Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4563 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've been doing quite a lot of work on my swing recently, working with James on evolvr and one thing that's been driving me a little nuts is differences between the longer and shorter clubs. Especially finding a comfortable address position, and potentially how the address position affects your impact position. Here's me with a PW on the left and driver on the right.

Both look ok to my eye but I've very comfortable with a PW, and very uncomfortable with a driver at the moment. And that's translating into impact as well. So my question is are there elements of the way you address the ball (distances, angles etc) that are reflected at impact, or is it very individual, or irrelevant?


  • Administrator
Posted
  Mordan said:
Originally Posted by Mordan

Both look ok to my eye but I've very comfortable with a PW, and very uncomfortable with a driver at the moment. And that's translating into impact as well. So my question is are there elements of the way you address the ball (distances, angles etc) that are reflected at impact, or is it very individual, or irrelevant?

Just a question: how do you feel your balance is with each of the clubs? How's your swing length vary, if it does, for each of the clubs?

I'll have James pop on here and add some more info, too, but consider the above questions too, as address position probably matters least when it comes to impact (when address is within a reasonable range, that is).

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  iacas said:
Originally Posted by iacas

Just a question: how do you feel your balance is with each of the clubs? How's your swing length vary, if it does, for each of the clubs?

I'll have James pop on here and add some more info, too, but consider the above questions too, as address position probably matters least when it comes to impact (when address is within a reasonable range, that is).

For some reason I was trying to get my weight forward on my feet (ie. more towards the toes), I think I was using that feeling because of a tendency a while back to have my weight too much towards my heels and I ended up over doing it. This caused me to overbalance towards the ball sometimes and shank.

So I'm now just concentrating on feeling balanced at address and I feel quite solid in both those photos. My swing length is good with the PW (I can even keep my right heel down and just bank my foot!!), and still too long with the driver. And I'm struggling to stop myself lashing at the ball with the driver too.

I wasn't looking for a silver bullet, ie just move this or that at address and it will sort out the other issues, but I just thought there might be some commonly accepted wisdoms about certain address positions translating into impact. I did suspect that the answer would be a bit of "it's individual" and a lot of "it's pretty irrelevant".


Posted

I don't want to appear out of line but iacas, doesn't his alignment with the driver seem off?

His shoulders appear either square or slightly open but his hips and feet seem aligned a bit to the right. For his PW, it seems right on but the driver seems off.


Posted
  Pablo68 said:
Originally Posted by Pablo68

I don't want to appear out of line but iacas, doesn't his alignment with the driver seem off?

His shoulders appear either square or slightly open but his hips and feet seem aligned a bit to the right. For his PW, it seems right on but the driver seems off.

Ball position is different.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
  Pablo68 said:
Originally Posted by Pablo68

I don't want to appear out of line but iacas, doesn't his alignment with the driver seem off?

His shoulders appear either square or slightly open but his hips and feet seem aligned a bit to the right. For his PW, it seems right on but the driver seems off.

Perhaps I shouldn't have mentioned the evolvr bit, I wasn't trying to put everyone else off adding their bit.

My target is a white flag one third of the way in from the right of the building you can see (it can just be made out if you click on the photo and view it full size).

With the PW my feet are aligned left of my target. I intentionally open my stance with my wedges because otherwise I draw the ball too much.

With the driver, I'm going for a pretty neutral alignment. Although as I said I'm struggling at the moment to translate the movements I'm making with the shorter clubs to the longer ones.


Posted
  cbrian said:
Originally Posted by cbrian

Ball position is different.

Would that account for that much difference in alignment between hips and shoulders? Maybe I'm just overanalyzing it but the OP's hips and shoulders look nowhere close to each other.


  • Moderator
Posted

No worries.  You weren't putting us off.  Many of us use Evolvr.

I am interested in what James would say as I am a bit the same as you in that the driver is the least comfortable club for me.  I have a tendency to swing it differently that my other clubs.

Your setup and posture look pretty good to me.  Do you feel you swing the driver harder than your other clubs?

Also, you mentioned overdrawing the wedges, so you keep the face open (I do this with my irons).  Is your driver ball flight also a draw?

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Hey Guys,

This topic actually goes a little deeper than just longer clubs vs shorter clubs. longer clubs need to be categorized as shots off the turf, or on a tee, such as the driver.

