• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Beachcomber

Jawbone Up

11 posts in this topic

Has anyone tried the Jawbone Up?  Looks like a unique device that Jawbone released to the market a little over a year ago, then stopped selling it due to field failures in hardware.  And now totally redesigned it and relaunching the Up device.

https://jawbone.com/up

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Nike has these. Some independent company has these too. There are a few of them.

I think they're great if you somehow need the motivation to do these kinds of things, to be more active, etc.

If you, like me, simply try to listen to your body and not be a lazy person, it's not only a waste of $130 but it's probably annoying as well.

And I'm saying that as a geek, too, but I draw the line. I know when I had a good sleep. I don't need to waste ten minutes a week analyzing my sleep cycles. I wear a GPS watch when I run a lot of the time, but I go without that a good bit of the time as well because I get too caught up in numbers and not just having fun, breathing, and listening to some music.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Erik thanks for the response.  I was thinking of getting this for my wife... She does a lot of triathlons and trains 5 or 6 times a week.  She uses a food journal and sleep app already... And has a heart rate monitor that she wears on her runs.  But doesn't have a device that can tie everything together... Also I'm not sure the Up is the appropriate device as it doesn't have a built in heart rate monitor that I can see?

Are any of the Up competitors (Nike, etc.) Bluetooth based?  I was surprised the Jawbone Up device wasn't Bluetooth... Especially since they integrated this IP into their wireless headsets already.  From looking at the Jawbone site and video, you actually have to plug it into your iPhone to sync the band.  Personally, I'd prefer to have a Bluetooth band.

I think these devices are very interesting... When I'm not traveling for work - I spend a lot of time online.  And while I do try and workout in the evening... It would be nice to have a device on my wrist that tells me, "Hey lazy ass... Go do something physical for 20 minutes." to break up the daily work grind and routine.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Here's a review I saw today: http://www.theverge.com/2012/11/27/3694856/jawbone-up-review-fitness-band-2012
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Oooh that is cool, but i couldn't wear it that much. I hate watches and bracelets. Drives me nuts. I would need something else, a ring would be better, if they could make on that small :p

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I've taken a look at the Up as well as the one they use on the Biggest Loser (Body Bug), they all track the same type of data, time at rest, active, calories burned etc.  If you're a numbers geek and like to look at charts that plot out your active hours versus inactive and calories burned then these are great for you.

I'm with Erik in terms of going for simplicity during runs.  I have a Garmin Forerunner 610 but I don't use it for regular runs, only when I do tempo and intervals.  When I first started running, I used the HR strap to monitor heart rate, the foot pod to track stride and the GPS to track miles and grade.  I'd review all the numbers but ultimately lost interest after I logged enough miles to run from San Francisco to Boston.  The value of this device to me is during strenuous runs to track how close to my max heart rate I am and how long I maintain it.  Beyond that it's just a distraction that takes me out of my runners mind and the enjoyment of the run.

On recovery and long runs, I prefer to just grab my Bluetooth headphones, iPhone and just run while I listen to music.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I do not get these types of tech. I am very old fashioned that way, i do not need all that feedback but i do see why others love these things. i walk, cycle and swim to keep in relatively good shape. The Doctor gives me the feedback i need. I would buy the product for a friend though, who i know would use it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by jamo

Here's a review I saw today: http://www.theverge.com/2012/11/27/3694856/jawbone-up-review-fitness-band-2012

Wow. Thanks for the link.  Excellent review to read.  Exactly what I was looking for.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think its a step in the right direction though. It would be great to get all that information. Its tough enough to try to keep track on how much you eat when you don't know how many calories you burn. Generic values for certain exercises are horrible, and can be off depending on a person's metabolic rate.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just for the reminder to get off your ass and get some exercise, you can get free phone apps for that.  I use Routinely on my Android, in which you set activities you want to do and can set days of the week and times, and you can set it to give you various alerts at the assigned times.  So your phone will buzz and ding at, say, 6:30 PM with a little reminder that tells you you're supposed to be exercising that day (or practicing golf, or doing something nice for your wife, or brushing your teeth, or whatever).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It still has to approximate the calories burned using averages since it's monitoring movement, and not heart rate.  If I'm walking on a golf course it likely won't be able to discern between the calories burned from just walking, walking while pulling a cart and walking while carrying a bag.

