Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3735 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

agreed ... the top women are hardly mediocre.    I think a better word would be boring.     The best women golfers are just ridiculously consistent - don't do anything flashy, just hit fairways and greens - they make it look too easy.

Tell ya what...next time you golf, tee it up from the Ladies tees, and see if You can shoot par or better. Let us know how that works out for you.

i had a sister play on the LPGA  for 25 yrs not boring at she made closr to 8 mil playing had about 10 hole in ones in tournaments boring naaaaaa fun to watch the girls play


Posted
I get a kick out of people calling their play mediocre. While you wont see many if any 200yard 7 irons. it is hardly mediocre. If 19 under is mediocre then sign me up.


Yeah 19 under isn't even in my vocabulary (on any course).

Of course it's not the level of the PGA Tour or Dot Com Tour, and probably not even a mini-tour but it's not supposed to be.

When I go to a college football game I am not seeing NFL quality of football but that doesn't stop me from enjoying watching them play. I admit that there is a point in athletics where the level of play is so weak that I don't care to watch it. For me the criteria is if there's nobody out there that can do things that I can't do I don't care to watch.

That's certainly not the case with the LPGA.


Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkim291968

I guess that's the reality. As others mentioned in this thread, I can relate to their club selection, and their "somewhat mediocre" level of playing.

Tell ya what...next time you golf, tee it up from the Ladies tees, and see if You can shoot par or better. Let us know how that works out for you.


I wasn't calling LPGA play mediocre.   I was quoting what Dave in FL said in his reply.   It was my way of being cynical to Dave's reply, in my mild manner.    I am not sure what you read into my reply.

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Tell ya what...next time you golf, tee it up from the Ladies tees, and see if You can shoot par or better. Let us know how that works out for you.

And they are not really playing from our equivalent of forward tees either.  More like our middle tees at most public courses.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I wasn't calling LPGA play mediocre.   I was quoting what Dave in FL said in his reply.   It was my way of being cynical to Dave's reply, in my mild manner.    I am not sure what you read into my reply.

I read it as, you were saying the LPGA play is mediocre. if that's not the case, I take back my post with regards to you.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkim291968

I wasn't calling LPGA play mediocre.   I was quoting what Dave in FL said in his reply.   It was my way of being cynical to Dave's reply, in my mild manner.    I am not sure what you read into my reply.

I read it as, you were saying the LPGA play is mediocre. if that's not the case, I take back my post with regards to you.


With proclaimed handicap of 17, I am no position to call any tour mediocre.  I think even D_in_FL said it in relative term, i.e, mediocre in comparison to other tours.

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm betting most any of the "mediocre" LPGA tour players shown on tv can pretty much kick Dave in FL's a55 all day long, any day. Just sayin'


Posted
I'm betting most any of the "mediocre" LPGA tour players shown on tv can pretty much kick Dave in FL's a55 all day long, any day. Just sayin'

No need to think about it, I guarantee it....! :-)

That wasn't my point though.  I don't expect anyone to pay to come see my sorry ass play golf, unless it's purely for comic relief.  Nor do I expect people to tune in to watch me on TV.  If I'm going to pay to see someone play golf, or choose to watch it on TV, I'm going to have to be entertained.  I'm not entertained by watching someone hit a 7 iron 155 yards.  Or even shoot 69 playing a soft set-up 6,100 yard course.  Sorry, but when I'm evaluating the quality of golf in deciding where to spend my golf viewing time and money, that's mediocre compared to what I can see on the other 3 tours.

Apparently, most avid golf fans agree, because no one argues that LPGA tournament attendance and TV viewership is low.  Even reading through this thread, you'll find that most of the responses admit that they watch more because they enjoy looking at cute girls than they do watching the golf itself.  Those that enjoy the golf say that they like watching a game they can personally relate to.  Hell, I can go to the local muni or play with my buddies (a lot of whom also regularly kick my butt) and see that any day of the week, and I don't have to pay extra for the "privilege".

Nothing against the ladies, really.  But just because they're better than me, doesn't mean they're all that good, again, in comparison to the other professional golfers that are vying for my viewership, time, and money.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I am in no way taking sides here. I think the word "mediocre" was used loosely for lack of a better word and was not intended to be translated into its harshest connotation. LPGA play has been viewed by some as lackluster in comparison to men's play. That is to say it can seem less exciting. Personally I love it. And not just for the nice legs. Although I do love those legs! But I digress. The girls are..well...girls. They don't have the upper body strength in most cases as the guys. Because of this I rather think of it being what it is. A different league of play. Both being top shelf IMHO. Hey..you know what? It Is a different league! Go figure. The obvious just obviously reared its head. And we were making it so complicated.

Posted
I am in no way taking sides here. I think the word "mediocre" was used loosely for lack of a better word ..... .

Nah, I really did mean mediocre! :-D But again...... relative to the other professionals competing for my attention, time, and money.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yup, some guys like to watch cute girls playing masterful golf. Other guys just want to watch big studs jack golf balls 400 yards. :surrender:

Takes all kinds, I guess.


Posted

In the order of what I want to watch on TV ...

PGA with Tiger playing

PGA / LPGA <----

International competition (President's cup, US vs whoever)

Championship

US amateur competitions

European

Web.com

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

In the order of what I want to watch on TV ...

PGA with Tiger playing

PGA / LPGA <----

International competition (President's cup, US vs whoever)

Championship

US amateur competitions

European

Web.com

Great idea. I too think a list best illustrates this.

My preferences in order:

1) Majors + Players Championship

2) Ryder Cup, President's Cup, Solheim Cups, International Crown

3) Generic PGA tourneys with big names atop leaderboard

4) LPGA with cuties atop leaderboard

6) Celebrity golf tourneys

6) Spare PGA Tourneys with no big names

7) Big Break

9) College golf

10) LPGA with no nookie girls

What's In My Bag...
Driver: Callaway Razr X Black 10.5*
FW / Hybrid: Nike T40 4W 17* / Nike CPR 24*
Irons: Callaway Razr X HL 5I-SW
Putter: Nike Method Core Putter
Balls: Nike PD Soft


Posted

Great idea. I too think a list best illustrates this.

My preferences in order:

1) Majors + Players Championship

2) Ryder Cup, President's Cup, Solheim Cups, International Crown

3) Generic PGA tourneys with big names atop leaderboard

4) LPGA with cuties atop leaderboard

6) Celebrity golf tourneys

6) Spare PGA Tourneys with no big names

7) Big Break

9) College golf

10) LPGA with no nookie girls

Honestly mine would be:

1) Anytime Tiger is playing.

2) Everything else on TV that has to do with golf.

About 1): Truly wish it wasn't so but it is. Not a chance in the world I'm going out of my way to watch anything with Tiger not in it (or even recording it).

About 2): If I am at home and there's nothing better to do I'll watch almost anything, or at least have it on, and not pay a lot of attention to it unless something catches my interest.


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Petterson can overtake IB Park for #1 ranking if she wins.

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I watch it. I love it. I got my reasons.......I didn't live in S. Korea for 6 years because of the food.

 :tmade: Stealth2 driver, 3 Fairway  :titleist: TSR 4 Hy. T-300 5-PW  :vokey: 52/56/60 SM9

:scotty_cameron: Newport Select 2 (2022 model) 

:snell: MTB Prime 3.0, :adidas: Tour360 22

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Geez, what's up with Lexi..? she seems to have lost her game or something..

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3735 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.