Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4880 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Originally Posted by golfjunky0331

No, I'm not hung up on labels but they do seem to help. The way I understand it, the peltz off the back foot dead hands technique works well for a short chip.

The Phil style with a "hinge and hold" is great for a chip with higher ball flight and when you need a sharper angle into the ball, and the utley pivot is good for most chips, and pitches up to 30 yards. I'm no expert in any means but I do like to get as much info on different styles and its nice that there is a forum to ask questions to those who have already spent some time trying out these methods. It's funny because everything does seem to have a label anymore. In putting ...

Left hand low, pendulum, piston, traditional, belly putting. Just to name a few. I do appreciate all the feedback and thanks to all those with different ideas

Except for 1/4, 1/2 and full swings, I don't hear much about Pelz any longer, other than people repudiating his SBST putting stroke. Yeah, it works to a certain degree with a 28 inch putter - the shorter, the better - but you would not be able to play golf due to the back pain. That's where Pelz the scientist ignores the limitations of the human body. lol.

AimPoint has trumped Pelz for green reading.

Putting the ball back in your stance is not a "pelz" technique. People used it before Pelz.

Phil is similar to Utley in many ways - except Phil does a lot of hinging, whereas Utley says it depends on the shot. Phil has more of a weight shift; Utley tends to keep most weight on the front leg - more of a center pivot and goes left on the downswing - it's a mini-swing. they both straighten their right arm through the swing. Both men do not like to move the hands back. As to ball position, you can put the ball anywhere in your stance, depending on what you want the shot to do and the lie.

Each of us have our own path.

Once again, Patience. Find what works for you. It may take months. Get the books, vids, read, spend the spring finding what works for you - in the dirt.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
From Phil's video, his swing key for chipping is to "keep the hands moving toward the target" (hinge hold, etc).  This helps for good contact and to insure your hands are ahead of the ball at contact.  Phil uses ball position in his video to vary the height the ball will come off the club face.  Back=lower trajectory, forward=higher.  I use this somewhat but use more of the Utley technique. Practicing of grass is best, but you can use mats in the winter into a net.  Try to vary the trajectory with ball position but also work on direction.  Put a vertical line on the net and try to hit the line at different heights.

They say you get a false confidence practicing off mats. Is this true and would it be better practicing these techniques off of plywood to give you a closer reality of hard pan.


Posted

Originally Posted by golfjunky0331

Quote:

Originally Posted by boogielicious

From Phil's video, his swing key for chipping is to "keep the hands moving toward the target" (hinge hold, etc).  This helps for good contact and to insure your hands are ahead of the ball at contact.  Phil uses ball position in his video to vary the height the ball will come off the club face.  Back=lower trajectory, forward=higher.  I use this somewhat but use more of the Utley technique.

Practicing of grass is best, but you can use mats in the winter into a net.  Try to vary the trajectory with ball position but also work on direction.  Put a vertical line on the net and try to hit the line at different heights.

They say you get a false confidence practicing off mats. Is this true and would it be better practicing these techniques off of plywood to give you a closer reality of hard pan.


It is the length of time the club head is on a consistent lie. A mat you can hit "fat" and still end up seeming like you hit a good shot. Grass is not as forgiving and I don't know that plywood would be helpful at all.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Yeah I can understand the part about hitting the mat and bouncing the club into the ball, but a lob wedge with little bounce off of plywood I would Think could help you simulate hard pan or a really tight fairway. There would be no room for error. I saw somewhere online someone practiced that way when they were younger to help with tight lies?? Just looking for ideas to practice indoor since there is snow on the ground here in Pa and my wife would be upset if I left for fla in the offseason to practice my chipping :-D

Posted
They say you get a false confidence practicing off mats. Is this true?.

I think both yes and no. You can catch the ball a little fat off a mat, and the ball will fly better than it would from grass. On the other hand, I think that if you are really honest with yourself, you can still feel the difference in the quality of strike.


Posted
Good point! And very true, a Matt is better than nothing And I can tell when I hit the Matt first and when my contact Is perfect. I also understand that grass is less forgiving but That's one of the drawbacks of living in the north, can't play Very often during the winter months

Posted
Originally Posted by golfjunky0331

Yeah I can understand the part about hitting the mat and bouncing the club into the ball, but a lob wedge with little bounce off of plywood I would

Think could help you simulate hard pan or a really tight fairway. There would be no room for error. I saw somewhere online someone practiced that way when they were younger to help with tight lies?? Just looking for ideas to practice indoor since there is snow on the ground here in Pa and my wife would be upset if I left for fla in the offseason to practice my chipping


Why do you have to practice hitting off of "hard pan" so badly? Take a piece of painter's tape about 6 inches in length or masking tape and color in with a marker, put the ball at the end of the tape. Then practice hitting, make sure the ball gets up in the air and the tape doesn't get tore up. The marker will show on the sole if you are catching the tape as well.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
Originally Posted by birlyshirly

I think both yes and no. You can catch the ball a little fat off a mat, and the ball will fly better than it would from grass. On the other hand, I think that if you are really honest with yourself, you can still feel the difference in the quality of strike.

