Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4249 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Since there seems to be a running dispute on perceived driver distance vs. real driver distance, I'd like to propose an idea.  Using a GPS-enabled golf app of your choice and your phone's screenshot capability, start documenting your drives on STRAIGHT fairway runs.  I do not believe this will work on any type of dogleg fairway, because you can cut corners and skew the results since the yardage is based on the fairway route, not actual straight-line distance from tee to green.

* Stand on the tee box from the spot where you hit your drive with your GPS-enabled golf app displaying your distance to the center of the green and take a screenshot on your phone.

* Before hitting your 2nd shot, take another screenshot showing your remaining distance to the hole.

* Post both screenshots.

If I'm not thinking this through, someone correct me.  I'm sure there is a slight fudge factor involved and the distance will be give or take a few yards, but if you're in the middle of the fairway, I don't see this being that far off.  I'm doing this regardless.


  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Most GPS devices, as well as phone GPS apps, have measurement capabilities.  Press button at tee, and press button at ball, there's your distance.  The hole shape is irrelevant. :)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  Golfingdad said:
Originally Posted by Golfingdad

Most GPS devices, as well as phone GPS apps, have measurement capabilities.  Press button at tee, and press button at ball, there's your distance.  The hole shape is irrelevant. :)

That's google-worthy.  I haven't found that feature on my app yet, I use GolfLogix.  Sounds much easier!  I'd like to see actual distances posted, and I don't think I'm speaking for myself.


  muttbag said:
Originally Posted by muttbag

Quote:

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

Most GPS devices, as well as phone GPS apps, have measurement capabilities.  Press button at tee, and press button at ball, there's your distance.  The hole shape is irrelevant. :)

That's google-worthy.  I haven't found that feature on my app yet, I use GolfLogix.  Sounds much easier!  I'd like to see actual distances posted, and I don't think I'm speaking for myself.


If you have the premium version of GolfLogix, you can get distances to any point on the hole, including the tee box.

Tyler Martin

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The best accuracy you can expect to attain with any GPS receiver without a correction method applied is within 15 meters (2D RMS) for the horizontal measurement. Vertical accuracy is within 25 meters. This is typically true for any commercial GPS receiver from any vendor.

http://www.spatial-ed.com/gps/gps-basics/135-differential-correction-methods.html

Craig

:wilsonstaff: - FG Tour F5
:wilsonstaff: - Fybrid 3W 15*, FY 19.5*, 4H 24*
:wilsonstaff: - FG 51 Tour Blade 4-9
:wilson: - Harmonized 50, 55, 60
Old Master - TZ Putter


  CR McDivot said:
Originally Posted by CR McDivot

The best accuracy you can expect to attain with any GPS receiver without a correction method applied is within 15 meters (2D RMS) for the horizontal measurement. Vertical accuracy is within 25 meters. This is typically true for any commercial GPS receiver from any vendor.

http://www.spatial-ed.com/gps/gps-basics/135-differential-correction-methods.html

Well then, clearly, GPS systems used for golf apply a correction method ... otherwise there would be exactly ZERO market for golf GPS systems, and there would be exactly ZERO debate as to what is more accurate, GPS or laser.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by geauxforbroke

If you have the premium version of GolfLogix, you can get distances to any point on the hole, including the tee box.

Ah.  There's the culprit.  I'm still bumming the free version, but I don't mind the $20 (or whatever it is) to upgrade if I can access that feature.  As well as get rid of those annoying ads.


  CR McDivot said:
Originally Posted by CR McDivot

The best accuracy you can expect to attain with any GPS receiver without a correction method applied is within 15 meters (2D RMS) for the horizontal measurement. Vertical accuracy is within 25 meters. This is typically true for any commercial GPS receiver from any vendor.

http://www.spatial-ed.com/gps/gps-basics/135-differential-correction-methods.html

I'm just going to trust it, as it is currently the most accurate way to determine distance as opposed to eyeballing course markers.


I would prefer a way for people to prove their "tour quality" short games and how they are "money" fro 150 yards.

I never really cared for distance competitions.

I've seen too many guys who hit it 250 have low handicaps and too many huge hitters who've never seen a fairway.