Don't be fooled by feet alignment. Many of the best golfers in the world have the right foot pulled back, or have slightly closed hips at setup. It helps assist the turning component in the backswing and swinging enough to the right, especially for a driver if the golfer is choosing to hit UP on it...

That is also an important question... is the golfer not hitting it far enough, and hitting up will optimize the numbers??? well then there needs to be changes to the mechanics of the swing to still swing out enough.

Dana Dahlquist did a brilliant video of Robert Rock, and went over some very important address pieces, such as the amount on ankle, knee and hip flexion.

It's also important to remember, that sometimes, "uncomfortable" isn't a bad thing, its just that you're not used to it...

The distance away from the ball becomes important in dictating what type of shot you're looking to hit. Further away for push and draw swings, as it has the arms hang more outward and raises the handle... closer to the ball has the arms more downward and lowers the handle, helping shift the swing more leftward.

In an ideal world,I believe we would flight the short clubs lower, and long clubs higher, but lets be realistic, we dont have time , money, or energy to learn exactly how to do all of these, though there are simple ways to do all of it. But i strongly believe Driver adjustments are necessary if you're looking to optimize launch monitor numbers.

  • Upvote 1

James Hirshfield

Tour Professional Golf Coach

@hirshfield <-- Follow me on Twitter!

james@thegolfevolution.com

UK 07939-902455

USA (814) 464-3446


Posted
Originally Posted by james_hirshfield

The distance away from the ball becomes important in dictating what type of shot you're looking to hit. Further away for push and draw swings, as it has the arms hang more outward and raises the handle... closer to the ball has the arms more downward and lowers the handle, helping shift the swing more leftward.

In an ideal world,I believe we would flight the short clubs lower, and long clubs higher, but lets be realistic, we dont have time , money, or energy to learn exactly how to do all of these, though there are simple ways to do all of it. But i strongly believe Driver adjustments are necessary if you're looking to optimize launch monitor numbers.

It looks so easy watching Robert Rock do it! Such a simple looking swing, and interesting commentary from Dana too.

That makes sense about distance from the ball and shot shape. And means my tendency to slowly get closer and closer to the ball isn't too compatible with trying to hit draws.


Note: This thread is 4563 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Short gym set at lunch;  bench press, four sets of five, 180 lbs.   Did a few of the medicine ball / driver drill too while I was at it. 
    • I took a look at a 6,300 yard fairly easy course and it was 99% distance and then a 6,800 yard more challenging course and it was 97% distance. Do you have an example of one less that 95% or 90%? Maybe I am misunderstanding something. (6,310/220) + 40.9 = 69.6. Course rating is 70.0 with a 120 slope. Less than 1% other factors? (6,804/220) + 40.9 = 71.8. Course rating is 74.0 with a 140 slope. About 3% other factors? These are more extreme: (4,698/220) + 40.9 = 62.3. Course rating is 62.7 with a slope of 101.  (7,569/220) + 40.9 = 75.3. Course rating is 77.4 with a slope of 155. So long hard courses are 97% length and short easy courses are 99% length in these examples. I am new to this so maybe I am all wet.  
    • I think in fairness what he means is Tommy's chances to win PGA Tour events are fairly similar in number to Rory's chances to win the Masters. I don't think he's remotely saying that Tommy and Rory are in the same league. Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but I took the comment as meaning if he keeps giving himself chances to win then eventually he will win one. Rory had a thing in his head about the Masters and won anyway. Tommy has a thing in his head about PGA Tour events. They do seem fairly analogous to me.
    • Don't get me wrong, I like TF from a nice-guy-next-door perspective but I was surprised at the nerves he showed on the 2nd putt on 17th. That was unmistakably a stroke of a player who had already submitted to the writing on the wall. Honestly I would not expect that out of a veteran tour player. I would have liked to continue rooting for him but gotta see a bit more fight from him. Rory could be reasonably accused of being a head case but he is a fighter. Big difference.
    • Um no. Rory Wins PGA Tour 29, EU 19, Majors 5, FedEx Cup 3 Tommy PGA Tour 0, EU 7, Majors 0, FedEx 0 He may win eventually, but he’s not in the same league as Rory.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...