• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
club ho

Rich Beem a good addition to the Golf Channel!

12 posts in this topic

I noticed Rich Beem on the GC. I thought he did a great job and was very comfortable looking. I hope he gets a permanent spot on the GC. Beem seems more like the everyday golfers that I play with is  but also has a Major  as well as many PGA victories. Beem definitely would never be accused of being a stuffed shirt like some other people I can think of.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Dittos on Rich Been he looks very comfortable in front of the camera and comes off as an average Joe. Hope he stays - just goes to show you that golf is easy when you don't wear a stuffed shift!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TGC

Where pro golfers go to die...

Rich was the main character in Bud, Beers, and Tees (?)

Ought to be fun ...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Dittos on Rich Been he looks very comfortable in front of the camera and comes off as an average Joe. Hope he stays - just goes to show you that golf is easy when you don't wear a stuffed shift!

I went to school with him. He is exactly like he seems. He will do a great job.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

TGC

Where pro golfers go to die...

Rich was the main character in Bud, Beers, and Tees (?)

Ought to be fun ...

Let me think about that........ Okay you are a worn out golf pro now you have to have to go to work on a TV show and work along side Holly Sonders and Lauren Thompson. I can hear Rich Beem up at 6am telling his wife sorry honey got to go to work! The lucky SOB I go to work and haul lobsters traps with stinky bait. I curse myself for opting to play ice hockey instead of golf when I was growing up LOL!. Good for you Rich Beem keep up the good work!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by club ho

I noticed Rich Beem on the GC. I thought he did a great job and was very comfortable looking. I hope he gets a permanent spot on the GC. Beem seems more like the everyday golfers that I play with is  but also has a Major  as well as many PGA victories. Beem definitely would never be accused of being a stuffed shirt like some other people I can think of.

Other than the fact that I wouldn't call 3 wins many I completely agree with you.  He is the best guy on the program, IMO.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by turtleback

Other than the fact that I wouldn't call 3 wins many I completely agree with you.  He is the best guy on the program, IMO.

You are right 3 wins is not very many. I guess  I got a little carried away.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've always like The Beemer.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it means less Damon Hack and Matt Ginella then I say yes. If it means less John Cook and some of the other more serious contributors then no. Still not sure I like the expanded format they started in 2013. At times the show seems like it's struggling to find an identity. They wobble between a lame attempt at golf GMA and a morning radio show. When Gary or Kelly run things it gets a little too morning zoo for me. The days they're not there it's all business. I think they're struggling to find personalities that mesh. Rich offers a different personality but he's already getting into the zaniness and it seems once the show goes down that road they lose focus and it becomes a boring exchange of underhanded jibes. Doesn't take me long to click over and watch reruns of Supernatural as I workout. If I didn't need a distraction to fend of the monotony of spending a half hour on a spin bike I wouldn't watch at all.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Dave2512

If it means less Damon Hack and Matt Ginella then I say yes. If it means less John Cook and some of the other more serious contributors then no. Still not sure I like the expanded format they started in 2013. At times the show seems like it's struggling to find an identity. They wobble between a lame attempt at golf GMA and a morning radio show. When Gary or Kelly run things it gets a little too morning zoo for me. The days they're not there it's all business. I think they're struggling to find personalities that mesh. Rich offers a different personality but he's already getting into the zaniness and it seems once the show goes down that road they lose focus and it becomes a boring exchange of underhanded jibes. Doesn't take me long to click over and watch reruns of Supernatural as I workout. If I didn't need a distraction to fend of the monotony of spending a half hour on a spin bike I wouldn't watch at all.

Not sure if I know who these guys are ... is one of them the guy with the dark hair a and thick, dark goatee?  If so, I totally agree with you!  That guy bugs me.

Oh, and Rich Beem seemed like he'd be pretty good at this job over the weekend.  I could listen to him some more.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by club ho

You are right 3 wins is not very many. I guess  I got a little carried away.