And I've said it many times ------I am yet to meet a low marker who tells you how far he hits it, unless he considers himself a short hitter.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


  CR McDivot said:
Originally Posted by CR McDivot

The best accuracy you can expect to attain with any GPS receiver without a correction method applied is within 15 meters (2D RMS) for the horizontal measurement. Vertical accuracy is within 25 meters. This is typically true for any commercial GPS receiver from any vendor.

http://www.spatial-ed.com/gps/gps-basics/135-differential-correction-methods.html

Ha ha ha ha!

I guess laser range finders must be 15 meters off as well because the guys that use them come up with the same distances as my GPS. Oh, and all of the yardage markers on the courses I go to must also be 15 meters off because they are the same as my GPS.


  MS256 said:
Originally Posted by MS256

Ha ha ha ha!

I guess laser range finders must be 15 meters off as well because the guys that use them come up with the same distances as my GPS. Oh, and all of the yardage markers on the courses I go to must also be 15 meters off because they are the same as my GPS.

Same here.  My SwingBySwing phone app is always within two or three yards of any fairway yardage indicators, marked sprinkler heads, etc.


My GolfShot GPS app is quite accurate. It also has a feature to measure drive distance. That's how I know my driver average is 242.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  Shorty said:
I would prefer a way for people to prove their "tour quality" short games and how they are "money" fro 150 yards. I never really cared for distance competitions. I've seen too many guys who hit it 250 have low handicaps and too many huge hitters who've never seen a fairway. And I've said it many times ------I am yet to meet a low marker who tells you how far he hits it, unless he considers himself a short hitter.

I see your point. But I don't see any way to prove short game performance other than having someone video your approach shots. I'm intrigued by driving distance and it seems to be a fiery red hot button on this forum, so I thought this would be a nice proving ground for all interested to put up or shut up.


This would be sort of interesting to see posted along with swing videos, but I don't see much point to it. Does it matter so much how far you hit it so long as it's in the fairway and close enough for a mid-short iron on a reasonable-length par 4? I like to track my accuracy stats off the tee much more than anything else since I know my carry distance cutoffs from experimentation for going over lakes or doglegs and that's good enough for me. There's just so much variability based off of altitude, humidity, temperature and ground conditions that I can't really see how the distances would be very comparable to anyone except yourself under the same conditions.

That being said, I don't want to poo-poo this thread and would be hopefully optimistic to see how well this method of measurement works.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't think it will prove or disprove anything necessarily, but might be fun. I'll try to figure out how to do it tomorrow while I'm playing.

~Justin

R11 9.5* w/Matrix Ozik Code 6.2
Taylormade 14* V-Steel w/ProLaunch Blue
Taylormade 16.5* V-Steel w/Aldila NV
Taylormade 21* V-Steel w/Dyanlite Gold S300
Mizuno MX 23 5-6 w/Rifel 5.5 SSx2
Mizuno MP 32 7-PW w/Rifel 5.5 SSx2
Callaway X-Forged 52*, 56*, 60*
Mizuno 0803 Custom Slighter


I agree that it would be fun. From what I've seen on here, not many of us live or die by our driver. But I disagree that it wouldn't prove anything. Lots of users saying they can hit the long ball... and even more casting doubt on the validity of those claims. Let's make this real and put each other to task. Honestly, I want to see if one of my crushed drives actually measures out to what I think it does. I'm consciously working on the rest of my game more than my driver right now, but dammit, I want to know. This would require that a certain degree of honor be upheld. You can easily cheat the system here, but that would only confirm the lack of a soul in your worthless, subhuman cheater body. I'm off to New Mexico for business tomorrow and I'm taking my clubs with me. I plan on playing a round when I get in town and contributing stats tomorrow evening.

Quote:
You can easily cheat the system here, but that would only confirm the lack of a soul in your worthless, subhuman cheater body.

That's just the problem as to why I feel it wouldn't really prove much, is because you could cheat. If you lie about distance off the tee already, why bother to reveal the truth when you could easily cheat without anyone necessarily knowing it. People could still doubt it the same as a number off the top of your head, but I'm not sure it would change anyone's distances except those who only guesstimate at their distance and weren't intentionally misleading people.

