• Announcements

    • iacas

      Introducing TST "Clubs!"   08/28/2017

      No, we're not getting into the equipment business, but we do have "clubs" here on TST now. Groups. Check them out here:
Sign in to follow this  
GaryH

Are tour pros driver heads the same as ours?

Recommended Posts

GaryH    2

I know the shafts they use tend to be very different to the ones most of us amateurs have.  But what about the clubheads?

I ask because i've seen a review of the Ping G25 driver where the reviewer said it's a very forgiving club but difficult to work and so probably not suited to low handicappers.  But the likes of Hunter, Bubba, and Westwood play it instead of the "better player's" i20 or anser.

So my question is, do the tour pros club heads have something different going on "under the bonnet" so to speak?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

GaijinGolfer    84

Nope.  The club that you buy off the rack is very different from what the tour pros have in the bag.  Thats part of why you see, "tour issue" clubs go for so much on Ebay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GaryH    2

Interesting.

So when they quote the names of tour pros who use a particular driver in their marketing (or when the sales assistant mentions this), effectively we are being deceived as the club they're selling to us is quite different?  The head shapes are the same (i think?) but what's underneath is different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

iacas    4,175
Originally Posted by GaijinGolfer

Nope.  The club that you buy off the rack is very different from what the tour pros have in the bag.  Thats part of why you see, "tour issue" clubs go for so much on Ebay.

Please, elaborate. What makes them so much better?

Because to a man every person I've ever asked - from CEOs to the guys in the equipment fans, etc. - they've all said this:

1) The equipment is the same. It's from the same production line, etc.

2) The materials are the same. It's not like they run some higher quality titanium in some pro drivers or anything.

3) The differences? They more precisely measure things like the loft. They have an extra step or two of QA testing. And that's it.

4) Aftermarket stuff is better - they'll hotmelt to change the sound and weight a bit. They'll obviously get much better (and more QA tested) shafts. Etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

TourSpoon    180

Iacas has it right. The only difference will be more precise quality control with much tighter tolerances, unless they are using a prototype not available for the masses just yet. And we know never to trust a headcover. Remember the pro model R7? It appeared in many pro's bags under many different head covers for a couple of years (as just one example).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GaryH    2

I see we have a difference of opinion.

Assuming the heads are in fact the same, i do find it odd when a golf teaching pro reviews a club and says it probably isn't for the lower handicapper who wants to work the ball, and/or for players with high swing speeds......and yet it's common knowledge that some tour pros use it!

In the Ping example, one would assume the tour pros would all favour the i20 or the anser, but this isn't the case.

Edit:  Actually, reading it again, perhaps i misunderstood, and iacas' 4th point relates to how the engineers do alter the clubhead in such a way that means the tour pros can get more workable versions of the G25 clubhead?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jspangler    7
I see we have a difference of opinion.  Assuming the heads are in fact the same, i do find it odd when a golf teaching pro reviews a club and says it probably isn't for the lower handicapper who wants to work the ball, and/or for players with high swing speeds......and yet it's common knowledge that some tour pros use it! In the Ping example, one would assume the tour pros would all favour the i20 or the anser, but this isn't the case. Edit:  Actually, reading it again, perhaps i misunderstood, and iacas' 4th point relates to how the engineers do alter the clubhead in such a way that means the tour pros can get more workable versions of the G25 clubhead?

You did not read him wrong hot melting a driver does not improve the playabilty, it gets the headweight to an exact number to the players preference. It does change the sound,I believe it gives it a more muted sound. I've heard that it improves the feel, but I can't verify that as I've never hit a hotmelted driver. As stated above tour drivers are just more precise. Your otr 9.5 driver might actually be a 9.2 driver. I've heard pings loft can be off quite a bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TourSpoon    180

Not every Tour player plays a more workable driver or irons. If that were the case, they would all still be using 1 and 2 iron blades instead of hybrids. Remember "workable" is a relative term.  Heck, I can work any driver you give me, many times right off the fairway. Lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GaryH    2

Thanks for the illuminating replies, guys.  I guess even the very best players sometimes go for forgiveness over workability.  Though as per TourSpoon's comment, i know from personal experience that the most forgiving drivers are not resistant to hook and slice spin, so they can't be too much trickier for tour pros to manouvere (in their case, intentionally!) compared with "better player" versions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WUTiger    454
Originally Posted by TourSpoon

... Remember "workable" is a relative term.  Heck, I can work any driver you give me, many times right off the fairway. Lol.

