Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

2013 MLB Playoffs


Note: This thread is 4510 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

There was a test in 2003 that a bunch failed, but then the results were kept secret.  In 2007 the Mitchell report named some players, and in 2009, the 2003 test results were leaked.  That's when A-Rod had his interview about the "willy nilly days" when that stuff was popular.  Ortiz's failed test became public in 2009.  His slide started in 2008, though.

And yet MLB never said what Ortiz failed for or informed Ortiz he failed.  In addition, no other names were conveniently released before the list was destroyed.  No one admitted to being the so-called leaker of the information.  We are just relying on and anonymous source saying they saw names on a list.

If he did fail, and was on the list, then we should demand the other names be released.  I have always maintained that there were other more prominent names on this list that MLB really did not want to have released because it would have affected many World Series.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
And yet MLB never said what Ortiz failed for or informed Ortiz he failed.  In addition, no other names were conveniently released before the list was destroyed.  No one admitted to being the so-called leaker of the information.  We are just relying on and anonymous source saying they saw names on a list.

If he did fail, and was on the list, then we should demand the other names be released.  I have always maintained that there were other more prominent names on this list that MLB really did not want to have released because it would have affected many World Series.

That's not true.  After it was leaked he contacted the players union and they told him it was true.  He said that in a statement immediately after the news broke.  That's why he always says he doesn't know why he tested positive.

I don't buy your conspiracy theory, either.  What more prominent names are there than Manny, Arod, Ortiz, and Sosa?  Its more likely that whoever leaked it just named the biggest names on the list.  Arod is probably the biggest name there is.  And if they wanted to protect the World Series they wouldn't have leaked Ortiz and Manny who had just propelled Boston to win 2 world series titles for the first time in forever.

The test results were destroyed because that's what MLB and the union agreed to do when they agreed to the test.  It was supposed to be anonymous and to find how how many were cheating and whether testing was necessary, then destroyed.  But the Gov't supoenaed the records in the Balco case before they were destroyed and someone leaked some of it.

I don't understand why Ortiz gets a pass when all these other guys get vilified.  I guess its just because Ortiz seems like a nice guy or whatever.  Pettite generally gets a pass, too, and probably for the same reason.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

That's not true.  After it was leaked he contacted the players union and they told him it was true.  He said that in a statement immediately after the news broke.  That's why he always says he doesn't know why he tested positive.

I don't buy your conspiracy theory, either.  What more prominent names are there than Manny, Arod, Ortiz, and Sosa?  Its more likely that whoever leaked it just named the biggest names on the list.  Arod is probably the biggest name there is.  And if they wanted to protect the World Series they wouldn't have leaked Ortiz and Manny who had just propelled Boston to win 2 world series titles for the first time in forever.

The test results were destroyed because that's what MLB and the union agreed to do when they agreed to the test.  It was supposed to be anonymous and to find how how many were cheating and whether testing was necessary, then destroyed.  But the Gov't supoenaed the records in the Balco case before they were destroyed and someone leaked some of it.

I don't understand why Ortiz gets a pass when all these other guys get vilified.  I guess its just because Ortiz seems like a nice guy or whatever.  Pettite generally gets a pass, too, and probably for the same reason.

I was thinking other Yankees, Marlins, Diamondback, Angels actually.  Why else wouldn't they give out the whole list.  The test results were destroyed because players from the previous few years World Series champs were on the list.  Plus, you assume it was steroids.  Amphetamines are also PEDs.

There are others like you that suspect him, but his power numbers are not up.  His walks are way up, which leads to a better batting average.  The Roid Kings were hitting 60 HR in a year.  Ortiz had 30 HR and 103 RBI.  Pretty tame compared to the others.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I was thinking other Yankees, Marlins, Diamondback, Angels actually.  Why else wouldn't they give out the whole list.  The test results were destroyed because players from the previous few years World Series champs were on the list.  Plus, you assume it was steroids.  Amphetamines are also PEDs.

To be honest with you, I'm not really sure what you're talking about.  Why wouldn't who give out the whole list?  MLB and the MLBPA agreed to keep it confidential before they even conducted the tests.  I think it was actually supposed to be anonymous and someone screwed that up. And they weren't the ones who leaked any of the names.  I imagine the New York Times didn't get any other names, why would they keep it quiet?   The leak came from lawyers connected to the case in which the gov't seized the documents, I dont know why you would think they would try to protect other World Series teams.  Its seems more likely that the leaker just named the biggest names, doesn't it?  It was revealed that Bonds was not on the list (though the same sample later tested positive for a synthetic that wasn't detectable in 2003).

And I didn't assume anything--I said he tested positive for PEDs.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

To be honest with you, I'm not really sure what you're talking about.  Why wouldn't who give out the whole list?  MLB and the MLBPA agreed to keep it confidential before they even conducted the tests.  I think it was actually supposed to be anonymous and someone screwed that up. And they weren't the ones who leaked any of the names.  I imagine the New York Times didn't get any other names, why would they keep it quiet?   The leak came from lawyers connected to the case in which the gov't seized the documents, I dont know why you would think they would try to protect other World Series teams.  Its seems more likely that the leaker just named the biggest names, doesn't it?  It was revealed that Bonds was not on the list (though the same sample later tested positive for a synthetic that wasn't detectable in 2003).

And I didn't assume anything--I said he tested positive for PEDs.

Correct. It was supposed to be anonymous, but they only leaked certain names.  That is what makes it suspicious to me.  Why just those names?  A-Rod, OK they hate A-Rod.  BoSox players?  Rival team.  No one else?  Come on.  Very fishy.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I don't think the lawyers who leaked the names see the red sox as their rival. .

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

then why just those three?

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

then why just those three?

There were 7.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

And who were the rest?????

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Correct. It was supposed to be anonymous, but they only leaked certain names.  That is what makes it suspicious to me.  Why just those names?  A-Rod, OK they hate A-Rod.  BoSox players?  Rival team.  No one else?  Come on.  Very fishy.

Nothing was more fishy than the Mitchell report - not a single red sux player named when it was common knowledge that ortiz and manram failed tests,

It was kind of funny that mitchell was a director of the red sux and and was allowed to perform this conflict of interest. (there were also no brewers named - funny since selig had owned that team)

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Nothing was more fishy than the Mitchell report - not a single red sux player named when it was common knowledge that ortiz and manram failed tests, It was kind of funny that mitchell was a director of the red sux and and was allowed to perform this conflict of interest. (there were also no brewers named - funny since selig had owned that team)

The Mitchell Report was released in December of 2007. Eric Gagne played for the Red Sox from August 1st, 2007, until the end of that season. Eric Gagne was named in the Mitchell Report. Jeremy Giambi played for the Red Sox during the 2003 season. Jeremy Giambi was named in the Mitchell Report. Mo Vaughn played for the Red Sox from 1991 to 1998. Mo Vaughn was named in the Mitchell Report. Paxton Crawford played for the Red Sox from 2000 to 2001. Paxton Crawford was named in the Mitchell Report. Manny Alexander played for the Red Sox in 2000. Manny Alexander was named in the Mitchell Report. Those are 11 factual sentences. Glean from them what you please.

  • Upvote 1

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The Mitchell Report was released in December of 2007.

Eric Gagne played for the Red Sox from August 1st, 2007, until the end of that season. Eric Gagne was named in the Mitchell Report.

Jeremy Giambi played for the Red Sox during the 2003 season. Jeremy Giambi was named in the Mitchell Report.

Mo Vaughn played for the Red Sox from 1991 to 1998. Mo Vaughn was named in the Mitchell Report.

Paxton Crawford played for the Red Sox from 2000 to 2001. Paxton Crawford was named in the Mitchell Report.

Manny Alexander played for the Red Sox in 2000. Manny Alexander was named in the Mitchell Report.