I'm not trying to really say that people will try to mislead you here, but I feel that those who would try to mislead in the first place would either cheat anyways or avoid a thread like this. Unfortunately that is how the internet's anonymity affects some people.

That's still not to say that I'd be interested in seeing how this measurement technique pans out compared to using with a laser and shooting the distance back to the tee box/to the ball from the tee. I'm guessing the real difference may be in that the GPS has fewer depth perception/human errors of misjudging where the teebox was but less overall precision on the numbers by a slight amount.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think I said this in another thread somewhere, bloke above is correct in saying that GPS isn't a perfect measurement tool without some kind of adjustment. But it is however better than +/-15 metres.  Most handheld GPS units will get down around <+/-2 metres.

Using a basic GPS to measure against the quoted distance from tee to pin would probably put you somewhere within 15m from quoted as you would need to know the methods used to achieve the original measurement to get any better.

Using it to measure from where you hit the ball to where the ball stops would be within roughly a couple of metres as it's independent of the course and based purely on the difference in lat and long on a global scale.

Elevation can play a part in the difference between GPS and what you would get from a laser but you gotta be a fair way above sea level for it to really matter in terms of a golf shot and you'd have to be hitting the ball a hell of a long way too.


Note: This thread is 4249 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 297: back to mirror work tonight. Working on slow movement for feels from the wrist stuff. 
    • Day 22: 5/13/25 Putting through gates and weight shift drills with a wedge.
    • I would be happy to hang out with you guys but as of now @DaveP043 and I are planning to stay in Cranberry Township. There’s a bit of travel between the two places, but maybe we can work something out.
    • Personally I have no issues with even the steroid-era figures such as Bonds, McGwire, and Sosa being inducted into the hall. My reasoning there is we already have nearly a half-dozen known steroid users in the hall, including those inducted after their steroid usage was already common knowledge. David Ortiz and Pedro Martinez (as well as Ivan Rodriguez, Adrian Beltre, and Todd Helton) both failed the same wave of anonymous drug tests that saw Sammy Sosa shunned by the nation, and he's in the hall. Piazza admitted to using Andro (the same thing McGwire was juicing with) and amphetamines. Greenies were commonplace in MLB clubhouses and used by countless stars, alongside cocaine, from at least the 60's all the way up until the early 2000's. There are at least a dozen other pros in the hall that have allegations from teammates who claim to have directly witnessed steroid usage. Even Nolan Ryan has stated that he thought steroid usage was a widespread problem in the sport as early as the mid to late 70's. I'm of the opinion that once that genie is out of the bottle, and it most certainly has been for decades now, it's a bit silly to pretend those already inducted are somehow morally superior for being not quite as astronomically and suspiciously good at baseball when using steroids. Hitters were using steroids, pitchers were using steroids (funny how we saw the number of complete games fall off a cliff at the same time that steroid enforcement was being ramped up), it's an even playing field as far as I'm concerned. To quote The Incredibles, "When everyone is super, no one will be".  As for Pete Rose it would appear that by all accounts he never bet as a player and only ever bet on his own team while managing. It's understandable to prohibit any involvement in the sport after it was discovered, but it's not something that gave him any advantage in reaching his level of achievement in the sport.  As for Joe Jackson, I personally don't think he should have been banned in the first place. He actively refused the bribe, tried to report the plot to the owner of the White Sox, and his alleged confession only occurred after the White Sox's team attorney got him roaring drunk immediately prior to the grand jury testimony. Every confessed conspirator also stated that he never attending any of their meetings or discussed plans with them. Not to mention the fact that if he WAS trying to fix the series he did an absolutely terrible job of it considering he was the best performing player on either team by far setting a World Series record that stood until 1964 and went error-free while gunning down at least one runner at home plate. 
    • Day 7: 5/13/2025 Range day today. Had a really good session. I was able to pull a mirror over into my stall and make a slow-mo swing in the mirror and then try to duplicate the swing to hit a ball.  Felt really good today. Tomorrow will be league night. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...