Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Dables

technology in Woods.........Is it the head or the shaft?

12 posts in this topic

As I mentioned in another thread, I'm looking for a new 3 wood, and as I started listing the things I wanted out of it, I realized the only club I've ever had that performed the way I want is the original Adams Tight Lies.

So my question is, how far behind todays clubs would that head be from a performance standpoint? If I bought one in good shape and dropped a new shaft in it, would it be comparable?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

This video that I have attached is a video by Rick Shiels who is reviewing the original Big Bertha from the lat 90's against the Callaway X Hot from 2013. This video shows that there really is not that much difference other than forgiveness. I hope this helps!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This video that I have attached is a video by Rick Shiels who is reviewing the original Big Bertha from the lat 90's against the Callaway X Hot from 2013. This video shows that there really is not that much difference other than forgiveness. I hope this helps!

this is fantastic.....Lead me to go ahead and pull the trigger on a used tight lies on Ebay. The price for my new 3 wood? $8. Perhaps I'll stick a new shaft in it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this is fantastic.....Lead me to go ahead and pull the trigger on a used tight lies on Ebay. The price for my new 3 wood? $8. Perhaps I'll stick a new shaft in it.

i've been trying to find a clubbuilder for the last couple years who will do bore-thru shaft repair. if i can, i will be putting some matrix black tie shafts in my old callaway warbird big bertha woods. to this day the best i've ever hit out of any lie.

i think the greatest leaps have been made in shaft technology to be honest. it's amazing how they can make varied profiles, weights, and stiffness to fit any golfer. you can only put so much in a club head - see: player muscle/cavity back irons are VERY similar to how they were even 20 years ago

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this is fantastic.....Lead me to go ahead and pull the trigger on a used tight lies on Ebay. The price for my new 3 wood? $8. Perhaps I'll stick a new shaft in it.

Isn't forgiveness what were all looking for?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Isn't forgiveness what were all looking for?

I'm not all that concerned about that. I'm primarily looking for a head shape that I'm comfortable with hitting off the deck, and If I can get that by spending $50 on a shaft as opposed to spending $200 on the new tight lies I'm going to give it a shot. I always felt like the original tight lies was pretty forgiving

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i've been trying to find a clubbuilder for the last couple years who will do bore-thru shaft repair. ....

If you can't find anyone local, contact GolfWorks. We all did a bore-through reshaft as part of the basic three-day school there.

GolfWorks not only sells components, it also does repair work. Check the online if interested.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If you can't find anyone local, contact GolfWorks. We all did a bore-through reshaft as part of the basic three-day school there.

GolfWorks not only sells components, it also does repair work. Check the online if interested.

Thanks for this recommendation...i might just do it for fun. you're awesome WU. i owe you

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't forgiveness what were all looking for?

Yes, and twice the accuracy seems even more important.
So the new driver is 8-10 yards longer (not that big of a deal) but more forgiving and twice as accurate (a really big deal, to most golfers).
I got done watching the video thinking that new drivers are worth the money.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, and twice the accuracy seems even more important. So the new driver is 8-10 yards longer (not that big of a deal) but more forgiving and twice as accurate (a really big deal, to most golfers). I got done watching the video thinking that new drivers are worth the money.

I think you make a great point but as long as you hit the center of the club face there is not a huge difference. Although most armature golfers don't. I think the video proves that even without the huge gains in distance we expect it is still worth the money for the accuracy and forgiveness

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not that it means anything ... but isn't the original tight lies considered more of a hybrid than a fairway wood?

I remembered it being really, really good at helping the ball get up and up quickly, so it seems like it would be difficult to use as a 3 wood off the tee.  Wouldn't it just balloon like crazy?

But I echo others that the tech is really in the forgiveness ... so if you are hitting the sweet spot of this club then you're probably not losing a whole lot over new ones ... especially if its providing you confidence.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Golfingdad,

By chance, I have an Adams 1999 product catalog here in my bookcase. (G, you are honor-bound not to tell my wife!)

The Tight Lies were fairway woods (see shaft length), with "upside down" heads that really got the ball up well. Here are the lofts of the original offerings:

Strong 2...12*...w/Graphite shaft 43".. w/Steel shaft 42 1/2"

Strong 3...13*

Original....16*

Strong 5...19*

Strong 7...24*

Strong 9...28*

Strong 11..32*

History tidbit: hybrids are descendents of the Bulldog , a trouble club from circa 1900 that had about a 25* loft, and a small wooden head about two golf balls wide.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

Advertisement
Advertisement


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Thank you! Got out for a few holes so it was a good day in spite of work!
    • 2/25: Played two rounds today with dad at a different course than usual. Shot 96 and 93. A few nice strings of pars and made several amazing putts (). Mostly bogeys other than that but managed a couple of absolute blow-up holes in each round that helped to guarantee 90+ scores from an otherwise very nice day of golf. I could complain about "sand-traps" sans-a-single-spec-of-sand with 10-foot wide puddles in them, or mushy fairways, or waiting 5-minutes for the 4-some in front of you on every shot, but there wasn't a notes field on the scorecard.  Practice is paying off, though. Hit my drives farther than ever, draws when I wanted them, and the fade didn't let me down when I needed it. 3/4 "flighted" shots are the new go-to approach of choice all the way out to 160+ with my 3-iron, and (n)GIRs have jumped up considerably. I've rambled on about my short-game improvements before, but it continues. Holed a pitch shot from about 10 yards and stopped 2 others 6 inches from the pin. Gotta play some more rounds from the front so I get used to stringing pars together. Realized today that I don't just get nervous about it, I also get cocky. Weird combination. 
    • I really like the travel of the sweetspot on the backswing. Kinda Nicklaus-esque.   They just stall a bit and it happens after impact. Can see how the belt loops are rotating all the way to impact.
    • At the top level the men may still be much better than the women at putting. Paige McKenzie once talked about how she played against some college guys who destroyed her on putting and she thought she was pretty good relative to her peers. I expect the best pro women ballstrikers have to work even less on putting to compete successfully than the guys where every edge is crucial just to get a card and make cuts. I love to watch Rory and DJ crank it out there. But I also get a kick out of Jim Furyk and Mo Martin's precision oriented play. It's all good. If they want to make accuracy more important for PGA players, all they have to do is grow the average event rough up a bit more so there's more of a penalty on every errant shot on the loss of spin and swing/ball speed reduction. Those are real issues for the sport...at least for facilities that don't cater to higher income golfers.
    • I have the Zepp 2 Golf (the round sensor).    Ive read the manual multiple times, and have approximately 500 ball strikes.    As I'm new to golf I can't seriously vouch for its accuracy, but I will say this: it's helping me improve my golf swing.    The 3D swing analysis is a great tool as is the swing comparison capability. In my opinion once you learn about what the tool measures and how it can be quite effective it    However, I do have a question: In the daily swings window, what does the red "P" next to the specific swing data mean?   Please and Thanks for any input.    V/R,  Chris
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Catcher20
      Catcher20
      (27 years old)
    2. JD15
      JD15
      (52 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon