Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Beachcomber

Rules Forum Suggestion

13 posts in this topic

When reading through the Rules Forum, there are a number of great threads and I've learned many rules by reading through the threads.... Unfortunately one thing that I find is that there is no clear and concise way to summarize what the finding/decision/ruling is for the thread that I'm reading.

A thread could be 1 page, or it could be 30+pages... But the user has to read through any number of pages to find the 'meat' of the decision/ruling in question by the OP... Or follow-on conversations by the various users.

For instance, this thread:

http://thesandtrap.com/t/69514/matt-kuchar-allowed-to-repair-an-irregularity-on-the-putting-surface/36

I'd like to see the thread minimally have tags for: Rule 16: The Putting Green

Then have a link to the USGA/R&A; rule/decision for the readers linked in the OP, so that readers can quickly understand which ruling/decision is under discussion.

If there is a breach found, list what the penalty is.

If there is a decision, list what the decision is.

In my opinion, the Mods should be able to go through and group these threads into sub-forums on a weekly or monthly basis and place them into the proper 'Rules' sections.  Meaning there would be 34 Sub Forums - and the threads would be moved to the appropriate Sub Forum (Rule 1 through Rule 34) once the thread has had a chance to take off.

I think this would greatly help users understanding of the game.  And ensure that the users of the Sandtrap are learning how to accurately play the game of golf under the current rulings of the game.

Thank you for the consideration.

Shawn

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

I'm not interested in creating 34 sub-forums and many rulings are related to several rulings. There's currently no way to nominate the "best answer" either, unfortunately.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by iacas

I'm not interested in creating 34 sub-forums and many rulings are related to several rulings.

There's currently no way to nominate the "best answer" either, unfortunately.

Bah! Humbug!

Ok... So lets just keep doing it the way it is... Which is a cluster.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm not always looking for the 'right' answer but rather conversation. So the current method works well for me.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by Beachcomber

Bah! Humbug!

Ok... So lets just keep doing it the way it is... Which is a cluster.

And 34 sub-forums with cross-linking results would be a cluster**** of another kind. So we're sticking with the devil we know rather than the one we don't, especially given the upsides of the one we know (people like conversation, less work required of moderators).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by iacas

And 34 sub-forums with cross-linking results would be a cluster**** of another kind. So we're sticking with the devil we know rather than the one we don't, especially given the upsides of the one we know (people like conversation, less work required of moderators).

There it is. Erik just doesn't wanna have to do anything.

I actually like it the way it is though...I end up opening something with no real intention of spending a lot of time in the thread, then inevitably read through the entire thing and learn at least one thing I didn't know before I had read it. The new proposed system would eliminate that.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Slice of Life

There it is. Erik just doesn't wanna have to do anything.

Yep. Y'all know how I do nothing right now…

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Bah! Humbug!  Ok... So lets just keep doing it the way it is... Which is a cluster.

Bear in mind, we already move several metric tons of threads a month because people don't put them in the correct forums and subforums. Very few people even get the title of My Swing threads right, not to mention the formatting and video embedding. :-)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by jamo

Bear in mind, we already move several metric tons of threads a month because people don't put them in the correct forums and subforums. Very few people even get the title of My Swing threads right, not to mention the formatting and video embedding.

Yeah, and when you consider how little an electron weighs, that's a lot of stuff being moved.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Why couldn't responders put the Rule number in the Thread title when they post?  This way there aren't any folders but you know which rule they are discussing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yeah, and when you consider how little an electron weighs, that's a lot of stuff being moved. a1_smile.gif

It must be all those bears I have in my mind. ;-) (I had originally phrased it differently. Not sure how it came out like that.) :loco:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by iacas

Yeah, and when you consider how little an electron weighs, that's a lot of stuff being moved.

1.09776931081e+33 per metric ton...

That's a lot of $#!+!!! lol

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Thank you! Got out for a few holes so it was a good day in spite of work!
    • 2/25: Played two rounds today with dad at a different course than usual. Shot 96 and 93. A few nice strings of pars and made several amazing putts (). Mostly bogeys other than that but managed a couple of absolute blow-up holes in each round that helped to guarantee 90+ scores from an otherwise very nice day of golf. I could complain about "sand-traps" sans-a-single-spec-of-sand with 10-foot wide puddles in them, or mushy fairways, or waiting 5-minutes for the 4-some in front of you on every shot, but there wasn't a notes field on the scorecard.  Practice is paying off, though. Hit my drives farther than ever, draws when I wanted them, and the fade didn't let me down when I needed it. 3/4 "flighted" shots are the new go-to approach of choice all the way out to 160+ with my 3-iron, and (n)GIRs have jumped up considerably. I've rambled on about my short-game improvements before, but it continues. Holed a pitch shot from about 10 yards and stopped 2 others 6 inches from the pin. Gotta play some more rounds from the front so I get used to stringing pars together. Realized today that I don't just get nervous about it, I also get cocky. Weird combination. 
    • I really like the travel of the sweetspot on the backswing. Kinda Nicklaus-esque.   They just stall a bit and it happens after impact. Can see how the belt loops are rotating all the way to impact.
    • At the top level the men may still be much better than the women at putting. Paige McKenzie once talked about how she played against some college guys who destroyed her on putting and she thought she was pretty good relative to her peers. I expect the best pro women ballstrikers have to work even less on putting to compete successfully than the guys where every edge is crucial just to get a card and make cuts. I love to watch Rory and DJ crank it out there. But I also get a kick out of Jim Furyk and Mo Martin's precision oriented play. It's all good. If they want to make accuracy more important for PGA players, all they have to do is grow the average event rough up a bit more so there's more of a penalty on every errant shot on the loss of spin and swing/ball speed reduction. Those are real issues for the sport...at least for facilities that don't cater to higher income golfers.
    • I have the Zepp 2 Golf (the round sensor).    Ive read the manual multiple times, and have approximately 500 ball strikes.    As I'm new to golf I can't seriously vouch for its accuracy, but I will say this: it's helping me improve my golf swing.    The 3D swing analysis is a great tool as is the swing comparison capability. In my opinion once you learn about what the tool measures and how it can be quite effective it    However, I do have a question: In the daily swings window, what does the red "P" next to the specific swing data mean?   Please and Thanks for any input.    V/R,  Chris
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Catcher20
      Catcher20
      (27 years old)
    2. JD15
      JD15
      (52 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon