Stiffer shafts, more workable, and the correct lie angles. Can't wait to stop seeing angled divots and my irons bailing right.

The RBZ replaces the Burner (most recently, Superfast 2.0) lineup for TM.

-Bryan

Bag: TM Superfast Driver, TM Burner '08 3W, GigaGolf Irons, Yes! Sandy Putter


Note: This thread is 4773 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I took a look at a 6,300 yard fairly easy course and it was 99% distance and then a 6,800 yard more challenging course and it was 97% distance. Do you have an example of one less that 95% or 90%? Maybe I am misunderstanding something. (6,310/220) + 40.9 = 69.6. Course rating is 70.0 with a 120 slope. Less than 1% other factors? (6,804/220) + 40.9 = 71.8. Course rating is 74.0 with a 140 slope. About 3% other factors? These are more extreme: (4,698/220) + 40.9 = 62.3. Course rating is 62.7 with a slope of 101.  (7,569/220) + 40.9 = 75.3. Course rating is 77.4 with a slope of 155. So long hard courses are 97% length and short easy courses are 99% length in these examples. I am new to this so maybe I am all wet.  
    • I think in fairness what he means is Tommy's chances to win PGA Tour events are fairly similar in number to Rory's chances to win the Masters. I don't think he's remotely saying that Tommy and Rory are in the same league. Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but I took the comment as meaning if he keeps giving himself chances to win then eventually he will win one. Rory had a thing in his head about the Masters and won anyway. Tommy has a thing in his head about PGA Tour events. They do seem fairly analogous to me.
    • Don't get me wrong, I like TF from a nice-guy-next-door perspective but I was surprised at the nerves he showed on the 2nd putt on 17th. That was unmistakably a stroke of a player who had already submitted to the writing on the wall. Honestly I would not expect that out of a veteran tour player. I would have liked to continue rooting for him but gotta see a bit more fight from him. Rory could be reasonably accused of being a head case but he is a fighter. Big difference.
    • Um no. Rory Wins PGA Tour 29, EU 19, Majors 5, FedEx Cup 3 Tommy PGA Tour 0, EU 7, Majors 0, FedEx 0 He may win eventually, but he’s not in the same league as Rory.  
    • Like Colin Montgomerie? 😛 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...