Exactly.  With a chip, you can tell by sound.  A really hard mat will also act like hard pan.  for a pitch, you are using the bounce anyway.  You can also tell by the height the ball goes if you are hitting into a net.  It is much better to practice off a mat than not at all in these freezing New England winters!!!

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Well, the good thing is that these short game shots don't need a full swing, so less room is required. You could put a mat or carpet down in a room, get some Almost Golf Balls, and work on that new technique until the thaw.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I guess hard pan is the hardest lie that I have trouble hitting from and a lot of the public courses we play get tore up and your either hitting from really short grass fairway or dirt. From a fluffy lie I'm pretty consistent. Figure if you can get consistent off hard pan lies everything else will be much easier, except of course the extreme rough.

Posted

I don't think that is the way you should go about it imho but do what ever you think you need to do. I think the "saucer toss" would be better on hard pan than trying to hinge and hold on it. I think I would spring a few more bux and find a track that waters the grass...

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I'm using a Matt right now indoors and seem to be having good contact with quiet hands, ball in center of stance with a nice smoothe pivot. For now I'm just going to get comfortable with this and see how the transition is to grass in a couple of months or sooner weather permitting.

Note: This thread is 4880 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • StuM,  I have, in the past, added a left handed club. (Ususally a 7 iron) However, I usually take a stroke penalty and move the ball to where I want it.  I play for fun and in a pinch can use theback side if my club if I don't want the penalty stroke.    RetiredOldMan,  Terry 
    • So, Brendan Sorsby, Texas Tech transfer QB, was found guilty of sports betting by the NCAA. He admitted to it. He placed thousands of bets over multiple years while at Indiana and Cincinnati. This included betting on his own teams.  The NCAA rules ban athletes from betting on any sport (college or pro).  A retired visiting judge from Tarrant County, Texas has put an injunction on the NCAA ruling. He is a visiting judge because the first judge was a graduate and big fan of Texas Tech, and he recused himself. The judged ruled the following... "Under Curry's order, Sorsby is permitted to play for Texas Tech's 2026 season on the condition that he continues his treatment for a gambling and anxiety disorder and serves a two-game suspension (missing games against Abilene Christian and Oregon State)."  Don't get me wrong, I don't particularly care for the NCAA. That still doesn't mean that a college can choose when or where to say, "Yea we agree to these rules for all our sports, well except in this case." Here is a breakdown from S&W. The Hidden Weapon in Sorsby’s Injunction: How a Lubbock County Court Order Quietly Neutralized the NCAA’s Most Powerful Enforcement Tool - Law Offices of Snell & Wilmer By Ryan J. Regula On June 8, 2026, Lubbock County District Court Judge Ken Curry issued a temporary injunction in Brendan Sorsby v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, Cause No. DC-2026-CV-0791 (99th Judicial District... The main judgement made sense. Sorsby, I am going to have all this harm done to me if I don't get to play. The Judge, I agree. The penalty for gambling is too harsh, so here are all these things you must do, and I will grant this injunction against the NCAA. Basically, an analogy would be when a person goes into court for a DUI and they agree to all these other things to not end up in jail.  What sucks for the NCAA is the NCAA has appealed to Texas’ Seventh Court of Appeals, based in Amarillo. All four justices that preside over the court are graduates of Texas Tech University School of Law. It would be hilarious if all four of them had to recuse themselves 🤣. For those who like to read legal rulings...  
    • The chatter in my brain is when the distance is between clubs since I am pretty weak at shortened backswings, etc. I try to simply decide if being long or short is the better outcome and choose my club based on that and simply not even try for the “real” distance.  For me a full normal swing is what I strive for.
    • I saw this comment made in a golf article... "Most golfers stand over a 4- or 5-iron still negotiating with themselves. They think about how hard to swing, whether they have the right club, if they have the aim correct and more. It’s a lot to deal with and long irons punish the “half-in” golf swing." I am not sure the "most golfers" is correct regarding the bolded part. I can understand if there is a bunker, water, and/or OB that a lot of golfers would be fixated on that. I am not sure that leads to ending up more times there. Pending your level in golf, the variance is so large in outcomes, it could be just with in the expected outcomes. I can understand if have a big lake on the right side of the hole being one of the most terrifying shots for right-handed amateur golfers.  I am not sure many golfers are standing over the ball talking to themselves, "Ok, maybe I should step back and pull the 4-iron. Am I lined up right? Oh, the wind came up, should I swing harder? What am I going to have for dinner tonight, maybe steak. (Joking, somewhat 😛)" A question is that how much chatter do you get while standing over the ball. Are you questioning the everything about your golf shot?   
    • Wordle 1,816 5/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.