If you understand how a golf swing works, you can hit a basic fade or draw with almost any club.

If you have an SGI clubhead with a low Vertical Center of Gravity, it will tend to launch the ball fairly high, unless you counteract it with a low-launch shaft. So, golfers with a GI or a Player's club can work the ball lower, providing they have the swing for it. Many average golfers lose carry on their drives because they launch the ball too low for their swing speed.

Also, some companies have gone to smaller driver heads (below 460 cc.) in Tour and Pro model driver heads. (These are the models they sell in the golf shops):

  • Titleist 913D3.... 445 cc.
  • Calla XHot Pro... 435 cc.
  • Calla RazrFit Extreme ... 440 cc.  (8.5*, 9.5* and 10.5* lofts)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

nsatt11    1

It depends on the person because things like degrees open or closed to effect the loft and the companies fight those clubs exactly for the pro. I know Phil Mickelson uses a Razr Fit Extreme but it is nothing like the Razr Fit Extreme that sits on every shelf. The driver that sits on the shelf goes anywhere from 3* open to neutral and when he was trying that out he was slicing the ball all over the place. So Callaway made a driver that would not be as open. They did this by adding a Titanium COG ( weight) to the back end of the driver head. This made it so he could draw the ball a lot easier, which right now he is hitting the hell out of that driver. I have heard that there were only a few of the COGs made and this is not something in the drivers on the shelf. I am not sure about any other cases on the tour though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

David Lake    2

Generally speaking, what the pros play and what you buy are two different things.  Personally, I have never met a professional golfer whose equipment was not significantly modified from stock, and in some cases were never stock to begin with.  A case in point is that when Golfsmith purchased Lynx, part of the inventory received was special clubhead molds for Fred Couples.  These molds varied significantly from what Lynx was selling to the public.  In fact the only similarity was that the Lynx name was on them.  Another instance was back in the early 90's when a premier player at the time was being paid a big endorsement contract to play graphite shafted irons from a major brand.  Half way through the season it was learned that his shafts were actually steel painted to look like the graphite shafts that came with the set.

As far as drivers are concerned, other than shafting, weighting, club length, etc. there are not a lot of modifications that can be made.  However, I have seen numerous instances where roll was eliminated on the clubface of a pro's driver.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If any of us wanted to, or spent the time/money, we could hunt for an experienced clubsmith in our area that can tweak our clubs in the same fashion that the pros have their clubs tweaked.  If I spent a month between the range and an experienced golfsmith tweaking my clubs, does that mean that my clubs are "different" now?  Or just "modified" for my needs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

twisted5ltr    0
Interesting topic just 2days ago I saw a site on eBay--actually I can't remember the name of their eBay store--but do a search under 'tour issue'-- maybe even ' tour issue club heads' On their store they list taylormade rocketballz driver head for $750 head only. Shafts for $350+. Tour issue irons sets for $1400. Tour issue putters for $2000, one for $2800 and one for $3000 I would live your input on these guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Valleygolfer    310
Originally Posted by twisted5ltr

Interesting topic just 2days ago I saw a site on eBay--actually I can't remember the name of their eBay store--but do a search under 'tour issue'-- maybe even ' tour issue club heads'

On their store they list taylormade rocketballz driver head for $750 head only. Shafts for $350+. Tour issue irons sets for $1400. Tour issue putters for $2000, one for $2800 and one for $3000

I would live your input on these guys.