Originally Posted by saevel25

I think its a step in the right direction though. It would be great to get all that information. Its tough enough to try to keep track on how much you eat when you don't know how many calories you burn. Generic values for certain exercises are horrible, and can be off depending on a person's metabolic rate.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Willett's brother tried to be funny, but he was way offline. Bad effort in dry humor.. He should've not written anything like that. It's just going to make things harder for his brother and I'm sure Danny W. is gonna hear it from the crowds.
    • Willett's brother is not a part of the Ryder cup team. Willett made appologies: http://m.bbc.com/sport/golf/37500790
    • I like it. Especially compared to nearly all past US Ryder Cup kits. Actually before I dish out too much praise, do they have a huge Stars and Stripes flag emblazoned on the back?
    • I would say it depends on what club you're talking about. For drivers I would say that the best performing drivers of all time have been made within the last five years. Aerodynamics, material science, and the proliferation of launch monitors and data driven design have resulted in improvements across the board in distance and forgiveness as of late. I know that I personally saw a decent improvement on my G10 when I switched to a G30, in that I gained between 10 and 15 yards without sacrificing accuracy. This is on the high end of what aerodynamics can provide though, simply because higher swing speeds receive a greater benefit from decreased drag. Depending on the individual you may not see much difference so long as the driver itself was made within the last ten years or so. For irons I would be inclined to say that the main difference in the irons of yesteryear and the irons of today is forgiveness. The irons made today are much easier to hit than previous irons, simply because they aren't as drastically punishing on mis-hits as the old blades. The PING Eye2 irons seemed to be the first "widespread" GI iron that sparked the trend towards irons that were easier for the layman to hit. That being said, I found my s55 irons (their "blade" from several years ago) to be more forgiving than the Eye2's. Based on that and observations from other clubs I have hit I would say the average golfer would be best suited by irons made within the last 10 to 15 years that are in good condition with sharp grooves. If you play muscleback irons though, there's pretty much zero difference between modern "true" musclebacks and those of yore, though the current muscle-cavity irons (like the iBlade and MP-15) will likely be at least a bit easier to hit than the older blades while maintaining a similar style.  Wedges are the only thing that I would argue the "latest and greatest" provides a tangible benefit for. The reasoning for this is entirely different however, in that it's based solely off the condition of the grooves in older wedges. As wedges grow old, and get used, the grooves wear to the point that there becomes a noticeable performance difference - especially when playing out of the rough. For this reason alone do I say that the average golfer (assuming they golf at least once a week during the golfing season) is best suited by wedges no older than two or three years old.  Putters are the odd man out here. I don't think it matters in the slightest when your putter was manufactured, so long as you keep a reasonable grip on it so that it doesn't slip out of your hands. I personally am a fan of the newer milled putters for the feel they provide, but it doesn't mean I couldn't probably putt nearly as well with an original Anser putter in the same style. I think the average golfer is best suited by whatever putter style and features allow them to consistently roll the ball along their target line, with no age requirement. In summary, considering the advancement of technology, I would feel comfortable putting these "maximum age caps" on equipment for the average weekend golfer to get the most out of his/her game: Drivers: ~10 years old or newer Irons: ~15 years old or newer Wedges: ~3 years old or newer Putter: Whatever works best for you That being said, you may still enjoy the game with any kind of equipment out there. I just think that equipment that follows these guidelines will let the average weekend golfer get about as much as they can out of their game without necessarily breaking the bank. Like @iacas said, you may find incremental improvements by purchasing the R1 over an old G5 but the question then becomes whether or not this improvement is worth the price difference. This question can only be answered by the person buying the club. It can't be denied, however, that a driver from the 1960's will be severely outclassed by the G5 and the R1, making either of them a much better choice than the 1960's driver. Interestingly enough, I have had the desire to go the opposite way for a while now. I bought the s55's my last go around, and I'm thinking that my next set of irons will be a more "traditional" muscleback iron (since the s55 is mostly a CB), along the likes of the MP-4 irons by Mizuno. I hit the ball consistently enough that I don't care about the lack of forgiveness, and I believe that the wonderful look and feel of those irons, along with the little bit of extra vertical control (can thin it slightly to make punch shots even easier) would offset whatever I lose in forgiveness. I know that I would most certainly never go to an iron like the AP2, the G, or the M2. The chunky look of the club (along with the offset) gets into my head nowadays and makes me feel uncomfortable standing over the ball in a manner similar to how I used to be intimidated by the look of blades at address. I would gain forgiveness, but at the price of distance and trajectory control - an unacceptable trade for me considering I value distance and trajectory control much more highly than forgiveness.
    • My newest clubs are pretty old. Maybe 2006? I don't really remember. The other day, just for the heck of it,  I played using my old Bazooka Iron Woods. (2i-LW) Shot my normal score. Those Ironwoods are probably 15-16 years old. I don't think at this stage of my life, that a new set would make that much difference. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. mahariji_slice
      mahariji_slice
      (35 years old)
  • Blog Entries