OTOH, it is 3 more than I will ever have.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Willett's brother tried to be funny, but he was way offline. Bad effort in dry humor.. He should've not written anything like that. It's just going to make things harder for his brother and I'm sure Danny W. is gonna hear it from the crowds.
    • Willett's brother is not a part of the Ryder cup team. Willett made appologies: http://m.bbc.com/sport/golf/37500790
    • I like it. Especially compared to nearly all past US Ryder Cup kits. Actually before I dish out too much praise, do they have a huge Stars and Stripes flag emblazoned on the back?
    • I would say it depends on what club you're talking about. For drivers I would say that the best performing drivers of all time have been made within the last five years. Aerodynamics, material science, and the proliferation of launch monitors and data driven design have resulted in improvements across the board in distance and forgiveness as of late. I know that I personally saw a decent improvement on my G10 when I switched to a G30, in that I gained between 10 and 15 yards without sacrificing accuracy. This is on the high end of what aerodynamics can provide though, simply because higher swing speeds receive a greater benefit from decreased drag. Depending on the individual you may not see much difference so long as the driver itself was made within the last ten years or so. For irons I would be inclined to say that the main difference in the irons of yesteryear and the irons of today is forgiveness. The irons made today are much easier to hit than previous irons, simply because they aren't as drastically punishing on mis-hits as the old blades. The PING Eye2 irons seemed to be the first "widespread" GI iron that sparked the trend towards irons that were easier for the layman to hit. That being said, I found my s55 irons (their "blade" from several years ago) to be more forgiving than the Eye2's. Based on that and observations from other clubs I have hit I would say the average golfer would be best suited by irons made within the last 10 to 15 years that are in good condition with sharp grooves. If you play muscleback irons though, there's pretty much zero difference between modern "true" musclebacks and those of yore, though the current muscle-cavity irons (like the iBlade and MP-15) will likely be at least a bit easier to hit than the older blades while maintaining a similar style.  Wedges are the only thing that I would argue the "latest and greatest" provides a tangible benefit for. The reasoning for this is entirely different however, in that it's based solely off the condition of the grooves in older wedges. As wedges grow old, and get used, the grooves wear to the point that there becomes a noticeable performance difference - especially when playing out of the rough. For this reason alone do I say that the average golfer (assuming they golf at least once a week during the golfing season) is best suited by wedges no older than two or three years old.  Putters are the odd man out here. I don't think it matters in the slightest when your putter was manufactured, so long as you keep a reasonable grip on it so that it doesn't slip out of your hands. I personally am a fan of the newer milled putters for the feel they provide, but it doesn't mean I couldn't probably putt nearly as well with an original Anser putter in the same style. I think the average golfer is best suited by whatever putter style and features allow them to consistently roll the ball along their target line, with no age requirement. In summary, considering the advancement of technology, I would feel comfortable putting these "maximum age caps" on equipment for the average weekend golfer to get the most out of his/her game: Drivers: ~10 years old or newer Irons: ~15 years old or newer Wedges: ~3 years old or newer Putter: Whatever works best for you That being said, you may still enjoy the game with any kind of equipment out there. I just think that equipment that follows these guidelines will let the average weekend golfer get about as much as they can out of their game without necessarily breaking the bank. Like @iacas said, you may find incremental improvements by purchasing the R1 over an old G5 but the question then becomes whether or not this improvement is worth the price difference. This question can only be answered by the person buying the club. It can't be denied, however, that a driver from the 1960's will be severely outclassed by the G5 and the R1, making either of them a much better choice than the 1960's driver. Interestingly enough, I have had the desire to go the opposite way for a while now. I bought the s55's my last go around, and I'm thinking that my next set of irons will be a more "traditional" muscleback iron (since the s55 is mostly a CB), along the likes of the MP-4 irons by Mizuno. I hit the ball consistently enough that I don't care about the lack of forgiveness, and I believe that the wonderful look and feel of those irons, along with the little bit of extra vertical control (can thin it slightly to make punch shots even easier) would offset whatever I lose in forgiveness. I know that I would most certainly never go to an iron like the AP2, the G, or the M2. The chunky look of the club (along with the offset) gets into my head nowadays and makes me feel uncomfortable standing over the ball in a manner similar to how I used to be intimidated by the look of blades at address. I would gain forgiveness, but at the price of distance and trajectory control - an unacceptable trade for me considering I value distance and trajectory control much more highly than forgiveness.
    • My newest clubs are pretty old. Maybe 2006? I don't really remember. The other day, just for the heck of it,  I played using my old Bazooka Iron Woods. (2i-LW) Shot my normal score. Those Ironwoods are probably 15-16 years old. I don't think at this stage of my life, that a new set would make that much difference. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. mahariji_slice
      mahariji_slice
      (35 years old)
  • Blog Entries