Pay extra for nothing...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

twisted5ltr    0
Lol, just to be clear I wasn't thinking about getting one. I was just wondering if there was a difference, since he clearly only sells what the site calls the only all tour issue site or some such claim. I was wondering how a guy so over-priced stays in business unless there is really that big of a market for big time suckers or there is a real product difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by twisted5ltr

Lol, just to be clear I wasn't thinking about getting one. I was just wondering if there was a difference, since he clearly only sells what the site calls the only all tour issue site or some such claim. I was wondering how a guy so over-priced stays in business unless there is really that big of a market for big time suckers or there is a real product difference.

Seems like a marketing cash grab to me.  Do you really believe these "tour issue" clubs will make you are me instantly play better?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TourSpoon    180
Originally Posted by Deryck Griffith

Seems like a marketing cash grab to me.  Do you really believe these "tour issue" clubs will make you are me instantly play better?

Cash grab is right. Would a Scotty Circle T help me putt better than a floor model Scotty? These "Tour Issue" components are supposed to be cherry picked with super tight tolerances for Tour Vans and reps to put out to players on a variety of professional tour levels. I think the Tour branding has become a little watered down now that any Joe with enough green can get one. This seems to be the case of the Scotty Cameron's at least.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • Clearly it's a lot of both, but I've always wondered that if golf is such a mental game, why do players only seem to practice the physical side.  And how does one even practice the mental side?  I've known a few players, not that many, who didn't have the most athletic or orthodox swings but were really consistent and knew how to score.  Were they not better golfers than players with long, aesthetic but unreliable swings?   What do these players who learn just enough to hit playable shots know that most golfers don't?   Comments?  Is the game in your head or in your hands, and how does your approach to improving at this game (or the mythical optimal approach) reflect your answer?
    • FWIW he played his third double round in three weeks.  90 and 96.
    • It's a disappointing end (w/ or w/o "closure"), but I've got no hate for Dan. Yea, even w/ the same final outcome he could have handled things better to the people following him. But really it never cost me anything and I was entertained when he was still at it (regardless of any issues w/ his approach to the project and/or how he portrayed it). He also made it easy to follow his story... I remember checking out his stats page every few months, and it was kinda fun to just see it. I'd prob still give it a google if I heard he was trying for the Senior tour in the future.
    • I had 2 in my last round on thick and grainy poa annua greens.  Both were from over 30 ft.  One was uphill and against the grain.  I thought I hit it hard enough to get there but came up 10 ft short.  I was first to putt so didn't get a read on the grain.  The other was a left to right breaker and I didn't realize the grain was also running that way.  Ended up about 10 ft below the hole. 
    • I agree with @Buckeyebowman. I was practising my swing on the range yesterday and was putting some business card in front of the ball. Very pure ballstriking almost no mishits, straight ballflight I swept the card away every the time. I was focusing on my swing and the card. Then we got on the court. First hole perfect ball striking I was able to focus behind the ball and on my swing.  Then second hole I made a mistake with my driver (know the reason now). But anyway my confidence was getting smaller. 200m to the hole. So I got my hybrid out "I have to hit this ball 200m very hard now". I still tried to focus behind the ball and the shot was OK. But far from perfect. From now on from hole to hole ball striking got worse. At the end I even hit in the ground in front of the ball with my sand wedge which never has happened to me before. My head was going "You have to hit this ball now!" No loose swings as on the range before. And no thinking about the loose swing going to the target. The more frustrated I got the more I focussed on the ball. I was noticing in the end I was focussing in front of the ball and on my swing but when I made the actual downswing my eyes got back to the ball which leaded to terrible shots. I noticed the eyes really jumped.  What this means to me. I have to practise to change my focus now every time on the range and make this a priority. I also tried widening my focus which really helped. But its a different task to this on the actual court it seems.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dresilved
      Dresilved
      (52 years old)
    2. kpetrina
      kpetrina
      (25 years old)
    3. Luana
      Luana
      (39 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon