Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4363 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok it is not a secreat but many of you will not want to hear it. It is quite simple.  Good instruction followed by a high volume of purposeful practice.  That is it. After years of chasing secrets my swing has changed from sever over the top to a nice inside out.

The secreat two lessons a week from an instructor who can explain what I need to do in many different ways and give be a practice plan to get there.  Then 20 plus hours a week of quality practice. Changes are incremental and build on each other.

It has taken me 3 months to get to this point still many months to go.


Posted

I'm not sure it's a secret that good golf instruction, followed by correct practice, will produce improvement.  But it's good that you are following that path.  Good luck!


Posted

I'm not sure it's a secret that good golf instruction, followed by correct practice, will produce improvement.  But it's good that you are following that path.  Good luck!


Agreed not exactly finding the holy grail but definitely the correct approach to improving. Stay positive and practice with a purpose!

 


Posted

Well, most of us can't manage to get 20+ hours a week of practice in so I wouldn't say that 20 hours is necessary, especially if you are practicing correctly. If you are practicing properly and with a purpose you should see some pretty solid progress with 30 mins a day. I would love to practice 20 hours a week but I got a job and two kids so that ain't happening.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

I agree that:

  • It's not exactly a secret.
  • 20+ hours per week is overkill.
  • 2 lessons a week is overkill.

I've had students make lasting changes practicing for five minutes per day in a mirror (sometimes not even using a club). But the commonality was that they were purposefully practicing with the correct prioritization/information.

  • Upvote 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

20+ hours might work for some but to be honest "muscle memory" (if you believe in it) doesn't require that necessarily.

Practice at the edge of your ability can really hone your action and make your limited time pay off.  This is deliberately hitting big hooks, big slices, fades, draws, high, low...hitting 4 different clubs to the same flag...and so on.  I enjoy The Inner Game of Golf by Tim Gallwey for great ideas on how the brain and body can work together to maximize your time.

Max Prokopy

University of Virginia


Posted

Well truth be told the twenty hours is not all on the full swing change at least half is short game.

and the second lesson is more like guided practice


Posted

My instructor wanted to see me bi-monthly. Between lessons he had me work on one thing. I'd say I practice an hour to hour and a half six days a week but very deliberate. I leave my mat and net set up year round and it's mostly for drills. May start doing weight forward drills, then slo-mo swings before finally taking some full swing shots, rinse and repeat. To hit ten balls full swing could take a half hour. Finish with that and pitch a few using a marker on the face to monitor contact since I am hitting into a net before moving to putting. Same thing very specific putting drills. Tomorrow will be my first 2014 lesson, it's been a few months. My guess is he will ask me questions for half of it and I probably won't hit more than a half dozen balls before he reviews the videos. He'll wrap it up with whatever the homework is and email me some voiceover vids.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4363 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.