Those are 11 factual sentences. Glean from them what you please.

ok i was slightly off - no key red sux players were named - mo vaughn was borderline (and was hated for moving on), but there was still a conflict of interest with ortiz and manram being left out

Follow me on twitter

Chris, although my friends call me Mr.L

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4510 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 525 - 2026-03-10 Got some work in before lessons today (was going to play after but it decided to POUR). Then like three minutes in later on.
    • Day 2 (10 Mar 26) - Worked on weight shift feel using slap stick drill (hands about 6” apart - coming back weight on trail foot - down - thru weight on lead foot….moved it to hitting chips w/9i playing what I call “leap frog” - hit 1st about 10yds, the next a couple past the 1st, for about 6 balls total.  Love it as the lies change, the distances vary making each swing slightly different. 
    • The first post is here:   Do you have an overly long backswing that ruins sequencing and leads to poor shots? In nearly 20 years of teaching, I've found 5 common faults. You don't have to swing like Jon Rahm, but a shorter swing will probably help you #PlayBetter golf. Which is your fatal flaw? #1 - Trail Elbow Bend Average golfers ♥️ bending their trail elbows. It can feel powerful! Tour players bend their trail elbows MUCH less. A wider trail elbow creates a longer hand path and preserves structure. It also forces more chest turn; not everything longer is bad! Overly bending your trail elbow can wreak havoc on your swing. It pulls your arms across/beside your body. It requires more time to get the elbow bend "out," ruining your sequencing. The lead arm often bends and low point control is destroyed. The misconception is that it will create more speed, but that's often the opposite of what happens. Golfers often feel they swing "easier" but FASTER with wider trail elbows. Want to play better golf with a shorter backswing? Don't bend your elbow so much. #2 - Hip (Pelvis) Turn I see this all the time: a golfer's hips are only 5-10° open at impact, but he turns them back 60°+ in the backswing. Unless your father is The Flash, your hips are probably not getting 40° open at impact from there! That's more rotation than Rory! Golfers who over-rotate their pelvis often over-turn everything - trail thigh/knee, chest/shoulders, etc. They have more work to do in the same ~0.3 seconds as a Tour player who turns back ~40° and turns through to impact 40° or so. Want to shorten the pelvis turn a bit? Learn to internally rotate into the trail hip, externally rotate away from the lead hip, and do "less" with your knees (extending and flexing) in the backswing. Learn some separation between chest and pelvis. #3 - Rolled Inside and Lifted Up Amateurs love to send the club (and their arms) around them. You see the red golfer here all the time at your local range. The problem? Your arms mostly take the club UP, not around. Going around creates no height until you have to hoist the club up in the air because you're halfway through your backswing and the club is waist high and three feet behind your butt! 😄  Learn to use your arms properly. Arms = up/down, body = around. Most golfers learn how little their arms really have to do in the backswing. The picture here is all you've gotta do (but maybe with a properly sized club!). #4 - Wide Takeaway Width is good, no? Yes, if you're wide at the right time and in the right spots. Golfers seeking width often don't hinge the club much early in the backswing… forcing them to hinge it late. Hinging the club late puts a lot of momentum into the club, wrists, and elbow just before we need to make a hairpin turn in transition and go the other direction at the start of the downswing. When you're driving into a hairpin curve, you go into it slowly and accelerate out of it. Waiting to hinge is like coasting down the straightaway and accelerating into the hairpin. Your car ends up off the road, and your golf ball off the course. Give hinging at a faster rate (earlier) then coasting to the top a try. You'll be able to accelerate out of the hairpin without the momentum of the arms and club pulling in the wrong direction.   #5 - Sway and Tilt Some sway is good but sometimes I see a golfer who just… keeps… swaying… Their chest leans forward a bit for balance, resulting in a whole lotta lean. The green line below is the GEARS "virtual spine." Pros sway a bit, but stay ~90°. This sway often combines with the extra pelvis turn because this golfer is not putting ANY limits on what the "middle of them" (their pelvis) is doing in the backswing. These golfers spend a lot of energy just to get back to neutral! The best players begin pushing forward EARLY in the backswing. Often before the club gets much past their trail foot! Pushing forward (softly) first stops your backward sway and then begins to get your body moving toward the target. Push softly, but early!  
    • I  no longer spend the time and effort trying to sell something I no longer need. Instead, if the clubs are in good condition, I go to my local golf shop or even Dicks Sporting Goods. Trade the clubs in for store credit and pick up something I need, like a hat. Cause you always need another golf hat!
    • Day 205 3-10 Wider backswing, reconnecting arm in downswing/arching wrist through. Also worked on less pause at the top. Recorded and hit a few foam balls. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.